I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache 1 y3 [) z- ?, \# G/ q; {3 @. n* T. K; S q+ z& s
Calm down everyone please.1 F3 {8 [# X# d2 }, n" _+ M
# q& W. s8 w3 b0 ?不存在 can mean two different things:: C+ B3 E7 O6 A/ E( `/ J- X& X
: |! Y* _9 y* h. S7 y: l1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.+ w0 O5 a+ j7 t. d- w+ G' \
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头6 \! q! L/ m+ ^& Q1 J5 g
6 T8 g, o( b. u' q/ S! \" QI assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist* d5 R1 d( e* L6 y
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表4 ?4 n5 U. R7 N7 F" Q+ ]# a- v( {
I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache 0 G$ U" g v4 x+ j9 Z l+ F9 d+ k9 X: j) U. e
Calm down everyone please. 8 I: q( Q5 L) f3 K2 L% ~9 S: a 4 v4 n6 q& Z5 Y [不存在 can mean two different things: Y; j" B" q: p4 m
" z; u# o& w/ V# V L; d4 b. _1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc. & ?4 [9 J' n5 w' n2 i+ Q0 Q2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头+ [, j5 V5 F% k3 [) g s8 O- t# H
$ s( t2 g" i0 A+ k& k
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
9 D: R3 v/ _0 d
, t5 ], g4 [" F3 n* k小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
原帖由 ︶ㄣ|._紸禵麯゛ 于 2006-6-8 13:19 发表 - U7 O1 H8 H" ~- Sbalubalu,别人跟大家分享自己的宗教信仰关你屁事啊!2 E0 n1 _% ?9 c# d
你不赞成你就自己去信你自己那个什么狗屎balu教。6 \- u6 G0 y7 q
你妈的。。。自己滚回老家去吃屎。乱七八糟吐一堆屎。2 K. [& i R- Z+ `/ W! T
别人的意见不需要你来评价,你是什么?你以为你是 ...
/ @" u4 H. p/ R
! t. v2 I. [& l9 K Did your GOD ask you to curse people this way?1 ?5 N2 m& M( M I# W$ A+ F0 R
If you really have a 宗教信仰, I believe your GOD will shame on you!
原帖由 balubalu 于 2006-6-8 09:01 发表 2 `, A i. m- r( z2 S( L9 F8 p" o# i) {! B
9 ^$ X' q: r3 K6 f' R: x( I3 d 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不 ...
- i$ } Y2 G0 ] U
" z8 G- K0 g3 Y2:" never exist" refers to 过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来一定没有!!!* o2 y% u( [, w: L" l& k! J, i
4 d4 B5 C" v7 b/ ]At least dora meant that I am pretty sure.0 D6 G R( R; t! ^6 ~( `
& b. S8 m7 u# r6 b) t) P; P
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 10:57 编辑 ]
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 10:55 发表/ S7 d) ~2 L5 E$ v" z: I) |
" q- T+ C9 L3 a9 Z: j6 ~" }( y
O' ?0 a. P R9 C0 X4 { l
2:" never exist" refers to 过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来一定没有!!! ]8 D1 Q6 |9 `+ U7 E( |4 H
! J. v4 `& D1 Y
At least dora meant that I am pretty sure.
5 O) E7 }5 { U& i, f4 f0 F4 v; y2 ^2 ?
Arguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years) # f8 C2 P: e& x% o* I9 U( F _) I( x( h; x; b$ v
Maybe we should stop argument. 9 g0 r6 [0 n; u, w+ k T% P2 X$ h, x% z
My commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion / P" B: j& q0 l0 U2 X. @# ^1 p0 f
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 11:28 编辑 ]