 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
$ h( T2 V! |) o* |2 d# Z楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
4 o& N/ K0 S$ ~; X: F, wcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 U3 X8 I& A" D$ z( O3 E
6 L8 G3 h) X4 O( o( H0 L您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
0 z7 }$ g) i$ z8 z$ e
) H2 ~: K9 j" n+ \* @安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
) v, X7 H4 z6 S: z. R; w' U9 ^0 ~6 G. G0 | k: m7 ^; U* u
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
+ N2 |2 ~* l5 ?1 b
1 M' W% z1 [, h* \/ M另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
* o) W1 L- P7 u# z0 u
$ i, X; Q2 A; r# @0 |/ q0 l关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
: C/ O+ e5 Q' `# z) R! V [Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.; W0 W: `1 F4 L$ D/ e" a, N& o+ V: _2 w
' l) h# H! e1 ^
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
3 D( Y4 b0 V; M8 M! O% F* w( d, J }: O9 z& O
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.3 w! C: w) _7 M* p4 m7 J" q
_( j; _- A1 \* O) u" x3 v
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|