 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( Y1 _7 s6 M. N! v+ Q3 X
) _4 R6 _ H [* n; l7 l- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 o$ U8 m, N7 K
( K0 s4 v5 R; a. @2 f! g+ [5 j- u TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
V! b+ {( t Y$ e1 c! ^/ ~' oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third }8 d8 O( Y0 e8 J
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic$ R* q5 F" _7 j0 S5 {3 y. G
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
& x5 T$ p6 ?( bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and) D" G. d$ p. }" m! F; e+ f
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 F7 t7 P/ f2 B/ b, ]) YQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
: i/ r! \& K: pLePage Real Estate Services.
, U) g; H2 G5 t' V4 w: n6 D
( d* a9 w8 G! m# W- ^( g' h' C Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters2 k- m6 P; ]: E, g
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 | \+ n1 s6 N0 t/ A8 fconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and! M# x. z5 q5 v% k+ s+ s3 X
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, a# [, M$ {& W. e
residential real estate sector.
~ ?3 r0 _. p
: q" c5 {! a0 P( ?& Q# J Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
, m1 |; ?* \4 ^8 ^# \" }occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 N; ?: q4 W# M% M% Yyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562: S3 J; H0 R4 k$ o, _ {
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380* [2 U2 j2 @7 O) P# `2 x
(+13.2%).
5 {$ Y8 L7 J: i2 I
( ]* @( z2 e# i "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth+ y4 {0 l8 f& k0 Q' x* B) i
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the% D$ P9 U+ j; E
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
: J6 o* m# T5 r; Z% Opoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- b, i# F1 [1 ~6 _. x2 Y% kpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.! U% Y I* U0 O* s( g
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We. P! Y1 Z; Y& o6 u' z
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 J7 P/ B1 H$ S- H! pbalanced market."
{! `% O9 V5 w6 q ]. x
$ e, X/ W/ w/ I9 U$ l Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
0 _: B. h i5 x# S' pconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
: }% {+ R4 B. M( F7 ?; Sto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
4 \; @ l; x: \5 O$ @; Rthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! R. O% m5 d0 w8 Y' J4 O9 ^' J4 ~9 t/ d
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 P' W: }% Y/ h/ s
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
, g1 Q5 o4 [% o8 p$ B/ abreaking price appreciations., h" a+ N* r" F! w- ^* Z3 G; b4 s
- O- P6 P2 o7 g- ^, @) }
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
- ]3 S1 i* S6 s/ beconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the* Z& \2 I3 z2 |" ]* {, R9 J6 Y6 ^
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.. O! n; c/ p6 W) a$ _, ?
4 W/ Z6 M* n0 x. ?) M In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid3 Z) z# `; b+ Z( w! o
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
6 i8 {* M' V6 K N& W& I4 l: Sconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off/ |5 ^/ b7 m5 I" N9 h( ?
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ [" I& M0 G! }- W3 h$ b' gIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
+ W' z2 e" a1 u: }1 y3 wgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of ` w1 b1 j" {1 ~, b1 _
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
3 D$ L2 _9 U, a$ C
1 u1 c$ e( B/ t3 Y" J* _2 S While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
4 A3 p. {, |4 L6 O2 K) N; Emarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
/ F" Y, j5 Q$ Efinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
u, U2 ~7 D4 d, e. C$ m$ i+ Jare markedly different than those found in the United States.9 P7 t" ]$ ]# O5 Z) ?. Y7 R
6 s' E. m( b# J3 K# \# F. m2 k+ Y
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& J% r( k% X) q" P, K GAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 r! R! Y2 [- V! d; R/ H, G+ ^1 _6 \
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the; F8 ]+ H' r1 k# s2 i
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ F" E2 T8 K9 e. U; e' h3 T
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the) C5 t: [ l- ]& u; V0 q2 ~: D
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ _' n f) j9 t8 T1 d2 \2 `9 Baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
0 t0 \0 ~4 o6 Nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."0 o* Z# f" u& k8 B+ [. e% t
8 N9 b7 Q# i: q <<
+ u% L8 {1 B& V, L' X4 A REGIONAL SUMMARIES; E2 M6 V6 S$ c, l
>>* U; F* X2 n- B5 m4 q# D5 L
# J8 g: I$ \' f+ `* y Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in; h1 Q+ ^" T. |# r" |$ B
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate* _) A+ W/ C6 f* ]8 [
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
/ o4 |, C J# } }) H2 c2 Llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of6 B% z2 ~" j, e
renovations.
