 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 / `* _2 T7 r; E
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
, Q8 Z; c% @' e0 A, Q [8 J) n# ?$ _: a) \
这明摆着是两码事
8 Z6 ~; g" p$ ^4 q3 F( Rsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
$ z! Z5 k) E7 e! [" a9 ?. g3 x1 c% j2 l" y: I2 P
can't type chinese at work,
* Y- {! B) h4 G7 G! }: k5 g; ]( t6 S7 ?( K0 x# G3 _4 w/ Z
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me." w; P- b% G- J: Z/ ]& N6 M8 i
; l) Q- s' y9 Z4 h4 w0 M' ^
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|