 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
! ^) K$ F! G" m! T: R; m8 I楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
" g/ h3 p. B+ p t9 j' @corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
( i7 Y3 t* ^9 n" _# W
- o5 W( U6 k* R( ?& M/ f您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
" o; [# ^7 O% U% n$ t1 v2 @+ R* g4 ~0 z6 f- z- G: g+ e1 N( L0 A
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
' s/ F& w! V( S& B X; I- a# V( h0 G5 `% g1 m9 s2 K
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
! ~' m% p9 A/ ]
# h; W7 X) ?6 |: G8 Y另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。" Y X% Y. P: O+ ^0 q" B
8 D2 [. G( ?: C) a$ g: t
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):: F; s+ v: \' a, ]8 l; H* r
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
5 e. l) Q# \+ l6 ?5 I( b% t& c9 |) j7 }' E1 A
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".& {+ m y, K. X3 m0 f$ f+ s
% r& x6 [$ f/ b/ qBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
( b; w3 C' o% j4 _/ ?
/ O2 s) u4 d- ^[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|