Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
( n7 I1 O# \. P6 s0 Q) XLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
2 c# C. k- z/ K* D( w% B
% M( U; o  g, ~$ WNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
( t2 ^- T  O6 J  k$ t5 I
' p0 ^! I" d- |1 S+ F& x+ tLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
2 Q" z5 u+ O% ~
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

, S; I' K- \' D3 [9 W
! K' y% W  o5 l6 M" O, k6 oIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

- h. ?0 p4 g0 e) e/ L5 X# a% qSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
5 D9 N* `; U% nSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
+ ?- B9 a1 n& pNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
7 @$ \2 ^  G- fYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
8 H/ e0 K+ L( t# g' f: z& a7 j
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
! s$ T& O7 X7 Y9 J, ^* f! LBoston  20.5 30.2
. V3 L" P4 G" R; J' ]San Diego  22.8 29.7
; S' [0 I+ b8 `- \San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
$ i* j; ?6 w# v) FSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
( E' Q+ y# j# v3 p6 A, K# TNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
* w. J6 w% Z& Z! a6 V
5 d3 m; i( P2 q
$ D9 N: i: ?* v) \% w; c
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
& U  f) i+ a. I1 ?

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
, }+ K5 |/ h8 [/ C% L6 j2 C5 x
it would be a good reference.

: k$ |) D# Q/ Z# x5 O* cthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]