埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2114|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable . l* n3 `) |: y* v3 k
# [6 N* i8 u& H4 i6 f" y
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -" I; o- t- T: k% t$ {' V8 y2 c
4 u" W; {6 T- m" x& f  ?
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market/ s+ c, A/ W  a
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
3 h* g# u. M/ g: f) equarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic0 Q' i3 i, I& J5 H( T" @, @" }
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
, @! L$ r) L0 d" G" Jprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 j9 p& D# }- R, g0 @more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,* ^2 m0 b1 d: [( I- k4 y
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal# I8 k& Z  N% C$ o; c. E6 O
LePage Real Estate Services.+ n# T! H3 ~) T- V
8 l2 \$ v5 o4 H1 X
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters# O( B- \  I4 H' L+ U, V
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; I. U: Y9 s9 ~3 I* ^conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and" F2 L; D6 g! ]0 D: a+ }* b& _! A) Q7 P
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the- I  d' j" }9 I/ A9 R' ~# f: k
residential real estate sector.
$ I9 ?- l8 `, G$ S! k; G6 J
) W4 ~4 h" ~; x! y    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation$ t# B! Q1 B* r- U6 [8 v4 P
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)' _( D1 p7 n8 L, V7 h. _% P) `
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
+ j9 M# A/ A- _. y3 }; c(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
; s5 J8 F, q3 v  E4 A(+13.2%).
6 p7 U; \- I+ [, u; ?' v" G3 I
- ^6 A2 O- o' }0 Z3 a7 H/ w    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
& U5 g, H) v, n7 F/ ?during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: s9 c" [1 D% b3 [4 Z& bfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are8 p- B5 e: l* M. ?  l9 I9 _
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
9 n& z$ b. V7 Y0 d; r* |% zpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
/ r8 {* |+ [) D1 M, Y9 ?3 i. `: G"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We, n9 q) b+ F0 X
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
( h5 x* ~: U: Q; e2 lbalanced market."
/ T+ ~) c' I. M7 N% s4 R$ u" F; w2 Z1 A
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 f) b6 c6 ^5 W9 Y2 W5 p
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" B% D& x9 u8 {1 B4 C: }" f: @to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' o# n2 D  J; G1 y3 u
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 _) h& P0 ?4 K  {  }2 l
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
& Q- f' p2 [. R, E0 ~: Cmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record4 A2 [1 z9 @; U5 k" d5 k; Y; X
breaking price appreciations.
+ F  h3 U* z$ @/ i2 d: Z0 V, p0 ?: j) {! R* W
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
5 j$ }# |' v5 k5 l7 E# w1 N# R- h" deconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. U8 O9 ~- O6 P& l+ @6 N
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
- n! [7 c  K! R" |7 E& u8 g& x7 J5 s% {  g2 K0 A) q+ X: s
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
5 c: a: Q" O5 veconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
( x. s( S1 ~% i4 F% o! I3 u# Y8 ?confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off1 A& p5 t1 t% N( m. _* u
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
+ t' h4 }1 J5 K9 fIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 X' H  c2 E- U5 X& b3 }* Q' igreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
5 |3 T3 u7 v2 V2 @* p) J! ?2 mprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
5 |0 C$ i# Q' q  p& ]# t/ a$ y7 \
6 f  Q; y* t# G% @& E    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
6 b6 }7 w( Q- c: S- j6 g; H" Fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
6 j* h2 I7 k/ h1 c* Rfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
3 z2 |- |! O0 }8 \/ _are markedly different than those found in the United States.
* e+ W1 K2 r- |! Y0 K* v
- Q2 g( v* n$ S0 a9 z2 w0 a    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the/ F: H$ j9 E1 t
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's4 B, L9 ^; L4 K9 E1 A. C
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the- u$ f; u  q: f7 m# c
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
3 J) e8 m% G5 j5 F! paffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the9 J( l* L8 f: A3 O9 }
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ i- K' z' U* ]3 S! Haggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: v1 M/ {* p* ^6 hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."8 K# W# C# U7 @1 g6 X5 U0 R

+ Z" |9 E/ e2 J% |! }+ `9 ~    <<- Q' x+ l9 v# K" A$ z5 [
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES, n$ x0 b8 d: o8 m, M( \5 d" D
    >>
! ?$ e: b3 }9 ?" Z
0 A# J% ^9 G4 r  ]. F5 t    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in8 }2 D+ _" c0 f8 \7 {3 w  ^
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
( y# \  W. Z: b0 b9 h! Rof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
, G* ?7 U9 R% q( q' `looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) P3 e0 ]3 @1 y( B$ i5 p( Erenovations.
