 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + b7 v7 q" f7 X, V4 {% ~& a/ J
) H; @5 ^. p( t8 p. S6 n! z- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -& m3 y; O) p: f
' s: B5 ^- b& J7 R) b5 i TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market8 f- s& r9 a, r/ |+ _* z! b
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third T5 r' R& f" `6 o, |- Y
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic2 y5 t7 Q( e0 z7 M3 [ N
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
9 z {7 e7 W3 w8 Pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
- n4 {7 ^* N2 {; Y9 s# Hmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,6 `5 q$ i# E4 O, t; s% D# D
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* Z' m7 Z' r p" k1 @# b
LePage Real Estate Services.
+ H' z6 M7 n0 p1 U. A5 \& v0 d' j8 @: q5 Y
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
+ H8 f% Q) U( W4 Care forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
k/ J8 |( p1 v+ G1 o' T0 Qconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
- e1 E$ t% M) i* a; Q7 c7 e% Lsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
' s Y- C, {: W/ A7 v1 n; w; ^1 ~residential real estate sector.
9 D- Z1 q" Q, T% n+ x3 Q
, s$ o( [0 ] @& D Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation3 s" \; Q% n& q/ x
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 ?3 x3 c, l. s0 V" s5 v' a" n
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5628 u6 t' m. W" _- {
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
* }" f% O, q2 O1 p6 v(+13.2%).6 U. [' ?) e5 R) [- A! h+ p2 ?7 E+ f
1 p4 z( M: H' w0 r
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
+ @' ]1 R/ x; X$ i1 Lduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the/ U. O0 w( ^6 E7 l- v; ?
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 _: X$ J7 Y% e& r9 W
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 O3 [# V8 E' cpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 U5 S5 C; v9 l+ Z: H3 v ["Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
0 W5 g2 h, A3 t3 W. X* ]" lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
5 y* T P' v* B Bbalanced market."
5 c) y! o, N; `# b1 a1 b5 h
/ e" O4 r* ]5 X- e% z% X Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,' `6 t" O9 \% I6 y1 ? y, q8 D
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift& B, l* A( q& l2 p+ [3 ^4 W: a& g
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: |" a; b: k# N5 ] ?1 Dthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
. v) @( u |- k0 Penergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,! s1 j4 \, q9 r; {" \: o
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
, w3 |$ }0 S4 a0 k& W2 Bbreaking price appreciations.
7 C1 o2 ^! k8 f- W. t5 _
( p$ B4 [0 x' I% j# l3 O Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding: b- J6 w" ?( m
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
& p# Q6 k1 n+ P. H/ N/ Plargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: l0 c. D6 d% S; K6 j
; P' M" D( J; ^4 A: O6 b4 g! g In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid( V# n, h0 P4 P2 D3 e0 o
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer9 a T' [. n; N# l+ s
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off! U7 t( K1 b( R, x0 m% k
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.) n3 k j" T! Y1 q
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
8 b7 L6 f- E G; {$ S' t3 dgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of; |/ f ~" G/ b8 o! [1 I2 [6 Y5 G, c' C3 d
price appreciation when compared with 2005.$ P5 A8 w( C U
. t! G( B7 O) c p c8 S2 S While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ a$ X: D# j$ B; Umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
' o, @2 r9 c4 [financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
7 }0 Q- z2 r5 Qare markedly different than those found in the United States.
2 b# l6 F, `) l( P9 ~7 I
# l, W( a- c3 _3 D Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
1 E( l1 C- `$ k2 e; v! F; v! FAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's2 ?- }3 t5 R2 C0 a1 b* Q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
# t8 Z8 U! M: Yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general+ g9 F3 \: }# D0 K0 R9 z
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ S6 G% d0 L6 L b$ y5 z1 e7 ^
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and- R" J2 l C0 ^2 N* Y/ l7 i+ s+ o9 R
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization1 ~( q- F L" |: ~0 b
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
& S( m0 M [1 J$ F( o! ?" d! U
: |* L/ N8 O+ U' Z R <<5 b8 L1 R u( K) Q
REGIONAL SUMMARIES$ L: ?* H5 B: F& C' B
>>
# Z$ j4 e' q% x/ f; y; Z% n- {
0 {; Z$ n! C* `, [) \+ N Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
! A" g; G& o. _% BHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 j7 Y& A! G# _1 o5 L/ Zof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
, D# ^9 i8 A; {0 W: S" \# T" ]7 flooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
1 @8 M. [5 ]+ {4 w9 w" z1 ~renovations.
