 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 " C; J+ u* Y) x2 X8 V% h
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!0 m2 {4 p2 \/ J
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
# J1 ?& z8 k6 O+ h( {+ c5 I4 t1 V! g* G' f$ W9 ]
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。6 \2 {- j9 r) o
1 ]6 Q: Y' k0 G9 l4 _- g安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
n+ G9 y% }8 J
K/ V9 ?0 X( Y. V4 R/ a. A1 Y不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?0 t8 A( \2 d r4 L* W. \9 ?
7 k2 x1 i4 P4 b9 ~: E. W
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。0 g2 t- K9 A# S9 h
) g7 m' j. h- I9 v: k6 _. w关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
- ]2 M! S. \1 ~6 P; nYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.+ I Y: V4 ? l8 }2 Q' j' R( z
, X* l) L, f- l; jOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
1 I8 {8 k- \7 [7 L; m6 b& p) H* J( \8 _0 Q* x2 M. P9 g( I
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.) o" ~: t" u' K" [: m; l2 v. E0 @3 }
1 m8 g9 B2 b, E- ][ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|