 鲜花( 115)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 年轻的心 于 2010-12-1 13:52 编辑
; J O/ V4 h7 D& X3 y' h( U9 y
, X- E7 x$ e3 t' E ~, m2010年12月* a) V2 Z2 t& j8 [( Q' V
Bank of Canada Interest Rate
0 A2 U. j4 W) A% ], O) z/ P' p+ {2 T! V7 Y) T! J
| | September 8, 2010 | 1.00 % | | October 19, 2010 | 1.00 % | | December 7, 2010 | Next meeting date | Source: Bank of Canada _' o! s" L5 {$ v* z9 i3 `) l; z
# D+ R; d4 a# Y p. K0 r& k
' |, a, w" q& U# p& jBank Prime Lending Rate5 L: Z. \9 K9 t; ]+ n3 _$ ?
# W5 G) w) x; S$ Y. y3 c( F
" \! a$ t" B9 A9 r" s G| September 9, 2010 | 3.00 % | | October 20, 2010 | 3.00 % | | December 8, 2010 | Next meeting date | + n0 i- Y& [6 k+ d" @& b I
Source: Bank of Canada% J5 M; X& j5 K0 T
/ K) @1 f; d- x& T0 I R
* _' B6 l" O) a, l
: l7 k* \3 [4 u% a' d; J, ^( c) r e
Conventional Mortgage - 5 Year Rate*
5 _; H: A1 ~0 T% \$ Q: @: H: i# W$ R1 N v8 [5 ?9 i/ v* z
6 h4 ?6 q2 r, [& R; Y6 n. @5 J& t
| September 15, 2010 | 5.39 % | | October 18, 2010 | 5.29 % | November 29, 2010
) M, Y* x! p9 ?! Q. R$ f | 5.44 % |
1 z8 z# w4 t5 O0 vSource: Bank of Canada
" T. b% Z% w P" X2 n* z*Determinant for high ratio mortgage variable qualifying rate
& Y& N! Z- M# P5 x/ _1 R7 s- f4 u1 Y* h3 y2 ?
9 ]9 V% d5 B+ h3 j6 W. J6 ]- F0 ~; {/ I" u& U* `
8 V7 C$ f0 Q! _; @) W3 ]) N. i
US Federal Reserve Board Discount Rate+ u# X, h1 r: m/ x
; k- k, m$ s3 h0 U" k
7 r. H$ ?' ?7 D# @| September 21, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | November 3, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | December 14, 2010 | Next Meeting date |
8 l+ u5 Y6 L1 N% s9 x) R0 ~Source: US Federal Reserve
/ G) t$ \; Q1 z& Q+ }" Z1 s* s
5 j3 s* S. z! h& ^( \; g9 `9 X3 G* N# M. c* w) u* r6 u3 L* r8 d
4 W& B% a9 J N* l8 |9 T4 A3 l0 B
5 o2 q, ~$ ^' l- {) K- M
- v; i1 q# H; y5 DExchange Rate $CDN($US)" d/ Q$ v- e7 W( n+ K1 n/ Q" }; Y, I
| October 28, 2010 | 0.9790 | | November 10, 2010 | 1.0000 | | November 26, 2010 | 0.9804 | : M+ z7 g" u3 [( ^; c p
Source: Bank of Canada/ p O9 ^9 }1 x
! L% p/ p7 K y, I7 {* i3 n8 y- P: X+ b% W9 ~3 W. |
9 p+ {4 H# u G3 r; u& Q- t* l
