 鲜花( 9)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 竹帘儿 于 2010-3-4 21:58 编辑
7 j+ g6 V" ~. c是阿,车子就是铁包肉,最重要的不是比谁能撞过谁,应该是比较出事的双方,谁最能保护其中的乘客" E" a( n5 d$ k* v0 j5 a# C8 c# I
2 O4 d' I, d. y( L% {
好多人比较的时候,都是想当然地比较正面碰撞的情况,其实,交通事故,又有多少是正面碰撞的?大部分时候,司 ...& t- {* R- D; W
Crisis 发表于 2010-3-2 20:25 
0 a/ l3 p' v& L
8 `( \/ x, Y2 b3 S+ b8 l, a8 Q看过一篇文章分析大小车的安全性的,里头也是提到实际交通事故的撞击方式,在所有致命事故里,50%涉及非两车撞击(翻车,撞击障物,比如树,水泥柱子),这类事故里跟安全相关的因素车子重量大小不算其中,主要是
0 d3 I5 Q' Z# L( O" Na) an effective restraint system (seat belts and airbags)
: O Z d2 x( g& Wb) effective energy absorption in the crush areas (front end or rear end)$ p2 M7 ~/ g) s& s8 ^+ q& x' X+ x1 E
c) a strong cabin area that does not collapse in the crash3 g( G4 U( `- a( z$ x
None of these items are automatically better in large and heavy vehicles. In fact, for item c, the roof of a heavier vehicle is more likely to be crushed in a roll-over accident than a lighter vehicle. This is one reason why rollovers in SUV's cause a higher percentage of deaths than in cars (in addition to their higher center of gravity.)
) k- L9 _% u2 F3 m
( A/ R8 T1 B# V/ P" A4 S; H4 p* s2 C2 X3 s4 o$ M! a+ M) j9 p
而在涉及两车相撞的另50%致命事故里,70%是侧撞和追尾,这里a和c是主要安全因素,车子质量仍然无关。下面的图表反应了这类碰撞时不同品牌车子的安全状况
) X; f3 c* H% k8 c+ Z, Z" W; MInsurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are shown below. (see http://www.iihs.org/ratings.)5 G( `- D# @- u8 X+ T5 g* L
* |, l. f6 M) z8 O9 x" q0 A+ l* Z' i& {. ~7 O4 @
外行看热闹的人飘过,楼上的各学科专家,各地农民请继续讨论。 |
|