6#cactus_2009 3 d3 k6 v; A! }& x2 N . }8 `" ^: {9 V8 z# C) W$ y6 GThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 7 x% n2 b% L+ i, O$ S 7 M8 q3 e% j. p2 S. n5 c; }! ^This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ...& T7 y# i: S# c6 J
ceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
% Z6 ~7 h3 B8 Y
7 l9 G6 u7 p7 N0 P8 _% jSo which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?' s1 K4 F% P; C
特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
4 T- [/ a+ p/ u& E1 Y! f% pI would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.