 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
) n7 M1 @. f5 B3 X0 z
: ^. b O& U4 j诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
& c1 n/ _) x, `1 I阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
( B: ^- Z* ~: ~: h
R' {% \; d+ ?% @4 w8 }https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
' J8 y. H `, ~8 ]' s1 \6 L3 Z6 T2 A( }4 {6 H" T
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse8 U; L' B6 b* @* z8 ?! J
) s; ]% v8 {7 z: JOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
- C$ L O9 E% |& c& N, W( j5 R2 B+ K2 _. X
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.9 R' h* g7 O, p/ e6 l; U. W- p
N( Y9 [$ f+ U5 m8 R. sHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
$ j+ l7 y0 C. R7 {" @% Q8 Q3 ]3 {/ c0 a: K, G; D* j6 P. L! Q
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
4 }, [6 \ O6 Y1 U: X) G! B; E$ x
- `. j, O) l- O% C8 oActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
/ V) }- S- h! D% I( `) k" A+ q% a2 R# U$ R4 Q
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
9 O. {/ X; t5 j6 {
! |+ Q/ q/ h a! U2 O2 W+ |' w# O“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”% G$ t- z) Y l0 L7 W# m" y4 f8 y3 I
& H0 I1 \. W, ~+ a0 X
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
4 I( v1 G, M2 L+ G, _6 E: ?) Z, x6 a* ~( e `( x
 ' B9 \8 R# v3 {9 b5 e& G4 U9 B
) r5 S' h: ^- Q) F* D% W) X0 h
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
/ @4 Q8 x$ C; j1 Z& ~
1 i7 w$ W0 B5 @: c* ~. w7 M' rIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.$ p# z" G8 o: C2 ^) H# \4 |2 O. k3 ]
. {, t' J% A: L' kNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.& y0 r# q$ g* c7 M) H+ `( M9 C
; `) T1 } d7 F0 k+ |
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
4 e! j- F" U( b0 w: m5 {4 l8 Y3 Z X, e2 O% @1 Z
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
0 t" j0 u9 g7 K# E+ j8 R
* d H2 k( {, m; p9 b+ wTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.# ~ [9 \2 R7 W" b- E
5 W7 c# l, |; g# Z( ]" i+ oActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
) K7 H' L7 z, ^& ?1 ^
8 t/ T+ E, G5 Z9 M8 l) U: I7 s“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email., |$ F' m( e1 h4 h4 l3 M
) ~" U, z; R$ O2 p% U: k“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting./ a, w% C6 w7 a6 o6 N1 o
' X5 s7 \/ u( _1 Y* M9 z J; [2 Q# |* ~
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”8 z0 y/ m2 x7 }
& r# W/ B* C9 Q) Q; X7 G |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 / F6 x& I; t5 H# a3 X/ p2 B( k
