埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1866|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* m7 M9 L6 m6 Z8 \) ]$ T0 W* X8 \6 T$ H4 t$ Z5 x: Z$ p3 q1 h
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
' p$ n! q, @/ o/ z3 ^# i4 ^7 _% i3 s% i# z& o
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; N+ D" X- o9 A& y1 aexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
2 l- Q* s! t# B/ Cquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: L5 T7 m/ C, G- `( m5 N$ jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
* S0 o$ ]; Y1 X' oprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and2 d  s; S. p( \. ]
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,/ B; f' S- W" @! [; d" |! p/ L
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* K! w! B6 D5 n; `/ l; x
LePage Real Estate Services.
3 _5 t. U) E6 R/ L, E' P6 P4 z
3 E% l, k2 ]) b0 Q7 o) M3 c% j- U; J    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters- g$ \* s& K: v% x
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
/ K1 W' F( i" Qconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" U( [8 T9 X& Q8 i; N( Wsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the2 G' v$ O& t- g1 P8 x' g: V9 m! S
residential real estate sector.
, d6 y  N: K8 ~% h1 I) l. _' s6 `$ k9 H. c+ ^# R8 K# f( c
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
5 I' g% [' I" y2 ?- M' h/ Hoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& h& @, G0 b' f2 ]2 q, G- @year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" C3 e' ~0 b! J8 i+ x
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
: H" N1 I6 P  }' S% @! ?, A(+13.2%).: b. ?8 U$ t  {3 {0 M

5 I7 |' }! p- g" l    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth4 W. n* u" L" ~
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
) `) E9 {% F  u9 s- wfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are& f6 ^: R* _7 v3 I
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,, z9 k# N% `2 N- M0 P4 B- N
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
) @( n2 Y( ?8 ]5 o# Y"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
6 H( t  J9 p, B; `8 Jwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy+ s+ e4 w% w$ p* q
balanced market."0 i9 F, c4 q1 z

, [0 B5 [6 f3 r# e    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 T# D/ b9 v0 k2 n! A& v
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift! K7 V/ @6 }' ^2 E$ C1 n
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
8 w" z+ y7 M+ A7 T3 U' Wthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! Q- _) c/ W4 O8 h; {/ wenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,2 X4 Y1 k! v5 x+ t. |
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 K0 m1 C% P4 z" }breaking price appreciations.
$ f3 e; }* N0 X( v! K) k2 F& I0 I0 N& c# x# e  q' z
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. J7 d+ w; ^) J3 }
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* g7 g; {# v  Y5 m3 P5 zlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed., w6 z5 C) h0 m1 d0 X+ d/ w. T* }
% c8 {% M6 n9 z& g0 }
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid/ z5 a% R6 d- l
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
2 `: o7 ^1 ]2 xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off0 n, ~- r5 U9 M- w* Q$ e  h
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.0 Y/ v/ P3 ]0 r3 [/ N, x
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
! X/ V; P2 ~+ a5 W8 j- o' Z: X9 ?5 bgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of. e' r9 E9 m* @, B
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 \. ]/ n- V- l; D5 ]+ t
" x; p8 n0 ]& A/ c
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
  g* ?4 f; R& \6 o7 umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 P& q7 W" ]: `! A. X
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 ], [& q$ {6 k1 ?' a( q9 rare markedly different than those found in the United States.
3 J+ U/ u6 E. \6 K3 k2 B& ]- Z" Z( J7 l3 R
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
) {0 v! t# k# z4 L. U9 [) u5 K7 RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's+ X6 c1 ?6 @! T' F
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 K5 h; I0 A1 v4 @4 H, o' i/ x
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general: Z* J4 B( s5 g$ ~6 e2 l
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% d) r8 x- a, M7 K* m) _4 @
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and% y; l9 P3 P' w, P! _6 m
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# H+ r' E) Q& a2 G1 d" D, Q0 _; H
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."2 F+ y; }  a0 P3 d0 Z

