埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1834|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters: 3 F6 j0 Z( R. I# D
6 q8 E( l' l3 s' ^7 D
Despite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat + F( U+ }4 l* E5 V$ j* D: O
    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US: ?" h8 ?) U" ?' w$ z. y7 ^* Y' I; [
commercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern
; o6 r1 w# j/ m, \9 b* S2 O- `as the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging* P& s+ v/ X8 v
Trends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
  w: z& d9 }( l: ~7 wand the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more
9 E  u  a/ P' _upbeat.: u/ |0 u' v2 u; I# L
    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded  o! h- u2 g) K1 W- \6 T8 a3 U8 q
annual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects
4 B% U4 g/ n9 \- j! vinterviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real* ^) g6 W- ^/ O2 m
estate experts, including investors, developers, property company4 Z: J# }' G* T% g
representatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.
" A# m* M# g4 [( U( W( X6 GOther versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world9 C4 D4 \) r, R( @' Y; j* ]( H. S
including Asia Pacific and Europe.3 U7 c! a" x+ _- n3 P0 \, {3 Z
    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian, X: [1 ?3 k4 U7 Y, U3 y4 C7 U* |
Real Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment
, v6 E3 Y: M3 u" kenvironment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to& }0 Z3 e7 z# z9 G+ P0 I- n! M1 |5 p) W
be avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record
+ u5 K" @% P/ Dhighs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."$ S% ~& ~9 v2 H4 i
    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the. M8 M% T4 U3 R, I( u: b& `
border will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game
. q$ h9 _, r* h+ ~* p  |speculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey) i' ]  d) e1 l; j: O: _: v
remain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US! W& d3 D1 [/ |; V5 m( b9 r
correction. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be  F8 Q, c, c" [2 F! V- A
very good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.
8 ?1 X! N! h# U' p# O# B. x1 ^: T    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian8 A& D/ L; ]# X- Z# O1 C( }
respondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by. |! z! J0 V5 ]/ x- y
commercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land
5 @/ x* I1 X+ X# Ddevelopment. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country
# w+ u, H/ V- ]! E( V9 W$ ^6 p8 |especially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating
4 H, _# m! y( w4 P: q) Tdevelopment prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The$ {% @- P& l: k: b$ q. V* P
residential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to
6 u8 I& ]* M- K/ H; o) L! u+ ztake a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and: R: x! ^! j. S2 a# h! G8 `1 h3 {
single-family housing looks overpriced.
$ P: K& x: S6 t% W8 [; _/ F    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with
8 E. ~: }8 T, a+ A) Q& _tenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian2 ^# o2 R3 t! D# Y8 h  ]  O, U
metropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push4 g9 \7 w6 r. M* p
higher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting
- \5 O% R6 w. w4 A5 c1 `/ ~new development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,8 ?( k' X3 t( ?8 L; t0 Q8 z
and most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental
& i% o! f8 h8 R. i  Z) Y/ Qapartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary
/ J9 c3 w! n. ^/ ^- Dwestern cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing5 U  i& v5 `" q; x7 P, c! f
shortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into
& l3 D( a" Q# ^0 a- ithe energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development
' A! Z! S. l+ B) R2 nin other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.
5 _1 C' U  B% u  n; \. X
  ~' B/ `& d6 o' b& g# _( r    Canadian Markets to Watch
! _  f- ?( m+ T3 y" P# z, G
7 s( P! z. p9 U+ S! W  d6 G0 o    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central/ f  e+ h7 m8 K1 j2 v
cities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour2 U: @3 @3 r# \6 O0 _# _
neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back
" U# c' v2 `: Q4 einto the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in2 j* O) }$ r! F+ d  [
downtown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical
# N8 Y, H: _# l7 T. d- b2 R: o4 vprojects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out/ L& x/ `- H: y2 d
west - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment
# g+ v+ J* _$ wprospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain4 e! o* B7 S/ t' m
whether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.7 g1 a, R- T5 b
Toronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high
4 B1 k7 U9 B5 P0 t: e* i' h$ pratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.# {, ^4 l! |! {8 m: J# e1 i2 Q

: g4 u* e$ J! Q6 v    Calgary/Edmonton
1 V- d- t% f7 h( d  r& y, }
7 Q' Z4 W1 e: F' ?8 D    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one7 j- R- u4 i; \' g% ^- l
boomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a
0 d/ o. j) v0 I$ K' E& `# U& t9 hbuy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,
1 e# w( v: b2 B. U6 m2 h, u3 J48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.' y6 a" t8 }+ W2 J& Y( |
Furthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale
. s5 J3 b% S. p" Q0 yHomebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the
9 E1 O- y) J  B: X+ d4 ECalgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays
+ d. [- z0 u" u, E  Istrong, this market will continue to do well.% e/ w) P, g7 s: A0 q; a* [% k/ S

