I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache2 L$ H" `' M0 J8 ~+ E6 v/ C
( a8 l' r( A. n* K4 e1 Z- P& lCalm down everyone please.2 }$ [% q( P' D _% L: E
: S- G! G! u1 p! p7 A) J( B* l
不存在 can mean two different things: 6 S+ l3 B) q5 }- [# u/ Y q : M$ Z" O! O x- A3 R1 M- a1 O1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.& s2 \# x/ ?, G1 |8 D
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 / R" u$ |* g5 R9 V 7 ?: r, v( Q' p& x$ R1 _+ R/ @I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist4 _1 Z5 l$ }; V' v. D: |) T/ j/ }: N
- u. a# s+ U. c4 p3 G0 E0 J# O
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:29 编辑 ]
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表 * h/ g; g0 `: I5 i$ S, wI would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache 4 a4 H1 c1 A& D8 P/ j) g K# j$ T& W; ?
Calm down everyone please.: b" G9 ?# ?' S1 g5 j; E
# ^ ~+ w& I" |
不存在 can mean two different things:9 T; f/ B& Z& B; I4 O; a/ J7 z
6 E- a* ]# R$ N7 k7 C1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.6 s' L: x# e% g, m
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 5 h6 }) v: ]: f% Z6 M3 u( q. i& h5 h& D& D9 M
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
8 f* ~: C( g& @8 ^2 N. {3 \/ S6 E 2 ~( i$ s& W" L/ F* b7 j9 R9 f7 r0 w小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
, q6 L8 f' H- S. Y7 Y7 e) Z6 sDid your GOD ask you to curse people this way?# f2 M0 z0 m9 T0 A. V' ]5 M6 n
If you really have a 宗教信仰, I believe your GOD will shame on you!
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 10:55 发表, _- i: V- I2 A4 a. @6 I. u
2 c/ _( T0 f/ j; {! R$ K4 F4 T
2:" never exist" refers to 过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来一定没有!!!" r. t0 S9 Z/ B- y
# D0 S3 w: X- _- f. i* R0 D2 g
At least dora meant that I am pretty sure.
原帖由 也无风雨也无晴 于 2006-6-8 10:30 发表 8 y+ |: m A. w! Z$ d宗教信仰是一种自由,信也好,不信也罢,别恶意攻击别人, ...
- n0 c# Z4 ~8 w$ H' V% o0 ?
0 D' W; Q( ? b' x- |Arguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years)8 @1 m7 k& N5 Q
! L3 G9 {: p$ H; m8 G/ B
Maybe we should stop argument. + m4 y; @" e* r4 N% Z6 L+ B( M% k$ x d9 ^; x; h- L
My commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion$ ?/ h, d9 l0 U0 `- Z0 ^4 p