 鲜花( 23)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-3-4 10:02
|
显示全部楼层
Thank you another quesiton,
# s, g/ w# [% V4 F) Q9 b9 S! |/ [+ I, w& @# K
According to China-Canada Treaty
. g, N) I" a/ S& P4 Z9 P
+ M: n! M4 W8 u: \& T0 d' AArticle 19$ S Y* Q/ h: I) w. ?
Students
0 h" s3 \9 Y _3 Y' b& s4 _Payments which a student, apprentice or business trainee who is, or was immediately before visiting a Contracting State, a resident of the other Contracting State and who is present in the first-mentioned Contracting State solely for the purpose of his education or training receives for the purpose of his maintenance, education or training shall not be taxed in that Contracting State.
_/ Y% L' b% r8 {0 _$ P$ _$ e
) T8 Q2 d4 b9 m. @( y# \
0 L) R% W& s/ ?' R1 P3 f2004年 , 我 拿 到 两 张 表 2 y6 N) `5 A% t) X5 U& E9 G* l
T4 是 RA TA的 工 资 $ i0 D* B0 |) B9 j' o" r* A7 [
T4A 是 scholarship; z8 v; p* q9 }7 e% C5 G2 C
+ e2 j7 u* q! e' [根 据 以 上 TREATY 我 觉 得 T4A的 scholarship肯 定 不 用 报 税 , 但 是 不 知 道 T4表 用 不 用 报 税 呢 ? 因 为 觉 得 他 也 属 于 the purpose of his maintenance, education 里 面 的
* N& F3 W' j) a5 p/ S4 n/ a r" |; n$ s
多 谢 了 |
|