' m! A1 Y  z0 [, C3 r% N    Vancouver! u% N5 T2 d6 i- U- S

/ N6 d" i3 I, L( V: b5 q5 \    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is6 [/ ^  ?% X5 D2 }2 H9 O3 R8 J
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous
. K4 b, t( m; H: P# m" m3 Z6 Y# {* Lreal estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the6 ^5 k- {2 W6 g9 S  m
market is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a
, j7 M9 `0 K& ^, V. Hgrowth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy
+ @5 ]9 X# d( Z% ^* _$ v) O) rrecommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%0 E# B  a2 I8 V2 ~
for Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%- h/ @' F; \5 r4 R% N
for Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very
9 Y6 ]$ _0 n$ P6 J! Egood mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.+ g/ X0 X* L0 a; x4 ?+ [, i
/ F, |0 {9 ?. m& ?/ w
    Toronto. e" L7 G3 Z/ D& L% Z0 b4 X
- e/ f1 D1 x6 [" q. I1 [/ ?
    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and5 _6 \  c; z" k8 N5 W3 {' l
manufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is
  }/ v( a* P" ~1 Y3 I* H/ v) G; m6 S6 ]relatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing
3 _: ]8 ?* F) D6 ?! C: {# ^1 uindustries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.+ [5 w' Q; w+ }* v
Three new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square
, j8 s3 x5 D  {' t& sfeet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and
+ e4 k& C  \+ MApartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.
8 |6 M' N/ Z* z2 }! \% M* ^: P# b2 V* `
    Montreal, b9 M" |) _% I2 V! Q: u+ F2 b

; U0 Q% E( h, G! `$ Z6 |    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall. y  @4 c7 y3 m7 Z6 L
growth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up* k5 P/ Q4 p3 [9 t  T6 {
shop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in
* l- `3 A# |; ]' y0 ]Canada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate
; u  x1 I1 X: v9 }! R6 Vsectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors  L! o. i0 I4 ~1 A$ n5 v1 v; E( s
higher as a "hold" recommendation.1 s$ X% ]  W) K7 F- h" S" Y
, Q' u4 R6 w4 R# {
    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years' L3 M6 v+ V1 T% ^, n6 |
include a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy
" Z3 ?/ U* s' ~* {* H/ l+ gmarkets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos
7 O% B6 K# n% o# N' f: X: z- enear subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest# u* k' b  o) [: u& {" q
overseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current
5 E+ u# }, n/ F1 G$ ^& _prices."5 N/ |: p/ t- z
    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at# i1 c, i' n& W8 o
www.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre.
( C3 w' Z( q: L) ~, D6 i
2 ~! V: S( q) G5 n5 h    About PricewaterhouseCoopers, a- _! S7 G3 V
. Z9 O- M  Y2 a: ~( K7 \+ y
    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,8 Y$ Z+ L/ V, m) ^
tax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its* Y7 w1 h" H9 {
clients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries
& B0 j, d& J2 Q6 {across our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop
0 c- I  \' ?3 q0 U2 W) ufresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of
$ ?  p2 h, Y& D* |excellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its
1 u+ z8 ^; v" I, @. |9 v! Wrelated entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the
: f2 }+ v; w. C- c8 ?country.7 Y" q$ K( m1 U2 B7 T
    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario
* W$ n6 D4 M9 A3 Olimited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
" t: b- `2 v2 c# `  cPricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
. @& U# n8 \) aeach of which is a separate and independent legal entity.$ w* n+ V  H# \
+ Z- X; D5 K" w
    About the Urban Land Institute+ M8 k, {. a7 G9 \8 ~8 S- U
4 M, J5 w: z/ F' ]; U
    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and9 c  M, i# q2 V: z! u
research institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide
; V( U0 q: A, i1 g' {9 ~0 jleadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating- ~0 r& A& p& ]+ {3 g3 z5 r8 f; u+ q
thriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more% K' _/ l; E% q1 b, {. C# q
than 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development
$ D* `9 \$ G4 j+ n" @9 Zdisciplines.7 h( m! j4 @8 i8 }8 d
    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.
- P+ o) n  n& B6 n) ^With nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District
( {! S2 u/ a. C0 y$ q/ m! x+ SCouncil was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is
$ c5 h  L8 z: nnow being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
* t' M# L1 B/ Y# bhosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,9 F% o! x5 x! l& z. u
2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake! E) k) u  r& F% a) I2 E
Hutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,
# k  k1 D# ?" c/ r- ?4 _President of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please
! K: `7 Y9 W7 Wcall the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on
9 U7 e" A- [8 ]7 j5 w+ q/ T: Y! ethe web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.
$ b0 m. ?+ }, m8 K7 N; i4 ^- P& P7 [
! Z# B& a9 T, i* b: T