! t# F8 s4 m0 d, v* d! }; q& B' S" h" o% d& N2 ~3 t5 g
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
4 X, y. _+ A% F9 U5 h" jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 p, c; x! s% ]& o
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
; E% o. z9 z/ [; i5 e- t9 G% s5 fSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.7 W! I$ {6 H- V- n% @
1 [0 A  n" r; X6 m0 L# @
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer2 `$ y: t7 n  f+ }; _! ~  d
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
( \  l1 B0 r6 l2 a4 H6 @' R1 x: {quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new! O9 B9 x7 y  l! u( q9 b9 x
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores, a) L$ I/ b- k6 X9 @% u5 X* ^
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
. e1 a4 H6 `9 `$ Jand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% T; X2 K( z7 f' @1 K8 d1 |4 K6 ]
& n. o+ E$ z) ]- ?+ U6 @    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
! V$ A1 Z5 N) V. K  ~conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
# q, p) Z- a8 Ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers! n2 `: H9 d6 ]( N8 N2 K1 W
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
5 p( r. H* p5 y: i. ddollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
2 \+ @6 G, o9 o+ g4 e1 e& Hbuyers with more options when looking for a home.  U$ S) t! ^" ~# _% t  j/ _: B
8 u! i4 z  h8 I! }( d
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly0 a$ i# M) P- s
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
  f5 D7 l2 N. W+ H- gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,& h0 B: z9 J8 x5 z2 ~, w7 @% }: N
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
- E* u7 r0 G4 H- K4 |+ n' r7 T0 ~few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
5 g" R: h% F1 q  ~; C" {
9 A: [* b) O, K4 H4 p4 e3 Q. ?  C9 A    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house3 ~" C" B) g" e* ^
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
5 B8 h2 D# f) M# llevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
, M, y3 g* x# F; Y1 C# [# c/ vfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,. `  D1 S" ?$ T' g8 b7 n- B
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the; D0 j* N$ }% P: d/ R4 c
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before/ [. F! u# `4 E
making a purchase.: k( ?1 w- S8 Y! ?( ^! i. Z9 F
. e% z- A8 ~6 G/ f) O
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 w5 n3 \" x5 D2 c" mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
0 s( H9 V9 L' N8 s8 x+ gconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
' k4 Q: F( o9 O# \8 D  K' Scentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
! ?; t# L. D5 `1 a* J9 d  yattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. ]0 o# a# e0 t% z0 @- ]: Samenities.
  Y2 w. L) D/ H+ X5 A: U8 b5 ]2 M$ t/ K" {5 Q
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 \  g5 K  f  a, S
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand- A2 Y4 S4 E' B9 O8 r' n  O2 Z; E
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 M% o5 X1 Q: |% H9 v7 q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been+ S+ A4 g& U, ^: {! M
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
: [8 S) X2 C2 M0 S, I4 f+ nresidence, rather than for investment.
$ p- E$ E0 ]7 c: z' D, [. B# g9 h# ?+ j; M5 d& v: u! Z
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as+ o( T! t1 c7 _  @( r6 @# s
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
- C6 @  k) P8 i+ W3 @in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer$ I5 Q. c" E/ @4 Q/ `+ i* d8 `+ @
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization( H0 C: _2 r" J  x  k7 d! x
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
! k  g- e7 U6 L, [! g$ Pthe market.
3 [. w* j" J" b& N; X) l- z
6 [& t' ^- A5 c; c    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
) ]' K8 w: q3 c1 G/ U/ zJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In7 J+ _4 h0 Y+ i6 d- s7 D
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
' f) q3 I9 ~# z, }. e, a' tmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
* A8 d5 c/ ~5 B: a+ ^$ }, d4 w$ E! Uto the shortage of available inventory.