$ C; S. ?/ r- F$ s" r( ~
. S2 p. ?: s6 p) z The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
1 R) I* @% c' _1 U ]# ]increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
5 \ k5 D- W' ?/ f8 `3 g& Ccompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and7 R! ~( E, z& w8 B; _/ Z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
0 n8 [- J N* a/ n3 v3 `7 m! {8 \! K( A; |3 K
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
. E( J, K' V- |, V8 J/ P: Kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
( R+ V; A/ F7 B( Z. g9 [ ]" uquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
: B# i, x" c4 a600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 Q( o6 |8 ]/ {# F5 h0 Tto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
. i) c- q9 L' t' Z# S5 \' _' A, Oand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ _7 O* i+ y) P" E5 ^# ^5 g: v& s0 X `' G& q! H
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced. {, n- B# J( Q: ?) ]
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
- Q; e/ z1 G8 J3 Jhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
) r( |( h) y1 o& `% pwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian4 c8 [! Q, W, K& Z9 U q9 F% Y( Q6 o
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
0 z! i9 w/ H C3 D% X/ U9 W5 y5 ubuyers with more options when looking for a home.
! o) u2 S8 \/ A
9 w4 |( F# F) T$ d5 E8 S Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly: X. I3 {5 M9 e" V6 u
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
- D M6 g% e o- S3 w- Lpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,+ y# U9 ?6 g+ r9 N
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
% `# z0 f0 i7 Z0 Y$ A5 x. Bfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
2 l+ Z" P; G# q* k* O/ A+ A% B* Q( l- v& j
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house8 T* w! R3 @& S9 P7 j6 H
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
' f7 q" D. i/ c3 L" X5 [& Olevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
e3 ~' u0 [3 i! j' ~6 xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,7 K i, ^8 \ @& h0 J2 b. p( G* |7 ?
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
6 S7 _: X2 c, r9 t$ N( Npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 _4 W4 S, O3 S% G6 ^making a purchase.
, r" s: `, f0 y' x4 R3 j- h
7 _7 w% b8 y1 M) E& l$ A Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 @' d8 G+ B) m$ |: {2 bmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
( g1 E, r7 [) \: e/ {# O Q3 pconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! [% Y& s' z8 O V$ D
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
# ~( q& s6 @2 Eattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
7 p& R9 F, E; F9 e: ~amenities. u1 U9 z* G, i& N9 Y- f
) ~8 r1 ~0 B6 Z5 T; W g4 Y
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
8 R: }5 k m2 }throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
8 h' C! r6 ?6 V: R5 b. `across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' M8 w0 C+ w& ]- f; c2 [8 t
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( R' b; i+ m" y8 _& q0 B% S. `
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 ~% ]5 g/ p/ T: ]" w# e8 g
residence, rather than for investment.7 f/ d7 Q5 E- a8 @6 d
2 G* X1 d$ G: N The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
. L, j/ C4 j, S/ Qhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted% I* [+ b: K) O( m6 c+ B/ t: ^
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer5 B; H0 Y2 R: w
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization U3 u- H0 N0 B1 g& q: d
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter0 M- Z' D w" G& `9 [% _
the market.
V1 b6 ~0 ]2 f2 g" o( W# F- z" n4 _: @( E3 R [0 P
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through6 ? v1 c) J3 [8 B
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% i0 |+ q: {' w) C
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( l" G7 [" c/ d; X9 Tmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ B1 F2 k: e) M: F0 R z
to the shortage of available inventory.$ v+ Z2 u5 O- Q+ N A# {- ?
