请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348

值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
1 s* S& P4 {! D  y" X9 \5 ]
值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

9 j) u  K! s+ V  A去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
5 T4 v) h; c' h$ Tskybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
9 j" t; Z. [/ ~9 |Tax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
/ Y0 q" X6 ]5 c8 h' F/ E6 s1 s% \6 y8 |100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
" M- Q0 D  I# F  ^$ WLand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
: x; E- R- h' dLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
1 }9 [9 I( h# x. L+ a- x3 ^Building Count: 1
Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
& ~1 ~" f# l9 ~9 b/ E/ r. gApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
0 v( w8 B( V* YBasement Development: No
Garage: Yes
1 ]! y) v% H+ c' zFireplace: Yes
, P  S3 G( S% j# M# yWalkout Basement: No
+ C3 A' T8 _# I- J: F; y$ `Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

4 g) E4 G1 N! U( ~you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.