 鲜花( 662)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2015-6-7 09:52
|
显示全部楼层
newnp 发表于 2015-6-7 10:29" @, K. I3 b% t+ P7 J, {
Go to Poll to vote at CBC -; A1 b7 ]4 f% ]
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/christine-sinclair-scores-on-controvers ...
这个页面上的主要内容很中立，说是：赛后一个主要讨论的点就是，加拿大队是否可能受益于主场作战；另一方面则怀疑如果当时的情况远离球门（球网），还会如此的犯规吗？
: B7 V3 K+ D& o
, ^4 R. n: z4 `/ s9 W0 U$ ~, V& J% i& O, s# c( A
下面网友的评论：如果中国队因失去比赛而难过，他们应该问一下自己为什么整场比赛都在防御！看上去中国队就没想赢得比赛。 ( Y- G. L4 d. V0 v% B- V0 r
+ b' \7 P# J3 n5 P2 K# t我觉得这个评价很靠谱。
" a6 f. c- g/ ^2 @
# z- A8 l/ ^- O, ]Wasn't a controversial call, except that some people can read it that way since it went in Canada's favor the end of the 0-0 game. But the defender did not get the ball (she blocks off Leon in the face, although likely accidentally) and lets the ball go past without making contact with the ball. Blocking off with a shove in the face while not getting the ball in the box is a foul worth a penalty. Did the home crowd help a bit? Maybe, but it wasn't the sole reason for the call.7 K, I9 x" [5 t) X. \' ^* t
2 y# {: J) Q2 v6 y e
另一个网友的评论，懒得翻译了，基本就是说：该判
( a% X; |* O9 X8 u& k, X/ B; J
/ }4 ^, L* Z u" {7 z
5 b6 n$ J5 F3 Q/ y |
|
楼主: 不紧张
狗仔卡
发表于 2015-6-6 21:26
显身卡
发表于 2015-6-6 21:48