! A) Y5 s( q4 n2 ]- E) ^Government of Canada Bonds' B. ]+ g: L& K) O& Q
. y$ m% I3 p1 Q( }! L) r5 M' \' _: N
| Bond Type | October 27, 2010 | November 10, 2010 | November 24, 2010 | 1 year Treasury Bill
# e B2 E8 L6 ?4 k# x | 1.21%
3 b% X4 K _' p% \ | 1.27% | 1.39% | 3 year Benchmark+ f6 e4 ~1 J! M; {8 C$ K8 s
Bond Yield | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.94% | 5 year Benchmark
4 Q* i" K7 `* j# T1 J6 p8 `" vBond Yield | 2.06% | 2.20% | 2.48% | 10 year Benchmark
' | I& q5 O0 IBond Yield | 2.89% | 2.98% | 3.19% | ! z, l7 d8 h* J
Source: Bank of Canada
$ f& B) E0 q" r, z/ w. z$ Q" {. I$ h) N! D! N* k
. Y/ A- W B5 l+ L7 S' X# T
^3 }8 h2 a: ]! K0 F0 N2 f7 ^- U8 Q, Y. C6 f' B; |3 X5 P
5 H6 }2 f# d3 x5 Y" m! ?4 ?# c$ |
Total New Housing Starts (Seasonally adjusted and annualized)0 o% A! o+ R0 m" @- R
Province" s# x! \& n$ O& w
| August
. h3 u' B1 U3 ^' e1 M h6 x2010
+ b% J+ \! a0 f5 x/ G+ }# K | August0 ?9 v8 m' ^& k
2009 . H6 t$ x( c# o7 Y
| September) f; C' a& z1 M2 e* Y1 X0 o
2010 ) C) a$ q4 `. x9 S1 y* U
| September
4 f2 h7 C/ e: E2009 3 K3 n9 p/ u9 b* D3 E8 ^ i6 P. |
| October
. Y) w; y3 p& j$ i8 V& T2010
. O5 ~2 u+ u& ~0 ~+ I | October, v+ H4 t% W/ P3 r- ^9 V- r5 a( K- S
2009 # ^7 R( o/ u8 O, I+ q9 A q
| Newfoundland/Labrador
2 c6 ]7 X- D) }4 E( d1 h | 3,500 ( p3 F( q3 g( D A5 Q/ l- v! X
| 2,400 + ~* |+ y9 x6 Q0 y
| 3,100
# {( y; x: I* I | 2,800
8 Y: ]* @" ?# C7 \5 v | 3,400
3 }; u% N7 |0 K5 h. b+ A | 2,900
7 c" A9 D$ F6 X# ]8 b8 h' j | PEI
, L1 d6 I, ~! f5 [ {4 g | 1,000 r& Z( B, |) v% X6 G" k
| 1,000 / E* \" r: f' e2 t% n/ b2 t+ c8 y
| 500
5 z6 M9 `; I: n) r8 z6 S: R | 700
. T8 d4 _; p/ \ s) @4 C8 E, w | 400 5 y2 _! ^' D! K" V
| 1,200 9 r+ s" b0 g% L) m
| Nova Scotia
: R4 f) t, h/ ~ | 3,200
# s, P! e/ x: I* g | 4,200 $ O3 e# f" `0 m2 s5 [
| 4,100 6 g1 Q; I' N6 X% o
| 4,500 + t2 e g. R% M! R( I1 i S
| 4,700
% U4 ^) j# h5 ]; A( B | 4,000 & A g! H% Y! @. ^2 W3 a+ p
| New Brunswick
4 z+ E3 V$ m5 H- n | 5,100 / ~9 d3 W( E P S$ o+ ~
| 3,700
) _ h+ Z' [2 C, `2 ` | 2,400
5 o+ W" p/ w. f/ S | 2,900 6 l3 I% i2 D8 k2 M
| 4,900
