 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
2 L* {- [& r. h- a. Dfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove/ F; y# }6 r6 V- k! m; k9 C
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
! Y, O( }" I7 m1 D5 l* gprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by4 ]2 B' ]; t* @# M0 o' _" W
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
0 P: K. A( Q0 [4 {8 D: Uoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction: w: g; s2 l P1 O% k- H3 R
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately( \9 |9 X; ~) X Y" p, E
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past) B0 J2 d6 g7 N* [
three years.
5 @ W& l% H3 k) c; OBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
. X: O7 \9 {; O. X3 jtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of% a! J' j9 N; s0 M! h
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects {- {4 `& G; {/ h& {2 \
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
2 [# f: n& M' e5 Tto fundamentally justified levels.7 t( v \0 p# r3 y/ ~% R8 q
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
4 m ~5 k6 {! _( m. x+ h/ O6 Iwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and" V% O, ]! I3 H
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”; `' ]% `! w' X% H# ]; I, q
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
! G6 W T8 [/ B& Dthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s) z5 W. Y% p& k# \. B. [5 {) \: h
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
! E' Y9 V7 w2 `. G/ ]% shomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
; G; Y `% H/ }& a# d, I6 M- @( G3 P; Nthat is now being rapidly reined in.) M+ K- O$ O- a" D* k2 l1 t3 E& h
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,, X2 d5 a& Z9 r; G6 J
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
+ w3 e9 Z% W. @' Z+ A7 Tmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh0 }& P! ?3 |9 ~1 v: W' R
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers, g! j: s2 {5 t+ s6 ?
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
& R! s- ~6 G7 |3 h a- x- o2 H$ D( Kremain choppy and new residential construction will be
. u9 K& e- P5 r0 G; @dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction+ z( z4 {0 R' r7 e
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this- v5 f* M! \, _6 i
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
. ]/ b" d, a* Cresidential construction will fall further to around1 T8 o' H( n, G+ \! u( T
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units- ~) N% R, q6 d+ _# H$ d
in the fourth quarter.. X: k8 n+ X! V- Q
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,4 Z: k3 }9 ]2 G C, _" O p5 i
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run( m- E* T/ \$ [" ]: t! K
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each1 ]& A! ?$ p6 a8 n7 `6 M
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home% E! K) W- Y1 ]' d5 K' j1 {
values since house prices should track incomes over the" T0 P$ G& V# O" T+ X9 K; h
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
9 {% ^3 Z6 B. O8 I2 h8 _3 X( \regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
% h- A( Q A: A! H0 y8 h$ q9 ^of residential construction.
# A8 w1 V @/ w- M+ M1 oTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a; }5 O$ I* Q& c) W$ H
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
1 I/ P, F( \3 p2 \0 kwould have occurred if housing had been priced3 ?1 y9 l g" K* i, e7 { H, [
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this+ V2 n1 S$ m/ ^( E8 f
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new8 z5 L- m( E, q, U+ p+ M
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
0 P$ ?' |% q5 J% S8 Amany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
' R' @, \8 }8 l4 J1 yRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
: f% B3 p0 n* m, k2 i% v8 v6 hwhere housing demand will further contract under waning* h' [9 b0 Y4 _* [
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are9 [/ I, V# z) H: M
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the/ J. Z1 J$ X) K
very time that the resale market has swung into strong# X( R# c [$ m, p3 ?7 S. G
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
4 p Q* g& I( qhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural9 @& _7 u: V' _& C1 ~8 |) H
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
" f! B ?3 G8 `# s$ vQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the# y& j: `: k# G+ O/ b) D1 {+ T3 D
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de$ X* Y$ a+ [; v6 m) N+ O. B
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,$ O7 k* O. ^$ l0 X
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
8 r J! y. S2 C$ Rrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a! s/ M1 t4 Z1 w i( z
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
7 s6 w6 ~7 R' b+ Blimited – with the important exception of the Toronto0 _" Y, z w+ n/ P( E/ q
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically/ t- m, w8 n: ~ f. a) U
high levels of apartment-style units presently under. o. i' `0 A* f
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
4 i. X, j, Z; e: ?. ~4 y$ [- _0 U) i7 Jreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as h5 P+ q7 [* [# B' d6 W
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
& ~1 s0 o+ h; d2 X6 u( R$ |spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
& X1 [1 e# ?- zresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we2 b7 `) |0 \" b* f
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
5 D- T0 O& {$ K% j* K8 V2 ^# Cinter-provincial and international migration over the coming" L! f# k8 E# T* _4 P# X$ G% M
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
. R6 G1 `8 A7 t/ @( [( K* |5 Lwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
5 m/ j; z: t- I; W0 GOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
u5 Z" @$ t+ [" t6 a6 PMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 M. K: @* Q" x2 w% p6 o9 M; i" l+ k
Grant Bishop, Economist: N/ m. S# O' c. ~+ D9 W. ?- M
416-982-8063- Q N2 \3 @. I! E0 z
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
7 q; \0 A7 h( T6 y; [8 ]- i416-944-5730
1 r+ Z8 r$ ?: G" P7 k, `3 ]. `/ O6 g# w- n: h2 m, ~' H
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|