 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
3 |! c/ y+ n; A! i
J( r7 D. c/ Z" Y H/ h0 W
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。6 g0 C1 C( c' r
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
! ~ f, l% |. e9 o J' L; d' |# {( G) M# L8 D
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
7 X! q9 e- h; B2 r7 Z+ ?; V/ J& ?: M# r1 E& c
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
5 [- [9 J Y3 Z* [
7 ~ ]" n2 ?/ [, Z+ {. OOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.7 i3 d6 V- z( @. H3 c3 } t3 I
H+ G$ c' S: }5 {% i4 _- f" v; l
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
9 }/ v# [" B9 o. j( p
; U, h# U T! A: i) x6 WHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns. P- B' ]( c- @ B/ w0 u
# O4 M5 ^* A8 g' X9 E; |5 P
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
+ Y% R5 S4 |, _9 F& |8 b& }* r& G; v" ]
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
7 d2 {: m( k% z/ s: t! k; ?) g
2 U" u+ d+ r9 ^; nBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.! @. [9 A9 x5 w( O! g/ v
4 u, j& A/ V5 S- M“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
, L, @, O3 ?0 W( n4 D$ C L& ~$ O+ W& z
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
2 G* ]* s% g) m" [
: S( ?* o J7 f2 M. h% N8 M
) Y# K, W! C* C, }/ m: R5 Z! [+ ~, D) o1 X4 w1 z
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
- a5 ]; k& M- G+ H6 \5 v$ Q$ c8 D1 L8 E+ h v+ i2 R
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
% Y) d0 H$ q. d
2 G6 [. e: s$ q# t; T2 XNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.; [* n0 u6 P3 P) f, v2 d# _. k' {
. C6 w) L* O8 m: ?. ZGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
, f4 L9 `! a( f2 p3 ?+ z' X
2 L4 g6 P+ m6 }* R$ B+ _+ b) EBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.1 m- C1 O5 }3 ?# e% a
# C$ c' X; ?! J5 m! F; a5 \
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.# w4 H, S- K# W. k* b
' A( g" f$ t7 t5 c* F8 D: \Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
$ f& u3 g% l; J9 y# s7 F9 m
+ Q# @1 L. j0 {! y7 z" c, I& V8 [“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email., A6 N' {/ B) Y5 ~$ s
Y9 ]" L* K' n5 U0 f4 h2 q! {
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
# s$ l' S) t' n, t
4 y2 m3 Y$ }* e% M“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
8 P! t- b! Z4 L) R) I, y4 I
, l9 Q# q, g1 c3 L1 h4 z5 E4 M+ { |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