$ B1 b5 B: A% I: V2 e7 { | 3,600 : a9 \- U- Q3 ^( e
| Quebec
) x$ F, F5 a: R9 |% N | 48,300 + Q1 D- }6 }" y4 M0 p/ s
| 47,300
( ~3 i7 t. E: X2 z8 C | 50,700
; h% @/ T8 b& x/ r | 41,300
4 @4 d9 U9 }- R! |4 ` | 48,600 - H' u- }& Q& l* H4 A0 g& P
| 37,200 5 M: s! C- p0 ~- N! x; r8 c' C
| Ontario
+ c: V# T1 Q' b: J, h6 Q1 \% W | 64,800 R" Z+ B* P' O- M& s
| 44,200
- B+ O" i8 ?# \1 ^+ |) M | 58,000 7 A. Q* x3 v, L; y& v" G
| 50,200
) P& t! s2 }% N$ x | 44,700 3 o4 w! C( n% u9 y
| 57,600 - h) l1 S: J3 U2 P2 m* y/ ^
| Manitoba
+ D( p, c) K- H$ R8 j0 _. i | 6,100 4 I$ P& o- f" i3 [$ w$ _
| 5,000 5 v& T& [+ Q' e# u
| 4,000
7 H. y$ x6 l% n5 X5 y. j | 4,400
* f/ a% J f9 S | 3,800
9 n8 v# H" D% x8 L | 4,200
- G! ^6 ?9 f: f, |1 X, o | Saskatchewan
, k% a2 r- K+ Y2 @/ v% D | 7,700 6 E9 _2 O+ A: N3 q% ^1 u
| 5,100
g4 {7 o$ U. Y) Y( E" `6 P2 e& f | 5,400 ! o2 S/ g; t. u# v# C
| 3,700 + W4 M8 G9 M9 y# M
| 4,700
! g- g1 e1 h6 L& ~! h# x! ~# n | 3,600 # V6 G6 E9 i) E1 V) }7 w; ~
| Alberta
6 |: ?" b( E% C | 23,500
* F, x9 S9 k: k: @, c: J6 ` | 18,400 + O# l- X. w! G! ]; b1 ^$ g
| 27,100 1 p0 d* x" G1 i9 w G9 a! P0 b
| 22,600
, B, c# d9 |% p5 V, O% v | 25,200 ' Q+ g# y/ J% K7 I, Q3 Y
| 25,000
9 b3 G- g2 h( s- H; Y; @ | British Columbia
" b9 v. ?- q1 D) r1 @ | 27,800
0 f7 U4 U3 {* O' ~. `0 I | 19,200 & Z4 Y- H8 I6 [( p9 g
| 29,700 2 O7 R8 Q. r1 c2 |2 Q
| 16,200 5 O. ]& h6 m! T
| 27,500 + a) q& e6 p4 H& h: V
| 18,200
" _0 C( @$ \- K6 m& M | CANADA
( u& g6 R1 c c | 191,000
3 I& U2 a' V* ]! z/ } | 150,500
3 a% `( V" c7 t" j, P8 u | 185,000
- C. {4 C# K, X. x | 149,300
9 d; ]+ R7 `* T6 T. f# Y; |. c | 167,900 : q; a% Q! Y: v5 K& E
| 157,400 ! E- v* T! e* i
| ( C4 s" I& z( a- G
Source: CMHC Housing Now - November 2010 and November 2009. This seasonally adjusted data goes through stages of revision at different times of the the year.5 u# `. q6 H5 O3 O2 B2 f9 l3 i
; k& @: w: D. t @
& N( F" e( K1 w: q0 m1 u
& L6 M; d4 y. a; D; z" {, f$ J' @9 [7 r9 x7 G8 A$ h
% G; G6 {% j, X( |. U8 N9 PAverage MLS® Resale Price for Local Markets
- `5 X9 `. y) {7 V9 T: A( C( H0 Y- p4 ?. |( t3 j" G) ~& N2 b
1 f8 U1 e) P" o# H( X, u
