 鲜花( 115)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 年轻的心 于 2010-12-1 13:52 编辑 - _# H9 o, s E/ K3 u, e
/ g8 o' K- F$ C7 @* T
2010年12月
4 u/ Y# g% T2 L7 E+ ]* \" ]Bank of Canada Interest Rate: T8 k( r; p3 k6 ?
. T' k; ^& ?# b, k! \
| | September 8, 2010 | 1.00 % | | October 19, 2010 | 1.00 % | | December 7, 2010 | Next meeting date | Source: Bank of Canada4 A4 X$ {7 u) ~- d6 w. ~: r
2 \5 A k- m5 S' I
- A% |! o, d1 u+ i
Bank Prime Lending Rate
3 x& h0 p2 ^; `$ A8 ~$ `. J& {$ g& U& K: z9 X* y& M
6 r o0 x: Y2 w% B& _: e8 H| September 9, 2010 | 3.00 % | | October 20, 2010 | 3.00 % | | December 8, 2010 | Next meeting date |
( a% t( p' P2 G! t8 YSource: Bank of Canada' l# ^& ]4 _6 {9 H `( s
- b" B3 f$ ]- O" R9 z5 D7 O% Z# S$ w4 d) r/ ~8 M0 P8 U6 d
- D" v/ [) Z* g$ X% v+ ]. f! a/ P( G/ k5 Z6 F: u( S4 a. m
Conventional Mortgage - 5 Year Rate*( b/ u& l7 c5 F* Y; ^1 s- U
1 l/ [% Z! A' y% q( a3 L
0 e$ n0 i) j2 S% \' j" }: w' i
| September 15, 2010 | 5.39 % | | October 18, 2010 | 5.29 % | November 29, 2010
* Z( a! p' {7 C. g | 5.44 % |
) x+ r! Q8 \1 n7 E: X' B. sSource: Bank of Canada) u$ L+ T: V& }+ J% \& F/ s! w. S
*Determinant for high ratio mortgage variable qualifying rate
, X* L+ s( P5 O% P) o5 }
8 R- Z2 w. Z: p1 c" |
: W, C8 ^& `/ d9 p9 v j0 ~& D9 W4 q. n5 u) I
# g+ W6 s2 x% |0 V: l" TUS Federal Reserve Board Discount Rate
7 k7 W: p6 t- S; d1 @% K# v
( T+ ^4 v; W6 z! K( m& D
. V$ T8 B$ Z U$ Q% P! G6 F| September 21, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | November 3, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | December 14, 2010 | Next Meeting date |
9 |% u. F7 g( A% T6 c7 S$ C lSource: US Federal Reserve
7 M) i# {' i$ |
, q+ S5 x3 p }) V
# Y2 Q/ N* _1 x; E3 T6 E! |" O4 d7 r
W5 @: Q0 Y9 @. m# D9 C3 r8 o/ |4 m" h6 H% e) R! ?% P' h. ^
: y' \9 W- d9 u' d- bExchange Rate $CDN($US)# D3 d" Z c- g( x/ f. q B
| October 28, 2010 | 0.9790 | | November 10, 2010 | 1.0000 | | November 26, 2010 | 0.9804 |
