 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
! v! H( c( T3 ]& J/ ~6 O* m
9 K- l2 J+ \& h M' x5 g诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。 P5 \8 A: N! }% k' @6 b8 L4 R$ m7 a
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
& _" n" o( K O0 l( v2 M, u3 z( G! Q' P
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
; [: e* r8 F9 j6 e
8 Z! V8 M( v; ]0 k! Y8 t5 ?Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse3 U8 X& r/ J ^, Z J1 l% n
+ Y$ A. Z# V+ y# e! h+ `
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
* L% [" N$ Y# u! @8 ~2 l8 N& I; c% {
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.1 v% _( k {/ ?
t% }8 b m) R0 x
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
7 I2 L- T" X8 x+ Y$ {5 ` q5 _% |+ P8 x( v
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”5 V1 k& n' v# p, C/ f4 f. h& M
+ W \* o j C8 [Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
, K; Q- {) |4 }( ]) c' |/ k! _' ~" r7 H/ c. g. x" @
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
9 m$ D1 p$ L/ x0 x+ d( ]" `/ G
/ m4 c; s1 z- @$ r, L“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”- E' \+ Z( V" y9 J* W; E/ _! J& X# {
, ~+ T" H& S, \$ \Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
( }' m& y6 _# a" ^9 r: B9 G1 `1 E. _
 * K! s( j$ [( ]& q. T
' Q) ` R1 R! |( [+ W, e
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.$ Q- Y+ S( O: G
1 ?$ U: b' F. V. M9 x- yIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.8 j6 I- r$ n9 ^1 B
* m: ]7 n, [. V6 W5 i: N
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
+ E+ p! Z% A, l1 L+ y6 H4 T1 @8 d- R2 o7 G- a5 m
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
) e* f+ o5 e! O" f5 e$ A$ u
; m* Q0 m& w' X8 H, B6 {! oBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
+ g% C( E8 \+ ~; L) B% Y
2 l3 F+ ^( z$ R5 l' R' B* \$ PTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.3 D: t; p3 w$ @6 O% Y. G! c8 T* K( Z
1 Z r& w& s9 s; dActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
, t" w4 g F7 g) D$ u x7 \' c \. p4 \$ G
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
4 V9 L; k! m# O9 r( a) a% |; ~/ u2 `' R( H4 ~4 s" p$ L( ^4 t* H6 t
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.* V6 |9 G, L4 M% m3 a2 x5 s
' k+ |; E% K7 m# I4 Z$ R“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
4 P* l/ r% k! ~5 ^5 t/ i6 j
* W$ q1 ]& Q: `+ ~5 l0 V |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
