 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 % P5 a1 V* I6 ]- z
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
6 I- v. W) |6 ?; _6 T4 Bcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
; ~# O+ r0 l2 |# t& l) m, ~5 A4 q9 z1 o) ?! [3 I( s
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
- |$ l/ ^ f+ B X4 E
2 J% U2 L+ y' P2 m" t7 |安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless. W, ~. C8 N+ X9 w
! S* k6 z; O3 U2 g- A. ~! Q }
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
; k# f& W* x9 r4 G+ h# x' Y Q) ~) [6 V7 `
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。* v& Q, c1 s* c s; B) l
5 U4 \1 {/ Y5 T
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):+ Y( D9 @3 d1 \4 G5 K: Y1 W% l
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
* z Z0 X: g4 s" R8 {4 F) o* l# ]! b1 L7 v$ a
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"., p. ^4 F2 j1 | V) h" V. T
4 m3 b- f0 m, H
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
( r' A# A$ L* i* n1 o+ D* U2 s
4 e7 W3 c2 E `% Y[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|