 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
+ {; w( @8 J: l* a7 j- Q
8 H) l6 y+ {: G- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
) e. b* a% x( b2 e* i7 F
% g1 q$ {- r U C TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
1 I+ ~' G( D; [0 @0 g9 n) ]- k* lexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third& `4 j/ W$ ?+ M* C7 j
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic% ?3 N" A, B4 }) b4 E* i- n
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! r9 p! i9 t+ _ Vprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and% I8 V0 _$ S8 }
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
& c0 N( ^3 P' X: G3 |" }0 {* BQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal! ^* g: O6 D: q' s2 ]4 `2 I
LePage Real Estate Services.* r1 g- N+ ~) u9 ?) E
- c) g: I4 ^% j# }* l0 z- c
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- m4 c- q: m: `: C' Mare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
& ?% H3 w' y+ R ]& P/ p& Yconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and8 h9 z! q2 h8 S2 `; e3 P0 C9 f" f
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
- H+ y, F( J% J; V( g( a A7 n# nresidential real estate sector.. S' u4 T" [) M" a0 t9 ?% m% O
& |9 t. _$ r% d6 S. G, L Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation4 |8 g; ` d' [0 @
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)! P/ y4 ?8 s! H: G
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
! k! |. e5 {/ C(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3804 M$ g4 h" I. Y6 V6 n: T
(+13.2%).' f9 L2 h# {3 r$ f; \1 v
- y% o2 @0 Q f/ W$ {
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
5 y5 ~2 G6 V: J* D V. \- Wduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
# L$ ?& x5 f6 |4 ?; [frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
) B- H4 C# L( Y M: v6 [poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! D3 s7 C! a6 n. [7 M; e6 ^
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% _: m+ {% { Y& g"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
/ ~- I! v4 F+ s6 rwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% y. s2 G. t7 a% wbalanced market."
( J% Q4 ]& W5 Z; P4 g$ J' X9 a5 \( G! f, }4 {: N. P- a4 p
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
/ I% ]8 s% J" Q% mconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ [! `* Q, x/ ^. J1 l5 j! Gto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: B c+ N1 t1 I# d F9 d/ Z0 }throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core% q3 a5 I0 b- d- }6 G
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 j8 i7 M2 ]5 A+ Q0 g
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ n& c$ w( d: t2 abreaking price appreciations.( Q1 b; t. K; s& E
$ y6 P( _* _8 [8 X8 d Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 @# [2 i2 k3 ueconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
4 \) a. e# d5 j* @4 olargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
- V( o. c; Y: a2 q7 ?8 E: y# K0 R0 J6 I2 V2 r1 P
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
: W% V# R. p8 E3 C! ?5 v" _economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
+ w2 D% y- A, g/ aconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
, C( ^& r5 u- P5 _) p. islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
5 H7 t, i& s0 NIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( k/ L7 o- I- S1 m5 Z+ \
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of# `: _4 @6 N. O9 z/ ], n5 h9 S
price appreciation when compared with 2005.$ @0 h/ H0 I; r5 o
2 T- E* S* }) k% y* n7 M% a) ^
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing; ]2 V0 U6 }( r. n' C$ a
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
( k7 N$ i( Y$ V4 f8 }% {; tfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, _9 n6 X* K8 t8 V K9 ~
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
+ K# ^$ Z, ^! E+ z8 X+ o
. \7 I3 z+ L7 n N; A* j! F Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. M/ a( o7 d8 I$ j, s+ a9 AAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's; o* Q' q# T8 N( Y- d4 r& W1 I
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the; x6 M/ Z( W2 ]7 O
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
1 P- \( n, M* X9 q9 [. |affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ o r" |( \, ~/ ?0 `- h
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
, U5 Q! _! I* q/ a3 C) k! }. `aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization* H/ C, O- S- P2 B
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."9 F; x. [1 W" e- u4 h% v0 \! v4 ^
' j, ~0 u0 r1 ` ~# l r; \ <<
, O2 B' P- E! g REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* O7 O# j( v7 k, t7 g) P >>' ?2 S9 t. u$ {1 g) m! Y; e# r, E
9 c1 ^3 ]; G: g8 o8 ~. { Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* t% ?$ E: `, f1 R! }Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate3 a) B3 J7 ^' u/ l% ~
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time& D' v2 Y" V& t0 f o/ a
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! n" D4 g% E' x& S) [5 |
renovations.
