 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
7 R6 H1 G, r0 T: }) z9 R0 o# C! k% h' z+ J, T# O# C, e; |
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
: c; S% K/ S D7 R1 q; Z$ Z; A0 \4 E& m* S
********************************** `( b2 b: u; b: C
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
: v9 l" `% n( y+ H& E3 z5 u7 }0 W9 Y# d7 S0 t/ ?) z1 I
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.1 S9 M4 a! r) `$ o2 B- S
1 g7 |) }; c: b* Z( i; w
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.: I8 u8 b% z3 K, ^6 a" D6 u
) ~% c( A/ s* T j
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.! I7 w* t# t# |" Q4 k3 ?" N
; f A; H8 b, L+ `% f
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.5 \ |. F* K9 W) h* P7 H, e
4 F$ x! y1 z- {# v' g* w h
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|