埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2111|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* Z* u! `" ?1 n7 z, ^" h' u' s5 r
5 @# @/ d2 L) X$ n- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( v5 O; W" X/ V# N

7 s% b9 I* d7 ^    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; J$ [! D" _' M" L( gexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" {/ b* h+ H6 [5 |' p6 Gquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
% D+ ~; C0 J% g" l0 N2 jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
; M7 u5 r) i( ^* _price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and+ O6 y: z( [, E# S1 v8 F
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- p( m; q  J7 @& x* `
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. d/ _  O1 O1 K. {: U, I1 j+ `
LePage Real Estate Services.( B6 X7 o( H+ f/ G+ }, T# _

' C' G- e  ~0 Y8 I0 c) l: e. T    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
* H3 M. u# x7 q9 u. U) Xare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic$ w! x, u. U5 v9 C
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and& c" K, J# @/ s6 p. {6 t% c
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the; Q; f7 P6 S9 {& @7 X# ?
residential real estate sector.
; [9 x1 |/ u4 K) Y) J* [/ ?1 _  Q  q
* _8 j# z6 _$ b( A( K) E, Y. Y    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation  I5 g7 n2 q$ A9 ~. J4 T! \
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( q# N) D6 Z1 t% r
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
4 A1 f/ H. Q+ t: }1 ]+ G(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3805 U0 S2 ?+ J. [2 y2 \8 I
(+13.2%).
+ g* _$ S$ R( x2 ?' [; v+ M+ P* g( t& o# C2 ?( x  j# T
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth3 |1 M! p% ?, \! I' M
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the& i% h2 C; q+ o! a
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are$ C  C, k/ }/ Q* j7 _) a$ W# }
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,. Q! K7 D9 P1 Z3 i
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.! u' F$ m. x3 T: G1 |
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 ]) B- d2 ?* }, X5 W
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy) ^  I/ r8 D6 U$ b4 Y
balanced market."
6 m7 |( p" |3 U( w$ ?: `8 V0 s0 z' l, j! v& R/ E2 M/ z* r$ v
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
; o: B4 C, I5 k+ z5 q1 ~! F% Oconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ P  K4 p- s# f
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
; b: E# P: E/ w5 i  W* H1 `/ Xthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core/ C5 z& W7 m7 A2 j, a
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
3 M- Q4 Q5 c4 d7 k0 Umanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ }' C% o" ~+ {) l& D1 f6 F8 ]breaking price appreciations.6 S4 ~2 {+ h" l5 U
6 s! X) X! W+ W5 @2 e
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 J  K1 Y) W% `- b/ Q% t' E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the! F; J( P$ r4 \9 b4 ~: q
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
8 i9 N% K$ p# b  q( }0 F% z/ ?& X/ f, e! e$ n
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid2 B% ~0 g; A8 m4 M5 n
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
: b' ?$ `8 q8 P( g( l# xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, X/ h% e+ J* }. o  q! D
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
0 D- |8 R/ ~# I0 N4 TIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
1 p7 W9 x) O  ~  ~3 P% x. @greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ U$ i( V5 S; G. D  ~- ^5 i5 _+ a
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
. F& `  H( ]9 C& h' J: M: V* H9 P& U) `% b& T
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: ~* H' T  }7 |- W% F+ F
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
  H' w2 p! e9 N0 m0 Z/ Kfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 _. x% ~/ E+ ]; @are markedly different than those found in the United States.1 {$ G2 H* U' R) R4 L
' e. I3 h' Z. J/ D0 v2 L8 ]
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
- a& \4 t' Y7 R, p5 `0 Z( FAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
6 Q  B/ k9 g# o7 g7 t, P+ H! s% o+ lfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the, h  ~: X- y) p8 T/ Y
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
2 w' o% i1 W$ B/ B: p# x- ~, }9 Raffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
( M4 X, y5 w) @! Q: G& G6 Rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
7 E3 [. e: y( A5 _2 S: {9 caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization* v# u4 U  q5 |' V9 v% y* Q" E9 X
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 ^, X5 G$ a/ q" L8 b; ?

