+ p: F2 [: f: ]# e! E; `: FSorry, I don’t see a correlation between my statement and yours, so to make myself clear: * K% U7 S, F( @8 `$ C4 z 7 F$ t7 X% @8 A! I& |4 `If you’re spared from tedious household chores merely because you are the main income earner, it’s only a privilege. ( P* d3 R2 T$ n. f9 |! j + D# ]5 V" Q7 EHowever it becomes a right (more or less) if you can earn enough to spare BOTH from those. & b' r( l! w8 z. u3 d
小黄 发表于 2013-8-21 09:13 . P$ I0 v. C+ e4 Q; K) R
想钱想疯了?某些族裔的一生就10个8个的生。按照您的逻辑,她们的劳动相当于100万了? " U8 F8 ~7 ?' U2 f* d- a 5 { r0 F9 o! u# [我觉得一个女人 ...
# y2 X* O( { t
( a0 X: M: L7 m L. R+ m% zYou can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspective of society as a whole, anyway. 8 e( i- O0 c) L$ c6 b5 B6 Q5 s, J7 e1 w& f+ S8 N z' G% t
P.S. when did you piss off Sumash? lol.