 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:) A: F7 W2 h, _% a/ ^, U0 X
! J n# T$ ~8 `0 mF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
( P' |- L: r7 U4 ^/ E F5 \ X4 l. `8 }% S* v1 n, }
**********************************2 F: a8 l( Z# H4 X5 ?9 ]
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
: X* P" {! ~3 t( ^5 N
( j( g) _' N% a8 {% l2 A1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
% F5 N# r$ Z: ^* ^0 r# a7 F" H. x8 Z$ y- R: ^* A+ ^+ b, j5 @! L& n/ w
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
0 k3 l) [. Z. v# r! { \7 L3 ]) Y# R$ _& r4 ^ o0 J, m$ H& q
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
' A# O/ P, O; I. q. U9 W+ B0 I0 Y# S$ B# a8 J! @/ e& G
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
; { }# S$ ^1 t; N5 M
) P) A! L6 o8 N7 A h5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|