Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
4 k* U& L; _$ W; d2 b0 x( n
" W0 L& I! g3 [Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

- y" [# ]& Y+ Z# @4 s2 L3 k, i& kLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
  B, y: V' q# |9 ~* I
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
* m4 W1 k8 U; D+ p( G9 l
2 E; @+ P* t! _# v; `# [- e' X6 g
" |1 e# i! V, aIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
/ B0 B4 ?- A: V0 V/ n8 G0 J& o: N& rSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
" H# y4 }, R+ gNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

# N, N2 ~* y" JIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

, ?( U7 j: K6 [1 H Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
" m& b: _1 }6 q* @: ]/ c- w2 w8 ~Boston  20.5 30.2
6 X8 D1 ~2 }" WSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
3 H5 q# i% x( q+ o. C' J' g7 J, M6 eLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
7 c- i+ |# I& CSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

. d! Z% ~. f' |# h$ u

5 }/ H9 z( d' P8 WIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

1 a6 S( ]* V& @0 N2 |
  ]( j( b5 z7 v! e; tFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
. ?# V: u% |( ~9 V; A6 D  V
it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

1 D. W6 o' \) V# `& L0 b[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]