 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
7 q2 c" K# W2 M: ~
! S; w0 J9 r6 s7 S, m; j诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
9 b; Y8 ^' S. E7 F( ?阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。6 z) {- z. R8 b: V; ^" K
& X( f/ O' `6 ^4 v$ ~& N1 Z4 Q
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
! T+ c) O8 U4 [+ d6 F
+ S1 D( i; c: k' ]5 n/ l8 KBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse; Z/ R2 W e# Z' X S
, p; |, P7 v0 l+ wOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.% a* k3 q I; ?# Q, L9 P3 K
5 p# [( C. J/ X" C
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
) X i) |9 @, W+ V2 X5 K: n4 x0 B3 J* s! Q9 U, ~
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
3 L$ Z) K2 A: B5 V1 U/ o% i7 h. C1 @; ^1 y
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”2 ]$ c# F. P/ M
8 Z2 m# Y; B! M8 _+ K4 x h9 B, C
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
# R; S4 B1 ~; S! O/ l5 x5 K
* A0 S3 j5 E/ b$ f9 h$ S+ h6 ?' nBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.& t" F4 _1 a- @
' { L$ J$ ?' E“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
* k& L8 r3 M# H6 X; ?7 ~" g3 B; O$ ^1 j! u. S2 u( q0 {
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
+ e- C- U. E% f& e7 t9 W" `3 w) Y3 e. j7 N; x/ d: r7 a
 3 H3 J& Z! I4 M/ d
! o: L; Y1 b H. ^4 N/ ^+ X: T' L5 b: MThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down., p2 z7 |) I) q( R7 H$ X
' `2 O/ r" [+ B5 qIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.- n( a+ M7 i* C& C9 u% F$ n5 D1 T
+ r+ p; {* C1 eNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
# U+ w# e6 j E
4 y# X! A! p% vGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
: ~1 W r' J/ I2 P& [5 f! a3 {! y4 m; \- d
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.: T8 j6 R9 A# j
! p' _# f% H' k% C% @7 }
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
1 A; L- \, W* U) {& j# s
$ c6 v# V4 E4 |9 Q8 Y4 Q! A. `Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
6 E) ]6 L( J/ U9 H0 K+ u$ C9 c5 M9 b6 m9 ?5 c6 u" L4 ?( l
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
' Z: K6 s0 c$ |) g1 C9 @6 C$ M) b! Z( C" P' L" M/ T! ^+ F% Y0 M5 q
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
- @8 ~+ d+ j( C# D F9 H8 g) i: h
2 ?6 b8 q) S) A8 `7 m! S* n8 G% t( [“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”5 Z! } F( o: Y" S% G0 E8 c, ^0 A; B. t
8 p) W: B: ^. x
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 7 o E- j( W7 K8 c
