请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
4 P9 H, {! q7 O; t/ \7 p
, \9 T+ L+ m: j: N$ P) C值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

3 V2 X* `! ?( y( @5 ]! J. ?/ _* }4 D值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

7 C: ^" S2 z) M' R5 R去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
9 }* i5 O3 \8 H, Eskybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

( H' h- u4 T* a/ a# \/ @4 ^眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
7 [1 R$ w" z' o' l+ }. MAssessed Value: $497,000
% z2 N* t* {( R2 H100% Taxable: Yes
" D  Y. m( @+ y7 Y100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
7 ]" F* `4 p, `4 _- W4 zProperty Type: Residential
3 `6 G* C) d" D1 JLand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
6 r* P4 H+ L0 a2 `: ^  ILot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
! @0 N1 f- v4 V7 PYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
1 `, e3 f/ S, n; QApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
8 m" f7 P+ h: V+ S: uBasement Development: No
9 J$ {# N6 g) C9 EGarage: Yes
Fireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.