 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 . l8 V: r. j' t1 ?5 s5 a G
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!- D! r* x1 T) a z
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
- \: U" l! u0 `
4 t3 ?, o$ E% J- f您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。) \9 l' O5 |6 F; Z" Q+ W4 p
, L+ H- W5 }8 f& J3 t
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.) h G6 d$ C4 k) h/ K+ t! r z9 W
3 U% r/ {0 L% O! t2 i& H- [不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
; `5 G+ k. N; I" J+ T
( n9 H9 h) @- V |另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
3 l5 b* p/ Q( o, r/ s4 S& A, u
6 q0 j9 f8 ]" F# @9 ~7 @+ o, t关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
/ t# {3 |9 @: E8 A# z# Y5 z3 |& B# oYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers. \3 W) k$ Q8 j
9 ]+ b7 j/ `0 u& `2 _% d) U v1 [
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
, u h( X1 [& z! ?; B& u
$ R( w3 ^/ j& b; r& v( R: `But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
0 \7 `: y1 M% C& W+ k# N& h
& s6 b Y! {% y0 e[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|