 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
' Y5 `8 b7 M, ~+ H d楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了! @2 L3 H. u! ?9 P' v& D4 i
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
! b7 H# v( o' K5 i
# J. s, i1 N3 G- h; P您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
3 e9 v7 S# h8 ^2 T1 Z. A% R; s& ~+ g& C+ `: g1 [2 J' B: e! C
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.( `& N0 N+ ]4 \( j
! E- _, {0 @; n
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?) j3 o/ O5 S5 ?" n
9 m. R5 C! ?, c
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
9 L" e+ S B" R$ h# P- Z# E& v- e0 w. I* K) w1 D# `4 M
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):9 n* ~ W6 h+ o' h/ U) y, [
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.7 q9 D9 m& f% G/ J$ ]' _
) ]5 D L3 A3 I0 m `Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
0 J0 X& R: Y% _' B q7 a
- R. l p m4 ZBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.# f/ S' J; x9 Z+ ^5 X6 x2 [- N; f. m
5 f3 p0 c% r% C7 @. q2 n
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|