 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
0 `5 Z0 P6 p6 D( `* I. ~% d楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!! g. x: t1 k+ E0 V4 v4 D
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... + ?' u V7 r) T. M- Y* C! i
( R4 ]/ C5 d0 D" r0 p8 F2 _您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
2 I/ g0 g' y3 _" M" L
5 A0 d3 O0 x% s7 _/ r# s6 K安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.& f( U4 X! ?) W. E" N
5 X- r @+ E u i3 E3 [不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
& J1 j& y1 u6 ?8 u% g5 h
! M! _' M. o' u7 ?另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
) _' r* v& x+ q1 I4 O% G" E. J: ~) Z" s1 a
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
& B% D+ ^8 v& c" r8 O8 sYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.0 k8 [" [; Q( f# t$ \9 g
) P' l& z+ v7 z9 d: O( ^' uOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".$ W( i9 i- q2 e
6 R; ?( w$ p" ?$ {But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.& L2 @( F8 n4 k9 j0 m7 \) w: M! _
3 c* c: Y' _+ S1 y
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|