 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
: \' D1 ]1 R8 n
& A" V" I) ?9 g5 O, p+ U9 m% |
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
% |" P M. z" b- i0 ~5 Y) ~阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗?请看文章红字部分。
: K, s; n% |2 c( Y/ C9 C5 F2 r) v
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse) d5 B" a* d# C- L# _
: {# ?( B- E) Q' f6 P$ OBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
5 H/ j/ B. A) ~4 S4 w' Q! q4 r+ D1 J8 u
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
0 b: ?4 i$ i* h7 l7 W7 b" ^7 ]! o Y, D, ]8 M+ {+ L! _$ J- q
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.$ n! B! f( {" p- U6 h
' ^( _! t- k0 r! XHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.: j$ u; b) D3 `2 F& y5 F
3 F/ m0 R& L0 yAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
$ T: C+ l" A7 z% t" e ]
. C8 k# l7 B$ R! `( L9 f# [$ J& ]Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.& T, v7 D j0 v; J% g8 y
' p' r& w( n; \ tBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
; D* J W! y9 H8 y" Z7 s. C# q$ h0 m& [* v
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
6 o8 M6 N: [' h& r) }( q/ R4 m# |+ K8 P7 L1 I! G- t
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”! X6 X2 v+ s1 g1 L* c1 D
" c4 g/ Q& ~9 n, @3 D. a' l3 P. M, o
7 j: h! h$ e3 R, l4 k J* O8 }; Z
3 p! Y9 W+ b2 _* W2 j5 w a
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.# H* h% a( V5 U% R6 k+ z
5 P4 E* o8 q' v LIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.9 ]8 b2 P+ y* N, l E
/ N0 j# R @2 C) N3 `& I& a4 P
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
. M! z8 j) u: T% a# |7 V1 L o5 r9 L
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.! x/ F1 p; x& N1 y: j' K
% J2 l N' s2 _9 b+ N: I# WBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.5 g" @1 F6 q: G6 G8 K
, j6 j3 d% r8 u
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today./ {6 b. f# J9 p
+ e1 J! h6 p. ^Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
7 H' ^& {( O* k4 l; q8 r7 I! ~, s% e" R3 f0 A
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.. B5 e3 R. Q4 |
F P1 I' N: R; v“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
$ ^6 J0 x! l. |. p* J F& E0 n1 r. l
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”: Y ^+ I5 u! u% ]! y# A7 P7 P( ]
/ U. b. J- a7 q
|
|