 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 D8 W, G- d4 u. `% ?1 M" {& T/ J; P: t
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
) M: \. ] k6 ~, ?; s5 t
' F- ], M ]6 q# @- N6 C TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 H+ q3 a* J g1 b: z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
2 D4 N5 n' ]% u3 }1 D7 B$ Pquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic. v- w+ b' s6 G" I3 ~, Q; M
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit: T4 t' N; D& H8 b
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
# N+ j, B( n ~/ fmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
) J- m6 a3 A8 W* k! y( g) VQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal2 n ^8 v- u F7 K { v* d9 ~5 J5 K
LePage Real Estate Services.1 A+ u% D+ n% t8 b2 f# {3 t
& `+ Q) W3 x* ]: T4 o Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( Y# J% \9 S3 i
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
8 `$ @0 S5 {8 N& V) mconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
. j9 F& R0 @7 P2 [6 F2 x5 \! G" R" Csound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the+ Q+ l5 s/ J1 G, i) x+ g2 y; t
residential real estate sector.0 ~" S- |+ ?1 A1 ]+ e$ P
/ ?/ X. Y) Y" N' k# n$ x
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
$ m& `/ T5 g) x6 s! ^occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
. n9 m b9 P5 R6 R A, xyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 \" |1 }5 }4 h" \7 S% f3 }& u: Z4 \
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380" ~' \( p% v, Y2 d" E# g
(+13.2%).) \3 i# J# c! `' c a
/ u" `/ f9 s- z" i, G" X1 k$ u
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; W6 s1 n9 M" m2 T1 p) N
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
7 U+ D0 K* L4 L. ], S8 H, cfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are9 l5 J% ^& o, N2 X0 l
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ ^' B0 O1 H( G) x3 t9 r: T- vpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
0 ?4 u0 w# |% p) s"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We7 ?! n! Y$ e! L3 t" w7 h. x$ [
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ A5 b, \+ o8 `7 X @8 {- Z" }balanced market."
" B8 i3 Z2 Y! Z5 a$ R' V' b ^9 ]' q2 b# ]1 \, y2 ]' `+ l F X6 S8 N
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
% S: u% i, t6 U+ ?. Dconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 k9 x8 t n, W* c5 G7 H; b* o( dto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
$ f" ]: T9 |+ [/ fthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core9 H( X4 C2 v, V* {
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,5 k; J6 D1 R2 F, E( _
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record. i/ U* C- X9 f/ \% C7 K2 b
breaking price appreciations.
4 s) L8 c8 M( G0 j
. l/ I7 d5 z+ W. b5 m Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
s! a* D5 ?! E" A' Zeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; y A" T% d, A& ~
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
* o& P5 T. f+ L5 B$ p3 o, M! {
2 F4 k) n5 ]" Z0 j In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid6 i, \; _$ }( ?9 z7 |, P8 `* ]
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer# O0 K& s8 c. g8 N' u5 D& z' J
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off' V- r& i% c5 a
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.% W8 Y" {$ ~/ [+ f
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers. u0 {- O/ f J& r! c
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
! i) ?# k, L) R& K5 g; cprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
( @- @/ U$ q, A1 n; ~/ p' E
/ i& B( u4 I' l% n* [ While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing8 _$ N, `: p3 K
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. S; D) w% N0 n5 C
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
; Z! ~; d$ x# z/ F3 tare markedly different than those found in the United States.
: e* P0 p+ v% b9 D! u5 B7 M5 ^2 N' b8 U* B- g; A4 V8 C- y% |/ W
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 T' g: ]+ \ [American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's1 S N- V4 ? a1 k: p
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the t* f# n& ?: l" O6 I+ \$ g8 }% J
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 X2 K' O2 }, e: z- M' z3 R
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the1 M& t; Z% r6 Y
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
_2 _" ^& R8 D: Yaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization, H5 R6 e3 U# L" c- ^
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."% i: _1 |0 F0 e
+ Q; w0 P9 i' g w7 D$ |
<<
, `8 c( g! V9 M9 T' p REGIONAL SUMMARIES @( Z2 e1 A3 K9 u+ J* ^
>>
; S, R* z+ h( O: {; u* Y, }0 A/ l" E3 {3 ^
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
6 M3 M! k/ j$ {; c6 q5 bHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate8 v2 y4 P* h' }8 j
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
9 \, D+ A7 j |$ x" C; d3 B: E2 T1 G; c9 {looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of9 ~6 w; v+ t/ d
renovations.
