 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 7 y$ q& P- D6 c$ c" w+ h
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?" q. Q, ~3 K' J- U8 `
7 _: p) T' e, I! D% @' S
这明摆着是两码事
( G; z8 B. |! I0 h7 }; N E8 r8 rsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
0 N* I$ _( J5 D! X2 Z* W
' X, E! w L9 J, acan't type chinese at work,5 a+ l. D l8 e' R& b( K! g: t) O
- w% x9 U5 M! A9 \% K/ m3 z
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.) }$ l9 d( E) R7 d9 L1 g$ S2 T9 T X
% ?) c/ V2 S5 n6 I G2 v! M" g
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|