原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:7 o/ ~3 E5 G4 l, I, l
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行., \6 X' w* A* _2 X! T R
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.2 W, n8 ?$ s8 U m
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 ! i8 n8 z% F$ R: d+ r; Z: mThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"& t5 D5 c; w& x2 ]
3 m( j, t( s/ ^, |4 U9 a5 w0 e
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."0 s3 m3 d5 e1 }3 _
+ G- Q! N; i! R+ I5 R' `% v6 |% cYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。: V8 D3 G$ F; w
) ~# h$ N. R" O' l
+ @- V2 _' T1 c+ g- k
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: e$ ^( E) a) KHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 4 }, k' U) e$ L* ^# }5 F' q$ r8 bThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" + k* c7 b& W. {! B$ D5 f# g+ j+ M: G- A0 q
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: - n1 k* l6 ^+ y, ~: P- O% r( K. `" e1 x9 |% E m' \. w V: j
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.