2 D! G) p$ w7 O( p( c; S0 [' V$ mSource: Bank of Canada4 a3 k9 j, o: E& Z+ e" {* t+ {
0 J, c5 N4 }. `% q4 M I$ [, l4 Q# d( m" G
# |4 m* S9 X9 {3 U- b
2 l* M M s% V, o4 g1 WGovernment of Canada Bonds# V0 E% _" ?+ o
+ u( q! y4 r: K: V5 D
2 K# g7 O6 j2 p9 l; x% o2 `; E/ {| Bond Type | October 27, 2010 | November 10, 2010 | November 24, 2010 | 1 year Treasury Bill , x) P7 Z' ~) }7 {1 b, ~/ I
| 1.21%
+ Y, j" B9 ~1 @( v3 C8 I | 1.27% | 1.39% | 3 year Benchmark P Z& n; w3 k e. c2 ]
Bond Yield | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.94% | 5 year Benchmark ) R) f$ N. K6 E
Bond Yield | 2.06% | 2.20% | 2.48% | 10 year Benchmark2 }7 G1 C x7 t# @( u+ C
Bond Yield | 2.89% | 2.98% | 3.19% | 9 @! f. _3 K, q9 w, N% i
Source: Bank of Canada
9 z0 C9 I$ _0 X: Y1 n# J8 y( X$ V
) A8 K5 q" R5 o5 T
# f& o3 U5 R. z. ~' o% q; Q- O3 T1 G% r1 g
$ w F6 |8 V) e# @
9 [, W7 O0 `* H/ x. A
Total New Housing Starts (Seasonally adjusted and annualized)
# X# T: v# d: x2 r: o6 Q; u! T xProvince# Y/ y8 y g1 n$ K. c
| August
. l" ~, u p* w6 R; i2010 , X, h4 y# E) Z3 j0 Q2 S }! k2 o
| August
8 E: T' v4 a- [ B' u2009
1 H, A4 ^: {. [, I- w | September. L5 ]- ^# p7 Z: _
2010 7 j, U' ?; v2 q& \) I1 G
| September- G: M6 j( g k$ C" F- d, D/ v" [
2009 5 z' ~6 W6 K) z- q$ R# I @
| October; e$ i+ `" J7 c& l" l
2010
# ?5 O) Y- ~9 ^1 L# |, H1 z | October1 }& h) y* ~$ S8 n, Q$ \
2009
! h) \: I- X, s& g/ O$ }0 y5 w P | Newfoundland/Labrador5 a* h& Y& c8 y7 e) W/ F
| 3,500
w# p: k% }! n | 2,400
' y4 X; D& p( y0 `. t | 3,100
% v8 s6 j& D4 n- Z# W | 2,800 " W3 I; y. j O" A/ c$ b1 h$ Y5 ?
| 3,400
" s- }/ P Y8 m. _" @6 V | 2,900 " Z; c# N$ I5 n0 a5 \
| PEI
3 N% M0 |) B4 B3 e9 K" p | 1,000
$ K2 p2 M/ Y- B# C$ a) T* V | 1,000 2 r2 O( U2 J: `( K# w
| 500
0 p& Q% }- R( Y, E& F ?! j | 700 % M) a4 g: d( u; h) B
| 400 T5 _0 i" I- E: O6 B/ d& K' Q
| 1,200
# u! Q5 P& x' q2 | | Nova Scotia
! ?4 p/ ~% |6 V# ? | 3,200 ; N2 S* Z& ~& r7 Y3 s
| 4,200 ! {: G" V; g$ E3 R3 d
| 4,100 . K0 l/ L3 Z- s2 ^% z0 G
| 4,500 9 n$ d* M8 r' w% F' A0 P ?