| City | October 2009 | October 2010 | | Halifax | $235,465 | $248,678 | | Saint John | $178,632
, e) _6 f/ b& V5 E; r2 I | $165,032 | | Quebec | $219,440 | $246,918 | | Montreal | $285,100 | $309,638 | | Ottawa | $320,561 | $305,872 3 c, {1 \( r2 T8 u4 A
| | Toronto | $423,507 | $443,633 | | Hamilton/Burlington | $296,253 | $305,872 | | Winnipeg | $210,618 | $229,467 | | Saskatoon | $274,759 | $293,929 | | Calgary | $393,574 | $399,679 | | Edmonton | $351,768 | $317,096 | | Vancouver | $638,948 | $707,207 | | Victoria | $481,500 | $343,747 | + i' M7 U P" |/ a$ G8 T( j
Source: Canadian Real Estate Association U$ V @( o; H2 e. `
4 U* X) ]: ?7 |5 v5 a, F
6 x) x1 r4 i4 s9 V- H% v
) n0 ]0 g! M( s) f9 i9 g+ Q8 m1 o& p' P0 s' c! { r& L u
: n$ M- f% u* Q" [
Quarterly Housing Affordability Index
6 ^2 o' P% I, e( r eStandard Two-Storey $ k! i7 I5 |6 J Y. f; R/ W( s
. d7 g7 @5 {0 T/ t( F
| Average Price
" Z3 I% l% a( u! L* P) ~* a: W C | ! l/ F& |# D2 L
| RBC Housing Affordability Measure
1 H2 B( P& L6 t/ H7 ?3 v7 b | Region
# i6 @+ Q) p( C! T/ i# i4 S | Q3 2010. u; |2 f/ y4 g: F _- `. x! u/ ~
($) $ X5 m, N$ l. K; \8 n
| Y/Y
- q, s$ z% ?7 @0 Q" h/ P% ch.
* R" u3 |% N. h# Z( a4 H$ f8 R | Qualifying
2 ^+ Y, s# z; R' iIncome ($) - G7 v1 s, L0 Q. k
Q3 2010 ) R: y8 `) W# g, e7 j3 R+ S. D
| Q3 2010
|9 u2 ~' p& y# \2 ?/ `8 w(%) ( z; u+ \6 k4 L" Z3 o- g
| Q/Q
4 w; T* ~7 u! z& I/ o. F& GPpt. Ch. , ]: q, L/ G L% }7 j" S
| Y/Y# J7 S1 p( z1 W6 E, U3 y
Ppt. Ch.
) ^& P* I9 q; n7 {! M9 o | Avg. since9 t7 o6 O- ~4 ^! N% \* v
'85 (%)
4 Z+ ?5 F* d f9 ?6 X | Canada A; o! k2 H% q' p1 A: b0 i: ?
| 370,700 4 p3 {6 K# \) k% k0 ~
| 6.3
1 E8 T; i8 G. p+ v% c0 b; ~ | 83,100 3 d/ a. }( w* ~- V* Y2 H+ m
| 46.3
' w, P$ P$ A7 d& ^, A | -2.5
( V1 }5 V; o( P" ~ | 0.3 ; A& g, r6 L; S2 V! n) W
| 43.3 * K1 m# I! k% q( s# B
| British Columbia
' d0 x' Z; d0 b; i6 c | 624,800
* P$ H' c3 y7 K9 z7 L3 B# P. N | 8.0 2 l& ^% d K$ D& e8 P7 W4 Q
| 124,500
" X. o2 @5 y6 w' G0 L! L4 q | 67.5
1 I9 D0 H& p% a) X" q5 [ | -3.9 5 B8 h0 R7 n( F
| 1.4 2 [, j( j0 ]+ J- I
| 54.1 ; L. Y. ^, y g; r4 O
| Alberta
