 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
) J; y' p. P& |$ `5 w, {楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!9 T7 F- B x5 R1 W
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... . _* [. @4 d, d- w* a* n
5 f2 T% P2 `6 L" t您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。2 h2 {' O/ \! e' Q' G& G
8 D; t1 g. o3 x4 J; r安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
" J: W+ i- g- V8 y# D( Y# ?4 r5 x9 C6 Z, A9 ]% ^5 ?! g8 g/ S
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
* g! |6 F8 R& I2 G2 z4 v/ A" A0 w3 E; g
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
- ?. K# [. m+ L! m. A5 s+ V* ]& D3 K2 G
. l# g8 G( Y _- `* ]关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
, m: `* o; k" q$ e6 {+ gYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.5 n, ~" M/ l4 t$ d8 v+ {+ Q
- k2 y) S5 q- n/ B% r' fOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".9 [) T8 y4 l2 [
" g$ e! a( a& w" s* ?) @But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
. o7 G! g% ?) d( a% W) Z% L' \& Z4 B# D- X5 w2 }
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|