埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2420|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
; W" Z: g, V7 gfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
' E% x* U5 Q- J! j+ a5 ]unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house" T+ t* f1 C( j+ O
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by8 d$ }+ Y/ [" S6 o0 h" o9 k* ^" v
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This) I, w' {. H) K! F" D. U
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
  c( d2 X* X; F6 M) k7 S/ ~2 f1 }that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
1 ?9 S! c  n) n12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past% u% K1 v4 b1 I2 a# c5 u" i9 q
three years.2 H: G- r3 s( Z0 F; `  A
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from3 u" O  g0 @( q- P) c
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
6 K. O8 N; p/ ~( `4 e: kaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
: \* T$ _% r% |5 }- cboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices/ ~0 e. e. ?; h' G1 G$ k& p
to fundamentally justified levels.
7 l. J  Y, P( g6 O/ J8 P- A/ e- U  `We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
0 D4 v  @( }6 l; i! d% z% Fwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
6 {  ?+ X0 E! V. N, z% k& ethat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
" N5 _# M5 H# g" L. Gwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although! E0 l3 R! A* D1 q
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s+ B2 w& |# @0 v9 r9 l2 x
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where0 L- K; d; y5 g- B, B
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch! u. H  [! F$ Q& v! j
that is now being rapidly reined in.1 Y) _) [9 L% h' }1 O( Q8 E
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,0 p$ B3 b0 }. u
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
$ o3 r$ H0 d1 R( m7 Q# M6 Qmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh% g$ A( C+ u* \' |: \
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
4 Z. m6 |: }; ?8 l, ~from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will: ~$ U. f' Y) E
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
0 T7 C+ m: T' H2 ^* V" Y( C) cdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction& [8 n6 f# F% @4 ]! M
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this( P. C3 B* j5 ?1 u
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide  ~* R) \* i8 \6 J' Y8 g& E3 J1 j
residential construction will fall further to around: ]/ g: z4 D- g1 M' F2 d- Q# `
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
5 F4 e- c/ m8 t5 `9 P8 ]) [in the fourth quarter.
' e  ]2 }  D0 g6 r* t, W* ^' i% u+ N9 XTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,+ P4 V# ^2 E) b" j& n
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run# \( J# R2 i& G, U
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each1 b+ x5 i+ Y; x- C9 ~3 }$ Q: g
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
4 w5 `* `4 S, e/ b: b  J+ ?values since house prices should track incomes over the
9 T2 O+ ^" D, @3 O! h, ?long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we3 T* ^* Y' Y9 Y# K) M+ A. m$ y
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
/ j( ?. k) [  L$ c: @7 F, Eof residential construction.
9 s7 `) m; l, J& k& ETo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a* i9 @+ W. B4 I! g
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
; E  o6 q. a. M; swould have occurred if housing had been priced
7 [; S" A4 F) L8 ~+ aoptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
' z2 [4 _/ F7 Yfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new' }* S3 y& _, o9 Y. z5 e# o4 M
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
+ b4 d% a4 k6 a# I" Smany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.$ A' e, `4 T0 e4 L
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,0 I' ]" e+ }) [, T* o: z
where housing demand will further contract under waning% e. N/ i' d. d, ~  v
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are% y& C; z* S$ F5 J7 w
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the  c8 C* L7 e+ D
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
: j- v: ]4 o" w7 l  {, Z$ o* pbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
  x6 k' M$ ?# _7 h" |/ b! `has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural1 x3 L- N8 K9 d5 \) N9 H5 |* ]8 d* ]
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
9 N/ f, J1 |3 E& X9 Y  bQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the4 E9 j4 G# B8 h3 p
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
7 I: `. w" u4 g5 w+ f( zMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,8 a! P: m8 s/ f5 n# B
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
5 ?3 ^$ @% p, W4 q+ Y; prates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
4 F) x+ g# N" ?! v7 u/ ucyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears, K8 I8 }  \3 S* ^/ A
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
# i/ l7 D8 J1 econdo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically3 L3 H' w7 N8 @3 r( W- O4 Z
high levels of apartment-style units presently under2 T' S/ l- n. d5 {" H$ T. B
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
% a' H0 z' O8 n" r4 @( K) `8 g2 Wreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as0 J: ?5 O: n0 I, V# u$ L
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
  D8 G0 A5 _0 @8 f" y- V4 ^spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
4 b: f" r3 J- a( mresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we0 ?* ?2 K/ u5 s! [0 T
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from# Y  z4 [2 f& s7 J4 I. ?* A0 e
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming# l) M' \! v9 w: u" L: m
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
9 O/ u" d, F3 X; `5 Xwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.' R7 X' R( }4 K" T
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING4 ~$ k5 h* q$ b/ m& G' l! l
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS! v# Y9 [% N- @  p" v
Grant Bishop, Economist0 V% k0 V$ Y! k7 U
416-982-8063
; O- w* b" g) n" }Pascal Gauthier, Economist
8 ~, \& g5 t7 L7 @416-944-5730# K" y; _5 Z, u' D

. I' r5 C' e+ I6 lhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-11 23:38 , Processed in 0.064993 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表