 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 9 a3 m- Y. j3 `7 Q) {& O$ J
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
- F" I' K$ x& z3 @7 {8 O( L+ b0 OOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... 5 H3 v m1 K0 t h& O( V2 l4 ]. l
! ~" E. H8 f2 C6 I/ h4 QIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. z4 u9 M# v; D4 i$ H" s* q+ R
; j7 L7 u1 \/ ~% Q& y$ J& WLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
! ]2 _7 Q9 Y L1 F1 ~4 L! T Q K% ^; Y7 L0 j
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
' n2 y# ~! }0 C. E3 W: |2 ?
6 X( @1 n' M' v6 L$ i3 MNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
8 Q% Z+ J R$ T% P0 K |
|