 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
4 ?, |. H; Y4 e( m- A) |% d u3 c: ^% F( U
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -+ ~) {( t% h" w$ D. d
0 Y+ l; x8 Y0 \$ O* n5 I9 g TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
( ^$ R$ t: j/ p4 @exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
' E1 \0 v, V/ s/ c$ A0 S' }& `quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 P3 n6 f6 L( c! O5 t2 O
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit! t7 K$ j% m' I. c" z( m& D# O
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
* _* L4 N6 \$ M) Q6 J; a! Amore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,6 J7 H# d( w# s
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
- G f. B5 c/ c G/ [- JLePage Real Estate Services.
3 Q# T$ y7 i* B3 d+ v2 h" `, g" ^. o" Y6 p
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
3 J) m$ H9 q3 H6 I1 Q0 Yare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
! x G' `$ K9 B) Vconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
4 {1 T8 F( K0 Hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
8 m7 k6 I$ p# Iresidential real estate sector.
$ ~4 c5 P, l: d5 @% M! e, _& H- B$ v/ \
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
1 N) C2 h) D7 O( Coccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
+ @, l( i* k4 U! I6 Tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562* C7 E" i p$ j8 j' r% P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3806 E" s: ^; Z9 `8 w; J( T
(+13.2%)." U1 u: A. \' z! A
+ T2 x! `, Z% q0 x; j
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
% q# P6 Z, A. a2 a8 Wduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the- H" n. y! d" ?6 x% W
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are, t: G, z1 t( X6 O; s
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
3 g: i; x0 k% x1 mpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 s7 l: C% l6 j/ j! a% z"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
# P4 \/ c% o" W4 D9 G/ c! {welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% L5 B+ P0 B3 m2 n" hbalanced market."; ]6 u( p P4 n
; T$ L: }. U/ e% S. J" Y- n9 J
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,- r- i$ ~6 H9 e; Z4 b
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift0 u% I0 p+ p# e4 }% _
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: i8 ^, M) L3 w+ Lthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
/ r. U7 r8 L# P4 K9 yenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,9 ^* W, a4 ]; B- v! s1 G
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record8 t) u$ p8 O, p
breaking price appreciations.
* W. `: ^6 I* i+ }4 ?" P. |. W
2 {8 p% [. Q, f, s* b- v/ i% [ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
0 a1 R; e5 b0 N, l% P: d0 I& seconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, U5 i6 g: J. w/ Y6 Dlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, E* L# `# L5 A9 d1 M) A1 R3 V" n) _1 _4 v& t2 s
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
* O8 V W3 f$ heconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
/ e$ }8 l' s2 f. s" |& S1 ?confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ p% |; ~9 H, ?$ W* d* G7 W: T! c
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
& H- O# p3 _$ H2 ]' A% P! uIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
. r6 H9 d! [3 Ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of7 d# P- j7 c( g( w
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
: J3 n0 a9 B) \- |- s& w0 P% Q4 t/ r- V: Y
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing, L) Z0 u9 ?$ Z2 H( {# ~
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and) _6 O2 s+ Q) S0 u1 W; e: m
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
/ ~! B: p9 d$ @3 b2 eare markedly different than those found in the United States. w& Q5 c6 S0 ^* T1 ^
1 k( ?, N$ |4 F
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' E, Z1 [( C- V1 Q. \9 k/ V
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's( I0 h' `1 h% D0 W
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
4 t) e6 @1 }; `! o Qrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general% ~( K" e4 t; p& I- o1 {
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ K0 l5 Y+ F( q5 K1 e* ~
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and) Q$ m4 x* C# l+ T/ [( _3 w
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 w5 B5 P, l* b, U
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.", g, b( M+ b8 E! u& ~
- y( w0 g5 r4 ]# i
<<0 @% I: L2 o. K2 w" c
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
i ?) T k, h8 [ >>+ [4 T; n, b3 q4 H
) H% @% e7 o S$ C* [- F0 A' w Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in. y J/ f( ?0 L% W
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate- f K% Y$ V) O3 n5 Y
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
, l+ {$ h0 ~( slooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
: `( I+ X4 d: D0 d. h- nrenovations.