( u# l/ l& p; Q7 }5 q! X | 365,600 % F5 z! r1 o5 p! i! S! a
| 0.1
5 t# U$ I2 {) Z | 81,400
. b! S |- ~2 N9 w$ z | 35.6 1 E% l0 F0 ^8 l4 z5 `" A% M
| -1.8
- e3 Y% x/ W5 l | -2.0
1 U B' z7 B; F; M1 Q- }' K | 38.6 5 }& J. N2 u3 C
| Saskatchewan
6 L: e3 H( _- S1 L% [0 c. D* N) @1 } | 315,300
% O3 b8 i, x+ C0 J! @! q H+ D | 5.1
$ q5 q Z4 u/ m7 o1 k# p6 D/ j: F | 74,100
) X' v/ Q( o5 q3 V T" p | 40.8 ( b. e6 y4 U% d- y! m5 w; ]' C
| -2.2
3 Y2 T* `2 m3 b( D+ Y0 t, q. X5 G | -1.1
i a# B( c4 X8 [ | 38.0
( K7 @: c$ b, G& `5 E7 D | Manitoba
) n2 q \0 t' ^% \ | 269,700
" _2 z# e1 t& i$ W | 7.8 9 Q# _7 ^4 G: h+ D. h Q$ n
| 65,000 ! @- D* K2 r" y' j, i. _
| 37.1 1 i& d( J& K) L3 a, a5 {
| -2.3
- B9 t; Y- q S4 v | 0.8 * B/ u7 e* B" v5 F0 C+ l: ]
| 37.7
( C2 |/ P( E" E% V$ U2 @ | Ontario 9 S+ t& d2 J) K7 }
| 388,200 * H9 y3 i1 l# H1 K! g
| 6.2 * r- ~4 G' ], \1 w& L
| 89,800
* `( G4 w% x9 m2 J: u7 v! _. s9 p | 44.9
) l; K0 ^* ?4 r | -2.4
$ N, q0 c a% ~, |2 n/ a8 O | 0.4
v/ Y- U+ p* d | 43.7 : f5 V3 q1 h! j
| Quebec $ `7 |6 _$ z# X$ t8 A4 P' y
| 262,100 * ^! l) w- S; Q5 U5 s3 e( l6 Y$ e
| 8.6
1 b! T* K a1 |# k: e1 |6 k | 61,700
" _ F! {" T. `! v4 @5 | | 41.7
- K9 h5 m% n$ t | -1.8
# ]- k/ s( I3 y. x9 B9 g, ] | 1.3 # c! V2 T7 ^+ }8 f* J
| 38.8 % J9 h8 X7 ~$ ~. l# H
| Atlantic
# k$ [" _. M% @1 t; r | 222,100
" h2 ]: @* q2 `* x& ~6 Y6 l# e | 4.3 * }, P. ^# ~1 }9 v4 \8 |# H& ~
| 55,900
6 A+ A: z0 ~2 U) U1 @. f A | 36.5 ; ~; H3 F% X% s# l
| -1.4 5 X& c$ O2 r$ Q# [% Z, l" F
| 0.1 8 T9 |1 b- M' W5 p% n0 z4 @
| 38.0
$ y9 n2 J2 V- _0 X* o | Toronto
- [' }, P R5 K& g9 m b | 554,700 2 C( W. Y" v# _! v7 x: ?0 a2 u
| 5.6 , m! D+ ?. z; K6 z, k
| 120,400
; c7 R1 ?& _3 Z$ m3 P0 S8 t | 56.2 3 r2 W4 m# H w/ t4 G6 [4 v8 m
| -3.8 " n* l' |3 G- _$ r
| 0.1 1 u! q5 E; Z2 x6 l3 }+ J8 n4 A
| 53.4
1 K" Q% L, h4 K" Z1 I& {& e | Montreal , U2 M- n# [2 s$ q
| 335,300 . z: E0 ]+ A. G" v- {8 y+ \
| 8.9 6 g# j/ |. y1 C! g2 _+ l
| 75,800 # Y. K$ f5 p) a5 E/ r L
| 51.3 7 }! P+ G# [. r9 G
| -1.7 ' q1 Z7 }( v: u4 R$ l6 P* y
| 1.7
# H4 ~, F$ A7 |( K: D | 41.7 6 O+ q/ d$ w( Z. U
| Vancouver & ^; h$ P$ X* j$ a/ E
| 766,300 $ t2 F7 ~% A1 d$ }5 R, f5 ?; C