| 4,700
' }4 a. Z# G4 C( d: }. o | 4,000 % L4 q7 N, d- j9 I. h
| New Brunswick. j- D% R7 ^, `+ `# J
| 5,100 " C2 S3 A/ z9 ~) ?. G. M
| 3,700 8 e( p0 `- E5 G$ w `3 A: s! r
| 2,400 1 {+ O' x$ s. y
| 2,900 ; U( A0 n, Z5 d* t; i- g" Q- w9 b
| 4,900
; e) A- U% v2 ?! Y1 }0 J) _1 K3 ` | 3,600 2 o; W% |1 Y8 z/ H. z. H2 J m
| Quebec- s+ J6 f9 f0 I9 c5 W f
| 48,300 - J" T* t+ }# r8 `- I- D. q
| 47,300 0 p8 p0 l0 O8 x) M/ a- ~6 s9 I" `
| 50,700 $ [: L4 Q- O! w0 ]! o
| 41,300
$ }6 e) j/ v& _1 ]! T4 l& n | 48,600
; m4 z; n( h$ o4 }& b | 37,200
3 ?4 @8 p( ]* g+ e, C6 z | Ontario& A& ]0 N( v& Y) g9 g
| 64,800 1 }; S A9 M$ G# {2 ^/ {8 Z
| 44,200
' j4 l' z! J9 e8 z: O | 58,000 ) h* s7 r& a% {
| 50,200 5 {( l4 q* w' L1 Y! U, H
| 44,700 ' X9 b, r0 F1 s: y+ k& _" i }- b
| 57,600
5 J& V! G* k3 C+ X! C: r) g | Manitoba p3 a- r# K/ @
| 6,100 ; B" @( U5 G9 u( k; b
| 5,000
; z7 w- c( g/ {0 d# O$ J+ d& w | 4,000
5 ^7 Q5 Z) ?* Q4 M" g* T* S" x* D | 4,400
( d0 u1 M% B' N8 O/ j) l( w0 Y | 3,800 0 A) i* o0 @/ o, {' i
| 4,200
6 _% z( E9 z$ U' ?1 c- ]6 N | Saskatchewan4 A8 X, C. S2 v4 X0 b! e
| 7,700 1 X0 x9 I) K# i2 } d' {
| 5,100
% S! P0 }8 K! b2 _, t | 5,400 _9 U4 X& x6 J" Q
| 3,700
1 F; y( W: R: X. o* N | 4,700 F6 E7 o6 ]+ N+ I8 _1 |0 `
| 3,600
) ]% q3 `% y" C; x8 s0 s( q: r | Alberta% Q7 ]( L: b* ~& J
| 23,500 + Z I2 f- e/ b* z
| 18,400
$ @* {. I! s: }* Y1 @! h& o | 27,100 2 O/ k& c5 Y: A
| 22,600
8 t& z5 W7 F3 D8 @5 D. @! n" X* N! k# K | 25,200 9 R% E+ v4 n4 z7 G- }+ `
| 25,000
+ `1 s \3 u; r0 ?$ q9 Y" J& K | British Columbia
7 J- T5 ^. V& F1 L C' z( t | 27,800 5 ]& X8 `& A; f7 |& Z$ W6 V$ u) `
| 19,200
$ l; o# c9 h" R | 29,700
8 w6 }5 Z& q& G" C | 16,200
- `' k; k# ?7 ^ | 27,500 9 `% b4 I9 ~% w6 I+ B3 i
| 18,200
2 ~4 w I# ^% W2 @- s | CANADA
: C1 v4 d! t2 p x! F3 S0 C0 @ | 191,000
- t Z* Y4 P2 d$ M+ L | 150,500 $ l( T/ n& r2 p3 K/ _
| 185,000
3 R4 x' E/ y7 Y, G+ Z( K | 149,300
- [& r2 x9 c/ Q; P | 167,900 0 W6 [% P: ]3 ?, W- M% R1 {
| 157,400
$ Z. P( [2 B# I" E8 S7 t | 3 }/ M4 V) q7 X m! h
Source: CMHC Housing Now - November 2010 and November 2009. This seasonally adjusted data goes through stages of revision at different times of the the year.2 \0 {: }# s& t/ T) L
* N J) \# X/ n* `' ?
