 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:. c7 u& G* k+ }) r1 F
( |0 G. C1 X0 J; m
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。5 _5 p) r7 ]# E5 } I
3 \- W: m$ T& m7 d+ N4 V**********************************( x6 t! c/ m( ~& l& c
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:9 m+ K+ R+ x7 d& u J# h
2 a" r. U0 P. |" v5 E1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.& M. t0 p' L4 G- Q6 P
1 D3 {' X" a9 {; J j" h j Z% p$ Z
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
: \- O* ]8 p. ` [6 |
" L# L% }; m5 @) A9 J$ M3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
0 ~$ q/ U" ?% E; `6 U+ G8 `. N' V I4 Q$ [6 R. k8 e- C
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
. m/ k9 h, g, [% J
$ d; @- e1 ^7 }7 T5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|