 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* p7 G5 {; A8 D1 m- D' ]/ Z- w7 ^4 k4 z: M; p3 l9 x W, A7 E
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
4 c ~8 r2 G2 | w
1 v0 W( c- s* J5 V0 s6 I TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 C; q6 U/ r4 \* {. j G
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third0 b1 J8 o& u4 j
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
7 c" x. ]$ H3 y: o* k0 a/ d/ e7 Pin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
, l' b r3 ] L3 q2 F8 Qprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and; `% P/ A/ r+ Q; U- i7 S
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,$ g0 S( K8 d# \# p7 }( @
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal7 _ Z7 B& |2 m' a" z. I _* |
LePage Real Estate Services.
; A6 P9 d) {+ e I
2 `- w( @ [0 k+ ]* Z7 f4 D Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters5 h. p U2 n8 ^& F+ d5 J7 z; Y
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic6 S( u8 X( N; Q/ T6 {, q
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and8 M) g* Q% l0 u& a8 r
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
; Y+ H% P3 ~, m( O7 y) Dresidential real estate sector.* i& Q/ p; N" [+ Q
/ a* W9 `/ Q- [+ s0 m0 c
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
% o0 m0 O6 t% N) C9 n" Yoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
/ S/ G1 I6 F* L& ]; Z- Y" t3 k0 k9 [year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 d9 Z. ]( E$ _. Q. J4 p9 F' q1 }
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
( a0 ?2 T; {& B0 F0 i, V- } u. i(+13.2%).
! O) L% q A& O8 p2 Y- k' O' \- H' ~( I/ [; \: f& o, A
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth# b7 p0 u* ^( z" m3 N1 Z u
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
) w/ \) @# \& K" J# u8 Ofrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are$ x" q/ A9 ]' Z: H& @& w0 A
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
1 B/ t7 C( G- Xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ V* O! ?; i* I( P2 H( F
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We3 K/ v) ], i9 A( h) }6 j" n2 {
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy$ f P$ L; f! p" d V0 u6 ~
balanced market." g# C7 b* { R3 c( J: j. V
* \* S: O; z8 _ Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
. m7 p# V6 K0 m& r" H: ?+ Hconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift0 O, G8 O0 d N
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ s% n* w( h6 ~# Y7 q3 G: A* s
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 b! @% R/ M9 D0 {1 W/ v# o
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,) N- X* X0 ]! Z) [" p: a
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record v9 _- s' j3 c3 I7 J- G4 D+ t
breaking price appreciations.* S1 d) n8 V$ A
. S9 v# Q5 r7 ^" {" q$ M Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding& O/ G, P* d+ E0 i0 T$ f, M
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ y+ _2 U9 l8 A% k- n% L/ Alargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
4 y. Q& s1 d% k h o: k
6 B4 \4 t; s X In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
4 g. Q2 n# S1 |5 n- N3 y6 Heconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
4 R8 t8 ?% m) o" m5 Aconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off' M$ Q+ L2 o4 m( j/ @
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ Y( S/ ? ~3 @7 T+ y8 OIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, K: t- B3 x8 B: Mgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, G0 H! E( D) L: j
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 Y7 w# t% j/ s" `& m3 M
1 {. ^) M3 ^! Z2 W: [. a' p While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ ^/ T( e# o6 y- ~0 }7 omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
+ Z7 G0 l6 u( n* w3 ^financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 w$ n! C8 z/ u5 [are markedly different than those found in the United States.& n5 }3 W! c! ^7 A( W+ |
8 B0 D7 \! f" \: L5 k Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& m; I+ e6 Y: i g7 R6 eAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- Z0 G1 @. ^$ ^0 E0 q4 ^) nfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
' l2 W$ u; a3 z1 U+ ]6 m) s+ i6 k) Yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general' N5 j& C/ b4 L7 ?& |
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
/ F6 I& O" ^% \' ]" fdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
