 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
$ z4 d F/ x4 L! m/ {
! K& k, J6 I. w4 r9 \4 m+ ~0 \
" s* w! s2 k" i) x1 hIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
+ Z8 P. q; C, O" f. T" L0 Q" Q9 b7 T# k! l! w% O% @
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03; K4 Z; g6 h. G0 }" K3 `% M
* U* Q# |( q f; W0 E) N) E
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
6 i5 O d! {. }: l1 S9 r7 j# d: _* s- V! J& G8 C* @4 u h
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) - h( q" M; V0 b5 k
|
|