 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 6)
|
本帖最后由 bigsnail 于 2012-6-7 11:17 编辑 6 h! ~9 @0 \5 L+ }3 h7 o* D
. r' _5 Y7 T" n( J* g4 d
open your mouth and wash it with detergent
/ b( F! X2 S, A W4 [8 f! f' e6 s: R2 i9 {
sure there is no rigorous statistical evidence because there is no way to manipulate in the experiment so as to fully justify the causality." q" t. X4 R* l
8 R( z# M8 D5 \0 ]' J* m7 L- `( GAnd remember: ' ^* y9 T& d/ S
"there is no evidence that A holds" 4 u4 w& @' ~% f" v Y
does NOT mean 0 [6 ~* H4 T: Y4 ?
"there is evident that A does not hold". ' Y8 p, f8 b- c8 _* [( D
In fact, A could hold.
8 k9 J h. t* L1 gIt's a matter like observability vs objective existence.' _% I3 e' k: H: R" C
So what you say doesn't constitute a refutation.1 ~# a) Q) ?! X% `4 M
2 m% ?- e z1 u' z* D
It's mainly by argumentation. See for example:
$ ^: X) A) j/ l' H; \" O
, s3 o; p; \3 ], |7 Q, ]"Does the death penalty cost less than life in prison without parole?"
! B/ I5 `3 k; b% w3 W* G6 ~in
* U$ h9 c, l' D* J e. yhttp://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001000
3 k: o8 M& H1 c, h3 t" L% h
2 E$ d9 r/ R. \) j; J+ y; @Remember, things are more complicated than what you think.
* z6 J, a- Y. n |
|
楼主: weidsun
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-6-6 21:15
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2012-6-7 14:59