' \; y1 X0 x& q8 R+ E; R6 V; rFor further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
: u' {2 b$ F0 o( c+ O) s(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com
* o* A+ d2 t& J) R+ ^( ]http://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html+ R& l. s& ~6 t2 s/ E5 Z* g( a2 o

. \; ^+ E. |" T3 a- c[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说:
3 w8 q5 H( Q2 B6 B7 {; d; d4 f5 s/ G
尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观$ k1 r7 a' P& w8 M- D, r7 z
    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国
0 V% c) ?, O7 q) Y% L商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。 1 B0 V( P- ~# d/ ~# M
由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴# D, L5 ]' t  S8 W* G
趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会) * g: O; S4 A3 _" J5 g1 I2 N& {
和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多
! |1 M# |% u3 a) R乐观。
3 y5 @: J  N. s    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的9 P) q3 y8 E; b* |6 X
年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了
! v; I' k7 e7 e访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时
1 [. \0 O2 R* F' ]/ G4 C4 V地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司
0 Y& x& a" H! x+ c& B! ^1 X  F/ t代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。 1 `; [6 v' r* u5 [, f6 |% {
其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷9 c' v0 h. n' c
包括亚太地区和欧洲。 ! D- F: u1 ]' P/ h
    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大% }7 G( z% U5 g+ g6 s1 f! W
房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资
9 d( m( c- G) x0 b) q. g" }环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎
2 B, B- O$ I9 Y9 z$ L3 F可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录, _% u/ f! q; {( L" P
高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。 " \5 c0 y; N% z3 r
    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的
( n7 O* [. D) {( W. l3 @边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏
/ p, r% F2 k& f3 e" M炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者
* O" r) K) c2 R继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国# ?' ^' Q% C% D' i6 R
更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将
0 n  s/ m  U; A1 m( m! x# |' H非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。 2 \) i9 ~. V0 M) k1 ^
    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大
* D- L) C4 e# `& X, e3 j受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是& w' O0 m8 l  S1 ]/ G2 E- b
商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地
5 t) y4 @4 C- Y, a/ M. I4 _( b的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行
4 v( C" E$ q8 i8 z: i/ `( k尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明
* s/ H7 ~: x1 C: w  b9 @" N的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该, x- w! y6 F! ]
住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要
. r9 P; e6 n! g  w6 |以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和  V6 y$ M8 m7 b4 h3 A9 T
单个家庭的房屋期待过高。 3 N. v5 Q* J: h' W  g0 C$ E
    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了
6 f' v! {; _, n' Y; C租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大& l4 _* f: x/ T9 D% b
大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动
$ R* w# B7 A0 c# Q更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制
3 e2 _& t. C, ^8 y1 ?4 C$ X* g/ R) L( D* O新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚, * e! o% y$ u; m2 o
和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租, y. |! N; o4 E* e& F" W
公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学
/ d' i8 I4 L  L西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋
' b3 o3 u6 Q, M" o短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入! m7 S" s3 Q% h. G, Q1 p
能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展
7 }+ S# `" B* o/ `在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。
  {% p3 w0 ^, R. A4 {5 A6 H6 r* [# M( [! I  q
    加拿大市场上观看0 _  Z' V/ H& [

