6#cactus_20099 r8 u5 s: [9 @
% V& O# _# ], l$ d$ M+ M0 C* r9 [
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
7 M# T; } w6 C+ o7 gThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ... & W* t$ L& t1 T" v( i# uceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
, D) L: R; ]( b; h! I
8 z. n$ T5 ~# w$ d0 u1 t
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then? ! U( w J& M* L特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
/ L+ C+ n( G3 ?* T! o7 i! S
I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.
http://www.leebourgeois.com/blogs/lee_bourgeois/archive/2007/12/02/e5ce8ef1cc0243ec8a8eb4281c885af9.aspx9 o( R: q4 C, ]7 y; W2 u+ L$ j- r8 t
$ J* c5 F" `* l, k% X/ t8 v
1404 Latta Court in Leger is Sold!8 w( R6 u h3 @% n) T7 z, [
Phaeton 发表于 2010-1-31 10:47
! e m' e8 N% K$ G0 f6 U' r% ^
" u2 m) }6 `$ ]% I, W( e$ b
That's 2 years ago.' ]; z: J4 |* {% j, v8 G6 c
9 |! A, s) |4 }' H
Don't you see "archive/2007/12/02"?