; q+ }2 f. z C* M# c1 a. |我不是说photo finish和idealist使用感非常相似,是说它们的工作原理类似,都是使用了硅化物。所以我曾经说过idealist很不厚道,根本不可能对皮肤有什么本质性的改变,最多妆前打底有效。idealist用了这几个成分,它们是使这个产品用上去会有顺滑感觉的原因:Cyclopentasiloxane(五环硅氧烷)、Dimethicone(二甲基硅油)、Polysilicone-11(聚硅氧烷-11);而photo finish用了如下的硅化物成分:Cyclomethicone(环甲硅油)、Dimethicone(二甲基硅油)。比如一下就能看出来,有相同有不同,但都是硅化物,所以我说主要原理是一样的。不过photo finish是半透明状的有点类似磨砂似的滑滑的膏体,怎么会像乳液呢?而且涂上去的感觉是很不一样的,很滑,很明显人工的滑。倒是photo finish light倒很像乳液,这一点我之前在帖子里也有说。
` ' K5 O* D0 w: O# ^; r" I" @5 M( V( q$ x- P6 k7 Q: \
I`m using Trilogy products for now, it is a natual brand from New Zealand. I`m always a bit leary about all the chemicals added to regular skincare products, natual ones feel safer.
8 u+ t9 u* Y' r) t& |9 XI`m using Trilogy products for now, it is a natual brand from New Zealand. I`m always a bit leary about all the chemicals added to regular skincare products, natual ones feel safer.. G1 {/ ~5 C& q+ y, T& C
nicolebay 发表于 2010-6-18 09:13