 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 0 l$ x7 b* I5 x
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!% I" g' j x7 o/ l
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
' [3 [# Y/ q# a q1 w1 {; ]) O/ z/ b9 F& A3 l" F7 d
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
2 S6 f0 c8 I. _5 Y9 ~$ D9 K& I. c0 ?8 i4 S, v
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.' Y3 ]" l M* r1 J1 O4 w5 N
" |2 G: B3 ]% x$ Z u$ @! A
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?& X: `) e- @7 a/ d" R1 z) R2 I
; q$ d1 Z- F! g. L# j+ V& s另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
0 j% B0 v" O3 r: V
* A T7 y5 W4 c关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):# s& z7 `7 a0 L- Q) Q& L0 D
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.3 ^. F& c h2 g4 A- C% e3 a1 ~! m
8 D2 x3 l) X" A7 D% y: z$ E+ O9 SOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
5 {1 F' J9 O6 c1 w' S6 _& e1 l) v1 M, m0 Y# }. Y% o* V3 _; v
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.% M' a9 {- P2 \9 D+ k4 L! b# T7 Y d( f
1 L* ?3 v9 `* ^. b# s
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|