 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
7 Y4 r+ E( n& \ O- B1 M' s0 e- A3 D j4 V4 H
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
1 y$ ~+ _) @ Y/ q- i9 r3 D( q
. O. h v4 C: R0 ]4 R' n- W**********************************" w( n# }3 @5 d. F
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
) {0 I3 L; H6 L% A$ }. E& Y5 L& x; X# c; v# A
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
, z( @' p. o& A. O0 l. k& l. i a% U+ u: j' ]
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.$ y: c0 P6 I& |; ], o& V( \5 t
# v" v, B( j' C4 s3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
& ?' U3 t7 }+ x
+ l I1 o `, L# L4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8." D. C! c/ s# V/ b9 p- u0 V
& X! k; O1 Z* L4 m8 Y/ H$ d
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|