Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
+ ^3 `7 _3 R9 y9 T, f' H& c  q# cLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

. J3 N& m4 j: P; ]7 Y( J7 ENot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
2 r& T8 g& t7 l
0 j. H4 \/ ?. B5 U9 VLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
$ }3 E' [; f/ D' p  G& ^* R' t6 h
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
$ N' q( ^" d. M- d

  j  T" d9 r8 @8 E2 C0 l2 O  sIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
& r$ ?8 I" q5 t2 h9 d2 F6 A9 ^New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
+ L4 X# Q. Z0 u  g7 `% A2 x9 bYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
) J( `# o: k/ o. i" }7 @
' r( D" @% w0 j8 A1 NIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
' p9 s, X* a" Z$ H+ E
8 \4 l% N- g5 b! kIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

$ ~7 D! M/ G7 l5 V6 [! V2 g) }$ e2 G) ~ Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
6 v- ]0 m  n5 T+ ^ Avg. 1988-2000 2001
$ H/ C5 ]; d) l9 g/ }6 l" kBoston  20.5 30.2
! C% y2 X2 ~5 h0 {& ]7 VSan Diego  22.8 29.7
+ L8 h' x! s1 X0 gSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
( K: i, A! P& Z: U5 k


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
6 f4 h4 }0 O$ j( T

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
7 v+ _1 ?7 A$ w) }! Q. M6 G
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
$ P  O( ?# K. Y
# g5 B( W- W- [% C+ e[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]