 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
; b' `: |" z8 l7 F1 u2 N( K
! _: g2 [* `! f! X% Z7 j1 B$ R" v5 {2 K( @* E" _- ]
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
9 _; l( T/ E% H: XRalph Klein
7 j3 ]" o Y4 X5 ]7 v
- p0 c K/ b/ g5 j5 H5 h# H我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!; _5 ]& c( S7 u5 w* P+ ?6 g( c
5 W/ K, ^# s$ f0 g+ Z所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。' } q+ U+ n: [2 ?
- o0 g3 p+ r& g! Y1 `: J; B7 V9 R8 X# o9 a% o, w
) G7 J" k. p$ G2 C8 k6 g
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades* E7 G6 a* [3 P
Historic Alberta budget balances:5 v* A6 }8 c" H
& o3 m: V4 T) }* U3 {9 e3 V* `
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus* l0 q5 @5 n' Y1 t5 Q
- K5 S# y8 R& v9 E7 q1 v5 D
1982-83: $796 million deficit
( {8 R5 r0 c6 p! d9 L
* p; S4 K9 i/ t6 W1983-84: $129 million surplus
" e2 r+ i6 \- ^5 x* t/ N, ]. |" o/ Z+ s8 E2 u& u: Y- [
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
+ Q1 |# c7 [- F) l* |+ `: S5 I. X5 I& S0 N) N9 {8 V1 F6 } ?
1985-86: $761 million deficit
g' c; t0 w. y( Q6 M+ k- e
3 u1 E, j; ~3 x! U5 j1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
5 ]9 \+ e' q H" t7 Y+ a2 J
- u! A2 ^# g/ d+ O# w8 N3 u3 `& `1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit7 F0 P0 A' F0 n( [- e8 C9 j2 Z1 X
7 m* T9 F* _% C( V0 v1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit9 z5 x& `% x% d- p$ w0 S
. b9 q& S; y, r8 u1 {, S1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
/ c Z( @- s x2 P
" c$ n& h% t6 `3 Z0 z1 q3 B" |1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit6 M5 O. \7 y' G( u' h, D$ }8 d
6 l% W. n( r5 o+ g; h, \" Q
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit4 o1 m; \) d+ Q j! Z. s1 W+ J
" d. Z# s0 }4 C1 j5 N! L$ n; Z1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
c1 b9 n5 ^* X. l8 I& z* [, r8 W- P: h7 j0 o( W, _
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
4 _" H! y0 \; s% G
$ s6 a0 l6 T1 _4 }4 |( w; }! B# ^1994-95: $938 million surplus/ i! F1 v f! z
" |* h5 R6 ^7 p3 e1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
$ o$ P6 s: [6 E1 |9 t+ t; B( ~+ |4 G0 O' J
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus# n. m% w+ w8 {0 X" b q
' g! J1 l" E: ~2 J9 N
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus0 K2 Q* z0 U' f$ b& F+ n* K0 \- H
' A4 U! Z% x: x5 X! ]" K: g0 C1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
1 ?( z' Z" }3 I* B6 \
$ O( z& {+ p/ U' Y' J1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
. Z2 S7 B6 ~! e0 H
1 l% W# k4 N% Q7 {) V4 A2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
' D3 ]' d1 _4 o/ n2 q! c
& x! x' M6 ^+ p/ F0 ^2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
( h; @4 E4 E+ ^, O% b4 m+ b5 r" Y- s6 I3 _$ s( m. ?0 F
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
6 G' I" ^' C+ o3 ~0 H M
, `: B7 w& S; w8 X. ~2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus5 |4 Q9 D* \6 g2 b6 P9 {
3 g. ~0 a+ p% A" F2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
2 O- g$ X! p2 W! ], m+ k$ u9 L) }8 ^- c: d* K
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
5 }7 W0 B4 |: y. I( Y' n5 Y0 ^0 t6 E9 L) x
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
! _! w1 v/ K0 V2 Y1 b9 ~8 X
# i; [ u0 I% J; O3 ?0 |3 B2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus- U9 d; t% l) L' R2 [5 |: p
0 U. h+ S2 ], W% W; q3 Z$ D2008-09: $852 million deficit0 V$ }1 ^8 M! M- G, F* s- s! Q
: z* M6 Y8 N2 k4 ]# s2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
) f+ Y* T" M) c$ `0 u2 B @# S* \! d; Q+ K
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
0 I3 `0 V9 X+ B/ w
$ x6 B( J, J" M! k8 B) r. D! L( b2011-12: $23 million deficit
% Z, P& ]; |; ^+ x' ]" q3 p9 m/ v t9 ?4 w
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit4 s) G- M" _! C% {% U! j$ L, `! S
; M4 n, v ]% h2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|