Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
5 p  D4 i3 c" v& A
Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
' d: H% h: m1 aLot 44 in Block 5  $198500
0 h( U, A( B/ J3 I8 y9 ]! S
4 @2 R/ K3 {, z" [Link is here:
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔
( k: o6 F2 M" h  z  k) y

! M: L. k3 Q" d8 V) aBut this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala

Thanks for your feedback.
; s- h& J# O4 F" L2 ?/ a
" V8 e, q6 E- c6 a: sIf the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
/ L/ b3 y$ O/ `  C; z$ m
44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.

Thanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala
9 L3 m5 O- `) t3 U, t
6 b" c6 T, b! |6 w) H+ lThanks for your feedback.
$ o4 z& R7 P& a
4 X) L! a* P3 s: L. Z$ g, nIf the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.

4 ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

; {/ f- ]" q, Q
You don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .

1 T5 n' B9 S: X; J  \5 a6 U6 a46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

+ @  s. X9 w- j
1 b2 @. I8 P. Vlot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
6 }4 q5 i! ?3 D, N  g$ }/ V8 \Lot 44 in Block 5  $198500
7 r7 h( r3 f/ V! }  y
! b# O0 A4 a0 {Link is h ...
6 O( b' q0 q1 K% p" y' X7 Ofourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
& b  F% F  \+ j( S; [8 \3 Wlot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
0 e, U2 F" F6 w% Z' X高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。
7 I$ `7 ~2 O, A/ K3 o% w% O
46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
) ^3 _1 Y$ R* c0 Zlot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
高 ...
; V) R& \8 `- w/ Q7 [* I! eWST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

5 [4 v4 {; y! M7 n3 d最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala

  |$ V3 P8 i7 [$ \44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
2 D) e1 D5 j: \' ~fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

! D( M- f  z5 |0 p' \
那只是某指定进深的宽度。
" X& q' z& l4 l! a
房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄
' X5 ?6 O) t2 e' t+ X
3 y* R! Q" B0 |+ ?3 X
看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
: m! b. w5 j  S另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄
; `9 m$ R2 t; S

看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
  P# P9 F: d" I0 I还 ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

4 \$ I0 }8 g% o+ C  e5 E38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。