Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

8 j/ ]5 P( e& \Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
7 T$ q2 g5 P% U; y, m4 `9 @
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

$ w0 ^, a( |% qTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

7 w8 y: Y- I2 l. D& j
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
( D. t4 c( J* m; L+ T2 [% p/ b4 |, U
( I2 ]! A& ?; S0 P# \+ @" @San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
, y* V# f( D2 y; g& n# \You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
  F5 ^0 q; Y- F, `
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
1 g  d- ^' I* K
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
( h& C) s6 k, R5 W: {5 Q Avg. 1988-2000 2001
$ s) y7 x  ?* m! |4 T0 J% HBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
, e$ v! Y. G1 }9 |" lSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
7 V# L' w' I2 Y+ W( R5 n, LLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
" j% e. x- V; G0 ]0 \0 }* HSeattle  20.4 25
2 u, {* |4 g: wDenver  17.7 23.7
% K. g8 f$ S& A' B4 I' B# Q  INew York  21.2 22.5
$ n2 ?. e' C2 v6 C9 |1 LChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



( A$ a4 P1 ~+ T3 p+ ^: x& P1 RIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
9 n) Y4 n! W$ Z4 `/ J( U3 P
1 v" ]; r" R# _6 a/ J
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

4 _4 W$ q  ~* b" g9 Nit would be a good reference.

( _7 X+ N( U+ D* }2 r. T8 `thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
5 U$ h! g# e  @4 P6 Q5 ]
4 S% P3 L4 r; l; o* m% h1 @[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]