/ _. n* V4 N" v; Q2 } K6 X1 P
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.) E5 o$ q {1 j# `( u- L# ?8 H" y
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 3 f9 n0 I' h, s- B " Y; a I6 _' G6 M% o0 H
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. " _9 G) j2 Z; _1 dThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. , C! B# ]5 g! G0 y+ n% E z " l& c, G" {0 A; A& }! @ * A/ c" ^) _5 G: _) i7 h- v5 d. E' a( V7 p: P8 R( s
2 v) C. Z7 t9 H5 a B, ]8 q1 o1 J( T* C' c0 |5 K7 C5 N0 b/ @. ]" ?4 C
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
4 B% {+ M4 j7 q4 Y1 w* L
& c4 j5 l9 u- A没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, ' I4 H8 \: N# e/ x# ]+ c c ; q% ^( o; Y2 ?但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 W0 d3 ^2 l5 i( b
/ S0 D8 `- p% E. q; G0 Y
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则