Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
& d1 u5 V$ K$ D3 nLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
+ w" W6 b& W: M" }
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
2 N" ^8 c0 f$ x
7 W& w3 m( C8 q( X; Y3 X. b8 Z  VLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
) O3 W$ S0 r9 K. M- |
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
5 D4 C5 d5 Q# T8 D% L
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
  [/ U0 N4 ^. oNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

: j, G' v4 F5 H9 @$ LIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

5 }" q" n; R& ^" g% O1 C Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
* l- h+ o8 Y7 l Avg. 1988-2000 2001
5 a" k' P  v8 ABoston  20.5 30.2
7 m' f" C* C. Q- DSan Diego  22.8 29.7
! f; L4 w$ O- b5 k4 mSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
! s3 A% s+ p3 Q+ a# y! O3 d3 H9 BLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
$ A6 O) L# n! m% X* aChicago  17.2 20.8
- L  t0 \/ [' J" Z- N7 g" _Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
- u% e) O/ H. Q: F" N& Z) J
5 H8 j/ \) E4 L3 v) H& `
" m) u+ z3 @0 j' F6 Q3 {9 r3 }4 ~2 b
7 m* u9 A, l3 q+ a. q$ r  @It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

$ \& a8 n, c, X8 c* v
) I( t. \' c' E( g* A1 d8 BFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

8 w. w( p9 ^( o: K/ i; `thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]