 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
/ r N8 O: n5 L `# X楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!" r e( `3 R( t- w* q
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
% j, U! I5 ]/ Q- R. s2 Q3 r6 P; G% Q, Z9 K c/ `
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
' L* C1 k6 G7 D/ u5 }
2 [8 z8 O; S6 Z; c6 Z$ U" k安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
" M$ l% @ U* i' T& e
s4 m' H+ _* D5 A$ K+ y8 b+ ?不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?0 v# R7 r5 ]8 ]7 z! z/ g4 V
1 S; v }5 V! f3 Z0 c5 A另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
& _$ Q; G2 q# R" |9 B- m4 B K: Z& q. E5 V4 S
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):3 Q* W7 Q7 S8 q! h
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.$ F: z1 K8 S$ e, g
7 N, i* o! E/ iOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
$ {' O9 w/ H( B3 _# ~
0 s/ {: N0 }, e: K7 X$ |# l" CBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.! K: r' m) g& _
. F2 K$ K% i: W9 Q6 \: }9 e- J# c
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|