6 E d) R- y8 B5 c9 `3 d' R! b+ s& b7 a6 H1 |$ Z' W" Z6 `
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight6 j; F$ |5 [# h
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
! {" j: O9 `! W* P7 Icompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 m1 S8 `/ Z6 R" W) NSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
6 [6 P( j( _' {# C: D, W/ c
5 H7 [* w7 e& i2 C$ N6 M The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
" e" n: c9 v7 c# ]slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
- R5 ^, y# K# |quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& l3 A; q$ j" Q7 L$ J7 f& P7 d
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
3 A, G$ _: O% L. L( t. P3 `9 Mto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 h3 Y: n. E4 s0 i* m6 O
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.( W5 t5 o1 |$ Z0 s- g
5 C, j" W! j; g8 t" [* d7 A In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced( ]3 q8 U6 L3 g2 f, f U- B
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
# m8 D" I! G9 q1 L* q8 [0 \homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 J: z }3 ^( S6 ]
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( ]7 t1 r# o( O. Y X
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
7 u& x- X5 `; f( u! o3 s0 f8 h* wbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
+ v7 q7 k" H2 R0 y, R, Y
& O" N+ _5 i j( u0 k2 [ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly( t1 z1 D3 H0 m B
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( _: ?- [- F+ W3 x3 gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' R* o6 G" y+ F# S9 b( E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ a: r0 e4 y8 Rfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 W; e- }% r" E: `
( N; o: J z/ a
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 P9 i1 c$ d$ s0 l2 [- Vprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory3 g# T% m+ T9 g& ~! r
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ l: G# Q+ t+ d1 { L) A" O5 T; zfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 V; A y" O2 Hwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the- _8 ^. J+ K- ]5 [7 Z
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before- j6 R$ h" r* P/ @# H
making a purchase.
5 `% b6 w0 B% u6 e1 ]" m
# Q p5 A- M- y. U* e; S Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
2 i. A, w O# q9 Fmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong, |" U$ f; j+ b3 n' M( c6 W
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 H I; Y2 d( E* M
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting% y" ^. {4 N- o7 z O t3 I* y
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown+ w" ~) i. B) U' q! u
amenities.6 Y' X* Z" P, @8 Z0 H: M) r4 K5 K
# u5 j. }8 b1 x E3 A The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
9 M' m$ D X' zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand* Q9 h5 h7 ?% Q) Q
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
; p u: l% B8 v. W# zcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been, |1 w, O- q, P0 }% H" g
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
! J7 }! A+ d4 u2 A9 n: r* g8 g7 Dresidence, rather than for investment.3 ] U+ C# N8 y- P' }1 h
! J3 I& A, D) Z k" u/ ` The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
, x' w j) j3 Y# G6 [house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
7 P2 W0 ]- M4 {. c% iin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
5 [9 E" ^. t% T; Cconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ K* j9 {; Q" ], q7 arate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter6 l4 U* u" v' Q. ?
the market.
