原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: ; `8 E1 @: F/ r# \3 j& ~' q, O1 V1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.0 i/ N* Z) Z& Z0 D8 i i
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. - c- t: H) T2 ?# e/ r/ r * s! b- [" c' F; |* F! T上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧.0 m1 V- j) |' S
% p: }! B v: C5 ~4 Y7 B
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20052 U( }. \+ F* j8 |
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" ( X: @2 e0 a5 b8 a% ?+ u# F* Z; l f( Y4 V- b+ j' }% u! D
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." . m+ ]. `' f* _2 {# y1 m # a5 `0 a. `4 P; x6 Q+ q3 O7 ~You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 . Y1 W. U6 G# L% m% d $ `) ^' D0 h' _) H3 |, G( M' C; |- V. V$ w; ^. @
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: + R2 ?; R F' e B2 b+ cHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 ( c8 q4 a% U. }; KThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" / b& g: N9 a) i+ x) t0 n+ J/ @ 4 Y0 i( u8 I6 O8 t: u"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
& R( Q% j$ T" o$ I2 bDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.