3 f0 o5 t- \' B0 B8 k) k* S    <<
' N+ i% J0 d8 B9 k$ \& W, E                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
/ V; N2 H, I7 r    >>3 P( i+ e) J7 r) R, L! e, D  [
+ h; E( @' P" j2 S
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
) a6 L# O5 n9 {7 |0 Y- d" NHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' i3 @5 H0 o- U, Q$ C2 [& ]
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
, m  g1 `8 a; D2 J  h0 Mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
/ q6 j& X" b) w/ z2 m+ o4 o1 Jrenovations.7 s) R6 R, }0 Y

/ w+ B  y( d) g+ T    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# G/ O: @% h* n
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 E& x) Y, {; J7 s) t
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 {6 k# r6 c' u7 i1 x& E. B+ TSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.+ U2 V& ?( e3 p3 ?4 v% t9 ]: C" Y" I3 B

9 P- Q; K" C5 E" Z0 J+ f    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
% y7 O% ~- f) w4 \0 _4 U2 aslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: \* W: A# q7 C7 \9 K. j' I% z- nquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( ]3 x* \6 y( j! M600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 H( q5 K# o( d2 Bto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 I' n" Q- Z0 |& g/ h3 u) X
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.; ]' A) f  d' q- g6 U1 l8 a2 z

4 W" N% y7 v* n/ ~! L    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced, ]/ U& j+ Q# @5 x
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 D+ r8 G" t- _% F% o/ Q& Y
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 \& K7 n/ }0 j5 P7 {
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian9 d6 N; G, `1 C3 }
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" ^( L+ f* c2 A+ u
buyers with more options when looking for a home.3 j2 e. x; a% T4 M8 Y
4 j$ x5 N3 A0 M/ i
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. l! G% a1 K  Q. t1 M) |
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes; S$ y1 S! F! X" \% H3 B$ y3 D( v' P
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,+ g% g9 Y4 x# o% t/ A) |3 J
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
- X4 a" [$ x, l# N- ?/ D7 Gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
5 k0 N% E7 s5 k; a: Y$ `) ^3 l8 ~4 r
' o) d- c* U9 Z. I    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 t: M( {2 i* X7 E; n+ \* o0 Lprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
* C, Z5 V2 {( Q; H! d( m# M* i3 d& I4 elevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ \' ]" S9 n0 F# J1 D
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
! }, j9 g0 `# l! X. }$ Dwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the$ {! W) R) i, ^7 N, _! a+ {6 m2 x4 X% `
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
' V* Y/ G5 O8 h5 Zmaking a purchase.
% q2 ?8 U. [  \$ c0 R+ @' x' K* A( ]; x% L. ]% j
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
3 j5 N1 M0 `' E) Vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
! U# w5 t) c# N$ Xconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
- V- z' h% E8 M1 Q) Gcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, n, F- x# c: h2 j* q" g* g
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 |% Q3 r: z" N' v: e' namenities.
/ s- @9 f, O7 {6 e+ Z7 g0 A
( V: F1 @! b. m! }  F3 e4 {    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels2 C! o' M4 ~  }/ W+ \& {# H
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand* ]1 w, P+ g6 I9 C) C6 o
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 H& r) X& G" v7 X, ]- a( y0 v' jcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been' e& h7 u. w8 P4 [/ G
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 Y/ I9 Z. A& s0 \
residence, rather than for investment.: [: O1 J2 O/ q/ S

) k. F: P$ ~* n* D    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as7 V; W: c0 X" s) X1 r$ n3 b5 Y, j' r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 `9 X- {8 ]/ ^2 `3 g8 e, ?3 gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
$ h4 P! K; m3 M) a0 Jconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
' Z0 Q' r5 i+ l+ R8 F+ o/ srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter  P% N  k+ G  y# _0 @& o
the market.- O9 l0 O+ H5 C& p4 D/ {0 b' K8 ?6 x+ g