: _$ H0 P4 b! X3 Q0 Z* E5 j
7 ~9 l4 X9 j" Y4 x
- i% c+ v3 v9 O- L- E; {
2 x' p9 `) j8 A( G$ OAverage MLS® Resale Price for Local Markets0 g8 \4 A3 E- u1 F' j, R
7 c/ a# c, K( a8 P& w5 k
5 `- c4 n3 R f4 t: }
| City | October 2009 | October 2010 | | Halifax | $235,465 | $248,678 | | Saint John | $178,632
L. S) j4 \$ B, @+ X# l! U. W | $165,032 | | Quebec | $219,440 | $246,918 | | Montreal | $285,100 | $309,638 | | Ottawa | $320,561 | $305,872 8 c! p5 `" |9 x7 R
| | Toronto | $423,507 | $443,633 | | Hamilton/Burlington | $296,253 | $305,872 | | Winnipeg | $210,618 | $229,467 | | Saskatoon | $274,759 | $293,929 | | Calgary | $393,574 | $399,679 | | Edmonton | $351,768 | $317,096 | | Vancouver | $638,948 | $707,207 | | Victoria | $481,500 | $343,747 | & C( E3 U$ Q0 P
Source: Canadian Real Estate Association
3 g1 O, ~8 h9 V) G W: `9 S' e: t3 Y+ u, g
: M' d6 q6 i# k7 u
8 x; Y0 a4 M0 ^. U4 W$ q1 Z
3 N, A0 w4 @; {: c2 u7 E0 ~, J w5 U6 A* t S0 T
Quarterly Housing Affordability Index & ?. e I& ]$ g) O
Standard Two-Storey
! E! P6 A; f# o, E" p" q$ \! }7 U0 [. _# Q) `7 _
| Average Price
0 F; p! c5 R9 g | 3 r6 Z, z7 P# l
| RBC Housing Affordability Measure
6 ?5 _9 z$ b& u7 J | Region 6 a, M: c) c, `) k' S* m
| Q3 2010
" t( ^ Q; ^/ f9 s($) , H) t. y( ^" C1 B: u9 t) k! t8 P
| Y/Y( a; P5 i" h" z" W
% ch.
! R3 h) b5 a) y: H | Qualifying ' u# j% y, Y: m. Q% x. N& r
Income ($)
/ [+ f/ T1 v* W; D4 F/ B# ~Q3 2010 ; E* n; { T- U! k+ f) S
| Q3 2010) r% n/ M1 E3 Q# {& _
(%)
+ j3 C* h8 S1 ^6 H2 U | Q/Q* L0 A/ d( i4 d5 g9 f
Ppt. Ch.
/ D6 X0 w9 I6 g% _+ I0 n6 M | Y/Y, y, z6 g1 G% }% Z& K
Ppt. Ch.
; a$ ~5 x& H, Y( _2 Y( b0 ~ | Avg. since; W2 C1 J9 @7 C: V4 x$ B* I
'85 (%)
5 Y- E1 K5 @3 @0 E | Canada
# Z$ o5 q; k. s# L- ^' c | 370,700 % s% ] l4 ^. V |
| 6.3 & ]! e5 `1 d2 E6 |5 h% m5 c, @
| 83,100
; u7 C: }" q+ ~6 C | 46.3 + P" @! m+ o3 q4 t& ]7 A" J
| -2.5 ( ]% z$ m1 K, r8 v. y k& E; _
| 0.3
0 a8 j D1 s5 \$ t | 43.3 U5 w5 | m2 f2 U" ~ @
| British Columbia ) c- I7 E+ Q; c7 f" {
| 624,800
5 a) m# ^! M1 p9 t$ q. \6 s | 8.0
- r, {) X* l5 @- ]" F | 124,500
, W2 R: @7 K3 A! `, g | 67.5 + c/ q6 D$ | M3 k' J" |
| -3.9 5 z5 t2 H; q+ U, {3 V
| 1.4 ' D2 n5 E$ N# p: ^3 K8 Y) C/ G" k
| 54.1 5 _/ J$ ?( `2 ?
