 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
& _$ w# {0 ?" f ~) B3 ZDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
- d5 p9 T) G5 \& |
! B6 X( P- \+ Y8 y( rEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
# h" b& K3 H+ f. I6 z0 B# V: A7 |8 |% L) L( a5 Z" l+ h, d4 \
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
9 }$ v* o/ w2 R& _9 x; }$ ^ f% q5 A" |' s6 n
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
% O$ T- l6 e3 Q+ M1 [/ Q1 `
$ V$ u1 E. D5 G" C/ h* f6 HDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.0 j( }- [! }# l5 s6 n
+ _& p. ?! C0 E1 {$ y) ?0 CDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
+ j* f" f- P: _4 |7 t5 G
0 M. ~! e% k' a0 B- R8 l; F5 J$ {Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.- @% _3 W, J3 D$ y3 B; d3 w4 ?
3 T5 v4 K/ G: z" A8 e9 l" L; sDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.7 z/ w# Z3 c7 I& J7 D
3 L# {) T, \" ^: @' W
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
- i- O& j6 e8 W- M+ F# B3 ^) V. @$ P3 Z. ?+ _ N1 k6 l! a f, D! K8 z
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|