I don't care if 政治板 need an extra 版主 or not..That is between you and 十字..I never request an extra 版主 for 政治板. So I have no idea why you ask me instead.. V' K, u1 J' G% i7 S; h! D
leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 12:50
3 @. [9 x9 Y: A1 Z
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?* ^+ ^( i, I4 j. U d E! P' S" a
6 J! X( e; P% ~8 z6 W- d. h3 n
这明摆着是两码事
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 P. U' ^; W$ o2 g0 N! c
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的? 8 W6 ?& N7 g& K! m& m) C $ W0 W3 q0 ~5 @这明摆着是两码事1 R. V r v1 M! Q
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03
z9 n& z$ ^5 q+ g4 |) M- g* _- h6 I0 [
can't type chinese at work, - m/ G1 ^/ }- P ( f4 {% L" z8 R) z8 [7 f"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.+ R# `. _/ X- k" D9 X
9 A7 g( L q( L* b. ?9 o; J
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time.
can't type chinese at work, 2 Z" z% ^8 {9 n8 E3 ]' H! |3 C( E- Y! W/ a B% R
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. ( `$ O7 |% H3 E7 k& `1 n 2 [* i$ j4 I9 M# H/ u! a# t3 N3 LWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious. ...8 v4 H$ u7 G* G4 `7 g A
leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 13:15
8 T p! i( @& s) g% u5 a我就不明白了,明显在哪里? - c1 g. v' K1 h6 c4 }8 F0 i6 \; I* r ' A5 [2 @: f( l6 @% L. q- b# O0 C. p, y你之所以觉得明显,是因为你觉得时事政治需要一个大量发表政治言论的版主,而我任为不需要,所以从一开始我们的基本点就是不同的 2 o3 u2 ?8 f d9 i6 N/ r ) D4 x2 e2 K/ q7 A" I没有人在这里觉得谁比谁更聪明,你当然可以想当然的认为你认为的东西是明显的,这是十字所谓的自由嘛
& Q3 d5 S! N7 \' B- N6 c为啥要是"版主“呢?. ^4 u3 y, P. A$ O' ]% f
$ I$ @) M( U: m; n' E/ T
为啥一定要”版主“来负责政治观点的平衡呢? 7 U7 f k# o8 {# `( N/ ?: m; y8 O& {' O/ j
版主和普通版友在发言的分量上有什么区别呢?还是你觉得版主有特别呢?