| Alberta
" j+ j" b; i8 B% r. D" n) { | 365,600 ( y; M# I) p- l& i
| 0.1 3 p' H2 e3 A% i" y- I
| 81,400 0 N/ d" U; z1 A- x; b
| 35.6 $ |& I) o M0 E: i
| -1.8
) P: x* q% _* f" V6 d( d1 o# l# Q2 U | -2.0 5 J. r% a: g8 d0 v7 {6 B
| 38.6
( F9 `0 K0 y; t4 X w9 g1 x | Saskatchewan
u/ r) i0 o6 v/ U; J | 315,300 # t0 l/ ~3 S: c5 X
| 5.1 q! J( e9 K% m' v( R& R8 ~
| 74,100 + ~1 ?; @& f j' ` V) d
| 40.8 6 J8 G2 s/ k. }, n
| -2.2
# I, S6 l1 A" Y2 A$ |: m | -1.1
: b% c) n+ G% Y8 o; i% D | 38.0 % k8 E, e: Y3 B8 o: e
| Manitoba ) b, N1 y( x2 `* K
| 269,700 , f" }5 I. ~' _
| 7.8
4 b4 g3 T5 V0 U: X | 65,000
a7 ?- T4 e( Y0 h! U | 37.1
& t& o. y( {1 L; N6 y" O | -2.3
: X+ [0 n( H1 L. M4 W1 H# |+ |) ?) K/ R | 0.8
$ u; X$ x: i4 @! Y! g2 h8 u | 37.7 1 k- W! {2 t$ M' U+ p, S
| Ontario
6 |8 I( B5 O" z) @* H0 L% d2 P | 388,200
8 W- g% J9 v& I4 n5 f2 H) S- W | 6.2 " k- Z' O# I, e( r& T
| 89,800 ! ^7 ?: f: B; z7 _! t
| 44.9 6 t) r [6 J% c4 }8 o# B
| -2.4
0 b0 p, B& K8 e2 v% [ | 0.4
) x, j+ {: b5 {+ i: ] W- u9 O. y4 H5 Q | 43.7 / [" M, _8 R9 J6 a. ^
| Quebec
% w! F: ^0 S) Q( `+ D" U4 N7 t | 262,100
3 u! L Q* C# c. r4 a& i' @ | 8.6
2 o# q5 g# G) r | 61,700
$ [/ S& c# K3 `. ?" N$ u4 V7 r4 P: j* s( R | 41.7 6 f8 M" q+ f; a& p- ~5 ^
| -1.8 1 Y2 v7 @+ \8 ?8 s
| 1.3 7 c e' @( Y6 G9 `( w( B( R4 P. g
| 38.8
! Q# y: F' M C | Atlantic : s: t$ s0 ~; M" @
| 222,100 4 H, H/ S1 G3 e/ d7 j4 @( v( H
| 4.3 + {* a, `7 c# u/ w$ X' } t' H
| 55,900
1 O9 e5 T$ k( f" b( ?/ ]$ _ | 36.5 : l4 P" @- u* s! k+ s' I7 Z& c
| -1.4 0 w+ g& Z: e* l$ b# }
| 0.1 5 L0 e1 e; S- X) n) W1 m( \. b& ]
| 38.0 : j5 a! W7 z+ |% m" D' x, l: n
| Toronto
! W9 W% V# l ` | 554,700 * d% q6 L2 T* ]
| 5.6
. G6 K! y2 L( L9 ` | 120,400
# t/ e5 f% w8 U. A0 D" }3 ` | 56.2
9 W5 z9 b0 |- q$ j$ u- U | -3.8
1 s @# v- j- @' r N: _& J | 0.1 8 ]! o) A9 g7 O3 O. {
| 53.4
3 Z @( }- t2 n( w" g& \7 p | Montreal % t; b% O1 r6 \1 H
| 335,300 0 \0 |% q ?7 a
| 8.9
& k7 k3 ]' [. R3 | | 75,800
S9 V' W% s. A | 51.3
3 k9 }5 W$ `; d' F& I | -1.7
4 B2 [: p$ E x* x | 1.7 3 S- X/ l0 Q- q9 N5 @) j* M# W