1 r/ X' f: K) x# C8 U
* _, B' S$ k- j1 l    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
  H* b5 H: u' _3 p) e  cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains+ W/ y! q5 P! H* Q8 ]
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses: C" q" V4 [- J' `! c
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 M! E8 ?  f# j  ?# w, ~: h

  B! }' {5 Q* T) k- S3 g$ q; q    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases7 O. G4 }# k- L/ j4 l* g
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low) a$ B  _# n# A* o; Q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that8 m6 z3 y1 Y; U7 X! d, a& p
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
7 s' k4 I) u# f4 I: \2 G$ Nprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
! H. v; |0 {5 t0 i& v! ^: dseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
5 T( q- e5 ?: A0 jbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

% [. [) D3 R' @" c' o/ R/ m% `3 Y- U) _
: v7 ?( o. R* U& U. Z    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
( \0 }  U: ~1 {as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; e3 }, ^) N4 k/ i- V9 y5 N
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( w: E8 V8 T7 r* t* D
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# ~: n7 p) J2 W' f: v* S& i0 E
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
* u" j5 Y4 f# S2 vin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" I+ n( D7 N) B8 @towards the end of 2006.
    9 S! h% ~" s& w: g0 p; n4 P8 T
9 u  Z! s& s6 l' H% v$ z$ H0 L6 Q$ u; I
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) z0 C0 E  k2 F1 C5 _& m9 z
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable. G: p/ C& m0 X$ M
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 h& i" P- G7 W0 A. w6 d
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
! X* X. e) s6 k+ X' ?foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added6 N  S6 F5 g" r: t
pressure on tight inventory levels.& y5 ~1 C) e2 {& r' e
9 j' k5 h' V9 c
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic1 o! N& V6 J  B: a5 Q
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people3 r$ \7 r- U8 e
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
5 a4 ^( H/ P: P: A- Mwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching+ o3 t! J+ n7 @' b" j/ v  l
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
8 J+ V: V0 J( W- C# y. M1 t2 g* d+ T3 o+ E8 @
    <<6 K2 Q5 m$ H& J: w$ a# H
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, z$ _/ x5 M# f8 m
5 m  t$ f0 T- O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 s* V7 Y, x/ o( W. Z                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
; a# _9 S% \- F2 h: p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 b& o7 j0 M) S0 \
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3, d& W) d  a! x" Q/ r8 a
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average8 D/ R5 R2 p+ E: r( E$ |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& s9 b& o  f3 m! u! q* O2 P    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
% `/ s) N! g: Y& a" Z5 N5 M4 E- Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 L3 M; z. X6 ^% f- ?, Z0 f
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
* F# }1 v( |. E7 Y5 _" j  v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% _6 q6 U1 V) }4 p% a/ v7 m& Y
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000( g+ G% a! K) B$ x- P) O2 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 e; G. s, a# e, G    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
5 H  B) B# s/ ?) g: E7 [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 S; `1 T! u2 F2 I* Y5 q    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
& N1 |" F+ h2 b, S3 S3 W3 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! c& _7 _8 F! G% o2 O5 C# o    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
2 {5 ^7 h) O- `- [2 n* \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& ^$ ]& n$ ?9 F/ Y; c
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185) @: T! E! @5 b+ E; U* x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 \' }5 s- u8 Q: @9 r$ S
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250& T& ^- b7 `6 u5 e; ~/ L" F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 M# p$ B+ @7 Z, R- R( D( a+ L/ Q0 o
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
2 R1 E' \: Q' \) z; I- X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: A1 O/ B9 @) o# p7 [* M2 C0 f: ]
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
% `5 V  A+ ^" D2 D7 u: o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 a9 }5 y% p% L$ m    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500* O8 B/ [; O6 X) P4 M+ H& ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 d) h0 d! G% I9 _
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
/ U7 e0 c: a0 V' n6 {1 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: q- x( z! X- K3 c
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
6 j) |2 {: J8 H0 ?( @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: z! _% ^6 V: Q6 a' L    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
