 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 8 X4 j a' l0 U+ L% e7 E" M
5 o' }; q' J8 y, W
5 G5 b3 _3 F7 N2 n1 J' Z) `( Y4 r
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
0 T) ?9 I2 Z( ]7 w0 @# F
. b" V8 t& [5 t$ P5 SLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
9 k, h) q+ s0 ^# \" d- K$ T
/ B; s/ j' X [% u: o: I- ?7 Xcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..' e/ c, S- M, Y2 i
9 f$ j+ `/ l7 l& k! q/ @Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
; G, z8 b, u: p8 H$ o |
|