 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 6)
|
本帖最后由 bigsnail 于 2012-6-7 11:17 编辑
0 _# U& i3 v f$ M4 J* x% [9 M2 r: }, ?
open your mouth and wash it with detergent
- x$ ^+ N8 g4 P' I2 ]. y# g6 h# ?! z% V h
sure there is no rigorous statistical evidence because there is no way to manipulate in the experiment so as to fully justify the causality.
' V" Y l1 f! g: W5 E4 a9 M( S8 P" p( x6 k% `- S& q( W6 W
And remember: . x0 c3 R7 J9 t) ], ?! D
"there is no evidence that A holds"
/ i, z. a3 B. w* ldoes NOT mean ) u6 d6 U7 t2 C& H; }
"there is evident that A does not hold".
/ j& l. i( K5 d7 PIn fact, A could hold.
: n4 Q, |" |* S( }: UIt's a matter like observability vs objective existence.
' }3 v; b& @3 G. F4 \5 cSo what you say doesn't constitute a refutation.1 ^. o2 @) d5 c5 F. ^9 w, n5 }, s
6 V2 h5 Z7 c9 Q- q TIt's mainly by argumentation. See for example:
* |& x2 v1 _5 r% r
a4 D N3 Y2 a" ^; o2 P"Does the death penalty cost less than life in prison without parole?"
2 K- d8 }4 ^" O" Qin
* r# T" `1 G: U- ~+ ]http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001000- @* u+ Z1 b. f* o
0 L; v/ K4 a' V
Remember, things are more complicated than what you think./ O, B+ |1 A7 q; J* y; g
|
|
楼主: weidsun
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-6-6 21:15
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2012-6-7 14:59
