Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
% ]4 U9 j+ T" pLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
% V: p" Z- m3 G5 u' X( P* z
8 u, z5 G3 W9 z4 INot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

$ W# f$ `2 x, c) L( I9 z2 xLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


; h( s8 ]1 T8 H% w! D8 e, T# S; FIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
: S2 y' V( _$ e' a( Q: ~5 o
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
6 |  R) c0 q& @* t! q7 \+ [New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
  D2 Q$ X- s) U% \You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
* s* e4 z6 y8 v5 k Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
* z, j2 q9 P" h0 RSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
2 @" E7 z3 R  i$ bWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
( h- O# X. J- {6 e. Z, n
  D! i' s7 R) m' O. A% r
7 I! z* t/ w/ p" c
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

; }; Z3 ^, f" _
; Z9 r- X8 S0 z1 rFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
6 @4 ?9 L; Z; c% a5 U! |7 P' k
it would be a good reference.

/ O: u% @$ M7 B  Q) gthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
2 d  o& |$ L& ~: L
3 Y0 \1 q+ l" u# D[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]