 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
% k, @% Z" h. r" e6 K( _; CEdmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14: x# z8 n' Y7 w% O9 k0 c0 a+ a1 m
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
2 ?8 D0 ]1 V# _4 w+ q, R( K2 g" l) \1 @, D7 _7 x; n+ u
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
* S9 V, H' Y( O, S9 Z. a# o6 z! H- o4 j! o' v# p P: N% \" ~
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
+ u, `1 _1 x* q% M% E; ]/ e6 O% [8 [
& v+ E3 M0 p* y. p$ U, Lcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..- P2 I/ W) I4 p+ U; e. h7 V" w" `( _
7 F4 T% ?) C; {Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) & z. S" `- J" Q+ r1 m, G
|
|