. A3 E. w% n7 Y% ~( \* b- c6 j9 }4 K+ N- r+ q* U: v- r$ @' M
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
* T* K5 H. k* M# H; Y: Qincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation9 U4 J# \) v8 W% z; x3 p) \% w
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
# R9 J5 G" t" q8 {September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
( k7 v& o( X: F4 f7 r0 d/ P, t* L: N
- ~" A- ]' _7 S2 m The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
6 t6 `: _! f ]) O- {& j. b5 x5 w# `7 Xslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the# b1 ?( p# z- |( q" v
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
3 Z4 x' H2 Z$ W% m600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ }, e% _7 h" h1 ?' B( u9 \) T
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 ~% k5 q s8 h8 X7 B& a$ E. I
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
1 [9 R0 ]. {4 s
$ h1 \4 Z; t& y- y In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
j: r+ D S+ U/ [ F# yconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their. N% I1 c$ ~& r: M2 ^4 P2 e
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ T4 a8 C* w# i. }& _( awas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian" t! k) J# m7 J( ^, n! |6 ^) a
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
~2 m6 P. _5 F; Z3 ~6 l& Z( abuyers with more options when looking for a home.8 Q5 S5 r- d0 i1 o3 S6 Y
8 Z2 O: c2 T0 ]5 X6 h
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly, A. H2 w- U9 C" Z9 W6 }" V3 c
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
& X8 M- U! a* k, X: o6 e& E, wpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
2 [! q" [7 p2 N2 y( C4 Fas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 K2 ?& r f: L9 v3 P) b
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.! S B7 t8 z3 q1 O3 @
: H8 }4 y( i9 T
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
* J1 F/ u' h/ {7 ~2 b* E7 bprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
$ o/ h" O! A! l4 y" ~levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting% L+ e3 V3 P- l' g7 t5 s( D+ A1 W
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 j; N1 g3 h: ?/ zwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
a& i2 x, H! d: {& M- s5 E6 Apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before0 D' c _! m& U# E" J( y
making a purchase.
5 t" E* S3 h! [8 X
* u0 E, o k4 s+ y! J* j9 E& p0 O Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, v8 q S0 ^3 v4 Pmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
0 X! B9 q- D2 Y5 w' \2 q9 J- x: `, S! Zconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city( ^: p' H+ W# ~" F# p4 B; ~
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting5 N3 S, x- N( O* m7 |/ R. \" c- c
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
: A) ^# @* O' x4 N( iamenities.: N4 P$ ^' a1 Q5 ~2 r: O3 s! Y
1 X6 }4 q% w ] The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels. B( X [& [3 d$ q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
' Y- c! j8 N: y |7 F; Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
( d* @' ?+ s. }) c1 V( ]continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been/ L/ O9 V( h, h# R9 B: n
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
N$ o% g {' O( ]residence, rather than for investment.5 T5 V) e& f( h/ T; ~ G% B
3 F$ s9 S8 S4 F The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: \; f" }! ?2 ?- |) b9 ghouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
9 r# e. [9 k/ h$ gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer6 q* D' N) c$ [3 @0 b/ t/ o
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization$ } n0 g! {3 g! g. o h R
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 E4 r& F. L3 {# ^7 C. ?. p. ?/ R. z
the market.
' ?3 R6 Y. a6 c( x2 I6 n% B: Z9 l4 I2 M+ W! ?+ L
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through8 I: H! G7 {9 c# }+ h* T
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
8 D- J F" `4 {% |" iAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring d: h% a6 G2 C9 ^
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ _" `4 n9 l0 r+ ~0 I2 Hto the shortage of available inventory.
