 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
' g# Y2 T* B! X" U& X: w
4 [/ R' t* f( d- N+ H9 `- c, P- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
W" |: D3 _& T l/ B! S2 x$ I! _7 V- B; B
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market: p0 q' k2 W( p( T- c4 I( g: M( Z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
) c" W. r; W6 B0 Squarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
! m7 I. G* ]' z$ f7 t K# q# Hin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 H( s5 n; L% ?' Cprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and. z) v3 B9 G' m, n) e' s! _
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
1 k5 C$ {* ]0 f% t: YQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 T& y: q% ~6 A$ ALePage Real Estate Services.' D9 U3 y/ I: R* p
2 h3 m/ o% S1 z" o6 [4 V j Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters+ s6 P/ ` j5 w6 q" T; x
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
/ ]5 x% G) J# m T" l- Wconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& v# [" d) R9 \2 o( `sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ u) \" d2 X( xresidential real estate sector.' O- p2 s+ J9 x/ h$ O1 D
: K1 B0 L- f {* N) I
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation4 n1 _ m C* i# S9 O% U R E4 g" y
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( I# f2 D: L! o+ }# }
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 c- a, _/ k U9 x# F6 ~! ~
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380$ {: ^% r/ M0 c; S
(+13.2%).0 x% [5 J7 A# v# U
" R p n/ u" h; N0 x0 m2 Q
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth, N/ m; D* w7 I. j% L' o( o' p
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
3 e8 ^$ g1 g$ K% V4 m8 Ofrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
* T& R* r" u2 x# ]: kpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,) }0 y* L% }) @$ B- j1 o
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( ]2 {/ r1 I' I1 j \"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
+ m$ O$ m2 G% ^welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
" b# S: W9 g1 i( c* Obalanced market."
8 b6 i+ W: U. D( E9 F5 U" l5 U% t& x# x* x
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,' S% K" C3 S, p: U
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 G$ o4 G) s h) }
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued( d: g, Q' D# U; }; b) t% h o
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
( b$ ?2 Y' h* a( F! I# Qenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,( Q( r" M( _$ u V) O# q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record, b0 t& O4 U/ `* M# s" q0 p; b6 I
breaking price appreciations.
, S! h0 Y" Y1 z* V+ A3 b& a$ K1 g" t7 O% s) j% K+ R
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
. k, ]/ h$ D' ^6 U2 neconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ J" n% Y; ^. X8 Zlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
' A$ T, O1 v8 `' q8 W* K# g. I7 X9 U# |. l4 y1 q) s/ z% {
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid. X7 ^; B0 m/ E
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer3 s j" p7 u! z% J0 k+ a4 k
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
5 Y( K- L; v. lslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth./ X9 H+ {; X6 D' y1 p+ U$ Z0 E
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers2 y8 d; j3 C/ k! j% M
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of6 S1 ^+ G. A7 h- b+ M3 m
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
5 T- s' s: n/ z" k" d# j3 H7 C; h. Q% u5 j: K
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ H4 ^9 h2 Q! n; Z% Z1 Q* i, I6 fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" v$ r$ {' i4 L: v# H
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
) U* E: Q1 Z7 A8 vare markedly different than those found in the United States.