) w0 {' \" c, O5 n8 ?5 P/ X. O5 a, @5 G# ?/ u
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& `9 d& y' B0 |9 [8 ]: l! K6 C
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation) \8 M4 o1 t0 h* `5 V6 G( ]
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
1 z* ^9 U3 I+ N: @7 G4 B* @, A1 l6 GSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
% x7 ]4 F0 Y! S9 f0 f3 R4 a
6 x% H: [; A. t3 d# ] The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer5 r+ T! e8 f- H) K- \7 T
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the$ K }& p- B5 r- D! c8 K& J
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
2 Q$ U+ j7 g- g6 t$ {) r3 V600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
) K U* P: g- }, zto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes" }9 u& r) V" V/ |$ G6 d( l
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.1 R0 p; p; a& h8 Y6 |
3 M8 b5 R" O7 a In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced; W; M' ^( x. C( L- |8 A% q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their9 B% G3 T" u1 E; w
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" g r" ?$ X, y9 D* i& P! bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian. B: ?% T- Z: n2 \
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
* |) y' `' Q9 H0 ~( `buyers with more options when looking for a home.+ }+ t- u3 f( p. L' r; K
$ z5 L: a5 Q' L) j8 }1 @ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly$ `7 x, A2 l# @! r# ]+ X/ D
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes0 J/ R8 Z7 e7 t% a
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,) x! |. h7 P$ U/ H, S
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last/ S* a. Q6 w6 b# h
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
S, @ v2 }/ l; e5 E; R5 P; s5 |
5 k( Y0 g3 d* J* A+ ~; e Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" J/ B; P/ z, h9 y# t2 {# X( Oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory- D. I# G5 W) E; n. B6 w
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting: w. Y% a+ S m/ _' l+ I( m& x
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
) |% O, C4 v4 Z& E+ Bwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ d8 U, l5 E/ @$ mpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
! ]8 k. d% S: I7 ^" |# Dmaking a purchase.( D5 f' Y6 [3 ~
% o$ S$ W! o) d$ b# b! l* M5 R. B
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& I6 t% {$ _' z0 r$ k" q: c7 y2 e
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 H% E! J- e8 |1 w# r8 ?
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city- j0 D0 f& X0 K, c" m9 [
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting6 q/ z) o) i: B [. l( e' J: X( Q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
* H- O6 d0 f6 Z/ G) N. famenities.
( h2 N3 X% K- b7 K+ _- o7 O' x" l2 f7 m6 w
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
4 s4 S5 @ }" @& C. ^4 g2 w" qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( \ e2 U) _9 C/ n+ N
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
$ }' n+ z, U9 n- W8 Icontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
/ c3 F9 o+ B4 d0 ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle( b% v& @. A, r0 x; X% z4 t7 C
residence, rather than for investment.% H1 e) K5 l* E. W( f
: N+ {0 R7 e5 b2 Y
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
5 I+ ^7 H# r# _ D, { [5 {6 ahouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
2 X/ a" U9 ~' ?! h$ W$ ^in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ O" k' q4 ?* {* N y: Aconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
0 Y0 @. q" S+ r$ Xrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter- N {/ u' A2 Q
the market.2 O( o6 F0 h6 b% `
4 g1 u+ @+ G1 E, E7 F In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through, Q7 E* p+ {; C
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; ~0 a) L3 ~/ T$ M7 s- P; }% |; ZAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring# x) Y, O7 e# m5 v
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due+ l3 z" N6 B( ~; D8 R% p
to the shortage of available inventory.
