 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 " } @. m" u* {4 N( H# y) R
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
, T) J$ O6 j: v( ncorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
, q; B, [0 U) Y m- w
" X! K( w! h' n6 V9 c) G2 T2 z T您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。8 q7 w) X4 w% T
6 a3 d& o( g q/ z' }
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.7 e1 Q0 f/ X1 c$ Q
+ _) ^1 Y' A( l. ~ x不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
. `6 @( `+ r: `, Y. ~2 E- f( W) d- f# ^4 I0 Q6 l' u; b
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。8 @3 F0 H) q+ a' |
! u0 e) D+ H5 B+ l/ k9 \
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
2 \+ t1 F9 T( u4 z/ VYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.* W' U! L C J9 y4 A% c7 M# k& l/ t
, ^5 w8 I1 K" {# [' [Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".9 ]8 b6 B$ a# R7 g. h
5 V, l) ~8 F# `: M1 {But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.1 f7 D5 Q4 L {! U
2 w9 a% H# @$ G" e8 [5 S[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|