, E8 E+ y+ ~% K* l( \& R! M9 Iaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
! [3 x, B" \1 C1 U! imortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
7 h; ]8 {: v) Z
, {6 m/ p h7 T( A6 b! o <<
E$ r" A% P; \. l U REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" y. l" h6 a, y% i >>0 N6 |9 g$ i' F; E
! ^: A- ~4 c0 B7 q$ ^
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in' ]- X; y; q0 e, D5 o" O; ]
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate( t4 x$ j: d0 ~, h
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 S5 E% P# T& `2 {2 c* D$ q- P& e9 D9 H
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of: ~, k4 i% B( c+ m+ d2 ~- x( T
renovations.( ?0 w% q" l# ]2 X7 r3 {$ g7 R3 f2 o
' C2 E# Z1 w- } The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight) o' N9 Y0 L" P7 Y( D8 x4 g$ |: v+ B
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: `* f2 `3 y* c8 t" U3 g; U( Vcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and8 X7 e5 F% Z! n& z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
$ F# J7 \8 c1 \( [& @7 v
9 T2 n d! \- D. `' a) X! [ The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% l# @, l g8 O$ I. @( Y/ p
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% w% _. ]& s' |2 D" j3 G
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new+ i# m8 e% ~1 a, @% v7 o5 O
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores. p3 A2 m* _! F+ N# t
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes' E* p4 x. N Z1 p
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
* |: J$ X$ O' [# u7 N) Q- h4 |3 F+ F r
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced8 i: @" t( z1 V1 u8 P, f
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their D' t4 r* C" [0 [1 n9 N
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ {- J9 Z- I% u: f, F; @) nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian4 i+ m. E# m: Z J' v' N" F2 q) y
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing. l, W; O3 {. A! ?# j2 |
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ I! |' @5 ]6 ~5 _/ }1 N3 t4 J1 W! o+ j7 v4 P
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
- G1 G( t+ L5 v! [$ Aamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( J" S, R' N" M G, F: Z9 Z/ `priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" x2 ?8 Q, w( s' I) s5 J; ~4 Vas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last9 f7 H, I* O/ s( }9 x1 N; W0 n2 ?
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
$ g$ g h7 l" X' n6 I9 q
/ D9 S4 |4 v3 D: G# ]' E Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house1 z/ j: d# s) \( v
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
/ A- X6 |7 p) \6 d! [: M6 k6 Tlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
* K- u/ x2 b9 yfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
) K6 Z( `2 [( R# y9 @' S8 Pwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the6 A# Y/ k( }3 B. E1 w
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) z, M3 r: S7 t8 Y. O
making a purchase.# R( c% w, h6 e7 K+ {: d( p
% C2 O8 B( \- Z+ N( G Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 f, B* @. m0 D7 y: g" B/ J" Emarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong+ r& c: z; n& \2 _; s
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city+ e/ X6 n0 l% w* x% o% x1 T
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. \6 d+ W7 X! G- j9 H V& ~attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown- A& J k( V6 v% s r6 j
amenities.; u7 _5 _, s+ l, W2 G8 S- k) P
) H# z2 y' |2 U. J/ k
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
9 J) p' I/ b5 ^$ h, Rthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
$ S7 F7 M8 l3 e% Oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
& C! f) ^6 E% q) e3 B/ ^continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( B* ] [3 S, L& ?! E
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' B+ b- C- Q' p
residence, rather than for investment.
& H% z- G$ o. X3 Q8 @! Z9 V. A4 g8 i' s; w5 }
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
H" B* z4 y/ f- b0 chouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
; D4 v8 n. O( ^2 a1 ` D8 Hin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
8 q0 S. {; e& k' Qconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ Q( N' V0 k7 M: S. ~% M3 Brate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter9 f" w& S, o k- i: W7 U5 P6 T
the market.
