 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ; @! e. F( F6 `) w+ `+ Y1 l& ^
5 E6 J' H, g: k9 F7 I- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 - \ ]# A! p0 c. K- m& i; d
8 E5 h/ z; \ @ TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market) O; Z: W& T: N+ J4 Q. G R
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 x$ u& W* f' J% B3 l
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ c& U: B! r1 l* N9 L3 ?! d# P- m) N
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ i: d' e! A" Z2 E$ wprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and5 ~. r" b, o0 U" J
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
' L8 j6 f, K3 q- ~Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal7 n; q) R) e% X5 r5 H. \. F
LePage Real Estate Services.8 K) C, n* e$ u* d* G4 _
6 x+ I h" }1 p! S( A8 Z2 Y; ^% X ^; ~# ^ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters0 Q% U, [1 `3 h# e4 z5 P/ O* n4 g
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic$ c1 K6 r+ x6 s
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
5 n$ t+ }7 ?+ B0 |; t) |! ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the! z, k" M Q+ @3 f3 i; M4 i
residential real estate sector.
7 o1 I6 ~) j/ \: n0 w
* b. w/ T4 j( X Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
9 z/ {- C/ F& ]6 x. koccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%); z# c$ K, k+ G% |
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
% e A* U: l0 ^# h# S7 p! _(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
2 z" F# j! z6 U% X(+13.2%).
( V1 J5 a" R2 f7 ?, B/ V+ r0 D( ]* h
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 o5 t8 [. ^) V r/ ]5 v7 _5 M [during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the& x7 g8 d6 C3 @- n T+ L( Q
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are: Q+ `5 W. H+ {6 |
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,, S; n+ E' V) e7 U# J
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
1 F. N( K! L( l"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We3 f1 d; J7 a( k
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, ^, }; R$ i! ]. D. rbalanced market.". a$ y% O# V, y- Q, E/ z$ D
% W! B" `1 j3 D1 Y
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
- x e1 z( z% E7 P6 P9 Oconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" H% {) F3 p1 g+ ^to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued) r3 C& t3 `" U2 e- s+ d
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
( ~% f/ Y2 W$ @; M% K- P8 J6 }energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,5 h, {; O! P5 h, s. A) Z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record- C# c, b% I: ]+ e" Y. N2 ~
breaking price appreciations.% r* [/ d3 X+ ^1 I6 N
7 Q( n; q: E. G' H Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding/ m; T" p; _* |) v, S/ i( c; J# ~( ^; w
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
( o0 {! W3 q& ?largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: m/ w+ T$ o7 c& O
3 q! T" m! C1 q1 Z v In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
2 a! k1 a' g) I* I4 t& N# Neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
' b5 {$ W/ @* o0 |9 v0 ]+ \$ Qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off- i$ V' d$ j5 \3 J, _
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 |- C: w9 f$ l! N# i9 P
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers- k- }/ ~0 }* x* m! E9 f0 {
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ A5 G6 L$ M4 g( k, A0 L( Sprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
- R- K3 p$ H4 y& U3 V2 A' I9 _6 w! \) a( L; M: h$ l* ~
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
( k$ K2 Y7 F- G6 H% Tmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ M& Z# d' `: [+ |" L
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada5 w8 k2 c. e% [
are markedly different than those found in the United States.0 O# b% Y% Y' Z
+ r4 {! V4 H" l Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
0 C1 x% l2 l hAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
' M+ S1 ]4 G# Rfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
: \6 c- j) q" }# {- nrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
1 k6 `/ f# z: l+ \( taffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the3 y# x* u! B3 G0 w0 z9 K( A- n
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and4 C5 @. P# P1 d; ]- I
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization: Y5 H5 m7 h6 p9 {7 x: ^3 U- P
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; y! i" W0 z" e& W" B a
0 f3 j7 Q7 O0 Y, R" a
<<
* ?: I! g7 K- ]1 q+ m+ b+ b% \' H) m REGIONAL SUMMARIES; O* p. w5 c) p1 v0 Y z
>>
, O- j, g7 ]! m3 v& r: j
& l* t6 `1 X& U5 Y( w Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in' A$ g$ g# P: T6 r
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
# }0 z6 j0 |6 C6 m8 y+ Y( ?of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time" m9 z9 y1 _" C7 e5 W5 W# c
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of F: R- k" R6 q% L
renovations.
