 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员* J& [ l1 k2 N' M8 \' J( i# {
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs* r0 Y# Q3 ^$ S6 a$ ]' X3 A2 B* B2 K: v
k: l4 O. K* W5 Q! g
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
, x/ ? ]! y ~7 V: }" v( R$ g/ {% A9 Q. y3 V, x, e- J/ s
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
( e9 Q5 J& s4 V. ]" B2 O1 G2 D0 u% I2 u9 |" C+ O
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.- C% X0 x# v5 n ^; P' m: Z+ H! _- E
$ X A9 Z% y% @5 W/ ?6 Z' CDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
% H. {- g+ k$ x& _7 j u% A4 r) G* t% Z6 G) L
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.& ?6 }/ c9 {9 o8 q1 ?" ]8 s
. X7 t9 @! Y h0 Q% w, ADow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.' ^4 P1 c* L7 c; a4 Z; i; p
3 n" ?1 L2 Q# k: o0 `Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
9 [" @) _4 J; ]) t
2 g0 A$ j' K' B& r+ K4 t/ nPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
E! H9 j. ~, U7 I
5 Y2 M# F; q8 |+ T$ K* Q; i- bDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|