. T. }3 k. V6 h5 p    <<( g( _# a6 o! w1 W. j8 F
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
5 ]- w) c! v! V- W2 L    >>, t. |* }1 M  n3 A# S
( ~: ~- y0 m6 p# F
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in6 @" L8 t7 o  l9 _
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
5 s5 f5 p( y1 [/ Z' f! e+ t7 dof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time. {" p) k' V; e  u: |
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
' \7 ^$ H& t' [/ j# V1 u1 vrenovations.* u( J4 ^: }( K, Z

! n$ H" Z# q! N. l4 Z* g    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight- X7 e5 B1 O2 x8 m
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: W. R! |9 X& `/ i! j2 S1 @5 _  Wcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
0 p6 }% R, k) G7 f4 b6 s* ^September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
& T1 }5 H# V2 y( L. v# o2 \$ o8 p! b0 n, i3 _
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer" d' O$ V: k  c& ]7 r" n
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
! k& A" F5 Y+ W8 |# yquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" B! O' E& D) x8 N& H600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% d; k! w2 @5 I) g( t4 [to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 A" |( D7 Z% g2 D; {
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 o3 O4 k& f0 q8 j) ^) @& u
7 ~. o; j# c4 v8 ?# E
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced/ `0 w' H0 F" F8 S: L* @! B
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
) b, ]+ T  I8 B9 F2 h4 ]homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
9 m' J# M7 \) M" ?was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian# f& [2 z! {( X
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing; L1 [# k$ A2 ]% q  H9 K1 B. X7 H
buyers with more options when looking for a home.* B- K2 y+ L' R. J
* L4 V; H. ^& p; S; _
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly5 B) {  \: O, p; ^/ i9 d
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
; v) s  G5 Y! E. N: Epriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
8 Z& U3 s( r  B$ f, h9 Bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last% }# B4 _0 J, c/ n
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 Y1 ]$ x9 E1 `* s* s6 _5 ?8 B# D% U
1 A" P& e( T# l7 i! w, ~6 t
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ E( x8 H3 Q  `& l! E4 {, oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
" H* a- A! h. D$ xlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ R" _, }8 A3 _) Q6 v8 Xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
$ W1 ]  C: U* U: F$ O( [6 r- M3 Dwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, H& Y" \% o, ]pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
, e0 V/ c+ o2 D' {# l  P3 u9 S4 @) imaking a purchase.
* H! i9 y# D* D7 s7 O3 c& K9 f% r2 B  ]" A! r- l
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 m' p8 v2 X; S" Lmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. y5 U3 q% [& f
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, R$ x7 n6 W( p# L
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting8 ^; r. ]8 X; g: b  `
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown( w( g( H- ]/ N2 E) c' V
amenities.
9 ^5 U7 i$ e+ u6 \+ |
: n9 L" P# O5 [. e7 T4 P$ Z    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
$ o# `3 b3 I* m0 a  q0 sthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
& z) Y) w; C6 I( g6 |; _7 f$ kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has( S9 n) Z( ]# Q2 M/ V( G  ~
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been9 x0 Y+ _2 g, u7 {" y5 a) H8 l) T2 Y
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 d, f5 P$ n- V& L" O) X  Fresidence, rather than for investment.- G; g( s( H! W' Q8 T% R
6 p0 K- }; q/ d! n% S. A/ l; z3 c
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
* Z! E  X  \& p$ U, U$ c- I: n$ ]house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
, B8 v5 P" b( x' t( W; Y( Tin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
3 ]. N! P& c. Z3 ?8 J$ Y! wconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
" f  }$ G9 {8 y' P. c0 ~9 \rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' s4 y8 |+ m/ Lthe market.
  r4 i; D- R/ F9 f
; K, T) a: Y4 I( ^" a    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* {- p" _+ t$ \( s2 F4 X
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In3 l5 P& \" J' n! Y6 }7 D
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
/ H+ j. x& h; V. G( g3 [3 |! nmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- Z; D) {5 I  F) M) X2 O
to the shortage of available inventory.) N1 r, Z* w, o$ f