5 c& h& ?% w- P" z# T/ j v" m- s- g, A3 R
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ L3 m, A7 W) F/ G" yJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
7 [% [2 r( d/ X |' p/ d* nAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring, M* l& B7 I* W' y% |
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due4 j# m! F% R$ R1 H) @3 _
to the shortage of available inventory.- ]. L/ E1 _. L. l/ V
& b; G7 C) j( S4 b: Z# L Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its/ ?; B1 N! D$ i
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( H2 ^* x: w. C( I9 A0 R+ k' vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
1 S( E5 s9 ~4 xstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.1 _4 q( _0 K1 }- f
5 r! c t7 r% M4 G
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
9 j: G5 M+ K% K; C- e! R4 ein the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low' w8 A+ ^% ?9 I* }
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 Y5 L9 G; V: F1 kpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring4 b) y6 }- S# F. v0 y9 M3 L
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer: S, J$ o+ T' f/ B! f, R
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! m7 i1 g5 j, I; G6 R
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.1 x7 N- I7 F" k8 ? Y
/ Q7 T% H# R2 C* ]. G# K
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 U! z. p! [3 Pas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton* M# R# E2 ], N5 ^! k! b2 R& T
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 u/ D g5 {) K1 d) j
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices. j$ _$ i% V7 j
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
" n1 ~& d, [5 p( |! T/ l5 i" p+ K' ^in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
5 D' f, @8 u i! `0 Ltowards the end of 2006.
& I+ D' I7 p6 d3 e0 F2 k Y0 c( [5 ~8 x9 `; p
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of/ ~& c3 |4 H2 q% ~- n j' X2 H
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 O0 X5 S) y/ \$ q/ t) tto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
. {5 U. { S4 _3 @group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to8 C) w3 J5 K7 }/ }6 i& H
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 g& {' x& R* z/ |% ?/ V# x
pressure on tight inventory levels.
7 M+ R4 N! A& w/ _' ]+ Z y6 k: Q1 z8 @: r6 q, O
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 G g( B8 `" f5 n, N7 X+ b5 z: ffundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
3 U4 a# {; X) Zinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;) L0 X4 o' K2 Z; n! N( g% d
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
3 T: d/ I: P) X/ Z1 Q$ I( Q4 g2 Kfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 e, C& B8 e- K$ d" g1 v+ b. Q3 B$ ^, G2 }" W: O' t
<<
" {5 Q2 J6 z$ _) Z+ q) E' L" H Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006& E2 v3 t' F4 y ^2 p
6 r% q, R$ }: s9 P4 Q- B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |5 _& z4 n' l- D; W+ ^8 \% ?
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
2 Q5 S+ K! A2 |% w% H+ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( T1 a* k$ @' \6 R: o9 G 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3; H* \! B# K" L+ O' B
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
/ n4 @! |8 A3 n! O X' k3 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------: ^2 H! |6 h7 `3 f
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
' v6 n8 A* g1 m! a8 U ------------------------------------------------------------------------- j# w5 Q/ t! X6 P h0 n1 h7 Y
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
/ l4 K- E# l: F0 \6 k1 p# U: r -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Y3 q4 P7 D% b& n( \4 y2 G% L: F
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000% |0 h# ~) [! \& [4 H2 p" z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 ^6 Z. b* M; H; n( A Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -7 q* R) }9 g4 l0 U- J* {% C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% C: Z% F% S" ~7 I! T
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
- h9 f% e2 R3 C/ Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------) r. c! Q2 c0 k/ }
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583. f0 y r* R# [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" D3 f/ M) I/ }% ], O- Y Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1856 b! s* b, D4 H3 e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( D# K) W O) H% i* H$ U1 X! x Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
& t$ [% B% w$ @4 I' a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ o* r( W3 Q1 O" w ~! @( g Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766 G/ K) S: {9 }$ @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
d2 s( L8 N( ^1 p& j5 I5 r3 d Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707; M# H8 I" [5 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# y6 e1 k* U& D* O+ Y
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
% {% j3 i/ i$ g) N- m- k -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 W, Y% L$ R2 u# A4 e3 p) Q8 b