/ G4 v) h: h2 {! Z( r
. B& ]5 X3 h, F3 ^ The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 S/ b' B3 ]0 o+ ]: Tincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% W' \% W+ V! k
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and5 i/ R2 _7 n: }; p$ a F4 p* d
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.- r! c/ }( c' v* w
5 | M* V3 S$ _* w" a% R' S The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
" n/ L) [5 g# c$ {slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. Y x6 A) J& \7 q/ I, _8 z5 p
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
$ h1 q3 g0 U ]; f; A8 @0 u600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
: J" x1 Q# P: E8 B7 r; mto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 g2 `9 m/ k/ A
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.' V0 z$ Z% Z4 }4 M' X" _- R ?1 u- w
; m7 ^, J. N0 P) R$ n2 l% C( ?
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced" t* Z% E; s8 c6 L
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
: p$ z5 r2 E. Z ]homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ r6 o W1 G) H* B- Twas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
$ @) z1 v' A# _) N& r' zdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing p2 j# R3 F6 T* |* D! q
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
9 D7 F- U( R4 r3 K3 b0 C
; O# A) m# K, F$ v Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly5 F2 v: w5 {/ K2 M% R
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( M3 y3 W! f3 }priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,7 o" W; U8 I& | y9 m) Q
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" s. | \) _0 w. ^; T% u ^: A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 y( w! N9 F7 j
7 \$ J1 e' w; [$ l/ L
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 y, W$ w$ G: [prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
4 j" f F6 u9 Z- ~) z& rlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
* b0 |4 ?" F0 D& afirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,8 }' l! y4 p* D; D- Q
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the; a' r" k3 m' L- D( N0 n) J
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" ]1 f) \* A: l! @ C4 o6 Zmaking a purchase.+ h" q+ i: J* a
7 b5 ^9 w0 E4 G/ _1 H8 N, U2 T" @. c
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing6 M; d L( b# \' a3 M7 C1 G
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong W# V, o. K/ k5 N
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city) P. Y0 M9 B4 t$ \1 S+ N
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting+ ^( W- M/ ?4 H
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! u- o& u6 Y8 X! p* X4 J
amenities.2 s& [5 A& v, [% Q2 \- t
" G- x6 w+ Z' a& V" | The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels% T0 |: Z% v5 A+ i* ^9 q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
& x$ a1 C" O+ U0 }" A( Nacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has: Q4 e6 H* Y# p$ e3 D9 E; D
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( p: C7 D. z" F" |( P: y1 Y" f
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
6 W& U0 L; n/ S3 m% Zresidence, rather than for investment.3 x1 ]% Q! W& A! ]! @0 ]4 I( u
2 @; W$ k$ ]8 R' } The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as9 Z9 ]5 m7 Y% p, |7 i) o' e
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
$ e+ z; G4 W$ uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer E/ j7 V) F2 G% |4 ?2 C+ _ y
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization0 m! \. ], W. g" [ e
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter0 k5 T2 J; {" E+ _; \( B. `
the market.% ]$ |! A8 t6 y3 n& r9 w% L
9 `3 a% F$ A/ \' ~
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
# [! L' N" l, ` B9 hJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In7 R( a. B2 D" S+ t8 v
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring! o2 p+ m0 j& W# o$ o( B. o