| 41.7
4 I2 v+ M9 @7 q4 l | Vancouver
; n% J# g! o( Q9 ?5 c/ f | 766,300 ; C, r9 }9 F* {0 f6 X7 ^. n
| 8.4
0 U- O A1 e- G# Q9 ` | 149,400
- b0 c) L& n' R | 78.1
" _7 U' A+ A# } | -4.7
& M9 ^$ ?# k* T: `, ? | 2.0 * j2 q9 g+ k9 _* P; n
| 62.6
0 j& a# X$ I$ t+ A: w/ n! { | Ottawa + F! ]: S3 g, p2 u) W( P
| 350,600
A) G. l9 b9 y: }7 N | 4.8
2 U6 Z8 ^0 S# l) h% V7 C | 86,600
0 V- W3 r0 _5 e' q E+ F* s- [ | 40.5
2 u$ ~) s1 S6 b/ d* E8 x; \" Y | -2.5
( Q5 Q, \# Y5 K0 T+ j- _& x | 0.0 % D& A4 A! a" m! A0 {4 ~
| 39.1 : S; B" y- g, J3 p7 Z
| Calgary
+ Q! N1 T8 q& I- X | 410,500 ) Z9 \$ b' j# n: m7 P/ w. h+ `
| -1.0 - {4 |% D4 N! Z' f' b
| 86,700 / `1 u, q$ y. y" }" ]6 t( c
| 37.9
( f9 c. R l" P1 a' m# ] | -2.3 % A7 @: K7 \6 Z
| -2.6 ! s; S, `9 h) b( m0 a0 J% Q
| 40.3 6 Y6 H# t# e$ L' ^# z4 B2 ~
| Edmonton # s* ^ Q8 f9 Q# {2 T1 h# u
| 362,500
& P! I% I5 c. d% J2 x0 K | 1.2
9 l: a4 z! z9 P* Z8 T- t+ ]4 f | 82,500
' T4 r! J* U" P: S | 37.0
4 k: L) L; ^/ {8 `( O. N | -1.9 0 _! ?5 c; r0 I! R
| -1.6 % X% P2 |2 Q; A. E1 Z) q) H; e1 _
| 37.0
- H: d) ]: O4 p# V/ u5 V | 3 \- p7 y' W, P3 q, c4 J' X
Detached Bungalow 0 e! }5 W- A8 P" B
| Average Price - F n2 D$ z; e; a
| % p5 w& h; V! g/ s R' t
| RBC Housing Affordability Measure , t& o+ y4 l7 {' c1 G8 \$ _
| Region " O7 Q. l, F+ t; |+ ^4 A/ B
| Q3 2010! `9 x/ o2 Q) ]
($)
1 P3 q6 u8 b" P. L4 E | Y/Y
6 I' S" S/ I, T/ }% ch.
% d% \$ j7 l6 \+ W7 G- S | Qualifying / v q' A2 v4 a7 i/ G1 E
Income ($)
5 A0 H1 Y4 p3 r0 w; b6 }" iQ3 2010
: J8 z. E9 P3 @9 R R | Q3 2010
, g7 z, G+ h0 V(%)
, e, y" I! |, u6 H" A | Q/Q
- ?* y; d3 Z3 P- V0 {8 x4 B( i; `Ppt. Ch. * J/ }3 T: x9 A' _; Y
| Y/Y8 l$ `; U% M9 |5 r4 l6 p4 {$ w
Ppt. Ch. , t8 l" ~: c' s1 ^/ d2 K2 c
| Avg. since0 v. q+ `: f2 N- f& z6 w' Y( |
'85 (%) j' q' A; \. Y
| Canada ( H, u% N8 J; Q& v/ K
| 325,300
: ]9 \( G5 b0 z/ d! {6 F& M | 6.8 5 M5 i/ Z" o- o2 [5 K0 W; @! v
| 72,500
$ R9 \. P( x& Y4 H | 40.4
$ K/ z; }2 ]6 G- z- G/ D2 s | -2.4 5 V/ T& S ~# A/ u
| 0.3 : Y8 T w9 r% Z4 H
| 39.0
