Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

2 F6 m0 r* I$ g( g) UNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
( e% J9 i8 ?# x* ?/ D9 K# u. R
; ?. N7 i3 m% Q- D) ]Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
8 R9 W: i/ l" N( U" [9 L% p
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

' F7 [4 c+ j# }& j- N
) L8 Q5 G* B& j3 L( D2 a3 ?$ IIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
% a+ I8 q+ V" k, C7 \* i
- f& }/ r' `+ i0 _& O! v- \San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
9 `: }+ ]* K) {, d# \' Q- dNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
: V, d6 t  Y' O; ?
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
) x2 d- ?1 L3 I8 n, [7 i+ C- M
6 c, Q& y8 m- A& b3 U6 XIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
( C2 p4 Y/ k! E7 y0 A+ o
9 G8 M% v' Q3 I7 H: G! u Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
) P! T. B2 T% i" d8 k3 H+ j' `San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
) s- _. u& }. HSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
. N% ~; Z4 U* f; O) a+ vNew York  21.2 22.5
1 s/ n' L' t8 o+ _5 V  w+ T; k9 j! GChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
2 q4 a& M7 a# G, r0 N
: z* N6 L4 @) J! g1 g- w# }/ q
1 O, R* ]' B/ n. [: {7 R
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
7 h( i# {7 O( L! t

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
4 \2 b+ x# }% O0 A  F1 N* C
5 a% x0 F6 }# Z  V, _  z8 Pit would be a good reference.
) l. [( G! f  x! l' e9 w
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]