靠,你这么一认真,我就想笑,是不是老杨的指示啊?# x' f7 \4 ?- v: _. m. X
你别怕,我不会乱来的,话说回来,你啥时候看我乱来过啊?8 R8 H u$ q4 Q# P: g2 f
举个例子,举出来请你吃饭。6 c. u) m) Q, y* V# K3 h4 l. u
NND,不放心就不要让我上任,老之不干了。. h" z# `9 t3 E/ G
紫光 发表于 2011-1-31 19:18
. a) U7 x9 W1 A. x1 _" W1 C& c
嘿嘿,好容易逮到一个自愿上钩,愿意奉献的,你想不干都不成了~ . t5 N$ O) p/ w 4 l- z* m( g+ ^你别误会,我只是说程序上的公平是我个人喜欢的执法方式,并不是说其它方式是不好的。 3 y8 ]: P( \) ]( T# m3 o3 Z/ N5 l5 P7 o$ Y
不举例子你就不请我吃饭了?那夏天为啥请我吃饭了?
# e1 a! q5 `; d' K0 X, w
I agree. Everyone has his own version of 正义. As a result, conflicts can't be solved, due to a lack of common ground. 0 G9 t9 y) f t& J! j: n+ x1 u8 ~2 H3 Y: d( T, s: \! F
However, a 程序上的公平 is shared by everyone. Even if it's not perfect, it's a static thing that people know what to expect and adapt.
谢谢,希望所有的执法能够记住这句话。 5 E- n( Y: {+ Z! G ~/ @' b) j6 l南京街头,现在没有老人敢摔倒在地,就是因为一次看起来程序合法但是不公正的判罚。3 O( c" [1 A; Z1 c& r4 l4 h
紫光 发表于 2011-2-2 12:43
. E: R, k7 _# P1 }4 T5 K- l4 V5 SYou are just being naive. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes. 2 L2 |7 N* P. ^) L% ^% r- r. @ . b; ~. k8 F1 CLet me tell you a story. About a year ago, a guy published a book in U.S teaching people how to sexually abuse young children without being caught. Disgusting, right? Guess what, there is nothing can be done to stop him. Why? Because it’s legal according to U.S human right law.
You are just being naïve. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes.7 c y/ ], V* D5 ~0 o& u- ^* K' O
* M3 o: r# J5 v" I* q4 g+ _Let me tell you a sto ... 0 h' }2 L, K% b7 Etqbs 发表于 2011-2-2 13:20