$ D2 o2 ~1 \# ?) B: G
; Y3 k/ N0 p5 e W; h+ E: R The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 ~% c/ J+ w! Y9 Iincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation/ z4 g/ l# V+ S: `! Z, N
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and0 _! w7 S0 u. B! E5 {2 w/ _
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter. V- H/ `( G }& t W8 d; w
4 @+ z- B$ H, z' }2 j" d, X The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
" D9 W$ h* Y+ |! K( a# x" Cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 V/ D9 A8 [/ P. b
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
- c% j. K9 E8 E600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 e7 b5 S* d) z# C% B/ [
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes. q' d& K+ h' d6 ~7 A5 \
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
& N: t/ U: U( P
. v6 }+ v, K+ s) z1 F* ]$ Q In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
# D' V7 d; ~. |0 R# c& h8 Aconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their7 f$ l/ G3 d& J Z! ?
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers3 G3 s5 q# ?- n8 D, x! D9 \5 d2 |
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian- P* k8 h- H/ O7 Z5 ~% m0 z' F
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
9 e3 s# e' l& g: |$ }# Sbuyers with more options when looking for a home.& o" C' H* v! V. @
; y5 o. ~( M% O! {! C2 u Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
+ ~+ m6 u; f% Uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes% T4 Z( t5 f0 u. }5 K/ H% o
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 l7 \6 ~6 s6 y+ ^0 j+ \0 v# t# pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
3 k. o0 ?+ h# Z: d* T. @few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# D1 K4 [: O I/ u" l2 f0 c
( C' t$ {8 k- R" d# Q8 x4 C4 ?# X Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house- p, P" u% G& c; a; p
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
; y5 F- w G6 e4 Clevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
/ S) |! Y" V' R. q0 |# ~* _" @7 c5 kfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# \) b& d# I& [1 I7 K
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
6 }- j4 P1 ^. F( T! q; F* gpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
8 W( f; {" ?6 V+ h! P7 ]making a purchase.
1 u) {- w* t4 z2 N* u) w9 p, R1 o4 W. }* V; Q# a
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% ?, o6 P" s$ L) o# bmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 k0 v0 g" a5 {' ^2 |5 ?
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city0 U( @9 b9 y$ h1 b
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
8 o6 Y2 N% p9 {. j, Eattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
: V! B. D- l; S: k0 ]) [/ Qamenities.
" f- }) \* p" T# I: H: c# G
# R6 x% ?$ v- m3 N8 Q% _- y The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
, n9 x1 E+ q4 L) J# \throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand, ^! E. O. ?7 w: g
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
3 r) O( Z A( r0 K; B% _continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 ]( j3 A0 F- |
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle- R5 ?% \; c* p7 g4 u. ]
residence, rather than for investment.
) A h0 \9 b7 k5 M6 s* t+ \
5 _! ?( g# v" M( I1 P4 v9 Q The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as& y; Y4 s3 C* W. L+ ^- y
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted2 g" t, B7 Q& a+ f, E
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
% L$ p5 c/ K- G* t gconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization$ ^* `) b% ~: M0 J! P- ^4 V
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* T/ e3 U3 u5 F7 r0 b. N, jthe market.& z, ]/ p* _& t/ Z
9 u& k5 {3 L1 B! n0 r" Y In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
& R5 D% z0 R8 k! e+ `, }& O+ XJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In6 Q! W9 U6 k3 i8 y
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
f$ o% j5 j/ L$ J' E% m! lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due6 g& X/ h! f# `$ Z
to the shortage of available inventory.
