 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* m7 M9 L6 m6 Z8 \) ]$ T0 W* X8 \6 T$ H4 t$ Z5 x: Z$ p3 q1 h
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
' p$ n! q, @/ o/ z3 ^# i4 ^7 _% i3 s% i# z& o
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; N+ D" X- o9 A& y1 aexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
2 l- Q* s! t# B/ Cquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: L5 T7 m/ C, G- `( m5 N$ jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
* S0 o$ ]; Y1 X' oprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and2 d s; S. p( \. ]
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,/ B; f' S- W" @! [; d" |! p/ L
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* K! w! B6 D5 n; `/ l; x
LePage Real Estate Services.
3 _5 t. U) E6 R/ L, E' P6 P4 z
3 E% l, k2 ]) b0 Q7 o) M3 c% j- U; J Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters- g$ \* s& K: v% x
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
/ K1 W' F( i" Qconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" U( [8 T9 X& Q8 i; N( Wsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the2 G' v$ O& t- g1 P8 x' g: V9 m! S
residential real estate sector.
, d6 y N: K8 ~% h1 I) l. _' s6 `$ k9 H. c+ ^# R8 K# f( c
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
5 I' g% [' I" y2 ?- M' h/ Hoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& h& @, G0 b' f2 ]2 q, G- @year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" C3 e' ~0 b! J8 i+ x
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
: H" N1 I6 P }' S% @! ?, A(+13.2%).: b. ?8 U$ t {3 {0 M
5 I7 |' }! p- g" l "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth4 W. n* u" L" ~
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
) `) E9 {% F u9 s- wfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are& f6 ^: R* _7 v3 I
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,, z9 k# N% `2 N- M0 P4 B- N
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
) @( n2 Y( ?8 ]5 o# Y"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
6 H( t J9 p, B; `8 Jwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy+ s+ e4 w% w$ p* q
balanced market."0 i9 F, c4 q1 z
, [0 B5 [6 f3 r# e Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 T# D/ b9 v0 k2 n! A& v
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift! K7 V/ @6 }' ^2 E$ C1 n
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
8 w" z+ y7 M+ A7 T3 U' Wthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! Q- _) c/ W4 O8 h; {/ wenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,2 X4 Y1 k! v5 x+ t. |
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 K0 m1 C% P4 z" }breaking price appreciations.
$ f3 e; }* N0 X( v! K) k2 F& I0 I0 N& c# x# e q' z
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. J7 d+ w; ^) J3 }
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* g7 g; {# v Y5 m3 P5 zlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed., w6 z5 C) h0 m1 d0 X+ d/ w. T* }
% c8 {% M6 n9 z& g0 }
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid/ z5 a% R6 d- l
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
2 `: o7 ^1 ]2 xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off0 n, ~- r5 U9 M- w* Q$ e h
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.0 Y/ v/ P3 ]0 r3 [/ N, x
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
! X/ V; P2 ~+ a5 W8 j- o' Z: X9 ?5 bgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of. e' r9 E9 m* @, B
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 \. ]/ n- V- l; D5 ]+ t
" x; p8 n0 ]& A/ c
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
g* ?4 f; R& \6 o7 umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 P& q7 W" ]: `! A. X
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 ], [& q$ {6 k1 ?' a( q9 rare markedly different than those found in the United States.
