 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
+ R/ N& D0 b( ~& m) w5 V楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
0 U7 v3 F2 c- ^3 z: R" Ncorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... . S# M2 y5 _) g8 E) k2 j9 D8 q
6 r# T+ _4 j1 k# m* q/ G
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。) A5 m, }& A2 l/ K" K- H5 F
( m, G5 Q0 u2 G% H
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.0 L D: X, f7 N% n; z- ]7 a
4 h" Q0 f+ T/ Y$ ^9 o. l6 Q3 D P( m不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?/ Q9 M# i ^3 f
: s' S2 N8 ^/ S- E$ N0 a8 M另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
& f; U$ l4 m. `" x( x& M+ n
+ r- l/ w- p% k+ N+ @* u; y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
/ A9 a( S# g* S: dYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
; @! w' a- d' ]% ^
0 E9 Y1 \; K3 o, u& V$ N- U3 S! OOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"./ w- F, Y/ O3 K$ J% Z
* F4 h% f6 B. f3 [* _0 xBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.* Z/ v t3 g0 l) H" q2 c
* |; ?/ n' D( g L
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|