0 @8 ~3 k+ O2 {    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央
) v1 L4 ?' {; f- L城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时
  [+ ~8 p# b, {, i0 x居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回
, g2 g& M* x- f! W/ Q4 j进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在; v; y' p9 `: Q, I" e7 b
市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直
4 V% P& y' }4 Y. w项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市
) C: E# C6 M) k. H/ V西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资
0 J+ f' t* J" w- Q: _前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定) U8 v+ ~( m: |* I1 p# I
是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 % @$ G1 ]# ?7 ^% Y. Y
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
) J% Y( K* ^& D1 Q+ X( R& w: m评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。
: b# s# m9 [7 A$ f5 H) r
- G' c4 b) l0 W! Z6 @+ F6 `    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿; t2 x$ M3 B0 Y0 |
2 D$ t3 [; ^  X* v6 r) F
    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号" N1 p3 I3 f, E9 V+ i; x6 B
新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作
5 `1 X5 k2 S; j8 p: `购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送, " c' e( }3 H3 g4 d
48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。
* k* e% g& Q5 E' X% m此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后, L# N8 z8 h$ z  Y: d/ ]
住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了
; H: y8 Y1 M& M% C卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留, f- K4 Y$ O/ u8 K3 I
强大的,这个市场将继续向好。
/ x, m  T; f, G# k8 ~9 f/ k. H
) s. l7 @" y, Y9 m( w  B    温哥华
6 G& G" X1 G9 H4 s  ~: B6 G' G1 Y) Z# B7 y5 m. F5 ^
    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业
$ y6 P1 X" E7 s8 q) Q' U3 n, J% R红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理
$ g* S  l3 m0 X" v- r) v4 }房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和
, @& ~3 l7 @! D  H市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个
. i) X' h6 B% ^) A主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进
7 L( p& f9 F1 O, a建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 % 8 n( J4 v1 J  N8 |; {  }" j+ ~
工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 %
4 u+ z1 E# ?5 @为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很& h8 h5 g  w3 L
良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。
: |3 M& P! {5 \0 Y/ I1 |7 P/ K/ C1 P4 C2 N( G3 @+ D
    多伦多
, j- O7 S$ L, H' [# G- Z* n/ X" z7 V9 z$ z/ C: v
    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市,
+ x( a. o4 k2 D9 d- l  V制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正( y! y/ |  m  w1 Z, l' ]
价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造3 P! t( {* a) Z  L9 H
工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。
  ]& d' v: ?* m( y8 S/ S三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场2 a3 ?* m" @  z) j
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和% |8 k0 }. I% @  W! v' F
公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。 - Y- A7 E9 U  a
0 G" p+ f$ Q- i+ i
    蒙特利尔2 {% J0 O- O" g$ c& o0 Z
  ]$ o* X7 l6 t$ J; @9 e1 {# l; [
    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体
( g5 s7 c3 U7 P! L) b; y  v6 Z经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立
% f/ z) |/ x' y& Q8 ?店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市! T8 n1 `& r5 [7 D
加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产
( N/ [4 n: y/ b! ^% Y8 \9 x部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业
" C- S+ D  i1 Y5 G( Q高为"持有"建议。
; b2 J0 ~5 \  g6 [- s& m
& |( @7 @0 ]; n# ^    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年
% ]& C, g) T  }' L: e& T包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源" z! K. [' `% z
市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓& S) b2 q2 o; a+ v+ U, V5 W8 H4 a' k2 d
附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资
2 C9 p' K( e9 Y海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的
+ j1 H- l: [% _! m( K$ G价格" 。 / U- ]% B: X/ t1 V7 S
    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
* _+ Z8 k- \: m2 \! {www.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。 " q0 q* T! F$ Y0 }/ P: S

1 e0 K! L& v% V% U. u( f8 y    约罗兵咸永道
# h5 @$ N# h" e4 @, D- Q6 b& B* D* b
    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证, 0 \% P8 V: T% Q) I; d
税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值
6 p& ~7 h& o0 d' b8 K5 J客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家, T  F* K4 @# K. H
跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发3 U7 g  C+ q4 d8 h% j8 k: [3 i( h, y
新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的
7 h* t/ z$ [! Q- E卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其. Z4 l% K1 d) ]$ V3 k5 m+ i
相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
4 X+ o& u8 m' W" @5 c$ c国。 3 U/ S: r9 a7 x2 F: s
     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略
! O2 ]; ^  p, V+ C) D* ^9 t; j4 B有限责任合伙,或视情况需要, # h, d6 s- Z( f/ @4 M# O- ^! q* J
普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络, 0 ]- n' k7 V3 i6 w: X2 e+ J0 V" R
每年这是一个独立的法律实体。 5 V2 d4 V& n' X/ L, f9 `; q
5 |( t' X& Y9 G  j/ @/ d
    关于城市土地研究所所长9 E( {( |4 j' h
( Y, [  F8 c; |6 ]$ L
    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和
- j- ~" M% m- p# {" L3 T) V& M研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供
& a0 B& ?4 ]# S- x" p领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造" n  R4 f. z) _' p7 ^  m& T+ I
蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更% `; }# y! W; }: O( a7 p7 q
超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展' o7 ?2 ^: [8 J* Z# p& G7 D
学科。
. L% q/ s6 C4 ]+ P" V    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 * Y. \  }% P% J. j+ k) V
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区1 x  H1 A6 Q4 E: r' K
理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会
+ c8 \+ m& r9 L) a+ S' Q7 V现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会
! G0 ]& b; [5 {" S& ^主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日, 5 _. }  y8 M. E- R8 c
2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力! _, Z) R3 N. ?( r
资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras , 9 Y' X/ A- T4 R! ?% u
总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请
5 p; w% g, p1 n致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈
$ L% O* D& ~; v/ r: i网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066, q4 t- H8 q: a1 T
+ N* @9 Q4 c" v# @+ ]: X- M4 ~5 \
" [7 {) l9 ?* _/ e5 ?+ |) R
( T; n5 D8 z! D8 E
更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园, 8 e2 y) n6 j  f6 V) M
( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层

' k! f7 u, A8 c. s6 U% {# i7 c5 U* ?9 Y, F8 l
大型搬家
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
6 Y3 P' }6 t+ p$ S3 k0 e7 v+ r5 N
u
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-15 23:45 , Processed in 0.227482 second(s), 23 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表