3 G7 J9 k8 Q4 U; ?) w1 s5 v( l. C, k7 I
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
+ P, s% q @9 O% p9 R5 b' D# s4 ^. Mmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains7 ^% x2 C+ x' c, N8 ]
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses" g4 g9 I5 n5 L0 O
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.3 |/ V3 h! d# ^- m6 z9 H
K3 E4 Z2 [/ T" j Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases- K! l( _. N9 i3 S. p
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
. W, {; g5 ]( T; N2 c9 b/ l' a: ]+ dunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that O/ k. s6 j, x6 K+ P2 m
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
`1 [- s6 Y4 u) G$ mprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer6 c& O7 j) e4 ?1 A* J8 L
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
/ S; {% V$ m- {2 i4 i3 \- Zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) M9 I+ v' _$ F6 B3 _8 @
7 G& N; n1 V2 C# b) ^- ] Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
6 W, r. a" o: F- p8 Ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; N3 d5 F; r9 S# Z. L& \$ _
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,& c6 Y" h+ v# s2 n$ S7 ?: y4 c
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
' ~' o1 r8 X. P% s& Qincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve5 W. B' v. V k
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
( I9 b6 e! I- q _9 c5 W: ^towards the end of 2006.
! C8 t K5 ~ X; @/ f0 D/ a' W& v: ]: K7 p. h
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of6 b q, C; |+ o2 O7 s8 k: N. Z% d
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
( R, Z. z4 B0 }3 _) C: r9 gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse! U7 r6 u/ q; b& E9 ?
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 @. k& }8 f# D4 `6 h
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
0 ^; R# ^& u2 C6 x3 Hpressure on tight inventory levels. [; `* @! e; h
& f |3 x: g5 o- {+ Q
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ e+ @, s/ o. b+ W& E& G% z
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people5 W! G1 A2 g! w9 M" z: I+ N3 W
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! ^. ~1 h2 K6 w" W9 e) V6 |while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching5 M) A( a" t* o3 r6 A3 U
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: t# G+ C4 x. H1 i
0 d) o( T/ a1 s6 @& e: ?0 u
<<! L1 I; Y# T+ n
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006" l* e8 g1 L% @/ y0 w
2 G4 F/ ^$ t, z, A) s( c0 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" d/ @$ \* l2 G9 }( V" F Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey) F4 P* b8 y. y6 y/ R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# e% s7 M0 W _7 i7 L 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3. p2 w& X" r8 e$ X3 C
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
3 U! W; s1 g3 { c -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 h+ r5 ]9 R! @4 @
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
0 {# i4 ^( F- R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ l R. ^( n% P6 Q0 g, `% M8 i5 q# P Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0002 P# P1 V8 @" e5 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 i3 W' {# }3 e, a, J) n+ s! q
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
0 U# j1 W a# |' e -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 {: M- L, K5 g" ]9 e8 Y
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
1 O9 v& v6 b# s+ D G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 z% | ^' F# o St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
2 Q$ @3 S+ \8 A- J -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ p7 K8 Z* W, \+ v9 f- E+ F
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
3 v$ i2 s8 e( u -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 i4 S% m- V1 O' d3 _
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185' C o; k+ i5 M% a* h- }4 H2 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( q8 Z& ] F& J. R! T
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2509 n0 k/ [, ^, a: e! o* A0 l* Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 c% i7 j& {2 P3 s3 W2 C, Q Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
! P; T! E v+ K2 `( M- N9 v/ O -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 V. N- H l" ?: k7 r
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
3 X! V7 \$ e! M( P7 i3 V9 V( v! ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 C2 b) p; C" P: w: Y& O5 H7 p
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5003 L0 E" m& |8 q% Z/ U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 [; F# w0 ]8 h$ G
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389) Y+ }7 `: m6 i: Z8 q+ E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 L( a# r% q" V. B! H
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
