街角房到底有什么不好？

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-10-7 17:09

in this case, who will take care of that out-of-fence area?
: C" B$ j, D7 z2 J/ w山羊发表于 2009-10-6 22:06

Just like other public area, city or nobody.

如花 · 发表于 2009-10-8 05:56

1，没有后院，不适合有小孩的家庭；
2，房间的窗不是离邻居的太近了，就是对着路。

sofia · 发表于 2009-10-16 20:59

这个房子怎么样呢？

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-10-16 21:15

本帖最后由 ceramistpalace 于 2009-10-16 22:20 编辑

这个房子怎么样呢？
& V3 J/ @$ u1 q3 O2 n3 W/ i0 Vsofia 发表于 2009-10-16 21:59

Nice, but higher roof pitch would be even better. This one shows homeowner does not need to shovel snow on the side.

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-10-16 21:20

这个房子怎么样呢？- r- k9 W+ z% C2 i+ A
sofia 发表于 2009-10-16 21:59

Nice, but I prefer a higher roof pitch.

sofia · 发表于 2009-10-16 22:18

higher roof pitch是什么意思？

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-10-16 22:32

higher roof pitch是什么意思？+ r% x6 g+ M+ f! o
sofia 发表于 2009-10-16 23:18

A steeper roof slope ( roof slopes at a sharper angle ). Not just look nice, it blocks off more heat in summer and less snow accumulated in winter, of course, costs more to build but it is one of the structural details worth to look at and consider.

Mike_Wan · 发表于 2009-10-18 01:14

將來不好轉手賣。

街角房﹐不好賣。同樣面積的房子﹐街角房便宜很多。

你可以注意看﹐街角房都要掛牌很久才賣掉的。

sofia · 发表于 2009-11-6 20:17

这个怎么样？

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-11-6 20:23

这个怎么样？
8 w4 u0 _1 L) @3 Wsofia 发表于 2009-11-6 20:17

The previous one looks better, exterior finishing is better ( impression from looking at the photos)

sofia · 发表于 2009-11-6 20:49

The previous one looks better, exterior finishing is better ( impression from looking at the photos)" w0 l+ \; ^- p4 P: B
ceramistpalace 发表于 2009-11-6 20:23

这张照片角度不是太好，外墙是石头面的，不过前一个已经卖了，都没来得及进去看。

sofia · 发表于 2009-11-6 20:49

看个内部照片。

sofia · 发表于 2009-11-6 20:50

还有张厨房的。

sofia · 发表于 2009-11-6 20:51

还是厨房。

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-11-6 22:54

44# sofia
As what can be seen from the photos, the interior finishings look quite basic, including railings, kitchen cabinets ( though with moulding at top ) paired with flat doors, a kind of no design, and not raised panels doors; fireplace mantel seem like drywall-built and tiles-surround are low-fired type w/boring outdated pattern & texture; backsplash is drywall orientated and no tiles or granite; island installed w/ granite countertop, the only upgrade in the kitchen though, however has not- so- desired square profile; number of potlights might be inadequate (as seen from photos) so illumination at night may be too weak; colour code is out of balance and not appealing. If this bungalow is anything in the 1500+ sq ft category, more luxurious features are desired and expected. The good thing is: all these are not the hardware part, except the potlights feature, and can be replaced or changed anytime when you feel right to spend some money. As a conclusion, the price has to be real good if you weigh in the future expenses to further upgrade the interior.

P.S. The exterior cultured rocks are not appealing too. That is why I think the previous one looks a lot better.

sofia · 发表于 2009-11-7 00:09

那什么价位是real good的？1700+sq ft.

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-11-7 00:37

那什么价位是real good的？1700+sq ft.
v# r0 b) n$ u1 G0 ?sofia 发表于 2009-11-7 00:09

I have send you a message. Pls check.

sofia · 发表于 2009-11-7 12:05

谢谢你的专业意见，能给一些更进一步的建议就更好了。

ceramistpalace · 发表于 2009-11-8 16:20

谢谢你的专业意见，能给一些更进一步的建议就更好了。7 G9 c3 z- }, |7 g2 i
sofia 发表于 2009-11-7 12:05

Pls check my PM to you.

账号		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册