l+ L) j6 B' o | British Columbia
6 V5 ?* L2 x2 B) d( `1 z! l | 544,700
, @& c7 l, e* m9 i | 8.5 * r# B1 h+ [. w" {0 p
| 108,800 # V w+ F" `/ @* M) m' u( L
| 59.0
) C9 s& L8 e8 C; {. w& O; U | -5.0 % [9 w" O/ p5 m ]
| 1.5 + x- `9 ?9 L, e P a1 p
| 48.9 : J6 `0 m8 n4 a) o5 L0 k( W
| Alberta $ ^, K( g, [/ R9 V7 f: L3 m# s
| 340,500
% b! N8 L" K! u$ G- c | 2.9
$ v; Z7 ^2 l t+ M | 74,400 . T D$ \$ |3 ~% {5 X. U
| 32.5 4 W& ^; m' c" j( a5 b. Q' F
| -1.8 ' a( Q! U( K. j( N
| -1.2 ! L( p z3 _: a3 {1 ?) C6 W
| 36.1
5 o4 k% X! D, t' j | Saskatchewan 1 [" `4 ]- Y3 A! k, _- x
| 312,400
3 T/ ?% F6 Y! \! ~ | 6.3 5 y7 u; f$ E( q2 \; @
| 70,900
# I& z" U- E! ]5 b# k. C7 k5 U I | 39.0 % F B4 L+ ~$ p% z& f- k/ O
| -1.9
" c$ d) f3 O& a4 Q1 h; B | -0.8 0 e* @" P# V3 x5 Q3 Q* G5 s
| 36.6 % d0 t0 C. l' C4 u9 D
| Manitoba
9 m/ x2 M" z" x: k- l" I | 251,000 : d# c0 |$ [: v+ Q/ ~" _" j
| 9.2
/ z+ _0 }; c% ^# \8 F7 s5 A | 60,800 / T9 ?* z g" R$ t. {* y
| 34.7
, }3 W5 k' I. Z2 B( G3 Y2 U; C) _ | -1.4 3 w4 S9 Y$ q" v, V* U6 C) Q* D8 s
| 1.1
4 v2 x- O) j6 F9 m1 t A/ T | 36.8 ) q* M- P4 Z, x+ s4 u
| Ontario
, h* ]3 J1 A- T; [4 p9 o4 C | 337,400 . Q4 Q) d; X& \2 @9 i1 G- L$ \
| 6.1
1 D6 e8 _& N# ^. K- u | 77,900
J0 Y, v4 u$ p' F# h/ A/ S | 38.9 . N6 g" w g* N+ F. |2 ]
| -2.2
" J# i9 ]) \$ u: {$ m | 0.2
7 Y# u1 C& I ^* R/ a p Z* n | 40.1
/ {* ~0 n/ Z3 @ | Quebec 0 x+ x2 [3 `# @8 V" I
| 221,600 ( G5 i6 O6 G- l4 {5 f0 m" `
| 9.3 % j7 z9 Y4 w. {/ H
| 51,700
( a/ X+ G; E% u* x* K | 35.0 * t* c. K! |, L9 m! N
| -1.4 6 ?1 s; W& \ d) m) U( e# y7 k
| 1.2 4 P! W, ^1 y6 ~
| 32.9 5 q' n/ U6 b7 V" w" O$ b
| Atlantic 7 k& P- k3 t- z) C
| 196,600
7 V$ u! {' m7 p+ x6 }4 v& W5 e | 2.3
! I' ]: ], a- k) D, p% ~ Y/ X# c | 48,200
+ l- q/ U% ^. ~, k+ M | 31.4 0 _4 ^" J/ t" p; |2 o
| -1.0
+ v& Z3 ~1 L1 G& M4 ] | -0.4 * v6 U8 y/ J! h# Y7 g; E0 g$ |
| 31.6
% j+ Q. g; Z5 ?, |1 S( {5 Z% {: K | Toronto
- i4 ~0 v! l. p k) N | 466,600
3 R; K w6 m* W8 q5 R | 5.0 4 B k9 B0 G1 w+ k8 k
| 101,100 6 t% t i7 M' H
| 47.2 1 o+ G/ {- }& w! [; E: F- ]8 F' Y! s3 B