/ A5 x  }2 Y) v5 ~: I3 Z7 s/ P    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 \: z/ Q. z+ D! |9 f
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In: G+ x* O+ `& G* n$ o
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring  S5 Z( n) ~- j
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due2 ~6 T- f% M% i
to the shortage of available inventory.1 ~, E  V$ X+ \1 m  K: |( p* j* U1 N* z

; a2 r% u; t$ X8 y3 D! Q    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
$ {, l9 x5 o3 r# _6 j9 V7 Wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains& X9 b- z+ ^0 H( Y
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
! i& k) d$ M: P! e( _/ R& astruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
, L. r7 v9 l  x3 l1 Q2 b
  S% V* F7 }1 L9 c+ m# w    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases3 A3 v; ?4 Z5 C6 s; j
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 T7 T" B" w; r% ?8 yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! T. X' z4 ?9 y' {
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 Z+ `4 P1 U6 |' L5 s0 n, u' m2 s
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( d( Z+ x) L! c# G
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as0 X8 L& t) {4 u! Q
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
. q% }/ o9 `. d4 c

% V4 d. j* }6 v+ U8 }/ p" U    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
$ N3 c* x6 j5 h' Jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton4 {9 F8 L" u1 H# j7 E5 ~6 R. z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 K5 b( P' ^* `! |# cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 C- H6 N5 G7 t# |/ R8 eincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* q3 ^+ i) n# [! b
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly: ?* _. [- e) j# k
towards the end of 2006.
   
' d- Z5 t8 V4 b) |0 f2 L7 ^7 `+ S
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 F" X$ \: T& E
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
+ C  e1 Q; a: A3 m6 ]" v: Bto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( F$ C9 ^& z" r- O
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to. W2 C9 h# k& J6 }
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added# c  _/ N+ y+ M9 ^) v8 R0 g: W
pressure on tight inventory levels.5 F2 @/ d* H4 j: U& b9 U( h

