 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 # U0 k, Y4 z0 [+ d
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?) i- R8 U$ L+ s
' x9 k: C( ` j2 R) Z/ V( L9 w* A这明摆着是两码事+ t$ B1 w" d, J, h' B3 m* E
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
$ y/ ]0 l; v& u; d: S' m7 S
" K" \( p% u( ]* v2 ]- I. Dcan't type chinese at work,' F" H$ c P. S9 P
" v( a1 m/ i ~6 y
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.7 c5 F0 g( k' r$ t6 X
0 x5 @8 V9 Y: U4 ~) L" J3 ] c5 rWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|