 鲜花( 9)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 竹帘儿 于 2010-3-4 21:58 编辑 ( t; \; x4 `. |# t& ]
是阿,车子就是铁包肉,最重要的不是比谁能撞过谁,应该是比较出事的双方,谁最能保护其中的乘客
* J7 q+ X7 @4 C& S2 V" o
! ?6 n4 H2 v2 P好多人比较的时候,都是想当然地比较正面碰撞的情况,其实,交通事故,又有多少是正面碰撞的?大部分时候,司 ...+ [2 A! `. Y* m8 U! u- |* u
Crisis 发表于 2010-3-2 20:25 
# E8 _( D! @7 S* f! \2 @$ p% p; G( S& O6 m: U; L
看过一篇文章分析大小车的安全性的,里头也是提到实际交通事故的撞击方式,在所有致命事故里,50%涉及非两车撞击(翻车,撞击障物,比如树,水泥柱子),这类事故里跟安全相关的因素车子重量大小不算其中,主要是8 n* u5 I+ E/ Q/ O) v2 d2 l
a) an effective restraint system (seat belts and airbags)2 z# u0 c* z5 d0 D4 h$ }" U
b) effective energy absorption in the crush areas (front end or rear end)
2 [1 d$ z/ f& \. h3 e5 r0 Lc) a strong cabin area that does not collapse in the crash
: G# Z! Q- r& H" w0 a) F3 NNone of these items are automatically better in large and heavy vehicles. In fact, for item c, the roof of a heavier vehicle is more likely to be crushed in a roll-over accident than a lighter vehicle. This is one reason why rollovers in SUV's cause a higher percentage of deaths than in cars (in addition to their higher center of gravity.)
1 l8 Z+ z- s8 s* Z: b
6 T9 c9 p4 J* @+ E1 j$ C2 f* V
" _& k3 q/ ]' c! j+ N而在涉及两车相撞的另50%致命事故里,70%是侧撞和追尾,这里a和c是主要安全因素,车子质量仍然无关。下面的图表反应了这类碰撞时不同品牌车子的安全状况
- ]$ o. J9 N& U: i- _* G2 a* [; GInsurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are shown below. (see http://www.iihs.org/ratings.)+ s' \+ c7 v$ ^6 {5 V
9 h8 T, x2 b# X4 e% _, [
6 E D' c, P- U6 f1 I' ?外行看热闹的人飘过,楼上的各学科专家,各地农民请继续讨论。 |
|