 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 1 J" c+ M* M: L: ~4 s" w9 G- n; \
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!5 |( Q+ ~: K* q' r
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... $ O, M9 k U2 X* Y1 d
! A. C! ~. E( `; U1 g" q" v: w
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。( ^3 Q4 N1 a; M; e4 [ K6 @
3 O- z6 Z: b3 ~/ I# G; P安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless./ i' `0 a) [4 l& [' E( E2 L
2 C5 z" i( \( ~ F- a4 h不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
9 G7 A! ^$ N+ z# @
4 H2 B6 f s" \% i2 F6 D另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
* d+ a) i( t* ^9 A3 N1 p
) ~7 @! U! @4 J关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
6 t: i5 b' E' N/ h7 y5 HYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
) @: D9 @) g" @* e; B* w) G1 | {" x: D! N2 P- l8 g
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".2 L( Y# }$ o: B0 I, m
2 \6 d& J, o- _( S5 i1 XBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.& p8 l* v; H% m3 O- ?+ X( o
8 e$ f1 m) o, y3 T[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|