) h. U, ^% U9 M2 \& {% u) [* L c
. G* H" M0 p3 ~5 l" N Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" G9 {5 [ j& Wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 D# a4 K: W4 l* v7 D
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses$ B, N8 F6 Y3 P2 D5 X
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province., ]% G0 j7 m* r5 a
2 [9 `' U% E, f7 T! c. W) l
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& G8 |2 ?$ Q R' q5 q" V/ d9 p5 Uin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ h/ `/ `4 o7 `- O, B$ {+ }8 E/ C
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
a( K$ r8 \* O$ Cpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ k+ [" P, Z$ F9 O
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
0 Y* k% `1 l" N% F0 _5 u! Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as$ U3 l" r, f) m' \5 a% m
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 D; o0 u0 S& w: H2 j6 \2 I: O7 T1 S' E: _
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
! L4 @/ Q I( bas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' R% q# A+ n. |4 J
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
% I' K s0 V% v9 umaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; N; T% g) \, P' a* s, P6 Fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
" E8 |/ }! y% f* z$ C3 lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 K& u$ X. w& l6 S% l4 N; m
towards the end of 2006. / \0 Y; O) C) X) \. C. U" J
0 C2 r5 w" E3 M* R7 FWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
: x' t( Z0 j# Z7 O3 b, qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable' e1 g/ q1 ~- x- b8 [
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse; J' {3 h" e5 L
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
8 u) k4 G9 J( I, ]. L. s$ d+ Uforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added4 F8 O1 W! E" b" ^
pressure on tight inventory levels.
, l5 O* \- h* y7 k
1 K$ x7 s' v y0 B8 M( i' d Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic B( y" }4 F, @
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people# @& {4 Z- i4 Z' s8 J3 [; s. [; j
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;& J8 b8 {5 `. j% }, r1 C& [) Q
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
P4 M- c+ b6 `for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: n2 @7 n2 u7 i1 X$ Y9 D- [
/ a Y; e5 H" Z3 k9 M5 {# Y
<<
T0 L/ R, l- h( c) A5 u2 N; O8 {& j0 ] Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
- p+ ?" h( l* n/ {" Y3 A. A, @9 h0 |& N$ I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" H5 x. |1 D5 v% B1 V: | Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
- L+ X( c! e$ _/ j. w1 v2 n6 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 `0 N. U8 o7 Q- X) q5 L
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 K# k. K1 ?8 X
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
. w; G ~0 H" i1 p6 o ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _7 D8 T0 \: J" `" y4 _
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000# J. g" d3 J, I f+ R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, ]- j" M3 s3 S: X( ]
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
! {! u k) E. B -------------------------------------------------------------------------) u& v. }$ m, n
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0005 E; |3 d7 l- p& P6 Y, Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% }& C: w9 f" ^& U% |! Y
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -& f/ a J0 w! N9 H, m% f# R* X6 Z: z) b7 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ Y5 k+ X) _7 @ _$ n7 h% j, _- s St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
6 y0 N1 h, t* ]1 r; t2 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 ^( o. Y" K$ K" v" x" q
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
. c; T/ v! K& \( k0 G2 }8 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 q; x/ `; O! _& P6 H Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185% O' ]7 G+ \8 ^! v. G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 H* [. \6 G& Z. A8 b! C, I5 O Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
6 N8 t( K& C$ i7 R2 Y+ i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* t" E4 D) U( C Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766- B4 K% O1 C5 e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 N+ c% m; A8 z
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707' j& Z/ ?- [6 N; j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 p$ O3 S( T) Q3 d; p4 n Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5003 T. o+ `5 s5 e8 k, z' t7 U, n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! l7 K3 X5 a1 T% ~$ a Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
+ `2 r0 n# N) l- @- @# d -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 w$ R# b8 l( T+ Y
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7147 y- Y- k& |. v$ E% f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 i1 l" s4 @# J x, ?3 ~