| 8.4
5 K0 v% O% E% i2 M+ T+ u* a | 149,400
! |$ f' ^, i# C: F$ h$ X | 78.1 - S: D4 D' E& R* f! s8 o
| -4.7 ; M6 L" |) r: i$ y' Q5 z8 L
| 2.0
' a* J) E# k+ `0 r | 62.6
5 u/ C8 e4 `0 M7 T) t# l9 t$ s | Ottawa 8 x; Z" v$ ^. {
| 350,600 ' Y. x8 e6 ]& q- D9 }
| 4.8 ) p& m: B, g- R" w# m, h' Z
| 86,600
% O3 v/ A$ M# h" A$ G7 Y | 40.5
|: f! A5 P2 @* p) n. G- ^ | -2.5
5 u1 o2 r M5 r6 c1 G4 e% s$ t | 0.0
4 C6 _2 Z/ P# o0 K+ o | 39.1 ; u9 Z8 s+ r! s s! |6 z7 t
| Calgary
2 V+ w* f2 q% h6 l/ l | 410,500
* N+ S5 M( B1 Z% a9 B; d | -1.0 `5 k D v3 e- l
| 86,700 + T% t2 ~, ?' x( s9 I
| 37.9
6 @0 l8 o# d% [' o- _! j- s | -2.3
0 n5 J8 |* l( n, f5 z; O6 D" z | -2.6 ! o. A) |* y( c c- e+ ^* X7 @
| 40.3 # x: I) o0 w3 _0 r" f& L% M
| Edmonton X6 W) I# Y0 ]$ X
| 362,500 " [ \. q. F/ d; a6 S, X! n
| 1.2
! p! G8 I8 ]0 K2 p# X* ]0 z | 82,500
$ R# ]. T, [, L: e( U | 37.0 + O7 \9 y7 |+ X* a& V7 M @2 P
| -1.9 , o0 G& n7 Y; W: g+ w" g# i1 `/ B
| -1.6 3 m5 l; x" e3 ~, ^
| 37.0
2 g5 {- w$ M3 w |
- [6 Q! [' h: v; dDetached Bungalow 2 o& _, b. R5 H @
| Average Price
8 e$ X+ l4 q' Y* v% b$ L5 I0 I | 5 K1 U0 R7 I0 H6 B
| RBC Housing Affordability Measure & @; f1 j5 ~/ e. R2 A" B
| Region
# B y+ Q) j3 t1 Q | Q3 20104 A$ j3 b. Y2 {! Y
($) 8 n# S3 L+ }6 D! h7 I- }2 X
| Y/Y
. L+ X5 y/ d' }: q6 ` k0 Y% ch. ) c! u1 Y+ t6 F6 f& K- m
| Qualifying
, T3 L Q3 F) o- |# ?: G$ PIncome ($)
; m% ?' D c J0 R0 p' VQ3 2010
! s3 A" \: L1 k; G3 w" X% W7 H& Z | Q3 2010
. j2 C& @9 m' q% Z9 m" g(%)
+ v, h0 V. ]; H( c | Q/Q : C+ X y( Y. ~! \& \/ B( w. F& X
Ppt. Ch.
- B, J; A) l L9 Z2 l | Y/Y% T6 H) z0 m/ Q! l: Z2 o8 r
Ppt. Ch. ) F9 h4 K/ X. h9 r! }
| Avg. since* N2 S2 Z. C: N+ S
'85 (%) 5 m1 P6 _9 y' X0 Q
| Canada 0 h( v1 ^/ c# \4 F# k; O+ b. u
| 325,300 6 k+ C/ m D4 T8 @6 u( K
| 6.8 % Y0 K7 F2 f% o2 A9 n/ t e l; j
| 72,500 ! y1 ]( Q; h7 ~( L, {* f. W
| 40.4
5 J2 L4 u( x5 {+ l9 c, \" y- b | -2.4 6 }1 q/ o5 w! }5 V4 K4 n
| 0.3 5 Y4 \! N$ Y9 }3 n; K4 D# m
| 39.0 - p2 O/ `3 z8 y/ G
| British Columbia; w6 D, N8 {5 T8 ]+ j
| 544,700 1 p% f _9 c9 M- d8 x q$ s
| 8.5 & U! n$ j3 a# c" A# ~
| 108,800 $ @3 b) {' l! ?
