请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
; k: A' g+ {- @% W( d; f2 Y
9 r% Z1 R7 W  G# u$ ?值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

: [4 A+ ^- c- |5 [+ d4 p值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
: q6 p. F' V* ~/ k) Jskybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
9 u! ]' Y0 J, F/ _4 a5 s+ cAssessed Value: $497,000
$ k) s5 q7 y* n) ~; B8 }100% Taxable: Yes
4 |* v- _7 h9 `% v7 y100% Complete: Yes
- k) G8 W9 Z5 WNeighbourhood: Richford
0 X. L+ h" |' b5 oProperty Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
7 n( d$ _& W: @% C# SLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
  {5 W3 x" k+ [6 EBuilding Count: 1
: I/ |; y7 x4 ]; b) l# x+ ^Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
6 c; u, S  P% x; L6 s; G8 JApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
4 |5 j1 z5 A! a% v7 y: D- n4 I1 ^Basement Development: No
" g2 l2 D2 `- ?. qGarage: Yes
0 M2 m2 C$ x8 u3 kFireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.