Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
) A! _2 H- A" w* _$ QLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
1 ~- S. Z5 b& q* a$ U
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
: `1 N1 X3 I; y6 m" k

) P  D" D4 u' sIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
' g: I" M  I3 d8 _/ L/ oNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
  U; `8 U; ~' J  u! uYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

! m% b% B! s. o) o+ J* t% F4 Q2 x) TIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
! r9 }2 S7 Z; T& {* ~- d* `
% W( F9 j$ L6 n1 d3 HIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

0 K6 W1 T+ G! U! F! N5 ?' | Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
" q- W! ?$ Z. Y" V" v Avg. 1988-2000 2001
" M* J, Z9 m; [& f+ P9 B0 R5 IBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
& U* i+ Z% ]7 G5 z$ f* uDenver  17.7 23.7
0 \4 c3 h9 g1 ^1 tNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
: F, ^3 M3 y" ~Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

# ?) X* j9 N# }4 S+ A5 ^' ~% t

7 B7 g/ `/ F8 hIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

1 g& T. `. E0 K/ S
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
/ J" w' n9 q* J* G! L5 x' h
it would be a good reference.
9 n# T) t$ v  r! D% G, ]# I
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
3 \2 e- ^0 X5 a* U0 r. `& ]
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]