 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 " Z# R9 j$ {7 X$ l: N. `
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!4 t3 p( B% O! J/ [9 L5 p
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... + a, D! D/ R# P) u( I7 V* Z* t
6 L0 D3 g- E( l* P3 [
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。0 n; W' r0 ]- p# @
7 T8 P$ j% b4 {4 E
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.5 E6 ^$ T1 z+ `* j
0 C3 ?3 Z- ]& {( v不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
! w' [& x) f% F5 t2 F2 t T0 h' s6 h; S5 L( B7 I5 Z7 E7 i* \
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。! y; y' C) ~' X* ^' m U6 K1 _' U% M5 | j
) m/ E9 e5 g3 w* {
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):1 `( ?! W9 ?; q* k7 a
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.1 [$ \: x4 v, E, g; l Z# \
& `' M* x2 n( ~8 }
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".) c# J$ m( T1 @8 ^$ b1 |1 A
J+ O( W" N' S" G, w+ d' d( ?6 SBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
3 [0 T" b- X" K8 x: x* F
% L" t; i5 C9 k% I% K0 B" p[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|