 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
D; b3 q- P: R- H7 b4 I. e$ r$ [( F+ r8 E; ~
* s; Y/ N: o& T$ ]) p& A6 z你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:" D. l& I3 B) q Y4 ~9 U
Ralph Klein) t4 w: [. Y+ o5 Q; c
7 Q! D6 h; {; h; y/ y6 c! \. ~
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!( P% Z+ |, |3 R0 U5 D
! t2 E( {7 T5 {. H所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。$ D) C5 Y# U3 M! R* F/ i3 Y! R
9 N- M2 o" C/ Q8 `
F6 y2 g- l1 {" S o
2 U$ X% f3 O6 Fhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
6 [# ~; \' K; W7 C$ C! ?Historic Alberta budget balances:/ H" B4 ]7 c! b& x; T: K3 [
) m$ y' @$ Z2 \! N+ j7 o9 l
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
) W7 x/ L; H" |2 U
0 F0 F9 P- H% O+ B9 ]8 v1982-83: $796 million deficit
& @8 c8 D& V8 `/ m
' l; k2 x, p$ Z+ K$ U1983-84: $129 million surplus+ L# u& T+ g' b9 U# ~
$ h" W0 T5 [$ L1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
z, n, Z5 H2 b8 J0 a/ C, y' s+ e/ ^! j2 L/ W8 w9 E8 r
1985-86: $761 million deficit
3 o/ R/ N6 ]9 b7 r& S
& d5 \# \0 ?3 K1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
5 i, Z( ~1 p9 g5 I( t/ H2 d) h Y& C' K W0 }6 R& p/ }
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit- v, N3 i. I! n& r. R
' X0 e4 M P; Z1 O" D/ i1 C1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
! {, i. N( E1 O7 k3 o B8 j) \) `5 |: v8 [
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit! u# r5 V+ Q/ J: |
. v/ a/ x% ^2 ^0 o9 W1 Y4 A9 l1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit& {+ q& r6 e& c6 a: q ` \
6 l! Q6 f1 v; p5 p7 `+ G& Z% M
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit- G) |* W/ q# }7 _# X3 N1 ?5 C
: X$ h3 [1 G" J; |9 d/ w1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit4 y1 G( w7 p T8 S7 \
7 L1 ?5 m: d, a1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
# p& u9 M+ R. y6 r1 [7 S0 `3 Q: o$ r3 N. _' r4 D) b' X9 ^$ q
1994-95: $938 million surplus
( e: i6 {. I5 T
9 ~' p1 l) W2 p( T1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
, Q& E& J2 }" v2 U" u
$ M2 P; S, A( a) Z- O b1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus/ M2 g, N7 d8 ]# p8 k7 E- Z7 c6 I
/ I: a+ q0 |8 Z( }" x9 z z1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus1 [; {# f% R9 ~5 S' z8 ~
- I: z, ^3 B( m5 @1 D
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus3 R s( k2 i+ f; W1 I3 }
) n" K( P8 k/ c ^5 _/ E1 r1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
4 l, ?# w' d- ]- T) m9 D4 [
: u& w) q7 g4 M; V: u2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus* q. P5 Z1 q& W
, ?/ \6 Q7 U8 Q' i. j5 Y* ?( }
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus, y. l1 \5 m; x: L4 V
A7 ?9 {' g! k- C6 {( ^+ \: V* ?) i2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
+ H% P4 p# s2 A U) L
- I* Y1 @2 Q7 K9 J2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
) C$ o! ~& o" L
; D) n8 M H* [5 k) i' x+ ], u2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus V# {$ y% j% M/ O1 }+ a' r
2 E. Y5 c4 a( e% {2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
; y2 L; X8 s4 m! j7 q* t R$ p/ U
4 f% o9 ^4 f. @' B) I2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
! `$ G9 }( g7 r9 x& F; J4 K3 ]" Q# c6 {8 c9 P! v2 {8 [7 Y
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
3 p) ~$ Q. K1 v) ?9 c/ U: A3 q: |# K v
2008-09: $852 million deficit
9 c k+ ~. r" a( Q) m3 Z/ v+ n8 @. G, W# m, v2 p# W- w
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit) o9 A! T% B$ l0 @. r
' i; R$ w" F) ?, `
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit( J+ L: k- z7 i
2 A0 c' m8 M0 T/ N& N! [# d, R
2011-12: $23 million deficit1 A" ]: p. ?% w* s$ F4 J& I
1 \/ N" M2 T$ @- ]2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
/ S* O7 v r( J; A/ n6 f) ^5 T, t4 }+ p
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|