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5004 D* J- \& ~0 D; W- ~$ q; U. w* y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Z0 T! c% u: G& x; L% g1 C Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, c; Q. n7 H# k3 p! x9 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 W8 K6 C$ g4 v; ~ National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8605 ` ] ?# s8 W! q! ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I" P7 @& Z0 @
3 w3 y3 A$ N8 ^* F" p* B$ c( | -------------------------------------------------------------
' k# H2 c+ B+ {5 b' |6 e+ z Standard Condominium
( p7 F2 R5 t8 H; R6 O& j) C -------------------------------------------------------------
% n. s, z0 _$ F3 S6 W" f 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
/ `6 H( x% O9 P4 d( T; S# Z" ? Market % Change Average Average % Change
3 C: |/ @. f1 I -------------------------------------------------------------0 s6 Z0 c i" a6 K5 z3 i
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
7 S9 f7 n. a% p' b4 y -------------------------------------------------------------
0 I; [8 ]0 [" U2 R9 |! a. M0 u Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
4 x0 P! l0 ~" P! t; W4 [$ M -------------------------------------------------------------
0 B! u* [* e; ~0 ^0 N0 R4 d) K Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
3 n/ Q1 f) z" Q3 I' x9 Q- w1 ?7 ` -------------------------------------------------------------' J7 J7 H S! P' u& _
Saint John N/A - - N/A: q- t" s3 \; P, z2 a: x0 {
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 `9 o2 B( X; y$ Q' I+ R2 ?8 @ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%/ K! ^8 }; Y$ x7 @2 k' ?1 E/ J
-------------------------------------------------------------0 F: U, I2 N( A& t9 j, v& K
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%) P1 [( P& D a& {5 H
-------------------------------------------------------------
. ]1 `4 x _. [! d3 i Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
0 d$ J+ |; F. n$ a9 N7 k -------------------------------------------------------------4 O, i& r& p1 e% R+ P
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
$ i$ f) p8 d% S. g2 C# X% u! R -------------------------------------------------------------
. W* q' h0 C! s/ v* G Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
& `# Q6 x# i' a- m$ a -------------------------------------------------------------
) P( h+ ` s6 }" i Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%' J5 o9 q. ^/ e" l# y" v5 X, v
-------------------------------------------------------------' P9 ^3 v1 z) @7 ~$ c a; ]& Y
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%8 y6 H. o! }+ i# D) O) ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 E& A( w/ H5 p. I+ P4 T0 R3 ] Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
9 O7 }4 M2 q* }- @/ F; i9 D5 ~7 R& d -------------------------------------------------------------% Z' v* ^* y! q9 O/ U
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
! e& y2 z/ N" |& J0 v7 f; I -------------------------------------------------------------
: t" u% J0 ]5 s& d O5 B Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
" X& @1 M6 F0 h# P" c: ^ -------------------------------------------------------------+ N* k+ D1 v; w# e2 B' ^7 M6 r$ l
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%: x9 S# ^& R9 d$ _4 [$ M7 m
-------------------------------------------------------------1 x0 n' A& L% R. E% H; J
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%6 z; a( \0 D) i- d/ q0 f% J# e5 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 {* _2 i- X- R3 q6 l* c2 d >>$ ^0 U& p4 u' C
) x3 h% i$ z8 u
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined, ]# n- R9 j# d3 n2 j: p: D' n1 w
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
) l% k' U5 H$ R o. H/ m" @' e/ \9 MJohn and Victoria.& h# t2 ^. ?! K5 d; J: Z
5 m$ m0 ~- ~8 y. j
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
/ x) B. J# e5 I" H$ v- e7 u$ z4 Kcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 L# Q% L C8 r6 K: X R8 D+ ]# \
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 W8 B' L/ X& oreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
" Y$ b% s+ q) E8 ~1 T d) Ftrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities9 }. f- w2 o" o' n& }
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is; d! } C: a: [" @7 K
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current3 z8 J- `& G- z# k* V
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ D" [) v5 m6 R* ?& B8 T
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on& p, f! C% G% ^& u, x9 s+ ?# D
November 15, 2006.4 H1 @& s2 v5 r% d9 R# O; L N7 K
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; R# d* j0 ^% Q: ?$ A' a
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
9 d& b3 u8 I+ v, n1 _- E6 jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is: O: V! M( G! q4 o3 g( ?# l
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|