5 a0 @8 i/ f& | n9 X& k# E
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its4 K" ` j8 h; e2 U2 y7 \5 `8 q
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains6 S7 ~. |' A8 A/ d# ~
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 ?8 ~" {- `2 z; X, b: }
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.6 n r: E/ i" p, K" }; ~
# J# y& ~ c9 q- h
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases# [5 q% k0 t" O
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
2 i' H4 X. }6 J$ \# wunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
+ \& N8 w: V, C' g3 p' ypressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- b9 n% ~- D2 Cprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
; L" ?1 P9 j5 I: oseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
8 e( X! N K, z/ ^" vbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
( L. g6 b+ m0 t! q6 A
/ n/ f3 B: ?0 k; {& E$ ?+ Y Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
w" w# ^" u+ cas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 |3 o' g ~( j. V6 v# Uremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 y3 c% D" z0 J3 s6 ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
B+ v8 G6 k% M9 G( {5 W( xincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve8 C; \2 I) M7 s! v5 J! }- K
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 p% r: w: f: i0 x/ z9 `; k
towards the end of 2006.
; L( h3 _2 D, Q: V# Q
" k' U) w" g* F4 r7 N$ Y8 G6 [While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of7 [6 }) v3 B0 x" Q( d: ]) Q
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable9 C# E* K5 K$ W8 r
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse# Z+ S& C& F. }2 S5 ~
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
! X7 p0 \% E/ y+ }+ y' Fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
. P9 ?' K( h0 T4 B1 L! p* {pressure on tight inventory levels.( v4 {1 K1 J* n0 X) l$ E
9 b# ^' e2 ~+ W- t) y1 n
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic1 {) m7 ]; C9 b8 b# B ~
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
7 A8 y- i" Z0 l$ A' y& {8 x. tinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;+ G5 ] F8 X( @
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching! c; P r! u! R! J% z6 V' `
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
. s2 t0 X9 R! O" Y! s+ q
/ r2 R6 P* M/ ~ K) W <<
% N5 F8 V. |$ ]6 m9 s) P Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
/ d/ n6 }3 `0 b, M2 x$ N( w1 v5 G, l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 t7 }7 {6 l6 ~6 [: J t) _
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey. \( X9 u. r' e) n) {! R/ R9 I' I" E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) v/ I* W3 H5 J: t' b9 h
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 ]" N5 A6 W$ V1 W( } i
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
0 J0 t% Y( t; } j% [8 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------# Q: S: G3 j* i, ]* N' q
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
' ^: f5 k2 T6 J( m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ g# y$ `( a4 d5 Z( k Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
( Z1 n8 ^, x& ^. C6 y) f -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 F3 J3 J# `+ }# u4 [5 _5 h
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
0 F" ^" L, l0 ?* k. ^# D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ Q4 ^( n5 e5 \! Q' W6 Z& f, `* e Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
. p) }: ]0 A5 m& Z ------------------------------------------------------------------------- `6 Y7 @" @' r4 j' r6 p
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3337 x3 `' W# l5 e* l1 S0 X) L! M W9 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( v/ n( @' L$ C2 g Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583. D& G$ t3 j( Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% p) n1 ]6 R9 i1 j Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1855 T& G6 P# s% p6 r+ N0 L7 |: }: q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 f" M" q7 j. G0 _4 j Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250* Z% |/ k7 M! \6 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 O3 W, H7 N0 _
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7662 I+ |5 P# y* X5 n: Y1 i0 @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- `- l- s4 h$ q4 H: T" } Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
! k" h- g) q( P, ~7 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% w; q) N! }2 c! I% p1 A0 b B Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
; j! j3 q' Z8 t4 ?# V' l a+ l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. L% O1 n8 a% ?8 I% d! C Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389, }# o& F, U) A* |0 Z4 }! ]# \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 o7 U e2 B- R3 h: o Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