3 J+ U/ u6 E. \6 K3 k2 B& ]- Z" Z( J7 l3 R
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
) {0 v! t# k# z4 L. U9 [) u5 K7 RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's+ X6 c1 ?6 @! T' F
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 K5 h; I0 A1 v4 @4 H, o' i/ x
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general: Z* J4 B( s5 g$ ~6 e2 l
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% d) r8 x- a, M7 K* m) _4 @
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and% y; l9 P3 P' w, P! _6 m
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# H+ r' E) Q& a2 G1 d" D, Q0 _; H
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."2 F+ y; } a0 P3 d0 Z
3 f0 o5 t- \' B0 B8 k) k* S <<
' N+ i% J0 d8 B9 k$ \& W, E REGIONAL SUMMARIES
/ V; N2 H, I7 r >>3 P( i+ e) J7 r) R, L! e, D [
+ h; E( @' P" j2 S
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
) a6 L# O5 n9 {7 |0 Y- d" NHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' i3 @5 H0 o- U, Q$ C2 [& ]
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
, m g1 `8 a; D2 J h0 Mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
/ q6 j& X" b) w/ z2 m+ o4 o1 Jrenovations.7 s) R6 R, }0 Y
/ w+ B y( d) g+ T The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# G/ O: @% h* n
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 E& x) Y, {; J7 s) t
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 {6 k# r6 c' u7 i1 x& E. B+ TSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.+ U2 V& ?( e3 p3 ?4 v% t9 ]: C" Y" I3 B
9 P- Q; K" C5 E" Z0 J+ f The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
% y7 O% ~- f) w4 \0 _4 U2 aslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: \* W: A# q7 C7 \9 K. j' I% z- nquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( ]3 x* \6 y( j! M600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 H( q5 K# o( d2 Bto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 I' n" Q- Z0 |& g/ h3 u) X
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.; ]' A) f d' q- g6 U1 l8 a2 z
4 W" N% y7 v* n/ ~! L In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced, ]/ U& j+ Q# @5 x
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 D+ r8 G" t- _% F% o/ Q& Y
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 \& K7 n/ }0 j5 P7 {
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian9 d6 N; G, `1 C3 }
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" ^( L+ f* c2 A+ u
buyers with more options when looking for a home.3 j2 e. x; a% T4 M8 Y
4 j$ x5 N3 A0 M/ i
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. l! G% a1 K Q. t1 M) |
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes; S$ y1 S! F! X" \% H3 B$ y3 D( v' P
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,+ g% g9 Y4 x# o% t/ A) |3 J
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
- X4 a" [$ x, l# N- ?/ D7 Gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
5 k0 N% E7 s5 k; a: Y$ `) ^3 l8 ~4 r
' o) d- c* U9 Z. I Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 t: M( {2 i* X7 E; n+ \* o0 Lprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
* C, Z5 V2 {( Q; H! d( m# M* i3 d& I4 elevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ \' ]" S9 n0 F# J1 D
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
! }, j9 g0 `# l! X. }$ Dwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the$ {! W) R) i, ^7 N, _! a+ {6 m2 x4 X% `
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
' V* Y/ G5 O8 h5 Zmaking a purchase.
% q2 ?8 U. [ \$ c0 R+ @' x' K* A( ]; x% L. ]% j
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
3 j5 N1 M0 `' E) Vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
! U# w5 t) c# N$ Xconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
- V- z' h% E8 M1 Q) Gcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, n, F- x# c: h2 j* q" g* g
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 |% Q3 r: z" N' v: e' namenities.