( [* n1 x6 c7 t) Z, z2 x5 d
9 F+ l' ?0 j2 E( k* u In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through X7 D3 k: B( a+ s' J% A6 N2 i
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
1 j+ u- M& R J, M/ |August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ D0 {3 k8 Z8 f# F% m2 d2 `1 A
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due a* X$ o' D. D" n# P
to the shortage of available inventory.6 _: w! K2 |) T; E! J& ~
& g& l- O5 f5 E3 d
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( M* H1 \) r& \momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
1 _% G' _$ q* B* g/ Yvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
& c; \- B0 Y' Ostruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& @+ T/ ~# a* z
1 ]9 H8 r" m( E' ?( i Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; T L4 p8 E- C
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
2 }7 D W4 }, x1 K4 u. j% }unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* x" {, |* U3 ?9 D/ m `8 P9 Xpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; n* B! ]9 \. F8 ^6 [( a0 T qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer1 ?2 \: G& G7 A& V! u; N
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
2 n/ z3 e4 B- y) O( Ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.: _' X( Z, Z; ]: D# `/ L
. o" @8 z6 }7 O9 ~ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
% J. d4 c' j/ m7 W3 Cas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! z$ |4 I( U" c" ]% k% p
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
y; u- y- W. a$ V# t: l8 W7 k! Cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, ?4 @' Q: L5 p1 Q2 Z1 F, l6 N
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
4 T H5 }& {' ~# O2 c( q! N7 \; L0 Tin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 P0 A5 U* F1 @. k
towards the end of 2006.
, f6 v1 e1 g3 n: c) l# i( }! o4 V) N5 r0 B$ R+ s* [
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
+ d, C# ^2 s* [1 ^9 I6 xinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
1 _; a8 h3 _8 ^to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse% W) u# M9 X5 ~! N$ K
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( o( {) \% g4 c r2 O, eforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
. e3 N% ?; W& s* H5 d2 Wpressure on tight inventory levels.
+ ^$ m( k( G4 U) Y+ v$ Y3 f8 b$ G$ m! k. g9 E
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 t2 n2 ]; l' X
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people7 b3 S* f" L+ |6 A5 z* f6 H& t
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! {1 U- b3 S nwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching7 C' O/ m( t- U1 m7 z. r, Q6 {
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
) O0 M6 b" R9 E# j" U* N5 `7 V$ k3 Z
<<& a6 \, [# p* h5 |: G |1 w
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) u$ R. z- O2 Z M, q& u. K) k6 _4 [5 E: Y' ]+ X4 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
r# Y1 A# k2 l$ n0 A- P( y Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey' d7 {9 ?* ~8 J( w0 S; S2 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 P+ d! ~* v! q! ~0 ~1 E3 @ 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
* }7 C2 V1 }2 W, p0 l* z Market Average Average % Change Average Average: q' \. T: F3 b4 [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' ?, q) u9 r- E: M Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000# w3 Y* v7 A8 F8 ^& [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( _- p9 Y6 ~$ m& Y/ ?6 d! {( }& i Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
; X+ a8 X, b1 A" T5 d- r' w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 F) c3 x: B# s3 k/ ] Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000& J( f. v* a! x& L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# x4 m; ^9 J5 Y) R, ?3 H Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
# S: X" H7 K0 j7 Y3 w9 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------% V$ \+ a0 I. Y* Y8 x! K7 B
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3331 y5 x+ V* U3 \: N I3 |6 O! o$ D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' J/ E' e* j) N) M$ I# h Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5838 f- ]/ \- J9 u( T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 T, e1 v- A' g( q$ ~
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
" E( X# p2 j( U( t+ a: e -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 I' Q% ?8 A6 A) E% M
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
; a( }# ~) F% f& D; R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' Q; W( n7 s0 a" r! { Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
+ D5 T6 P( w6 `- j2 \! p2 ?* r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 i' K* C6 `5 t8 G$ P% Z Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7072 P* q o& w- y8 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& N7 a+ u$ f+ E; d; r Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
$ Y- `, P) ^- ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
