 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 8 |$ I- ^3 y! Y l- D0 `, Z
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
. }4 ^, V, q! j) q# m- y. A3 ]$ o4 D4 n% m. V
这明摆着是两码事5 w9 e6 y/ b+ h1 D4 M, H" h: q& t
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
: s7 T1 i3 T' _/ B% X/ s. n: d
1 X% r7 @: p$ `7 y" g0 h9 zcan't type chinese at work,3 ^8 l" o* v) ?8 i* Y
9 I1 U9 E$ b. c+ m: J) C7 E
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.; A' ^ _% h) x- b( P: W
0 M. J/ u3 @* v5 N: V
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|