: F3 Q4 M* P' e7 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 e$ u7 [, i1 ?7 N
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
2 {* p+ I' ~% ^6 M) i# z -------------------------------------------------------------------------' T% C, l7 d+ X$ x
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000" Y8 f5 W6 q; f6 Y( j, I8 }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- A d+ O/ Q6 ` j( Z8 R+ b National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
" U) {8 ^+ |2 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------& D0 n$ ~ y8 J4 T2 K3 o" I8 n
3 N) q; q+ O Z+ l" V
-------------------------------------------------------------8 m" k7 V' O% {7 z5 e$ M, v
Standard Condominium D7 W# X* t- w/ o' n
-------------------------------------------------------------7 V1 R; [" j% k7 }
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
: ^& \! d8 q4 {0 x2 |6 t Market % Change Average Average % Change! Q- o+ o, Z/ v5 c8 ~8 U( e. w$ O
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 \/ ]' `$ s6 c' Q: e+ v @- v Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%: E1 d0 e5 H# `7 m, ~6 N5 z, p$ O4 U
-------------------------------------------------------------, A4 E' @2 K2 v' K
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%: T% O1 o+ o: O& `& H2 B
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 ?2 }! l( O1 ]. {- C Moncton 4.9% - - N/A: \8 ], Z9 B! h0 X6 q2 y
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 Z7 J3 R1 Q1 e0 [ Saint John N/A - - N/A
j# G+ K' Q- Q4 K4 [0 p2 O/ g( A. q -------------------------------------------------------------
+ Z) f+ Q1 k$ I2 ^4 Y! V, V St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
' B9 K4 I7 h! H! D5 ^- f! ?; Y2 W -------------------------------------------------------------
p' c: j+ w: | Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%* y- g0 e8 K8 P; u3 R
-------------------------------------------------------------& b5 X6 m/ W0 _4 u; Y( r4 |
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%1 |+ j& b# M# X+ v
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 Q1 H& E9 K: ]5 k8 M# A: M* F1 d Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%4 b1 V% ^" k& J f8 }
-------------------------------------------------------------
# O) `2 |1 z g/ S0 F, n Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
* t5 {' y. r8 h% G: p6 M -------------------------------------------------------------
& D' ^8 s7 n" O( H Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%( H( g0 \. s* w; E K: M
-------------------------------------------------------------) L5 v+ e$ e4 ^, Y
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
' l5 d. \. `% C2 @0 t( e0 J( n -------------------------------------------------------------- U7 y' d0 y1 r( ?0 V+ X5 ^
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%9 U: W7 w0 R: q# I
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 ]) T* n+ z1 q9 g7 | Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& c5 H9 R* D& Q+ n
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 C' C- `0 J) V Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
5 P) t; X, C# W- i+ `/ C -------------------------------------------------------------; B, P& O U; H; z1 ^
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%4 m( m, w* X, Q1 f. z2 c9 N" J9 ^/ W
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 j8 B. n7 E9 S National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
' l3 N D' u. |, _3 ?4 Q) i- a3 p- v -------------------------------------------------------------
6 w2 r$ ~" \& v, H$ }1 s8 s >>& G* U& f9 n Z' r
* K6 |9 |8 [' {; U5 s1 m" n0 A
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined- r5 ?6 E0 ~& _0 c
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
& v1 N6 O$ z* `9 d" F8 U7 I' _John and Victoria.
# P- a' w4 s# b# n( ]. ~2 J- M( t8 \6 i8 ~. A$ S* T) u
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 `' Q7 n5 q) kcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of ^1 _/ `: l" L& G }2 A
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 e) h! b. r( V
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
8 J1 Q8 K* f# ]8 O3 r4 u0 }0 Qtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities; ^4 y8 o" P; ]# D% Z
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
! b, z4 t& y: O/ y8 Xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
& [' d( r0 Z$ H: t7 d# Kfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, P/ N' _% V* j2 |9 n
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on& Y0 c# d; _- c+ E% j
November 15, 2006.
/ P9 b# J' t$ g2 l* g) ` Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
) ~* S: J" D7 L" J1 }, G0 Bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge9 ? I2 ?! h! ~* e5 K6 w
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is, a' M0 i E3 M' ]' `% T
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|