) t/ z B, K0 n$ \8 D2 [0 g |0 P) z$ r1 E+ }+ F, t) F0 C; p
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
* X0 w% f0 i9 \- J# x% B FAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's- D( B4 @: M% K2 j
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
% ]7 l& ?, P |: @- {# erelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ a6 r, w+ _6 K5 Z+ X6 y& }8 @3 u! W
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the/ g0 [5 q+ b2 r
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ Z3 [9 s9 n4 R }, `4 W8 Y1 Jaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization; s: ^4 Q3 i4 k
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
3 Z4 b: d. \" a4 |7 F
% T G- C: c; O: x0 M3 | <<
* m& @" Z/ t/ T5 Q REGIONAL SUMMARIES
- h% N6 {4 X8 K( |# K, K >>( H/ J4 f' V# X4 b: u
% D9 _/ s' b2 D7 ]* A Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in. a6 c5 m: W6 t, Y) e/ n X
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
5 G3 A8 y7 b) H* k8 D3 v$ t( @of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time# k8 B6 q$ W Q! M( t
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" K, i0 Z; N: a0 q# s) v& L4 i1 nrenovations.( r3 R6 Y& J5 y2 E
1 W. |6 e' X- v; s The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight. `; S( U0 W/ r- r& X& f) H" |
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- ^7 }/ B8 G5 p6 h$ h9 O
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and5 R/ a4 q+ g: t3 c9 D P; M
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.& Q+ h* Q* T4 `
/ Z: Z3 }3 K6 q- [! O8 ~% M
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
G6 [" |& Q4 p; g8 c/ E7 j- Zslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the9 J5 `4 N1 k) H$ g9 H" U/ b
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
2 t, M, I) @( `* c1 N; n) R600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) D* C, R5 u( ]7 ~% i0 _: w! S8 i
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes( g# Z" A5 K3 O, T# l8 Q% c }# Q! F
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
+ f6 j4 i8 s5 Q3 O/ t; l: d/ B3 @& s* ?
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
! B$ V8 t8 z' Zconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ I* T A. p& R2 }3 {. o
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers! n; f9 i1 f' \. P& S6 P0 f0 O
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' y* p( B. ]7 C' t( G2 O" B% o
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing4 L# a2 b0 P# {7 u/ C& y# Q
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
% D1 G4 y7 A8 s2 I& I2 S
; i; i& E {( N1 A Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly3 q7 u6 w5 X. E: F$ i, c1 R( z) k
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
1 A7 T& @0 F0 ~8 a+ R' F+ kpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
' X6 j% q) g6 zas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
9 P8 L4 ?$ \2 ]! z8 O5 |few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
% N5 B: H1 _$ z$ a& g( i; [1 f& D- x
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house* [& o, Z9 R9 O
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& {2 B v4 \" z A/ [
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& E9 f' Z: Q0 M% i
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
0 f @* |0 n$ J( E, _) ] e( gwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
+ o W5 _* A) W$ m3 ^9 qpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before* H. L" i8 J" a! E" i, {" B
making a purchase.& U. D! J; n4 P) d2 Q9 ]1 c& n7 l
- r) u( d* k- X; {3 I5 e: y
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
9 R) c9 Z, @- z" F5 R+ nmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong" U1 H4 ?0 j( d! O B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city& c4 z. q- R M* x# d. l
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
0 J6 J' R% h% ]9 G5 `attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown4 D8 p" N3 K# x) d
amenities.! j7 Y& E0 {8 y( R5 K
9 R3 w+ x0 R. Q
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
i, j* p- b+ e$ P2 L) dthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ e. u2 ^! C f" {4 @
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
# k2 B8 n9 f) o' f4 ?continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been* q! F; \/ W1 x, ?, }$ [& f
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' \0 K( Q& O0 P& T. O, g; y8 ~
residence, rather than for investment.
J, e" o$ @( \- b
2 U/ v2 p1 F# C3 J6 a! Y1 Q. ^2 C$ T The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as8 Z7 H8 P3 Y7 N6 V
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
1 M6 U" J2 [9 L2 q9 W3 e7 g2 O9 Xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer! m$ G7 @3 Z$ t4 I
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization" Y3 h2 V9 ^( Q, ?6 }
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' E& b' P; T) r( L: N |the market.
+ ^7 V- ~4 L1 ?+ r# m% r* m& L9 n# |9 e5 C7 A
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through6 f/ Y+ f" M$ s+ F8 Y
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In- ^4 n# Q6 G0 q; s# n5 o% |
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
4 W0 _% l$ C" zmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due) s2 G8 e1 t1 x5 X! ?6 x6 F# G
to the shortage of available inventory.