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
% _( U c c& { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' T/ g, Q0 r1 s Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714% i: S+ J( s% j* F6 B7 }. M( S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& ?2 k2 X' J5 W$ v; E
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
! ?- r( D8 M" c7 u9 D$ b( O2 q- A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ?# z5 J5 g$ p, s- J Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000+ l# m$ m. `* {8 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- k3 V: ?+ W8 N/ M3 [$ c2 k, ^
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
% c6 Y: y+ g" X4 C3 A* k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 N& c! a, b" Y+ X
t- w8 H5 T% X5 j -------------------------------------------------------------' y1 A; o5 Y# E7 G# S S2 g; A% p
Standard Condominium2 @* }# I5 w, U$ e' C7 G j
-------------------------------------------------------------( s: E9 ]% x5 [3 \
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo* W' e/ n% @. z, Q7 ^+ A9 W. O
Market % Change Average Average % Change3 }) U) R% H! `1 n4 n) J- j$ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 s+ Z. _" C) V; t+ W3 `4 Q Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%" E2 [! |4 B0 u1 M6 w! z
-------------------------------------------------------------
. R3 v4 [% a0 A Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
4 @. F8 W1 x0 ~; m3 @ -------------------------------------------------------------! J9 w" k' u3 v) h n- H3 `
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A5 ]' H$ u! r( Z$ [# y; `# I3 v
-------------------------------------------------------------: ? L. |8 a( g, S
Saint John N/A - - N/A
' V' [" R3 ^0 p7 Q7 ?/ }5 i% H -------------------------------------------------------------
' n+ I8 M: D: U% D+ x! U8 u5 i St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
7 J e% i% r& D* D -------------------------------------------------------------# M- ^. E, s0 q; n
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%+ D! s. g. }0 x h8 @5 l5 O1 l
-------------------------------------------------------------5 e! h# J! C- ?+ a7 R" T/ Z
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
" J- p1 ^2 \ }7 H$ t/ c -------------------------------------------------------------
- f& a! [. Q* e Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
j9 Y3 j0 f, L. w -------------------------------------------------------------
! X N* G, D% r0 @" v7 v Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%8 y% s9 w" O0 V7 Z9 o! O* y8 z9 [
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 k/ e! l& \7 v, I Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
0 j% W% y' p6 c; {* O9 M -------------------------------------------------------------
9 ~% k4 L9 a. f# J Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
2 [" l4 _9 H# g' T% C7 N. ]0 Q* M -------------------------------------------------------------
7 b1 ^' y% W+ R$ M* X5 E* q9 e; B+ { Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%% U% Z0 q) a/ _( K* {
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 S% C8 {0 @9 v) N Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
' Y3 _6 g* x% b/ V9 n3 G; \ -------------------------------------------------------------, M- P. `2 D. B+ y( S6 k. e, o
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%7 _& @( M' K# B- O9 D& C" E% c1 r
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 W$ z: C" I4 }% J8 ]: {/ D; | Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
2 q9 H3 s& P+ m' | -------------------------------------------------------------! U4 N4 \, V# `" N* t
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
* R' ^0 B {, S% A0 u8 M -------------------------------------------------------------3 s$ w) S2 V- V, S
>>
- a$ ^4 x9 ?9 r% g5 g: i0 s2 f9 u6 o/ i+ G+ G# U
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# z# o f7 }; S* L+ Q; ] v6 Jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
9 q( q+ S/ B) a- qJohn and Victoria.' M" o" ^8 R+ M% a0 _2 y: k
( [, f) Q: E( u
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( E, S7 k3 N' c0 B! e
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of+ W# e& G) j4 M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release4 c3 y- v* ^8 c' I% S* d
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price! S% i* i8 \' [$ j7 f7 u
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
2 @, A3 j5 H; n$ H: r7 }across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is8 i" G z# A% Y. {
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current( s7 J* e" r' D! X& M& u$ ~7 s
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
& o7 f/ W- n: Yversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on1 @) f8 ]# D( C# y
November 15, 2006.
3 P' E# \; U% n. ^. f: F Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# ?" ?5 E% p! N, z) r! _( v1 ?
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
4 o( f; W$ ?0 X1 A; ?provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 K, `( N4 y7 u4 u+ \, pavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|