 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:" Y- Z# ~$ L( J4 `$ d
! l# K2 b. O z2 L' T6 f { L) I
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
- H% {; A1 n. ]: p, L- U% k9 |, h
**********************************
9 C6 f0 F( K9 L! B5 N7 S5 U4 HAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:( u6 p/ X( @$ \, i: V
1 K9 Z4 g, T4 _- ^
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
1 b$ _ r6 | `( W/ o( S( I
: m- w+ G$ t4 H- ^8 A2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8." ^- y2 A/ Q3 y6 M
' s" m, F& e- O) [1 D2 K
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
! [* e: m9 N. H. k8 a5 T5 _/ A5 T0 R9 b) A
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
% X1 \: o; m: q6 s* G) |1 A$ ?2 N% Z: t
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|