6 |& {* z" F$ O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Q& N) [- M& _) b1 S* v Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500- e' v5 ~5 a% D3 g) U+ z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 l' @/ W; i' @. A0 L! g1 g* p
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
/ d: Q) a3 D) V+ f# _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- R( H% Z8 L# J c5 q3 h
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8600 f! d! x* k I* v9 ^/ o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ j- G; | `; G4 R( f+ y6 m, o# Q5 D( u" q Z z( N
-------------------------------------------------------------* m9 \. @: I# ]* @/ v
Standard Condominium) T. m3 E% q* ]! J
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 W8 Z/ u @$ a x; p5 u; [- m) ~& d 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo. S" K# O/ A# U" n0 z3 u+ x
Market % Change Average Average % Change
+ q8 V! p& E1 c -------------------------------------------------------------; w9 G. Q: W" X- R+ n
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
) v, y' I1 H8 C$ j9 m -------------------------------------------------------------) {0 ?; r6 A( D O$ S$ j
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
& W' d8 o. X( b% @' Y -------------------------------------------------------------/ E+ g0 z" Y4 F
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
4 K: A" g% ^. Z2 ?5 L -------------------------------------------------------------( i9 l h: Q( s$ W4 X/ ^! V
Saint John N/A - - N/A5 z$ }, X1 w) ?& `$ T+ b1 [5 M3 K
-------------------------------------------------------------3 ^" L; b+ N% x7 q) M0 Y& K
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%/ R# [/ R% R, A: S2 }" q
-------------------------------------------------------------2 G H+ [5 ^' Q4 P, {
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! g: D; d c9 O -------------------------------------------------------------
% x' K8 l4 f, z) y Q: l4 C& h. t Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
4 V! y. b6 g, M& L: m, r -------------------------------------------------------------
! s( q% n& E" X, \- r& g7 y0 N0 _* Q Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
3 L4 k' z: p% J' h$ Z -------------------------------------------------------------
8 H% V7 S# f% b( m i* T/ f. s Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
% w) U5 n3 ^! P9 E R k -------------------------------------------------------------
$ L; m1 V" p! j$ D5 L6 a- ~8 Q% J' x Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%* v' U, @- g+ F/ E' I. e- J
-------------------------------------------------------------
' ]/ n" m2 j/ I% e( G% t) C+ i Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
$ I1 s+ ~4 M% E: ], E4 e$ f -------------------------------------------------------------
' K P2 V% B7 L Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
2 |" L5 E" @/ i2 A( a2 E -------------------------------------------------------------0 a& [& P$ U: {2 k
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
$ x5 @( n; ` v! I1 i) ^% [ k -------------------------------------------------------------7 U/ ]+ e* U8 {
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
, _& @/ x9 b0 [7 c5 |% t7 |* e -------------------------------------------------------------
6 {$ ?3 C+ n4 f; _. p v Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
6 _5 R7 C+ x9 k% L" X; B, B3 s -------------------------------------------------------------
! i6 I9 l" t0 B, b0 S9 _ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%9 R+ e- E& R" [/ `3 v
-------------------------------------------------------------* ?- |$ I, f& U1 ` O" o
>>
% D* ?0 W. a1 M( W& @+ f5 k0 ~* W2 }8 K7 D+ H2 ^) Z3 v
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
( P* W9 I! C+ _" d/ Rin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
$ p" Q6 A- v& J' q" gJohn and Victoria.* A2 O4 c) H# M% G. P }
# T6 O& u8 p: z/ h The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
9 S/ u2 M) |8 p, S( Fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of; i* X$ w {4 c8 p
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
* @- A+ M/ w7 ^- d& P% P- R- {references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price) ^3 q& ?0 e, d6 ?, q$ a* k9 |5 R
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities" N+ r4 Y3 v) S" J' R7 n9 N, x
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is7 N/ U6 E$ [) ~( C$ s
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
! x; X8 J5 O0 C8 G/ Q2 @' Z% g9 }figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable$ o3 U2 r& p p$ Q7 a9 T8 u
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
; {- N3 ?9 u' D y1 lNovember 15, 2006.
! X- g4 H# f3 ?; g) J3 o Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
! w- {& i8 Q4 ?6 D# T, bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge/ z L3 l- p9 p: p" @; E
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is0 O, S+ A+ i, d1 @6 H# i( r
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|