 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 0 c3 r- R$ s+ \: L
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
, T1 P- `; [, y5 ]corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 9 _! N. Q6 j( i/ Y$ k& R" a
% O& n9 }/ e* G7 s) s) H
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
/ V0 |# U) Z7 e/ Y7 O7 s5 ^9 X: @. n; r) m8 x
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 w$ a9 |: P) F+ U( m4 Z1 B! i! F: _" s# P! L( i7 } N
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?, k( F" l: _. j/ u
9 d; T+ F9 K: s
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。# ]0 B, q# U( m& m1 Z$ c4 O2 T
, [9 S, X% c- M$ j2 Z8 g" @" h
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
0 m- k3 k: `) z# m9 J5 E- KYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.8 U A& {8 Z6 h5 j+ q; l6 Y# [/ @
9 l/ C4 |3 b! ?Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
/ Z4 ?+ t6 M! U+ U$ i9 f5 R, t6 }/ r: f& y
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe./ Y8 y& T3 ?% n# |$ }# G
6 C3 h$ S6 }/ O! a+ s( [0 {! k[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|