+ \( o- f! o: Q/ a
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.+ y% [0 {" f, ~
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. # p0 O* u- Q8 T. @( D* y# x; r, Z ; L$ M, K" G; x7 @7 w9 F( w
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. + a1 Z1 z* L1 v9 v: S+ YThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.8 Z8 J* G8 @: @
4 y! E. g( `: @" T
4 h. |: s' H% k: O1 j* r, x3 e R8 ?. x! ^9 b. k ) r0 k: _7 |$ U( B8 d9 h6 A- v0 b# q
: _# ^2 {$ M% }) K; ?
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
0 m, h! i9 D% E2 c, v* @
* \. H X* t& X/ T% a+ F
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,/ q+ Z" R: l5 D5 y- I
& B$ f7 H7 w6 t但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 O4 Z3 L+ z+ T. u+ j3 R; u" T 6 i. b+ c3 @( G V3 N; ~记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则