2 g' `( w( @& T$ m- a# i; X, ?9 u7 |- U. H
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
6 L" {0 S+ N( b; [; cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains" o# B2 b. ~# f; m- U1 f0 `+ D) {
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
& y' T; c1 J1 a' R+ k- h: hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.) p8 g' m, Z6 L, V4 i. l/ S/ J4 k0 ?/ P
" ~% i9 j$ j2 M( A
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
2 h* w4 O& O( \) Pin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 x+ D* m( g- N1 j6 dunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ g# \4 Z. V+ W6 ^$ C6 [3 Kpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
9 k5 {$ n: R5 x" x" ^- F5 ?7 z4 Pprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( ?/ h9 s K& @ l+ }" Z
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as9 l; b2 \$ Y# f3 L! F+ W
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
5 [$ Z' w3 [- d7 v3 R
3 C b+ C. V* }$ u. T. z Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 n( k9 w) m) w8 z4 {6 ?
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& Z- N* _! i2 c' T: C# yremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
0 F( {) N7 Y/ {5 I6 ~maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
$ V ?8 O+ r# c0 [2 B' \increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
. w6 j+ C4 B$ |6 c3 I+ {in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly% E$ i, X0 o6 j( c5 k" m
towards the end of 2006. 5 F. ?3 N# J! Y ?
9 l6 s/ l `' R
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
1 {- V0 s8 [0 I4 ?' Qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable, r% l7 }. [+ ?6 K- j* B, P
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 j7 P# s1 e8 h1 Vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
! `$ f$ X" p' i# ^) l2 w) `foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added$ F* o5 h4 ?* T3 R7 s5 G
pressure on tight inventory levels.
4 I- }, Z: e, l' _. `0 ?! o C/ G) B8 s0 Z
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic# E: n: C8 G& n# C7 a' m; c. W* v0 N
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
# q8 {+ i2 C" h) Y! cinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
b$ i8 W. Q6 P6 }! P6 i4 ]! Swhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
7 m3 z# `- Y, H7 C; V4 \, P G( x2 a ofor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
- g, L0 E) B+ p4 D1 k5 g% ?! k! s$ m2 K
<<7 e, j+ Q$ }) W4 o6 N
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
* c) A4 D+ M7 l+ {- L! K9 \" R
5 i' d+ b, l$ o6 k9 d$ J, G X! w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ]8 H, S" R) J/ P0 V7 G Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
7 N- m5 d2 H6 G# K4 a2 b4 [4 n$ C -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ^* Z. D, t/ Y/ @
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3* P1 W$ F2 N( w6 B( O
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
) [) n$ c6 Y0 ]0 I3 `, j F -------------------------------------------------------------------------, p6 z4 C7 P1 @( P$ P
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0009 T" d) [4 K8 j6 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! d8 v I* n9 J0 M2 w, t* M# z) g+ u7 e
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
" l0 S4 t: S. Y. E( U% V -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 |$ X/ i4 `; M0 u8 ], Q+ f' w
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000( q+ N$ X* G+ I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* f0 s, N; F) @* b4 [! j Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
" c" L) N! c k S2 `( J/ I -------------------------------------------------------------------------( N6 A8 K2 F. q+ ^! H/ [
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3339 [) O$ J6 n- J7 W+ D8 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: P' G4 s& L% m, t f6 _7 i
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583 w3 T5 E u2 b9 U3 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# l3 U2 S3 o% C/ \4 d Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1854 @: s5 S/ h/ L4 S& X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 O% T9 \; r# J9 v$ b+ i
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250& T6 o* R4 L0 [$ b" A* t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 X9 f4 X# {4 G7 i9 B
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766$ P& W5 M6 G0 u4 e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* t: D+ ^' |/ k3 j9 S
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
# l1 M r* ~3 D% u0 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 f& N: z W% y" Y3 u: N/ V& k
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
^+ l2 a$ y+ Y: l5 ?! X& ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 b6 n9 h* G' S9 g5 M# C Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3896 v: O+ c8 ^9 N( C5 k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, l0 k7 s7 f' d/ w Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
