 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
$ M2 M0 b. t: N) g0 w8 j4 a/ d* i( A8 Z" s, z4 k4 |7 S+ Y+ V- t
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。. w2 m. ]3 B$ |: W7 w* j
$ o$ _: @6 _, I8 ~& ?7 C**********************************: H6 k- Z; x: z' d2 ?# j& w. a
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:9 B1 E& B. I9 y) F9 a
N; G9 N& s" B( f* ?6 h
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
' k' i( F) R7 ^2 }& {, u( K- q5 R+ C( J; K
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
5 t. t- G2 A. d
3 l& s6 J6 }8 u+ a. L: ~! N( \; Q3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.7 u s- w, Z6 L
( t! Y$ F; p1 u6 {: q: l7 c4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
% ]3 j" K+ |5 L& O+ m; x( F8 p+ h0 n- r
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|