 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
% E& R _- L8 o0 h E
! n9 Y; C5 Z! F; f* Y$ s% d+ ]: z- f2 K6 ?$ f- g
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. " H$ S5 @) K; H3 ]
/ n- }! G- H+ S: ^( _2 L% V9 LLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03/ v f0 h [- ?' ?8 l
8 P' R! G% x% z5 H* O( @' }' J6 v1 G
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
?) R2 F& A) ?! T
, e% P6 g) o( z; y& L4 F; yNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) # H* d% n% N& Z7 `' y/ V
|
|