 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员: m, B, i& ^& {) l* e3 o! A
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
7 E6 N8 a/ t4 o; b- z' c4 e2 k# B1 o( o' m2 ~3 G( _
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
3 s. X# L* {3 @2 Z, v# r: s# m
( U1 @" e. {5 a- a8 eMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
5 _- Z! T U4 z r4 d1 ]7 l& f$ ^8 m# }1 F3 K$ O
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
3 _& Q4 ^4 @: [: ~1 H8 Q0 s" g0 p% p9 k) Y D3 e2 p l' e
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.' L6 o, }% a2 R' r
- H' C) k& P! M* qDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
H$ ^$ ^* m' m, e: U( T1 I* @; V. a3 A
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
9 p. M; g! {+ g% q& d# G8 `! T J& \1 h+ j# w
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
8 y8 W. m1 E& c' }. k+ [
; r3 `' e7 \8 a% {3 Z wPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
/ b' g1 s, _$ K- W$ B/ T/ g
1 B7 P1 y* n& K& p1 l! g/ N1 \5 G/ UDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|