| 59.0
. k4 {. \5 J- M! m: S9 T0 V | -5.0
% }5 I$ w C0 L' ^ | 1.5
4 U9 C, L! j9 _9 j | 48.9 & U1 a: V+ g5 o2 {2 i7 P
| Alberta
5 J9 ^( L! [' T, C+ b | 340,500 3 C6 u7 c' \3 G
| 2.9
9 J$ ?; t; G- z7 f1 M" `8 x% K | 74,400 6 }1 Q( Z C$ v3 Y- ` L1 C
| 32.5
' x; w6 Y7 Y d' p/ c | -1.8
0 l9 p9 D2 I1 R9 A l% d4 X- H9 K! g | -1.2 , ?5 C2 E0 u8 R
| 36.1
* p' t1 b3 T3 k2 q3 c( M+ x. x | Saskatchewan
9 ~; A5 v+ m7 H' g) P | 312,400
]5 \8 E' H( q3 H# h, h | 6.3 2 K b& n, x' v) U' U
| 70,900
2 `1 J2 W- p7 J8 M' { | 39.0
' G9 v6 [! o4 t+ S, A | -1.9
4 a/ s. G; W5 \2 W, k8 u6 Z# Z& h | -0.8
$ Z% B. S0 o/ l G+ d/ v | 36.6
& k9 ?( f/ X- L: V3 N7 r | Manitoba
, m0 D/ C8 A9 E( h0 _ | 251,000
. k0 B& I6 k$ _3 @% k* Z | 9.2 `* ?- t, q4 }0 H; N2 u( y9 R
| 60,800
& l; M: J) |9 E0 q: p. L* M | 34.7 . {5 P \" \4 @. Z
| -1.4
5 f8 c8 |6 h6 m( c | 1.1
! Z; L( ^ x0 ]) } | 36.8
7 x9 q7 v4 J; ~4 q K" E( U | Ontario
% F# X/ V& g3 m5 f8 Y# T) V | 337,400
5 v/ _: H1 y1 e; V% u9 ^ | 6.1 1 z3 d% u; O; l/ u( d
| 77,900
; C6 V, t8 s; E" o. v% t! n | 38.9
# S9 Q% [/ M' G1 Y | -2.2 6 j+ A: c9 b4 k* |
| 0.2 7 u) T$ d/ v" g- r5 ]/ [% c
| 40.1 8 k7 P5 N; i J/ e g2 |6 O
| Quebec ! p, M2 j" G$ r" }( O6 X* W
| 221,600
; C @# u8 i" h9 [1 x( V9 b | 9.3 , }; f- _: r: t* o4 B
| 51,700
3 W# X( m& E0 N, [* k | 35.0
^5 h- @: E) O' U3 k" n | -1.4 " b7 U) v$ B+ b" X$ n. }, N
| 1.2 5 n, C q4 Q8 B
| 32.9 % \* d4 e. N4 v# n& |
| Atlantic
) }" e, d$ ^8 x* g, d! }6 V | 196,600 $ U% \' O/ `$ k# Y% f0 O
| 2.3
, S) a% w k: g# D* ]( I9 W | 48,200
_( p9 p0 Q7 k& y7 b | 31.4
- M% U! c9 R+ `% a. T9 n! n( E | -1.0
* r1 |# ~+ w2 ^- Y. Y S/ T | -0.4 1 S4 h& k# u/ y
| 31.6
( w0 ~) b! D% Z6 H2 ^2 j8 M0 O% t6 Z | Toronto
2 o1 w$ D4 |1 k | 466,600 ) u _4 g: W1 B. A. O) U' \
| 5.0 8 M( i0 C2 C# X' y1 ]2 t
| 101,100 $ L% P+ ?; |- L) }1 l& c9 ]( |, r
| 47.2
8 A2 u8 k% q6 y3 T4 v, y/ p | -3.0
0 h" m, ~5 S( G* n. P; ?. @ | -0.1
# _( ?9 a9 y' A- N' J, q | 48.2
7 N! {/ D. `7 O) j) i' R | Montreal
