请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348

: _5 `; F/ h% x# _5 A! o% Q+ v9 `7 B2 m值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

' ^. x, n4 i2 F' a/ _眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
; }# r( a7 n: JAssessed Value: $497,000
! F& ?( q5 d$ i3 I  t) x' J100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
( B- ^5 A7 |3 v- C, zLand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
; J1 J" L; z- _/ @9 ILot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
; n* J0 L2 K% w" O4 S3 a8 w( M  pBuilding Count: 1
' W) J) H; t8 u% nYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
, U) j/ _' [+ @! R- o! y  m; ~Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
( L' P: H: B$ S0 F6 N' l0 ZBasement Development: No
Garage: Yes
Fireplace: Yes
( P& ^9 H/ ~+ V8 s" `* IWalkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.