" F" r, v. y' o0 N7 Q4 @7 n! X( O    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
3 |( Z: p5 ?2 H2 D2 Ymomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( Q! v/ c/ e8 |7 z( `9 F, R8 Rvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses1 _3 K. A* u4 Y( v
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& G2 V4 j/ k2 F. l9 y6 Q
: U+ R9 I, t% N6 `+ f    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases2 h# q% B- q/ U' d
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low; }8 d% C8 b+ o3 `) b! V& M
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! [: K2 r# t; B, O: s
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
' C5 f, H& Y6 L* x5 P- Eprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* \; R2 m5 O0 q3 c9 s
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 m6 e  n& V, m# H2 n, Sbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
5 j) _+ j7 |7 @1 m' }

4 z8 u5 H* E# _' z- b    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
6 m5 U# T1 w' c) W: P4 {as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! _0 g, D2 Y# x  _7 e2 @remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,  {' B% n2 i/ J- ^8 O( I# }; Z
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" D  n# d4 z! A+ i. v2 R
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
' Y  i4 e" [( @0 Vin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 m5 Y) f4 V1 F; itowards the end of 2006.
   
# x! q  Z+ Z: x. _, r" ?# U" E% q
3 T6 C3 \4 w5 Z3 q3 `7 L2 [While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 H+ K% z( [7 P6 S3 y
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable3 f8 w5 J& ]% x
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ O; V% @1 P% c0 J3 M! @5 {group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to6 m7 \) C% q& C3 k; B
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added5 |0 v# h* ~+ z; w5 g) f% r* U
pressure on tight inventory levels.
0 W4 j# |0 h% C& @7 t4 p6 Y# j" ]5 U- ?  u
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 x  G0 }3 U3 t. Nfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ [$ g1 ^+ M# f1 J
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 @* n, O& \8 X# U/ z/ jwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching! W, `; e, [- p& Y0 W
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: Z: f3 S  U9 r

