 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
% ?' C4 L- e" i) p, m楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
% S( r8 \' h7 t0 l, w5 s- f/ Ccorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... * t+ U& Y7 Y( J" A: J3 A) q
" f6 F* j/ H+ S# |5 v7 `& n7 R您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
8 ~7 T3 K: l. O- m
4 }6 x! O$ D" s* m- d4 q安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.. Z8 t8 b' o/ T- n! V
5 [# |" A0 E& A: y: Q不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
, W$ a [- i$ m; L. K. s3 P5 S8 @! u+ r8 e
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。. p }- T6 u% m1 W! y! D
+ L" M* I& E& z4 M3 z7 {, P( y
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
# F! ^) J! {5 V6 c# T3 T% |Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.9 d1 U1 {; ~& }* ?, H7 J/ s* O
2 U' G( ^$ ]" IOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
: I. b, ~ {: G/ J, ]( U6 c! u$ w
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
. h# T% D" w$ g; V, D, ?$ E0 U6 m9 t6 r, x% M k+ A* N& U& k f
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|