! S' G8 Y, ?1 t+ f- K) ] | 271,100
% ^" j6 m/ D' G% [# o. { | 11.8
% k5 p; H. ]8 `- E7 p* R | 61,600 ' y" |0 C2 V% Z) @
| 41.7 * ?) G- t* X2 V; V6 \: L
| -1.3
1 A& r' G: Q, R, ?# Q | 2.2 ) J8 P* F5 _4 t/ T
| 36.9
$ K7 ^9 S& n& F* f | Vancouver
5 J$ w& l& `. {, p | 672,500 % O8 Y ]% T7 [
| 9.7 : x) J# l7 M- a4 X H8 a
| 131,600
# f2 I( V# }( L9 m) h- l3 N | 68.8 , n5 n8 j8 N+ i; W$ |5 T
| -5.4
+ ?4 \, q. h; F8 r9 Q3 i | 2.4
+ C/ M% s6 b7 i: d0 z0 z4 y, [$ V! X) o | 57.3
* E1 ^% ]' Q' N' x6 R: W6 P | Ottawa
- I) ~- \! G" O' h | 340,800 / f8 e U; y& Q3 Z, K1 l
| 3.4 7 }4 F) H6 {0 L2 D) _$ y# v
| 81,800
4 ?+ m( V0 P7 c$ ]% r& G9 F- g9 f; Q: } | 38.2
+ F, A- ?2 Y H: |: _' P | -2.9 + |5 b0 L/ l l B( r b/ b
| -0.5 1 l3 {) D V8 W$ \3 @1 y% Z3 p
| 36.6 ( t. g# z8 g, _/ p
| Calgary $ D# k) D+ S6 Z+ x( }9 K7 t& ]
| 412,700 ; j2 r2 h1 g0 v; `7 S5 C, G2 ?
| 2.7
( q" g& w5 G3 \4 b | 85,00
" n7 x4 s/ K: e3 c# q5 [: S+ k | 37.1 ; u/ E9 s8 T3 s7 x8 t6 b
| -2.0 9 y3 g M/ F& e
| -1.5
0 [8 g; `, h* e4 ]4 Z9 U | 39.9 ; ?- k# J' I/ V8 X% k8 p2 V+ B
| Edmonton ) w; `% z* N. f9 ]" j# x
| 322,900
B& m' j( I- f9 ]7 g5 B+ s/ B7 y | 5.4 , q, _4 @ W/ k5 Q1 T3 c2 p
| 72,900 3 X" j; w, Q& [. w
| 32.7 ) q* C7 t" R M. e9 o9 d8 b$ f
| -2.0
. y) R$ Y+ s6 o. J2 y | -0.5 3 G- x5 W: A( x0 U" V
| 33.9 ( `! @/ f! Y: P' Z" B9 ?( V
| % J4 y+ M$ c! I. H* r" `( t# H
3 |1 c: S2 `3 ASource: RBC November 2010. The measures are based on a 25% down payment, a 25-year mortgage loan at a five-year fixed rate and are estimated on a quarterly basis for each province and for Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver-metropolitan areas. The measures use household income rather than family income to account for the growing number of unattached individuals in the housing market. The higher the measure, the more difficult it is to afford a house.+ m5 U5 ^8 T/ \5 s- l8 L' [9 w( }
# t* A9 R7 s3 \ N" L2 G |
|
| |
|
|