 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
& ~, j- V+ l [9 _, b- dpeterpan 发表于 2015-10-5 12:38# F* e9 b4 U4 R3 V4 M# y5 Z$ c& j
1. 不行就不行呗,大家也没指望ndp能平衡预算,但吹牛画饼就不好了吧?
+ z5 g3 A3 c, p! K4 O5 C$ ]! Y1 R2. 我之前也说过了,不要老拿低油 ... $ F% i1 g# G) ?1 u
% P# g7 V q! }1 |: h4 m! |你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
_9 X1 M# j+ Z$ {Ralph Klein
, W P; i6 R+ [0 X# D7 C: K
; A! K/ c; z' W- T: G我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!3 H% q/ a; b: c# n7 g
* x; Z8 L4 m# ?9 G" W# d
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。 \4 v/ f/ h5 [+ D6 J$ j
F4 R# \( c% Q! w/ A$ ~
# m5 d/ k/ b k) W/ ?; [
0 _; Z7 g( ]- dhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
5 D& M# P% [2 c, ?; CHistoric Alberta budget balances:
. a1 T; p; i: S* J% T' n% l' k6 u$ g6 F
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
4 ^* h$ N9 R8 q; j2 p; E+ g5 v4 z: m6 K j" Y7 T. O+ ^; p3 d: @
1982-83: $796 million deficit' `1 `% o) S; T' s. p; ~
* z! I. v N8 |. |1983-84: $129 million surplus
* D( z S( l+ d1 t; D U1 f ^) U9 _2 N3 E! Y i9 W/ {7 x3 |
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
/ H' I& T; r: w+ i7 p8 n! M6 }6 ^$ N" [- k2 Q* @
1985-86: $761 million deficit7 c, V7 D) }# w8 }
# H9 }# W6 ~ H0 G/ v1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
" u, V& l8 U7 ~* [, _% o4 P1 J7 |2 K- b5 x* {; o0 S
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit9 Y& `$ F1 P2 y5 P4 Z
# f0 f/ T7 c8 p% H1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
; s, v+ g5 \% o* f4 x5 {$ e# a- U4 z% f7 a6 I+ w, ?
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit- b* ?% R2 n3 q F
$ K' s* k: w3 U
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
4 d0 j" X1 N9 R& C6 S) f
) T2 J% @' w$ a1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
, R% R O, q: R; Q
$ A- e1 p9 n( r) w; f: P8 R: I1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit! k- Y/ x1 H+ D% j
& D4 m6 `6 E* S/ e8 b) {1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit1 ?8 I5 K s9 m7 M0 x3 j4 b+ A
2 \8 _9 S, @# g: P* u& }5 L. c4 O1994-95: $938 million surplus& x9 ~- M9 I& C5 U
+ b" C B+ e( C2 F8 g
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
. c* g9 p, ?5 X& C4 Z
! j7 C) R9 ~6 l# u1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus2 q, t! V4 b2 \$ Z! c9 j
- D9 N2 C. L4 Y- e( s( N- z: I& ?
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus" l* b; f3 Z& x' ^. W9 T3 P; A
# O3 h; ^% n6 I: A" p, v( ]) X4 Z
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus' n, f. x$ H, Z. [' X A) o' v
t4 Y% x8 ], l& E
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus# _! J9 r" K+ z6 g
8 c1 `' n. R" G6 Y! m# u+ H
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus! X3 i' X6 T% M& D* b
5 O) K: ^! Q! D# D8 X. x2 U5 o2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus% {: N! j2 z9 a& r0 T" P
' p0 G, K. G8 x/ O2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
; t* x& K5 f; C) a+ S0 T6 {- q' Z0 V
+ _* X2 j, c8 {/ @8 {2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus3 n# I7 t0 J' w0 f. v/ @
7 O- s o4 n, _/ c
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
7 s: Q! E& T( ^5 G, F8 V5 `8 O( f
* r1 B2 L" b6 n2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus) ^, Z1 n/ [/ o. u' }
- [) ?7 e. v! B8 f2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus A1 U$ P/ |1 K4 G
, q o6 g! Z; ^9 }
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
' m `4 K- ^) b- ~2 f5 A0 G' [) D/ }
2008-09: $852 million deficit( g0 U' V2 F0 r+ I2 X6 r# X
9 F% ^# J3 K$ e2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit9 r# @9 i, w- H/ J) M! _
6 R% j# P7 |; m8 j& w4 W3 {
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit1 g" Q% ~3 _) M/ {; l
7 x4 G7 G5 n2 U
2011-12: $23 million deficit
4 |& h& Q" M! Q* R
; L1 Q: x3 d! p8 t. v1 _2 K2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
2 I9 Z: l6 F' g0 J( q* k* T
; _) ]9 D3 A- _( k$ q2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|