I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache : c! q$ H) }. ~3 D% v6 W( l0 G/ P# i$ l+ f0 ?& o2 @2 A; C; m) O
Calm down everyone please.) f$ Y( T4 v; k4 U7 {1 I
( Z: R# u+ a1 R不存在 can mean two different things:8 _$ q" v: ]( D q3 o
( J% h7 T/ g& M4 m7 u8 ^5 g( f1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.7 P. p3 C1 z! R; a
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 : b. c" H& A1 {! ^0 A% \- s% _% U' {+ u" C& A8 Y! F# s. ~! y' L+ U; k
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist % s- a* h; D; V% T - h% ?8 l! l0 N6 L* O( S[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:29 编辑 ]
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表 & S5 b" O; M6 u% {6 Y+ \I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache 1 b# n2 H* _' `+ \2 l. `+ B. N, u9 m1 h6 n3 D
Calm down everyone please. " b' e- G0 c2 r: @) G$ p% X( ~& X4 l4 J. V) b
不存在 can mean two different things: # p2 E4 Q4 H% Y 9 f* G( d0 o1 R4 d1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc. # z: m" J- z" {& l% W2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 , Q( Z4 _2 J7 }; q- _2 c! @% E9 P. Y2 V3 ? k3 w. I0 [
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
" `) C) i; Z% L5 t
) k. A5 b, j3 F* I9 |6 D小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
原帖由 dora 于 2006-6-8 08:57 发表 " }, ^( ?7 i* B0 W3 P: E _( }是我要求版主把那些帖删掉的.; k* |; P' T# `$ b0 o
4 D2 k8 Y9 x- ]0 G: R% @5 e我欢迎讨论, 但是反对争论与吵架.
# ^7 ~$ y$ ?5 f7 r. W& a8 ^
! [* J8 R* T6 f% N' s# t( o
以前记得删贴的时候也会给被删者一个解释、一个理由,怎能就这样不明不白地删了算呢?; a' ^( s( u. k. Z
7 j: h8 b6 s! S. C- [0 Y3 J
难道这就是贵宗教办事的一概作风?讨论不行的上马甲人身攻击,人身攻击完了借机删贴泄私愤,还好不是在中世纪,不然偶这些异类也得被宗教裁判团给活活烧了。% s2 \* e; P6 B$ v
7 ~; \" s5 O# n" P# u9 t0 a5 o+ P5 k$ f8 ~2 \ Did your GOD ask you to curse people this way?6 ]7 C. R6 ~4 H; W
If you really have a 宗教信仰, I believe your GOD will shame on you!
6 N3 Z* R6 s3 A- ?Arguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years)1 U+ U/ a: T# y& T. E2 \& y( Y
# A2 N$ g7 \6 ?7 X/ a- I! X: xMaybe we should stop argument. . f( Z* I5 d, K4 E* y& b5 x2 n. n# s. Q' d# z# k. O" D8 [
My commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion7 q) k1 Z9 v' {