3 n0 V$ ?/ t( }' {This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
9 x% E; @( }/ U% I% nThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ... # g$ ]7 P0 k/ E$ wceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
: j9 u( }4 s6 g+ `0 j1 x, O 6 k" C) j0 P/ P8 v2 H, ZSo which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then? + J+ i+ C- ?7 I2 p特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
. Q' y' n1 q' a5 Z3 eI would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.
http://www.leebourgeois.com/blogs/lee_bourgeois/archive/2007/12/02/e5ce8ef1cc0243ec8a8eb4281c885af9.aspx 5 n5 P. s& H. L1 F/ |7 E# z 3 ]4 ]6 {4 F' K* \1404 Latta Court in Leger is Sold! 5 ] f- a, b, `9 HPhaeton 发表于 2010-1-31 10:47
* i$ V# c4 R/ f/ b) H6 a# X4 x 1 w. Z0 |2 h) _9 `& k; B) @That's 2 years ago. 5 [* y/ n* G" H7 W$ W0 u8 L9 I8 y5 A4 g$ \$ _
Don't you see "archive/2007/12/02"?