  F8 C1 _. t' K( @3 V. X    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 h* S0 q0 _* v
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. T0 O' t4 W" F- V) m
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" V6 _, ?" A6 b0 n% ^while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching8 T$ a6 R+ v0 x# M& C
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
4 ]7 W1 y4 ~9 \" |  h: F2 G6 D# O; U3 @
    <<
, T- |0 I( _* \/ F      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
1 \9 g6 W2 a4 W# P- E; ~
' e. y, l- [, @( J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ]4 ?7 l* [7 J                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
; N2 `  c& C1 T. c, q# d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ G5 c0 T2 R" N; D2 ^' z( C& {                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3. e% f$ A: s! u, p" f' Q
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
' v7 d, |  n3 o3 b! S$ U9 w# t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! t/ B$ u% Z, x6 A    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
  Y( R. G4 O" G+ O3 T; w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 N( Z& e7 N4 C/ H  n    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
$ Z7 q/ X+ Y6 h/ f  T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ P! S0 u: X- ^; K/ L' N
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
& B# \8 F7 |# l# v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 E! d7 G6 I- {% _* v* U- F) J% z    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -8 ~# y4 [" O9 M% E7 X( R3 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! H7 k. k; @; P( E& h    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
% T. q! R, v$ z+ I8 N' A* [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 [% e5 T7 k* L- V8 x; z( ~
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5830 Z# [6 i" x& X* K0 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! q8 v) e' ]+ g( M5 x% ?    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1854 R; \6 H2 F3 Y, u3 s- i" a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ |# c" k: m/ m$ S) n4 k
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
1 y+ m! K4 c/ I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, M- P1 U) h  E  X# S" G
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
4 ?; k+ X0 g# [( o. Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: D$ \# P* |- _    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707& F# U3 n3 }& M' g' [$ r& c: X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& H* L5 b6 J4 q& n- r    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
/ F1 w0 s! Q+ A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 x9 }7 q4 S( f# L
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389  d) j: Y! l, |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; L1 F0 C* _4 H1 I    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7140 N' W0 R; A% P, q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ O; r* H- U& _. y* ^5 l
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500) m# V* h" c1 r/ {2 I  v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 s4 Y; a! P8 c4 q    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
. J! Z4 Q, |8 I% W+ f6 E% f, o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 g, O9 ?. R/ s* t7 m
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860, P0 g# c: D3 G! c& E2 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# D0 l2 I( G! H0 S) Q, w  r3 L) k. d% d" |+ n
    -------------------------------------------------------------' A5 ]5 S6 \. c3 N
                               Standard Condominium6 R+ M1 g# O; g7 O# D* j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 J+ S8 ^- {4 q0 i) t+ l                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
! j1 ]* a+ S: @% f# Z    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change' D$ ?" `+ S6 O" X* F  E( ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 F+ J% E- n/ r0 b6 R    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%7 ]5 T) Y7 h6 u# y# I$ K
    -------------------------------------------------------------. w2 ~& W" v( n+ S0 V
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
* I3 i& g7 I, V* w: @    -------------------------------------------------------------5 K2 l" p* l7 i' T5 @
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
3 v# A) x" X+ K    -------------------------------------------------------------
, ]9 h* k; ~( B7 z5 D    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
; ~! |# V3 e* q9 [1 A: _- O- l$ I    -------------------------------------------------------------
& H4 ^7 B  k/ c6 X    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
8 u, P( o4 d& }    -------------------------------------------------------------- ]+ o- N) N( l' P: r0 E$ f
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
! T% w- Q0 K4 v$ v    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ^; g8 r- V. `; F8 G    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%' a- U( n, l  L5 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------% b7 w& n8 Q7 ^& x" _2 W
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
- [4 Y: I2 e- z4 y, L    -------------------------------------------------------------( H0 l; {0 w0 n
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
- b4 ]7 g+ S# V! j1 c0 m* `    -------------------------------------------------------------+ |/ S9 ~9 Q. W/ i- L
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
9 \7 A) I+ a' f# t* u0 K    -------------------------------------------------------------
" A+ i8 v8 B8 j( k& F    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
1 ~2 |7 X- [" U4 S    -------------------------------------------------------------
, Y  D( H8 Y' V' z    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
1 U/ T6 L$ K+ w    -------------------------------------------------------------
( z: y% O6 {  b5 I# L6 K    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%& S2 S4 g8 x; i& j1 ^; r  g
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 y1 z. Z! Y/ ]- t8 U, T
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%  N: |2 w- s( p9 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------# E0 v8 ]+ M$ J$ ?5 L
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%4 Q% I5 Y# `: D: V# q: W7 Z* a
    -------------------------------------------------------------% t3 _# X4 L+ t7 Y5 d0 H3 ?2 M  ~
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%7 D6 m  O5 U" F
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ W/ x2 k7 O5 e7 A
    >>
$ i% V* `& w  M; ^$ T0 {. B6 h8 H8 \" Z/ o5 O3 J
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
5 I7 }* G; P9 @0 Xin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
/ X: J, }6 v% U6 |# EJohn and Victoria.
2 j8 e* R4 K' g  n
. n. s1 V0 k% H2 C" n    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most: n; k# V% j# Q2 F
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 |9 ?& U1 h" a. V3 Bhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release& e% b6 \8 M6 b( D. d
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 @# ?! F( d) e0 T
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
) Q$ k3 x' u/ r; m+ Y, Jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is0 a$ D/ S# `! v% t- `
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
, U! O/ P2 S& [6 mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable& v. ?: N% K4 G/ ]  [
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 l. @' ~: d# y! u
November 15, 2006.
0 u" _! _+ \% j+ @" o! K2 E! X* C    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
& }. m% [/ ]: s$ L- Jfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
: u2 n) u2 m2 ^* Sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
  z5 H. [' b4 j# Oavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-8-1 02:56 , Processed in 0.070738 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表