Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
' x4 k2 ]- U/ n; }+ F0 f
$ P1 L0 U8 M0 G4 a! p7 s9 o* t) o
3 F. V# b' h) ?7 T" I, X0 u: {In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
0 b/ a, E; v% z' O
1 O8 P( R+ m. l! v2 q8 l' PSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
' T: b3 Q! G6 Y% YSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
6 ?8 F% y. G: k% e4 l0 G. WNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

$ K8 ]0 H& q4 @$ LIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
# |# t: H% `- i, J7 u2 X, C
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
) P. [, ~+ Z& g: H, T( B* a+ N
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
8 s  W) J. Y3 v( n+ z' Q2 o# D0 P2 V" mSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
4 ^# h' ?9 c% G. RLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
! e3 B+ W8 j  ?1 cChicago  17.2 20.8
& ]. C& D# P5 w6 m6 \5 K7 HWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

4 ^% M' a" t# R. w) p
7 z9 W9 R, }$ n$ d: o" ]! V
" P; m6 d; {7 R' h4 T$ _  mIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

+ l$ X( D3 ^0 ^* r
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
# R" Z$ @& T8 F- K3 o( q; L9 N
it would be a good reference.

: U! m$ [5 @' h7 P8 Q$ B! othanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

3 B% Y9 N$ O# g7 V( j[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]