/ s- @9 f, O7 {6 e+ Z7 g0 A
( V: F1 @! b. m! } F3 e4 { The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels2 C! o' M4 ~ }/ W+ \& {# H
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand* ]1 w, P+ g6 I9 C) C6 o
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 H& r) X& G" v7 X, ]- a( y0 v' jcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been' e& h7 u. w8 P4 [/ G
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 Y/ I9 Z. A& s0 \
residence, rather than for investment.: [: O1 J2 O/ q/ S
) k. F: P$ ~* n* D The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as7 V; W: c0 X" s) X1 r$ n3 b5 Y, j' r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 `9 X- {8 ]/ ^2 `3 g8 e, ?3 gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
$ h4 P! K; m3 M) a0 Jconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
' Z0 Q' r5 i+ l+ R8 F+ o/ srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter P% N k+ G y# _0 @& o
the market.- O9 l0 O+ H5 C& p4 D/ {0 b' K8 ?6 x+ g
/ A5 x }2 Y) v5 ~: I3 Z7 s/ P In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 \: z/ Q. z+ D! |9 f
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In: G+ x* O+ `& G* n$ o
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring S5 Z( n) ~- j
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due2 ~6 T- f% M% i
to the shortage of available inventory.1 ~, E V$ X+ \1 m K: |( p* j* U1 N* z
; a2 r% u; t$ X8 y3 D! Q Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
$ {, l9 x5 o3 r# _6 j9 V7 Wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains& X9 b- z+ ^0 H( Y
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
! i& k) d$ M: P! e( _/ R& astruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
, L. r7 v9 l x3 l1 Q2 b
S% V* F7 }1 L9 c+ m# w Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases3 A3 v; ?4 Z5 C6 s; j
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 T7 T" B" w; r% ?8 yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! T. X' z4 ?9 y' {
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 Z+ `4 P1 U6 |' L5 s0 n, u' m2 s
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( d( Z+ x) L! c# G
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as0 X8 L& t) {4 u! Q
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.. q% }/ o9 `. d4 c
% V4 d. j* }6 v+ U8 }/ p" U Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
$ N3 c* x6 j5 h' Jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton4 {9 F8 L" u1 H# j7 E5 ~6 R. z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 K5 b( P' ^* `! |# cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 C- H6 N5 G7 t# |/ R8 eincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* q3 ^+ i) n# [! b
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly: ?* _. [- e) j# k
towards the end of 2006.
' d- Z5 t8 V4 b) |0 f2 L7 ^7 `+ S
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 F" X$ \: T& E
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
+ C e1 Q; a: A3 m6 ]" v: Bto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( F$ C9 ^& z" r- O
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to. W2 C9 h# k& J6 }
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added# c _/ N+ y+ M9 ^) v8 R0 g: W
pressure on tight inventory levels.5 F2 @/ d* H4 j: U& b9 U( h
F8 C1 _. t' K( @3 V. X Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 h* S0 q0 _* v
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. T0 O' t4 W" F- V) m
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" V6 _, ?" A6 b0 n% ^while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching8 T$ a6 R+ v0 x# M& C
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
4 ]7 W1 y4 ~9 \" | h: F2 G6 D# O; U3 @
<<
, T- |0 I( _* \/ F Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
1 \9 g6 W2 a4 W# P- E; ~
' e. y, l- [, @( J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ]4 ?7 l* [7 J Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
; N2 ` c& C1 T. c, q# d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ G5 c0 T2 R" N; D2 ^' z( C& { 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3. e% f$ A: s! u, p" f' Q
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
' v7 d, | n3 o3 b! S$ U9 w# t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! t/ B$ u% Z, x6 A Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
Y( R. G4 O" G+ O3 T; w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 N( Z& e7 N4 C/ H n Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
$ Z7 q/ X+ Y6 h/ f T -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ P! S0 u: X- ^; K/ L' N
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
& B# \8 F7 |# l# v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 E! d7 G6 I- {% _* v* U- F) J% z Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -8 ~# y4 [" O9 M% E7 X( R3 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! H7 k. k; @; P( E& h St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
% T. q! R, v$ z+ I8 N' A* [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 [% e5 T7 k* L- V8 x; z( ~
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5830 Z# [6 i" x& X* K0 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! q8 v) e' ]+ g( M5 x% ? Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1854 R; \6 H2 F3 Y, u3 s- i" a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ |# c" k: m/ m$ S) n4 k
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
