 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
: j# ?" B3 f. H0 v& l楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
2 ^* H. ~8 Y0 C' |$ Ncorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
5 S4 }6 T0 Q- f3 w" }8 d7 A4 f0 n. c
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
7 [1 ]0 V7 T/ |
# k3 _3 [% @3 V* l4 D1 E安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
. s- W; J4 o% ]. ^6 m! u \, m5 L9 i; z( L. t4 @6 m" L* |' b
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?1 ?& \$ W% P/ j+ o% w
: G! B" z7 s2 _1 U另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。& i2 S& B' ]1 m& o: \
7 ~, `& K5 ?4 G0 x: Q1 Q关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):0 T) K& [2 D$ g& e) r1 H9 j
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.8 M: L, a2 Y/ M, Y1 Y: f
5 Y- F& [: E! `0 W
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".: s+ L4 ~$ E, N* m
5 g: z7 G( O6 X. E7 A8 P, @
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
: P: G h$ t; y' U8 E, m) A
" e" ]4 @8 D' p. C) g- M[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|