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due l$ K( \. r Y9 e
to the shortage of available inventory.8 U3 T$ H! I. p* v
7 C' J/ {& T5 N3 Y: `4 T7 [
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* i; ~2 i4 }+ E, p* {
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains& `$ l U! v, `3 Z! `0 @
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
# u. l, H& ^, mstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.* U- h3 V8 B8 R) E/ ?
' U( H/ L, {7 p/ Y
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases4 D- t6 X- f5 }7 N- x3 P) C. }
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
& M" F; d8 R! {( X; `, `: iunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that: m X2 | T0 H7 u+ P7 s
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring3 }0 P) K, @3 ] `0 X/ |1 S
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer/ R, h1 p0 p# \, B: `% g. F
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
( Q0 E, J6 M) c* j0 wbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.! ]; r6 ^/ W5 c4 h( K Q4 D
5 _( i0 \6 L) l- R+ a
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
% h; `1 n3 c1 T& ?- cas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
% D8 r& f& T1 h' Sremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
* l) ?7 g( T6 u9 V. d1 C K6 I Ymaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, c8 p& R, U2 R& ~! N) q; [
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve( B1 c, ?% @4 S0 Q
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
8 C5 @- Z$ x8 [& v+ v6 Otowards the end of 2006. ; ?8 T4 V4 I; M
* Y8 _# o' j/ K: N( D6 {. I8 sWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( z4 J7 F. m' z" ^( `
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
5 Q n/ D( B$ h: E) c6 ?to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 p* |# m, c) v+ l: M
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to. z: G/ D( `: J6 o8 E* Y
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
! j: c5 V/ T! m' j) {) \6 wpressure on tight inventory levels.* K) L' K& j% M
$ |8 i( ]) I, O# R Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic! T. n+ M: Y9 z V5 [! I( {4 U
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people* b9 c8 C; H& X9 [8 E4 X3 g
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;6 k1 \" M+ Q @4 J
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
+ Y2 ^6 J! [! i u' Hfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.- W8 F' G4 f5 R/ b
& b9 d8 k8 ^" l# e( ^" c& c' p. n <<7 E$ c" M* w0 m. c) M1 i" e9 d
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 w" ^6 R" B# K+ }0 y' d3 S
7 S# p; K) r6 i, O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
p# O! P t& b' _2 _ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey9 R3 B6 k2 ^9 l" v$ K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Y( D7 v4 [* P% D* n8 n" _4 m 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
$ i# |9 D0 Q$ b: y9 @ Market Average Average % Change Average Average' g. Z9 y" ]% I8 [3 N; o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! S; F% h1 ^- b1 A! E9 H. e" t
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000! V/ ^ \4 \3 p( {" j3 P& Q9 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& p. m2 P+ P* ~8 R1 q
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000+ F, Z9 w% o8 N/ k- ~* C0 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' r- D9 B7 m0 I0 [) F& O Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000. Z! Z% |& q4 o' H; H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! ~; ?5 L# X) A) H$ h
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -) }% u& f6 G7 }/ m8 N1 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 c3 k3 R4 [/ ]* l4 L5 I0 [2 l/ v St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
8 j( O! B; V! i6 }. \& D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" h5 H& @' J, J; r/ k/ T Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583& g6 m5 q3 V4 h( Z4 S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ N+ S: X7 \; t8 f5 ]( Z Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185( P0 h1 C0 f6 \! R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- c+ u: f, }2 t, N, ], z# ^ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
+ N% y' Y: d" \. U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; e' d7 G9 {. i% q* [( M* q Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766/ v; m) F& y! o: g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ~; z% s" G: {6 ^" B
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707- C' u) G- X5 m2 Z3 F% F: E/ w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 ^9 W. Q1 N. y0 P F/ Z8 y. q Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5004 e& E7 |& @% X: A! O4 s: f2 z) r0 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* N; w/ V, b. V' } Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3896 ~1 c2 L* d4 m( C) J5 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# X! O& ^3 E# i7 {* E* X% k0 V7 Y Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& Q. q9 a8 M$ O5 i4 r4 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Y: l" g d2 ~8 t- f3 _ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500* ]( H0 `$ j1 |6 J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 d3 {& h' ]7 @$ r) h1 o! M, U