1 y+ m! K4 c/ I -------------------------------------------------------------------------, M- P1 U) h E X# S" G
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
4 ?; k+ X0 g# [( o. Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: D$ \# P* |- _ Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707& F# U3 n3 }& M' g' [$ r& c: X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& H* L5 b6 J4 q& n- r Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
/ F1 w0 s! Q+ A -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 x9 }7 q4 S( f# L
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389 d) j: Y! l, |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; L1 F0 C* _4 H1 I Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7140 N' W0 R; A% P, q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ O; r* H- U& _. y* ^5 l
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500) m# V* h" c1 r/ {2 I v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 s4 Y; a! P8 c4 q Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
. J! Z4 Q, |8 I% W+ f6 E% f, o -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 g, O9 ?. R/ s* t7 m
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860, P0 g# c: D3 G! c& E2 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# D0 l2 I( G! H0 S) Q, w r3 L) k. d% d" |+ n
-------------------------------------------------------------' A5 ]5 S6 \. c3 N
Standard Condominium6 R+ M1 g# O; g7 O# D* j
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 J+ S8 ^- {4 q0 i) t+ l 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
! j1 ]* a+ S: @% f# Z Market % Change Average Average % Change' D$ ?" `+ S6 O" X* F E( ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 F+ J% E- n/ r0 b6 R Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%7 ]5 T) Y7 h6 u# y# I$ K
-------------------------------------------------------------. w2 ~& W" v( n+ S0 V
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
* I3 i& g7 I, V* w: @ -------------------------------------------------------------5 K2 l" p* l7 i' T5 @
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
3 v# A) x" X+ K -------------------------------------------------------------
, ]9 h* k; ~( B7 z5 D Saint John N/A - - N/A
; ~! |# V3 e* q9 [1 A: _- O- l$ I -------------------------------------------------------------
& H4 ^7 B k/ c6 X St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
8 u, P( o4 d& } -------------------------------------------------------------- ]+ o- N) N( l' P: r0 E$ f
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! T% w- Q0 K4 v$ v -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ^; g8 r- V. `; F8 G Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%' a- U( n, l L5 v
-------------------------------------------------------------% b7 w& n8 Q7 ^& x" _2 W
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
- [4 Y: I2 e- z4 y, L -------------------------------------------------------------( H0 l; {0 w0 n
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
- b4 ]7 g+ S# V! j1 c0 m* ` -------------------------------------------------------------+ |/ S9 ~9 Q. W/ i- L
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
9 \7 A) I+ a' f# t* u0 K -------------------------------------------------------------
" A+ i8 v8 B8 j( k& F Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
1 ~2 |7 X- [" U4 S -------------------------------------------------------------
, Y D( H8 Y' V' z Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
1 U/ T6 L$ K+ w -------------------------------------------------------------
( z: y% O6 { b5 I# L6 K Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& S2 S4 g8 x; i& j1 ^; r g
-------------------------------------------------------------7 y1 z. Z! Y/ ]- t8 U, T
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3% N: |2 w- s( p9 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------# E0 v8 ]+ M$ J$ ?5 L
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%4 Q% I5 Y# `: D: V# q: W7 Z* a
-------------------------------------------------------------% t3 _# X4 L+ t7 Y5 d0 H3 ?2 M ~
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 D6 m O5 U" F
-------------------------------------------------------------/ W/ x2 k7 O5 e7 A
>>
$ i% V* `& w M; ^$ T0 {. B6 h8 H8 \" Z/ o5 O3 J
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
5 I7 }* G; P9 @0 Xin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
/ X: J, }6 v% U6 |# EJohn and Victoria.
2 j8 e* R4 K' g n
. n. s1 V0 k% H2 C" n The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most: n; k# V% j# Q2 F
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 |9 ?& U1 h" a. V3 Bhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release& e% b6 \8 M6 b( D. d
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 @# ?! F( d) e0 T
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
) Q$ k3 x' u/ r; m+ Y, Jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is0 a$ D/ S# `! v% t- `
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
, U! O/ P2 S& [6 mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable& v. ?: N% K4 G/ ] [
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 l. @' ~: d# y! u
November 15, 2006.
0 u" _! _+ \% j+ @" o! K2 E! X* C Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
& }. m% [/ ]: s$ L- Jfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
: u2 n) u2 m2 ^* Sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
z5 H. [' b4 j# Oavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|