 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
4 P8 t- Q2 {. h( q6 D楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
& }6 A' i* Y K4 J% ]1 U; Icorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... : H4 [' r3 \9 f9 H, }
' q2 l, T$ y3 v" w您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
# m+ k, ~% Q% ?6 T% }8 B: y+ `' G4 d7 V, @9 W$ X# A3 [7 s
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
8 x. i4 ]! t0 x7 q! l
5 t; o! R/ ?1 n" U C0 f* `# A不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?9 {) n8 ]# J, g
2 P1 Z( T; y( z9 U0 D
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
. W6 z D8 r% y0 J- S# q; J9 t- R7 E# O# [: k
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):' a E$ e" C+ R' m& L
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
# Z" M! o* {! I
- @$ q' ~7 @4 e; OOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
% m% ], w; z( w2 P2 T ^3 [8 Z
2 `( ^2 J: l2 w+ }But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
* H7 |* P9 D+ E2 w) t, \1 F
/ l! K$ G' [" n5 i, R9 w[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|