5 \- ^. N0 b) ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------! ^( h/ C5 p! V
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& B8 Z1 a) Y" d: s. F. N( |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* X9 ?: ?+ V9 @2 N+ i6 h4 {& O
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 B1 M4 ?- x, a/ H( ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 q, y+ q) r3 y n/ w9 S/ n
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
# {% K! t/ d9 S# X% s0 _3 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------( I: b1 [& ~9 T. C4 K
0 b: P/ z- F( }1 p- ]. [6 t
-------------------------------------------------------------: R" Q4 u# s$ @$ o. i
Standard Condominium( v8 t3 w, ?# n9 j$ }
-------------------------------------------------------------" H/ A8 x0 e, Z- F& N- e6 I
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo; N. {, ?, {4 B1 o2 P0 P2 K3 l" F4 @
Market % Change Average Average % Change, g' G2 b6 {/ L* o7 a( k5 }
-------------------------------------------------------------- a+ @6 y/ x F0 s
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%6 u& P& D, V9 v7 k" K z$ V4 \
-------------------------------------------------------------; E2 q3 l+ h: h
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# V. m( o# Q& q* ]0 O1 |% w -------------------------------------------------------------
& J7 W6 [/ K1 C# u% A Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
: q1 Z7 I0 C9 t# d+ }$ ? -------------------------------------------------------------6 \# ?: V8 x6 K& Y+ Y H
Saint John N/A - - N/A
" b8 o2 F' ^! e4 p/ y! W2 q( b& m -------------------------------------------------------------
2 M* ?2 j# g9 `& _8 _ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%5 O# R3 t+ e( S q Q4 C
-------------------------------------------------------------
* T3 f" U1 X' X$ U Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%- t: V7 V. o6 u; L
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 P/ W# [1 \: ~0 b/ t Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
$ q3 y% s9 X; |6 N -------------------------------------------------------------. ^5 l1 t8 d' v! Y7 t
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
+ \8 b5 f' g' ]" @4 D- r& j -------------------------------------------------------------( O+ S- \! j. F& {
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%3 u+ K/ B- ?! g, q
-------------------------------------------------------------
q- j' F0 ]9 O3 u& C6 e Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
0 Z6 u8 h1 Z9 c7 g -------------------------------------------------------------1 ^ T2 b$ o) F+ l0 H
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
; r3 E3 I, {! L( {( ^& e8 m( I -------------------------------------------------------------: h. b! Y( Y5 U0 a. r! V/ v0 c
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
6 `4 {. e* y7 N -------------------------------------------------------------6 ^: c1 Q* r3 u: W( S, B
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%" I, B9 f& x, Y8 f) i }
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 n: i" u2 J+ e) { Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%8 L$ D5 s2 t/ b' @# j$ W
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 P0 j" i: u5 F7 [* Z Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%+ `, B) c- v% Z5 u% q
-------------------------------------------------------------: Y) \+ {' X; T h% p
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%5 h$ i/ f3 E! b8 y2 b: m
-------------------------------------------------------------7 O \) r% A+ m
>>
6 ~; o! `& o- V+ C9 p7 ?! z
$ V7 C8 J9 m2 ] Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined& Q1 `& X* o: p! |3 B- @
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint5 j" ]; q8 `$ Q
John and Victoria.1 _3 A' M5 M% B& ]7 r2 m
" e! D+ V8 J/ @" w2 t8 \8 ~) w The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
! |. x: G6 L# s( Acomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
) g& n( K( j( x6 e6 N Phousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 e' g4 ^' r! X- J- X5 X) w
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price: p4 {: s- W" r% F- b" D7 E
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* k% Z% c' X% H. t1 w& g8 M" kacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* r; K: ?: g) q( X( n4 d1 j$ @available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. a- Z- p) u$ L: A. ?
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, \( d) T# z6 Y+ [
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on8 F+ S" v+ }: O% R9 z- {
November 15, 2006.* K! f v' W4 ]/ C
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
- O" R1 N$ K& i; I/ N, j2 J$ }fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge1 p! x) k, p" C6 z( y7 r& U3 B4 {
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is: O- p+ u/ w% \7 y6 E; C% C
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