Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
: C- [& C0 Q# v* ~  rLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
  l; G9 Z( Q) k
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
$ V( J0 z. j5 {3 e3 W
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

; p0 z9 e; o: y& HTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
+ m/ V& |# y- j6 f7 G! P

8 V' z+ ~, O# \" VIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

. t, r$ f% K9 ?1 }1 t6 F- h( eSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
* j7 ^: k& G. G2 F, i- `0 kSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
+ V8 g! ]0 o9 INew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
% ]- o3 d! j) e5 U
5 C/ J+ ~  G* [) tIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
4 v* X; h8 i. H, K. @
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

) q) a: R0 z# P Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
% A5 ~; f7 c5 c* G! f  v Avg. 1988-2000 2001
; R: ^0 s; O3 L& F8 Q% m* J& g5 Z8 |Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
' M) C* a1 T! R, l" W% [San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
3 a. P; V3 E1 i1 E% f" @. |. USeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
" \/ r) U( ^5 G2 e

+ D$ |, d6 `$ u" B) L
# z- x9 s" ]: ?It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

! l% r# q2 N( {, u* K
- e; a, R  \1 o: x$ v1 aFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
+ N; [* W+ J5 ]. o0 D
; \& \4 q7 R9 B: m& g. kit would be a good reference.
! M5 U1 Y! h" o# M5 v
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
% s; }/ g) V# \7 n/ o
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]