 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
0 e, i; d5 p8 z- U& QDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
1 F; ~: O! w b* h8 ^0 n# T8 I, l# Q7 e) d3 O
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday./ z( g3 b' @5 R5 u. |4 w$ A O
' o3 e# u0 W6 E* v/ B6 \' G, lMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. , ?6 j- {' ]5 y& D
+ n b, a. h0 Y; GThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.! ]" x' t. v/ }3 Q( e0 Y9 M- L
, \- w4 s$ s, B6 {9 E
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
9 y8 e8 N% _) } j! I2 K- @, d* |: m# `( k- g
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives." @: R5 G: d' ~' K2 U3 x5 N
+ V F$ _1 S% f6 o' t
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
& s, B+ [5 G I% ^8 I/ K5 ?5 E
) L# o2 R1 E# Z# h1 R& ]Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.6 q) `- K" Z y: ~" ]0 }
6 k9 V' R5 q/ Z- |2 m7 C. K8 X/ v: n% O
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.- n7 O, k& Y4 I4 p- }
$ {5 p4 g# U* ~$ P0 }: k9 k7 o% G
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|