 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
9 a" ^ S2 h. h9 b" ]( G
% r% |$ r# E9 }- b# Q' b4 X* {& E, |
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
6 U. ]8 N5 k: U9 h% T! `' b2 ?阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
, r# Z' C9 k- W+ w# P( w2 h: |5 X/ E4 s, Y0 ]5 ]% T( V
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse) w& k2 t1 r3 |9 i) f' `, B
4 d. b* G! v2 C6 A6 G
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
! h y5 ~3 Z6 p# G, I; V* S: u! {
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.$ h" m* z7 o" g h( N
: F I. z p& L1 x" p( ?, F0 R
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.5 Y- f/ A* u, ]$ Z! ~) D
; I4 C, O) s- |) `6 `# s! y
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
1 I3 o. m! @& P: D _' m5 Y0 \2 t- Z+ F/ @( c
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”3 o% ~# _. G$ }# Q& X+ o
- ^3 _7 [% Y- }Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
8 u" D$ d6 O& s
9 m6 {4 f1 u& d+ O v! K, s) ABut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems./ C9 e. [$ _3 u" g
! o: m8 \1 S0 \. v C
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”' K( F5 T; s: P4 K
3 g3 v( ~( _$ \
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”. w, ^6 W% P0 E
, f8 W' }8 o, ~7 q E2 b1 }2 M & a! H6 _$ C; ]* Q) B9 l
+ e* C& F& f# M1 Z% c% I" s& |The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
: J( W6 F, J) x, D4 o( X
) y: _2 m* j8 n- XIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.6 f P% x: u% k( E- C7 |
. v' d& f2 k- y @/ f/ GNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.2 Z' J2 e4 ^8 a( A
6 V: @! r0 S8 A4 _ D M D+ l$ x
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.1 S; q+ Q Q6 O! I- s5 m$ U2 E" w7 R
7 w& O- J5 A8 A' E# @2 IBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
6 F* b' h2 W( i- p9 d8 E
. P, W2 J6 E/ M1 O+ M8 hTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
% o" g" \! q* u* F( H) B; D0 v$ k) Y/ T# j& [
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
4 G& d! C# g* C; r4 C6 v! e6 v+ T: ]7 z: G
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.+ V! ~3 O2 N2 ]/ S$ t
, H6 e4 r0 U. \1 o0 z! s“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
% \6 a& J( R) W" f X5 p; [9 Y: t7 N
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
. F, I# z \8 B1 ~: I8 J* s6 K; ]0 ~ T, F0 i9 _
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
