Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
& @2 n& O: ~+ W* P( [. v7 @
Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
Lot 44 in Block 5  $198500
1 [- q, |, }+ U3 x# D& x
/ R+ ~3 T7 \5 J, q) M# z4 ~* |Link is here:
* ^- d& w/ b( |2 \http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
3 H6 e+ f6 h# [% J5 \! J) n8 qhttp://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔
+ O. S1 |, C7 y0 n1 }( K7 p0 b. b
6 x2 r' j, `. n( c
But this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala

! E- E" r/ T# x* N( P" QThanks for your feedback.

If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.

0 g0 [6 W% H& }) K44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.

4 ?$ ]% s0 q& E0 ~Thanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala

/ p% R! Y0 |- \2 Y- Z8 AThanks for your feedback.
8 Y7 w7 T( U. @' x0 s" Y3 a: O
If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.

' a. t: _& `$ H  h4 ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

: I( E1 @# g- Q, S0 e' w
0 G' h+ m. q7 F& \: c3 B! KYou don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .
: c) V! \& l( H- V3 u& {
46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

  K8 r, f; m8 {: V- Y' ulot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

" a& p! q, h+ @$ o' aLot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
. l1 j& V( O0 U( a1 |Lot 44 in Block 5  $198500

+ u0 Q" |, \6 x3 I9 d8 yLink is h ...
) @$ P$ ]/ J; G# L9 {, Qfourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
' P2 g* O) A+ w- @. Flot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
; ^' u3 u( N. ^. Q1 r, r7 w高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。
) V; V, J3 e! e6 z, n+ G: m
46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
高 ...
WST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

  N; I/ D) ~- l最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala

" G, i6 a2 Y( v. K44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

, I9 G6 W# G; D
那只是某指定进深的宽度。

房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄


4 s' c% Z% q% M5 ?: K- n看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
) B; g3 Y, s# f: K" p" p( ~! X另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
! W: V3 h+ `$ m1 ?: D5 L) Y还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄
! D4 A! k! H3 o" \( y# Q4 [; x+ M
. S" q9 q- w, Q9 Q1 Y
2 n- H3 B4 F! J, i2 r看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
; z$ y# _- [. J还 ...
3 z7 T  _8 c: v2 mfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

; T0 e8 t6 ?4 ~38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。