 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
$ p2 D! ~; `3 m# k* Y3 C3 }* d& {+ {* w$ ~8 v
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
/ ^: i3 j( { l: k2 Y0 L阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。4 ?+ P$ d$ b5 _9 {! _
( T6 |8 k8 |0 w& W6 v
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse/ T9 ^; ~. j( }% m) x
1 [1 @, i" x' ?$ u6 @5 @Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse1 M9 x* B5 z% H7 c% |; a
; f" p8 n1 z4 R9 }5 Q% j; v
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.8 m8 z( d' e# q9 U: }5 _0 b
1 ]" o4 \) p; F8 y, k7 K! BThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.5 ?6 Y& N9 {' w& a# M: b
( Z8 I$ b" D+ J) C0 t$ Q9 T
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns. j: v3 l& l8 I1 s
) h8 ?: N" H& G: F# u# U' s. P
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”& g4 r" u) F7 d2 J1 p! \( l
8 m$ ^3 `; [% w+ M" ]$ w" YActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.3 J |& j5 N* b" s
& z+ f' m5 ~) L3 `But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.+ M, S5 G" z! ]4 M/ A3 u' V/ K: s
) a4 z7 E: ^' v7 P7 T( g+ R“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”6 S; d, M& J2 h& U$ u( a
3 K- B; i6 q3 h( k' |9 o1 l& p/ SPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
6 @3 [( Q4 H* X3 x2 ~/ x: N+ @+ B/ F2 d* {- i
 9 h8 x9 e6 Z0 N% i4 m% g4 o5 W
& ~+ v9 v3 H4 ~9 C s NThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.' S$ }. L5 g5 I
9 c, g& L0 M* ^2 R6 `# i+ n TIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
2 J1 d2 Z$ w1 l/ ~9 z% o2 N7 ~' J+ }3 i& T/ Z
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
" c& R& Z9 K& }, N+ v& _. a! v! ~1 T* T O
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.+ e. D% D/ u& |9 \. `9 |' f
1 v& o( s/ W+ ~5 y) MBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
4 G3 Y5 V* J& _# h4 s( P
8 T: P+ n1 V, d2 kTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
2 M: s. @. b; b- r$ M' @/ |7 u K! I- l2 [# j
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy./ R8 ^/ ~* m3 t5 @* y6 c! P& \
3 {5 h. p' ?0 X“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
7 K; v; b# g3 ` n8 F( [$ p8 l& r- n2 z5 {' A; ~- ]
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
% z' X# J/ C; P& H5 X* L$ j, Y4 q% c/ B" G8 j% t
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”9 V% z$ J5 h8 i1 P8 } B" o& t
6 o# R* |; Z4 J. Q7 { l. t+ O5 m7 w |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 ' i! e. y: [/ D2 U# s" ~