u" I, [% a& e# g2 O Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389' p# ^$ s4 y9 U3 X! f" K3 s: C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% L) Q( Y: Y( q, w p: s Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714. O2 I9 c( G! V' A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! t8 U6 A. D; C" g( R" i7 `
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500: L: g' c# |! q; C7 H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( D1 U* {' y* Y) O( U3 L Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
$ L, J+ z+ L$ M* [4 U: R3 _5 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 f, w0 M$ ` y# ]- C+ Z/ a
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860/ R6 T/ x5 ]" N/ i6 O# |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. ~! h2 l0 o. s* A
* c( Z5 g2 e% }* z" s* | -------------------------------------------------------------$ Z, p$ X8 d! i3 b0 e
Standard Condominium
8 @" G, z n% H -------------------------------------------------------------8 A F* u& P$ h; l% O5 O0 `
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo( B8 Z- n* H! y: H0 k _0 }# J
Market % Change Average Average % Change
" V1 b2 j2 S$ U( u. s" d2 V -------------------------------------------------------------
N+ G4 P3 U! W0 G% [) l U2 g Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%" j' c# I( _7 f# m; n2 I
-------------------------------------------------------------
* i* P5 z; m5 Q# R | Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
4 d' T. m G" k. W -------------------------------------------------------------1 b4 w d9 i5 \. l3 j( \! h N; f! h
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
5 u2 [/ Z- P' W/ F& e -------------------------------------------------------------5 m( B2 g9 R, D7 i! T9 Q6 i, m
Saint John N/A - - N/A. W) n/ X# e# G4 Y" s: J5 N% j- Y
-------------------------------------------------------------" X6 j2 x: S, `+ M& ]: M/ c
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%2 W; M) X( j' y3 J) \) e
-------------------------------------------------------------1 z( Z( d6 U+ a4 M a
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
% B4 F k4 Q: i -------------------------------------------------------------8 T% m* I* B+ O- {) ]
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
/ q" h$ `; X( N1 ]; o% ]0 Y# `0 A4 v -------------------------------------------------------------
6 A; y; V( `% U- f" z+ @( T# e Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
/ e4 p2 Q6 O3 \3 J -------------------------------------------------------------
# N- b2 L; C3 _/ E1 x Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%# v4 w3 ?1 e: z3 h. H0 w3 q. l& |) ~. u
-------------------------------------------------------------
# R- P/ [/ b+ I. w; | Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
7 u2 L+ Y% Y, T# D6 T7 K7 O0 B -------------------------------------------------------------
& ?2 Y3 Q; |# j) C Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%% s. v' P/ u8 d8 y$ t
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 z7 T( ~. h( ?4 J Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
/ y K6 r+ S# n% `$ z -------------------------------------------------------------* J, c: p/ p$ U! x! u, O
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%5 h2 c; u0 _) y: t" T% D2 E( U$ N5 G
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ P" K# u; M: l4 C0 C5 Q Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
2 x e; r1 y5 a. c8 P+ g7 U -------------------------------------------------------------
" p( C* q. k4 @" \% A2 w Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%/ }' T: ~; t3 J( K7 a
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 i' s6 o$ Z( u National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%! m% j$ U: k/ j. I+ P. }6 ~# h
-------------------------------------------------------------
) y' ~. {5 q2 l( [$ N >>
# I/ d7 i5 R( t# m9 u8 w9 {4 @# g2 y" G) c+ Y1 j
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
( Y7 d2 F/ v! ~" hin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
5 @& T3 T; v* p" C' B V* R3 k: YJohn and Victoria.
- S8 f$ @* A6 w6 c# r# P3 E
$ Y; x7 }9 V. T$ V' n! W0 E The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
1 S& j- \0 n. d3 fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
_8 L: R/ B. K* phousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 ?6 _. g+ x) n/ g+ l' r0 Creferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
# z) p# T/ N7 e! dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
) ]! f2 |) Y$ V9 U* cacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is, F7 d: D8 J7 d8 D
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current/ q$ y! k- W6 ?# n; ]; G. u, o$ R
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable$ X" M$ [- x$ T# |
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
1 H4 @) i, [- ] e! yNovember 15, 2006.
3 v j# U9 Q. P Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 s/ q- z; V8 e) h2 Vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
) b* j( t1 A0 S4 x; F/ v/ \: qprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is& K$ G2 X9 d5 f1 w; P! @
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|