| -3.0
6 ^4 {/ i! E" D% \0 ~4 x! n' e | -0.1
; t7 f/ L, q# b | 48.2
! g, J9 e( ]6 [: x( C | Montreal
$ J0 _7 ]' |: r( \ | 271,100
! Q A. O5 ?& ^5 b' I' Q# T | 11.8 9 p, X1 S z7 k9 L) t
| 61,600
( y8 _$ @1 t& R$ P" Q- u0 L" Z | 41.7
6 P1 K5 z7 w) k | -1.3
& [9 ~* u/ X8 o, w | 2.2 7 y, `# N8 m# Y! K6 y
| 36.9 8 i, G; K$ S6 p" N" r! ]3 w
| Vancouver
% P* T! d( e( O/ L | 672,500
7 b6 v+ G: s" Q7 g2 a- ^. i" \ | 9.7
3 S# _- T1 D+ _/ w8 T | 131,600
6 i' V# W- K3 m1 v3 u( U) o2 M; x | 68.8 ' g; X) V( `9 E; J8 L5 w5 \
| -5.4 0 ]. r4 N. n& `* {8 z/ {5 Z
| 2.4
; c6 v1 v c0 U* ]# \ | 57.3 0 {8 @) O& A9 h& `
| Ottawa 5 S& M; y$ D8 F; v( s, a/ r6 l
| 340,800
- I# M# a, [; S1 q& _ | 3.4
* B% N% X" T1 z+ q | 81,800 K/ _8 {# L K4 t2 `
| 38.2 8 H" Q+ G& Z# }* i6 c
| -2.9
) N" E6 x: k) w9 ^& | | -0.5 7 s$ W0 G& r5 j# f7 u& \
| 36.6
6 @( ^8 @4 ^2 T) O2 Q- S4 Y* n2 {4 X | Calgary
1 i$ ]0 j% S( @' Z1 X | 412,700
7 s$ Z$ d/ n: _$ g' ]& C | 2.7
! {$ p M6 k; a [7 g7 v/ ?+ Z) ^8 a | 85,00 7 U2 z$ j Z6 _$ S9 Z6 O/ F2 q
| 37.1 ! _' N( ~1 w' q
| -2.0 5 f7 ]3 Z+ L! [; R
| -1.5 1 H9 O/ d+ D6 P/ j
| 39.9
& w Q, j3 {' Z- d | Edmonton 2 w/ `1 d! @, R; r+ \( ]
| 322,900 ) u* ~. F' E. K# n2 P! _
| 5.4 8 g8 B& Q/ G! a% n/ V* h$ M+ ~
| 72,900 $ g5 W9 U+ F/ F" Q: E* y' R
| 32.7 $ |( U1 @6 j; h% Q
| -2.0
* Z5 _6 @6 ^/ d1 w8 I | -0.5
+ a7 H) R; j3 _4 N* A2 h0 h | 33.9 ; }% V( z8 Q* Z( F% S" l( T; G
| 9 a+ b4 X* C' ^6 I5 q; H3 Y# @$ a
3 A Z" s" |3 e/ U8 |$ m9 ASource: RBC November 2010. The measures are based on a 25% down payment, a 25-year mortgage loan at a five-year fixed rate and are estimated on a quarterly basis for each province and for Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver-metropolitan areas. The measures use household income rather than family income to account for the growing number of unattached individuals in the housing market. The higher the measure, the more difficult it is to afford a house.
- B6 u" C9 y5 y/ c, S2 r1 o, }& `8 B5 }, g% q5 N% `7 M9 G, x
|
|
| |
|
|