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000- U: A! n) U/ i$ D/ Z- b9 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ i7 L* k8 Z+ ~$ S% ~ National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860& r3 i, _* ~8 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 L0 F9 @ Q$ m1 F1 ?7 P& e
( E# a5 s% S5 P% A; w- _
-------------------------------------------------------------* \* O9 p* F0 x% l; _( q& u
Standard Condominium% C3 h- C7 e, x, ~1 ^" K& z& e. ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
, K' M) M) Y" { 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
: D( f4 h& D" Q$ G Market % Change Average Average % Change
$ h7 U( o3 p) Z) C4 |; j( q1 Y -------------------------------------------------------------
+ M" B1 L* P! v Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%+ Y3 l9 y, l: Q& s
-------------------------------------------------------------4 z" d! {/ }* D
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# w8 | p5 ~4 v9 \% W8 p. w# `+ p" | -------------------------------------------------------------
' X3 U4 U% ?! M$ t4 o, D Moncton 4.9% - - N/A) X7 p: \3 o% o) |7 D) `
-------------------------------------------------------------& W3 h$ M: n N. M$ C( F. p6 q
Saint John N/A - - N/A) f1 F4 S2 E( w: r: N% \& i# D
-------------------------------------------------------------3 n( J3 ]; g8 o( Z& \
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%! K0 q/ t/ B4 h x# M, S/ |
-------------------------------------------------------------
& V; Q: g4 E: v Q3 u4 P Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%- b3 E: |/ Z2 k# D
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 x% s$ w: s, O1 a6 z; ?) {$ z* p9 ?: \ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%. o% B; X. Y3 k
-------------------------------------------------------------
- i9 G. F0 U8 Z+ j7 H- j9 ^ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
9 A* P' a: [ z2 [' V& ]- { -------------------------------------------------------------* x3 U# T) ^' i" E, r4 }0 _/ @% d
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%' I, r# z1 n2 q9 r' {
-------------------------------------------------------------+ b4 c* j5 S1 E! s" S6 x! {
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%) ^( d* P8 i; N/ B7 R
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 E7 u9 L+ ]* H1 W$ ~ Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
' v( Z0 y4 X( @) V& s/ E7 K! q' M -------------------------------------------------------------
0 ^3 c6 ^& g( y: t! o9 @ Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
7 o( C5 J4 }1 J' o5 \ -------------------------------------------------------------
* m" p, G; w. C* u Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%, j+ t7 F: I) _8 S. G
-------------------------------------------------------------: z$ c% N6 n6 }# S' u2 U
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
0 {5 \4 \" t' }$ S ------------------------------------------------------------- n8 I$ j- }1 Q7 K$ z2 Q$ e; y+ m$ J# B
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%: c8 J. j) N u$ t' o5 g1 v% [4 B
-------------------------------------------------------------4 w. e0 [& \) o
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%! F D: L2 S$ Q( b
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 }, G; D& s0 m, Z! u% e >>. S! e1 c" ]9 V% `0 S
$ c3 b0 M @* R2 B- d' p2 t( G Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
- F) k* o: l3 J4 ]' K0 Cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint5 b7 w8 F; e) U- R
John and Victoria.) V; M; x( |! w! Y2 G
$ [6 w% p0 ?, L7 X$ B) f
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most5 _6 I' A5 V/ B4 j2 S2 l4 C( M
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of5 R+ ^7 i t5 B( w
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release- J4 F+ L: R( B7 f# b# X9 ^8 z i
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
1 N- V: E( Z5 l* y+ o; E. Mtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
+ w0 R" m( N4 Y% \& ^3 Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is7 P# k9 P; |5 \( G" X; @
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
8 r; M$ `* T& }) F- q1 Vfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
+ A- Q& a+ ^) M, Y. z# Q0 ]/ e" fversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
2 i1 t; F# Q/ u' U& q1 u) V, wNovember 15, 2006.. V* P. u' [) B$ O. j3 [( h
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of( w/ i" U% N9 }. q+ p
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge2 a8 B3 t7 k4 g( U
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is1 e" }. ^1 o. A0 c! J" T: B
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|