 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 * D# U6 I8 q6 Z7 c9 X
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
" ~% T. i: ?9 N b0 zcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... , ]1 ]. T* s+ W( U
/ r3 T9 u( z$ X您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。+ F) [" e; Z8 R' a0 K& B6 H7 A9 Q" D
~7 z! A. ?/ ~0 Z y( m% x ?
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless./ n7 x* b7 t- i0 r( G% y h
. |8 Y) O; Q5 D8 [$ [
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
! {3 N$ e6 t+ L2 v7 L) |0 |, n/ r$ p- ]
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
$ t/ Y6 k& G) Q! s9 z& K' g' r2 B: K; F
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
: j6 ]0 i0 U2 x( V5 _* uYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.2 D8 S) {& k3 W) o- u
: U# w; s5 l" p0 |$ C+ s& s, V, ~Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".# c: X/ ^: n8 g( u$ H N0 _9 Q
, P' R4 O, m9 S2 F+ D2 u
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.# I( R4 \; X+ j
4 I5 j9 C5 A) y1 Y: S- J, L[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|