5 J+ {% G/ d( i( J, N" M    <<6 P2 x/ S8 ^8 ]; a7 ^9 N
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. C6 T$ _( C( V: h! e. ^1 d! r: D8 S. Y) `2 \6 n7 u. U) m: ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 X2 N" I& p4 f* ^                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
" `% D0 z, b* E2 t/ r9 }; ]! d& c& \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 v$ \6 f( s9 _8 I4 p
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q33 c/ t" s# V, N* ^) e" w
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average7 K' v4 s% e. p/ M  }2 H& ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! J8 \  D/ \% |/ l# }
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
4 q7 g6 r) V2 y. E9 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* A) C7 _: {% m$ S& q
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000& r# ]! d1 _4 Z- ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Y7 K4 i9 G5 c8 A2 U2 q    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0004 r* b" h1 b! m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ e2 ]2 K: f+ L! j% S: v" ?' ~$ a
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -  e) B: |1 U; g, H9 V6 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ?  L+ T- m/ p+ r, R" C5 k    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333% _8 m  I2 |6 v+ M. a5 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& e3 p) ~4 x; J4 Y, p    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5830 t% A! [. n. _. b9 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( }. n6 d! M- w, i5 L    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185$ P. f6 E! ^3 Z% O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 D" @0 x! R9 _6 j
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2503 M" A5 X& P5 r3 Z+ i4 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 r. G9 ~( e* j9 l" v% E8 V    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766, J+ t: x. Y. @/ F$ R; g: X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! d& h- M6 H. U/ n$ m2 E! P
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707$ R: P" ^9 O  i: S! K$ @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 m% Q; {4 P/ n
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500/ Q6 Z- V! q' Y" }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! |% e# E7 `. I9 W! E0 s: q    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3894 @& L8 Y; ?5 S! I$ z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  y3 d; o5 v& `; @2 c' R    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
8 c3 i4 W3 s* q3 ]! w  N5 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ v2 j# B/ V) F+ B
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500( z. e* g/ y* ?9 N6 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( O0 D9 {! D7 \: n& Y$ t    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000. k6 |/ t# f$ M. a6 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; P6 Z6 Q* D- p  B& s/ \$ k3 I9 w
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
( ]! R+ @) [8 B; P' r/ U- R+ M8 h2 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 x0 y3 N) X) B. t
5 Q; r' \: i* C2 s    -------------------------------------------------------------3 L* c$ A9 C; K
                               Standard Condominium
2 e2 T5 P) I7 u# j    -------------------------------------------------------------
" X1 j/ F( F; D% t. n) g9 C% [                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
1 u7 L0 r+ s7 Q# {, L    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change- s# p7 O- l7 |  v3 t# l9 I0 k. p
    -------------------------------------------------------------: c6 |& v# U* i) n4 Z+ M
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%6 y* t0 V; N2 b1 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" Z6 s" y7 G' w1 J; h    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%# G+ q& c7 P$ J- K# F/ l6 }3 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 O$ s. l7 l% ]    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
# ]! Z6 u: v0 H7 @$ X( n    -------------------------------------------------------------  }& L9 r2 ]  Q. H( G$ F7 H
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A6 i) O3 K. p  N2 M; z! i, f
    -------------------------------------------------------------' i6 m) l# {# q- f1 q9 O
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
4 \% o- t5 |* n4 L    -------------------------------------------------------------, `: s" V8 p: S# c5 D; C
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%$ r0 q! G3 Q5 ?7 _( f
    -------------------------------------------------------------; a# [( n" Y5 h1 l0 ^
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
' u5 d/ q* ]1 H1 H/ H" h" M    -------------------------------------------------------------; K7 p+ w: [/ ~2 N
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
8 P7 M. ]1 Z1 X' q3 x  o9 q) Q    -------------------------------------------------------------" E  c# q6 d2 H  j  d1 ~. |
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
/ y' J0 F: ~- X5 L    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 A+ ^) V5 s' ?2 i, i6 C3 _, [    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
0 O9 a! ~. z4 N2 T    -------------------------------------------------------------& _- L: Z! \  _1 [
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
+ @! C% d: h4 J9 A- U7 y4 B, R    -------------------------------------------------------------4 w6 x7 k% Q) N& q; `( U3 c' T
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
* S$ D) L/ Q4 e0 p3 d1 r1 `$ K    -------------------------------------------------------------! W/ ]0 }+ U5 @6 ^+ Z
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
5 @! v: U. o, N9 k$ n" C! r    -------------------------------------------------------------! M& O$ s8 f  g# y9 [, O" X. {6 Q
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%* d" U2 n( p+ r) ?& x
    -------------------------------------------------------------* I* f4 o( m0 Z' W4 a
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
- \5 D. M" H* ^    -------------------------------------------------------------/ }7 o1 L: Z& V$ G9 h
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%& g+ O! R. _# y5 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& L6 X, S& U' I) l8 }    >>& }  O" _3 ^$ T

$ w3 o0 e. D( i! \$ F; g! N    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined) D8 f. O: T* J- j/ Q, b
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' B% _$ Y; A$ G' t6 K, t0 |5 B& i' o8 F
John and Victoria.0 ~# i( @5 {9 E3 w
$ z. S1 g- t- {& @+ x
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& B6 l2 X7 K1 U1 h/ B: M6 e/ Y: \# Fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 m# ]2 _- [8 t, rhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release& q( N1 d! m2 m4 j, q; X  ]
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price6 G8 \. M& f  F6 q
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 Z9 d% m/ @& V& u, [6 @; W! gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
6 u4 D* r* r- l% q0 ]available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 @6 N0 C" l& N7 C1 m
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable  l0 z& m& ~& F* n7 h3 `) g) u
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on$ s$ E$ G$ l. {& b& N0 n
November 15, 2006.
/ h6 k: E6 m! L! ]    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of& O) E8 i: M: d
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge* t. ^. D: P* _. h+ |% W
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
  e- E0 {: O  l$ h! o; u' davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-29 11:12 , Processed in 0.129027 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表