 鲜花( 9)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 竹帘儿 于 2010-3-4 21:58 编辑 ; {7 D/ H. @$ E
是阿,车子就是铁包肉,最重要的不是比谁能撞过谁,应该是比较出事的双方,谁最能保护其中的乘客
# l- U6 @6 ^, _2 P5 H5 w
7 Y3 P, T% a# U$ @1 r6 B好多人比较的时候,都是想当然地比较正面碰撞的情况,其实,交通事故,又有多少是正面碰撞的?大部分时候,司 ...
6 U% u( ^" |! L$ H& cCrisis 发表于 2010-3-2 20:25 
9 B4 y1 }0 b- _+ P9 | e: v: O( E6 }- ~" Y8 o M% L
看过一篇文章分析大小车的安全性的,里头也是提到实际交通事故的撞击方式,在所有致命事故里,50%涉及非两车撞击(翻车,撞击障物,比如树,水泥柱子),这类事故里跟安全相关的因素车子重量大小不算其中,主要是, E6 y2 g- B+ ?0 M: `% k
a) an effective restraint system (seat belts and airbags); n. }, p% @, W/ `/ |
b) effective energy absorption in the crush areas (front end or rear end)
; r8 Q' A; N. a7 C% Y _' Ec) a strong cabin area that does not collapse in the crash
4 ]& ]2 }4 E1 y; WNone of these items are automatically better in large and heavy vehicles. In fact, for item c, the roof of a heavier vehicle is more likely to be crushed in a roll-over accident than a lighter vehicle. This is one reason why rollovers in SUV's cause a higher percentage of deaths than in cars (in addition to their higher center of gravity.)
+ A5 [& S1 W1 R/ t1 e9 G9 B
) y) |) X6 s: p, c( T! O
3 y, i T5 e- h% u& x而在涉及两车相撞的另50%致命事故里,70%是侧撞和追尾,这里a和c是主要安全因素,车子质量仍然无关。下面的图表反应了这类碰撞时不同品牌车子的安全状况% p+ d: v/ {: ^3 D6 H5 f* n+ F
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are shown below. (see http://www.iihs.org/ratings.)
8 ]9 q4 M( i$ Z' I# x' y) _
/ i3 K4 l# Q$ f; a3 H
! r3 y V9 o8 U; m/ B& I
外行看热闹的人飘过,楼上的各学科专家,各地农民请继续讨论。 |
|