Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
+ `+ Q& h* ?1 |: BLot 44 in Block 5  $198500
. r1 G! M  |1 C" ~! w2 A
Link is here:
; U5 O% R& [: N+ xhttp://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔
& }' x9 x, l3 G* R% O8 n

But this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala
% d$ A. L5 u& B3 a' Y
Thanks for your feedback.

If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
) Y" s" Q; m- G5 I
# f; S: q( {. s9 N: v' g6 B. D5 H44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.
6 @" f% [3 l' |! A0 y9 w2 Z& `( J: U
$ G; Z2 Z! k: d0 P8 a8 \% Z3 BThanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala
1 R3 w; c8 T1 {; A
9 l1 |0 n8 h- f, Y* @/ R6 RThanks for your feedback.

& C) `. R- N& s+ K0 _If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
% k( }4 [5 K6 R. b
4 ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

# K3 S  F9 B; _; ^2 }
You don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .

46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

2 l) G  r- @! B; `/ D" W, x5 zlot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
3 V. b1 T6 E7 e1 O, p9 C
2 Q! J  G& r1 v2 g2 q, O6 RLot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
& y4 V& q- i, o, j% J1 N. k* L: uLot 44 in Block 5  $198500

# X  W. f& f5 @' f- @4 u7 Y, qLink is h ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
# I. c8 Q; P6 ]4 Z+ o; `/ E; ~lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
. w) c9 c& U6 L3 S" F2 L5 U高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。

46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
* z0 g7 t5 r0 }$ g+ blot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
' B9 o' ?# B1 n5 T; t8 V7 w4 j+ I高 ...
WST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala

2 J( ^/ S9 N7 B44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
" i/ i1 r0 Z) ~; Y: Ofourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

: @2 |  y* v- `" m0 C7 C! E
那只是某指定进深的宽度。

房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄


4 m; g% l4 R% K, n; b/ c5 }3 y2 \看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄


看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还 ...
9 B7 g0 Q9 \  ~! K5 M/ J6 ^fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。