0 x G( C: B' H7 G, s1 B1 D* \" }8 u, N0 s g; K, F) T0 A' x
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its. J8 ^& }% l: a* _! @- R+ X
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains8 C6 k+ q X0 A5 _: E
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses1 w5 y; o% t, U% M5 g8 B+ |
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 l: K' j Y. t; b% t, e; i$ M+ ^* A2 @* |2 c) q. i) R
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" V: c* q$ C+ l) u) _2 sin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ I6 D* S' S8 A" x3 M aunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that* R# C6 O" c1 K$ T' ~- d$ v9 I
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring$ Y4 I1 g, ]% \& U# Q& \& l
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* U" a! s8 Z+ D
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 k7 R& T9 c" U3 Zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.% R& D) p, }/ d3 l& S
+ a! ~$ E# U/ v Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 D. q7 M( ~- b3 o6 Y0 X3 e! i# V) q
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
- A+ u3 |. ] U3 nremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! s. X6 e: u9 q% V$ N, I% o1 mmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) U4 V. ]- C1 B4 h
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! S3 i* P) X: A# {/ c H
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 K `' C* d- ~8 ?* y
towards the end of 2006. 3 I/ n0 q. z2 O9 p. v5 U
% G2 b) H3 D4 V+ m8 W) [7 a9 m
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of" z2 \: c- B3 b% y1 {& m6 j: V
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable1 x# f. ]1 y/ ?- y) [5 m
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse) B+ ^$ T; {) M
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
+ X |5 M |6 p& e1 f) Sforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
0 {: ^* j+ z* R9 p% Ppressure on tight inventory levels.& {' S! w" B7 V: l( m1 [; M' X- \
8 y: v) s7 l# `8 G( h Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic. }. X, E* a- g, F
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people, {: o6 B* B6 ^$ h6 Q6 q- F
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 c5 J+ Y1 J' n7 Hwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching4 j( O$ Z% d, r" T6 }
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
( C$ q: U: b7 g& q( [
/ ]# F( }) c$ }: r: n" X, j <<
* d! z+ Z+ m; ~6 ] Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
6 @/ d8 K$ t! |) c
, S# \# W4 E- ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. m& { p+ @+ X- G Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey- F$ ]) e$ b% v6 C2 `' B4 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 w/ b9 `! Q$ @: r7 S) U
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3& r u2 B. Z# j4 S- m
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
$ ]7 K# L/ N$ c/ { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' Y7 n$ r8 |/ h( G Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
) K+ j) h' A' d/ U -------------------------------------------------------------------------& G* R5 h# ^% P+ T6 N
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000( j4 A5 d5 N$ Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 j( X( J! F0 M
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000) y9 Y+ F9 L: X$ t# y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 n( E ?$ T& g
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - - E1 E" ~& f. {% | s( \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ e, C; o0 T0 [: w- h+ b" m St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
* W( L- g% N. F. B+ @$ @! A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- J6 V6 ?' b3 L" ]# S0 g Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583/ |) {2 X6 B5 ^! b7 v) j- _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
X+ p7 q$ K- @, }# n' N Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
: W$ w5 p) j6 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ l& U$ Z& c3 G) h7 ?) w) V+ d
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250! B; X: L3 m2 i- J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( f( n8 B" c* p, H; Z% u1 F
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766+ S; d2 _7 I1 Z V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- {% Y+ l3 A0 }3 R$ | Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
1 v( n' e+ A6 y3 f3 R, r$ [9 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 m2 H0 H1 p& l/ j: C- {2 r0 W7 F Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
. F! n8 v D* D( h4 H% [2 J6 U -------------------------------------------------------------------------& p7 p g) z8 m
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389& u* V7 G+ f; ~* h* w! I) A0 h! l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 u8 } R$ c4 p/ |7 z+ y Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
" ?: c2 n: G1 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' \3 \$ N& |( ~3 ^" v Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
3 L& N, X& ^# b9 G3 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ A9 `' ]# X4 }. f& e( l Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000& K( ~5 G$ h( U. ~; ~% A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) j3 E2 ^, @5 Y" ?, N National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860. ]; ~; N/ ]' d/ p% g* k* D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, k* p" ~- C7 m6 W! N$ }6 G7 l
" p. F+ v1 z: [8 o4 H -------------------------------------------------------------. R, W6 B5 |; j" d6 X! z, y8 X" i
Standard Condominium! u1 _9 }$ D% R# D
-------------------------------------------------------------9 m$ E! R' `( s( ?
