Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
+ W# P$ k& D( TLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
! ~. P, b5 `% D+ A! T: H
. Z$ Q6 q$ f6 E* J4 G9 l" p. Y1 PLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
! D- e9 @6 V- u- N+ ?6 Q
* e. Z. f  n( Q: KTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

0 U; B1 m- d7 K. P0 ]/ K6 m; P
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
  i' x  z1 L1 W$ O
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
( ]$ ^$ y  R: `1 q3 Y% Z# V: C' cNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
- d7 ~) |' H+ m0 N! }" o5 AYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
6 l0 h. \( }( i# ]
1 ?; c! M2 ]0 sIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
) o) }  w+ ~" J' F7 m) a: K
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
) c, _3 P3 y  G9 Z+ R8 R4 ^Seattle  20.4 25
& g" t+ \! `1 H4 [( Q9 e  ^Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
8 v8 K+ p- P& `' E( e  x# TChicago  17.2 20.8
* Y4 G7 \# t; U4 HWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
0 f! T+ _: j* n$ @) q. J' ~# r3 Q


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
  `/ b5 v, B. n$ N' ^* u
5 @' Z6 B6 z" }2 p' ?5 `' ^
1 q9 G3 J* z6 L# ^9 v: ZFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

/ J; b. ~. q: P2 }7 |/ Vit would be a good reference.
7 y' t7 [) I. C
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
( K" B; s1 }+ I7 _/ o& [
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]