 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
, T: f- _% Q2 x$ c0 D3 U1 Ffrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
0 \) \3 h) H1 H" B* ^% _4 o3 n7 Qunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
6 {0 m, V" @. K3 k9 Tprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by- ^: J: S. z9 g/ O
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This3 d2 {. Z9 v8 K' p& ]
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
( m" |8 R4 j! B& X3 n/ pthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately: j: `9 ^2 d& A. ~: O; Y$ o) b
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
0 B% U* [% _% I% h# H2 sthree years.7 U( R: ~5 z$ ]" V% V! i. B; q
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from& ?7 F Z u/ [3 u7 p
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of' y* k8 J/ b* q* x3 E
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects9 F. s2 {; _, F% G5 b: I7 M
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices% C8 Z b* d* `) j$ @* e
to fundamentally justified levels.
* l7 ]2 A' x6 q4 Z. @We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”# g. C$ I2 l+ `$ V/ j
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and. u$ s3 O! b6 H4 L/ I# D; `
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
: j& D( ?* n3 m: Xwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although$ I4 |" h4 z" N. l4 P( P
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s- B- Z/ n2 M5 @; [6 R5 t0 ]3 [. T& a; a
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
: B4 z! g1 G K. L; ?) phomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
* w6 |8 w& I9 `9 Z8 T) T5 G `0 Nthat is now being rapidly reined in.# D+ \. e9 y6 l" v3 A8 g
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
% }7 Q! C( M( R" b$ d+ N. e) rthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
' `" L( y2 M3 z3 O lmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh7 }" t* Q, [7 |1 q! @8 e6 f1 U
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers) P- u9 Z! M/ q5 P: R' c
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
; G& J% @2 t7 }. z% Aremain choppy and new residential construction will be' p2 l; K s3 C1 H
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction# p7 A" \; d* z( A3 v' K o
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this# `; @0 ]: j- G" d2 c4 o! P' ~
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide- _! W) [4 |" M; P7 m5 z2 f
residential construction will fall further to around
' K# \: s6 {/ H$ T; ~( l125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
' s1 R6 p, ?6 |$ m- N0 {in the fourth quarter.
4 L; ]/ t1 t) u% s# L& I, p5 e& W- \To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
$ [# u9 c& y5 W. j7 E, \' J2 Wwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
3 f' T8 b/ g# N* _; [4 }fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
- V) B1 c- I4 ?province. Affordability is the key concept behind home( E/ _( ^1 C' d/ W: @
values since house prices should track incomes over the& v8 a3 L- F8 ]/ h" q
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
* r* M" K: Y) m8 D+ @regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers+ u2 d& a! r# m V5 h* J
of residential construction.0 Q2 l3 y2 ]& [
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a- g; f4 ]7 Y& H
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction" a$ ]+ g& L" A/ G- P; q
would have occurred if housing had been priced& P' x" s( y3 n1 ^) B
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
! I1 @! v1 }- Z) J h, ]# j. `9 hfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new% n' y1 ^, f- {2 e0 A
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too7 a9 X$ l8 w9 W6 K4 O7 a4 t
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.+ A& M! I' _. P [
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,! s" }6 u4 S0 q& |# s( A" Y
where housing demand will further contract under waning
% R+ I ^9 x& P3 y/ ]9 F; ~population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
0 \0 [+ v8 V6 p% Oalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the7 I; F7 s% g, |# T1 c$ p% b6 N2 ~
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
% C+ e$ W5 W; [! m+ [0 Fbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces) y) x4 p/ o/ j$ ]2 {) ]# I
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
* A/ E% i8 j7 eweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
6 b; S) `- }3 L' W8 x j& gQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
& `% O$ X) F8 y% j- pstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
/ h f0 ~; c, sMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
- i6 j8 J2 J- n* S; Egiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
- |! D9 D$ U' I" yrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a* G4 W4 d0 z" I) \
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
# j5 X7 s. Z& Blimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
! X3 w: Z" ]! Lcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically9 g1 t; B2 l' G/ G6 G" y
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
& C9 C/ ~; E/ yconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will+ ~8 L4 J$ n: }0 Z
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as0 {) a6 D1 ?! T0 x
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could8 A2 d* S1 Q1 p6 X( A* Q9 a
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while, J5 d1 H% c" G" ^$ ] R
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we# f# A# b8 K' v3 I, {0 J
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
9 {6 o% X: i. a4 Binter-provincial and international migration over the coming
" o0 P- \+ m+ E( S; _/ Q. Z( K' y, Hyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
8 _$ {* d) J1 P, Xwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
4 m% K" Z5 p# r# J6 _OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING+ I7 n. q# j+ n( y9 ?
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
; h5 Z% `' _% B: [# j0 T8 a) _Grant Bishop, Economist
% I& n. i; }5 T( ?& V, S416-982-8063
' }; r2 d" z( n$ c) `Pascal Gauthier, Economist
& p! E1 x; q& W1 C416-944-5730
$ Q# C4 E* a( ~" ?' X. B8 l, t# h! }" e
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|