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo+ ]. {$ l1 \! }8 L
Market % Change Average Average % Change; z2 g2 C2 P0 }' `% ~$ ?
-------------------------------------------------------------3 C- [+ E g/ }# q' x' D
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%, y1 R4 m6 w% E" R
-------------------------------------------------------------
( n9 L' G3 e1 J* n Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# c( _) c# j! Y n -------------------------------------------------------------) u0 x& }& }9 x- f; _
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
0 m$ d7 d& F* U( w3 J# ? d$ w -------------------------------------------------------------
* O6 [1 o5 d0 h3 Y9 |! v Saint John N/A - - N/A
; c/ \7 t' n0 k* x# q -------------------------------------------------------------, M6 F# ?7 g! s
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
, n# @9 x4 k4 _+ J8 L -------------------------------------------------------------5 U& _/ {2 [4 Q- J2 S
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
" X! f6 U) p- ~; @ -------------------------------------------------------------
5 U7 ]; L1 @4 o6 H( c3 L9 ^ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
, r7 y2 X N& X8 @, L& q2 _ -------------------------------------------------------------: I$ e- N% f O) ~
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
% U( l; t0 A* Q4 `/ n0 C2 x F, V9 J ------------------------------------------------------------- A, ^3 h) h I5 i, Q) i
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%, u w' A9 |' X+ u; C
-------------------------------------------------------------( D" |/ J8 R7 |, q" q- D. \
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%- O% Q: k# A r' z8 _; V: R
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ Y6 i N( ^: u( I1 K Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
' a5 N, G% k$ B/ W, O -------------------------------------------------------------
" s n) `, }3 W, P Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
5 y& A7 T, R( H -------------------------------------------------------------
8 @* M8 q7 v7 v. @: \- z; { Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
: \9 p4 y$ I J. N' E -------------------------------------------------------------7 O! G {: X* t* e+ X; J6 j
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
0 l$ U& j. ^4 L& l4 S/ e -------------------------------------------------------------: \1 k2 I! z; R! b: [
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
. M8 v" m. R- D' N9 t* {3 w' Z -------------------------------------------------------------2 Y3 z& q3 }! J3 j; {; \
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%) B% A" H6 r6 w& I
-------------------------------------------------------------1 p t& s! [" s
>>9 a: n \. B. U2 Y A5 P
( u1 ]. P% L' M" t) q, ~# l Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined; @- [0 y- w/ W
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
. r ]. _% @ K0 \7 y& f, w/ S" SJohn and Victoria.+ x' ?4 l% q( `0 m4 e! Z
9 i4 q5 }# k1 s+ A
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
% B: @1 S1 A' y" I/ D. q, ~( pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
% {- m% v2 B$ X* p5 y' Bhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release# m7 [2 T( {8 d* y1 u
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
( _% k; z# U d0 y5 w7 Itrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ S' D& b, { y0 G% S. W5 ]& D
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
' V( N% T+ t1 z3 Favailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. p4 v; `& A7 ?& P0 [" _
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable( q. L& X7 P$ n- I
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on6 Z. L0 ~5 x' ]+ j& C9 {
November 15, 2006.
" O) N, D, }9 r& ^9 x% N5 Z/ \ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of3 D, Y" I. c/ g) Y2 f% p
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
9 S3 v% {6 _) I: E1 uprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is0 z3 ?& _4 F. U! t) q9 x. x8 `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|