 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 * N& S0 Y1 K3 f# q6 u
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?/ x1 |/ G) R5 r) O. n! `
) A" p7 I. @; M# S$ D( v; x, \4 ^这明摆着是两码事! p9 \7 m* [% Y: J
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
$ r% l' @+ d# J7 d% S) H, R/ |5 H' J
3 D2 }8 h$ L8 P, @can't type chinese at work,
! a" d# t) c- _
( k' g$ Z8 c M/ B, u5 B"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
& S( F% z2 L, w/ R. ~' f0 h0 ]- N$ N% o0 u$ t: z: R" X
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|