 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
' w6 r& X* l* c0 }# I+ Y6 g5 w2 X6 o- B
_' u! L! N9 O3 f诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
! R* O: P9 O. y阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。2 m5 Y- f; W9 M9 Y1 _/ g5 d' F
6 W/ b( T8 O; p% ~' y! j/ F. B1 _1 y
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse2 U3 f8 j! h8 ]1 J7 W! |$ x
$ P: z( q# t7 Z
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse" d" w) }+ r# _7 q
& E# n* N* R( g! c! N4 q# {Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.3 e7 P# X; w; k. t4 }
* {4 b; ?; Q0 L7 y/ |6 H( _
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.3 l3 @) ^0 W6 T4 T5 K1 P$ P
% P+ W; s* Q3 d6 CHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.) C$ x8 J4 ?+ ?6 l& K& {
7 y/ N* `( X) e& {/ WAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
8 p" m# o8 g/ F# T; g
0 v' t& z9 S3 {& T4 @Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
( a) G. s# k) i2 ~7 p+ V4 g; A! ~; ?& [) x
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
) D& x. s- G9 [' A' M4 }0 }, L$ M" n, y$ D. t5 h
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
S7 J) ?- F% l1 z
4 \0 X$ @8 O% M+ Y2 b/ kPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”. y6 o$ r# { d/ ~8 d7 E" p- e
) g1 _0 e/ L" B
 * c- G( [# T$ Q0 l- o5 Z" h
8 y: n0 V# C- B7 ?+ A; m: VThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
2 n# v& [! N9 e' _: ^" D- ^( Q% e9 S7 w4 M$ x5 Y
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction." t/ n: K" _2 G" ~2 e% @$ {
4 i* z2 X/ _: g
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.: H2 X. C: C( V/ ~, \7 e+ o5 w
+ ?9 K0 X$ n! a7 H7 B" B& r, S5 LGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.# w) P9 Y5 f8 k: N
- Q0 r' K' G, @: ZBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
7 g0 |# O) m; p1 D5 c8 U
# h8 `: B( d3 z* ` P5 O: t/ gTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today., i3 [( {1 \5 p' R: A) A" V
" {5 c" Z+ w* jActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.( A5 B/ M! w. T5 O" U6 \' k2 D6 _
1 n- A3 H! }2 I& h, C1 ?“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
' t$ @; y9 `3 @0 v
/ a4 s5 q- P# V2 N2 V2 S' X6 c" V& C“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
' ~- ^. X/ u9 \, _2 i7 P; W( b4 Z: _: W* O
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”- M( Z7 I/ l" J+ O5 G+ E
/ I1 n# Y n2 n0 i
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
