 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
0 v% h9 \. f! ]/ a$ A GDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
% o2 F3 E1 O# ~# s i1 i7 {) G, N9 n0 Z6 V8 b% z4 J5 `: X% j# r
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
$ L5 X$ d( K( v0 `. `
5 c, }4 ~% X5 |! ?3 G) h' @Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 4 M! Y, Q$ u j( ]7 Y
2 O+ g5 V! P5 }
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
% h6 ?: P5 s- p- s* H* Z8 b. t: o* {( a7 b7 `+ [- Z
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.) _" Z6 m- O3 W- n8 V
; O$ U: G8 @; C2 Z/ |7 ? b
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
; D, \& {& _! h0 f
. V& C1 r- n- ~) ~( |Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
/ ^( _2 [- U4 S9 B5 J
% T; s/ [ R5 P8 _' u% [3 y8 CDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.; a# Y1 O/ |3 D v4 q7 O( I V
^# O& A7 C; w& a' \7 ~$ gPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.* r% g2 i2 f6 H& V& g2 Y! B4 H- w
" w7 e2 ]8 l/ Y }Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|