& T4 g: O4 I# o% k% t2 [3 Q3 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 H9 O: d9 `$ t1 G' v, t- t* o
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000* c, A; t2 K$ s* Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* l2 \0 ~6 `+ W5 {) W3 Z$ \    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860# G  c: [+ x. ^7 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" p- w- w" a) `/ `* w! Y0 _
& l3 E5 F; n% f  w% h. n' T/ }
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ f, Y4 V4 t+ a1 {
                               Standard Condominium
6 J1 w9 K4 E6 {! D# _0 k3 Z( q    -------------------------------------------------------------9 Y( m9 R5 S7 Y3 s3 }
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
5 w+ _4 ~5 L3 ]3 t- _% s3 D3 L    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change$ k; J) C1 ^3 i9 u& g" A3 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" l$ o0 t# s% d# X' P( Q    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%/ n5 X) X8 W$ \) ?9 I3 x2 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# h( h& E( w3 j- t/ ^1 Z, r    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
4 J4 F; \2 H' x) e8 g. @    -------------------------------------------------------------
! g7 C) q0 d$ ^- W8 R; L    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A* I9 ?; k' }& d# H* d4 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 E) l$ w. o. L1 j2 G    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A, o9 A$ z  Y. H" f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 [9 V- [3 G' @    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
; @2 F8 E8 e  P/ |" R8 W1 H    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ S' J3 ]8 Z$ [, x! V    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%; G" U# ^+ L2 m8 C: `% g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 l3 f9 r3 z9 s2 s/ s    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%: W9 o" s- S/ M$ D1 r7 v0 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ V& H+ |) u! E7 w2 r  w, c/ L4 ~) q    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%1 O5 p2 s" d# b( ?% }1 g+ I' z6 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, x9 \' t0 o% R8 ]) w6 P    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%0 ^' V5 ~$ k0 N. }1 ^' o3 z  u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 `, M+ }" f* S+ |  n+ P    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%8 }! W0 K0 W, g5 Z, j4 V9 U  P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; R8 n) M+ P  O, X$ X$ S    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%- ]6 {3 e! r) Y: Z0 e, F% d# S9 U  T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: r, p. x% V# p' [/ ~! c/ S    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
, [& R0 C4 W4 ?8 A8 ^7 U0 D    -------------------------------------------------------------1 E& V4 S4 Y- ~5 v" ~
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
2 q( P4 o$ U0 K# Q. B) Y    -------------------------------------------------------------
. ^$ Q$ S  ?* b: `7 ~& n) ]  _    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
. ?0 t# h4 l* I- G3 k: b    -------------------------------------------------------------  a5 f7 R' \! E. F5 U4 v
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%* Y- g. R3 ]5 i9 Q- q, v+ y4 n4 [
    -------------------------------------------------------------; H0 P8 }1 l2 U6 Q& }" s) w+ F! r
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
! P; n+ s9 y6 _" O# X    -------------------------------------------------------------# b* V, N0 k; M
    >>
+ q  p  v7 b9 [6 A* }3 L6 U8 D0 ?9 n! g" j, W
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined9 w/ T6 U! C  g7 \. k
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint/ _! I3 Z3 K1 L9 B$ U; Q; n. ]: f
John and Victoria.. ]# p; W3 p; j5 z, |, W

; h9 K& r& N; \( p, O  k# F    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: Y/ D- S. [3 E. p) ?/ tcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 ?! v) H* h) v; Ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 _/ `* M8 |9 W7 f, g
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price: m: C- W, l( e: F
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities9 y2 @# J4 V; e6 S# l: l+ \( q/ g3 }
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is! j+ J1 S6 Q* W. C
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
. z3 {. D( {$ Cfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable1 C  ~9 M% i) x8 W% E; {2 G) D- T
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ I* w. j( K4 W$ `" x( n4 K' J, G
November 15, 2006.  \6 G! E, X+ L$ _  ]( p
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of/ j8 ^% f* ~/ a+ |3 c( {- _
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
5 y3 V* k6 ?# Y( Rprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is' X# F6 Q% I& |2 ]5 }
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-29 12:36 , Processed in 0.075693 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表