 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
( t' ~9 A8 C3 o2 X
5 z: o! ~: |) }$ G% R诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
1 {# E1 G! _$ y阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
" _ [: V& o k+ k/ c- W# M8 Z/ U- J* c* _5 f. H/ l7 J
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
; O# {) ]6 c. l/ m' Z7 L/ c! B# s, V& C; C# D1 m0 G# ?6 }
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse+ _1 a0 k3 s# G' B1 k
8 @4 E9 Q( o) P) k# Y$ sOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.: H6 [+ h. r) X( l- _6 _ Q
* _7 W2 l6 ]& u; ]3 YThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
+ @% R& X) R, u2 X4 c+ w
* h6 Y3 J7 x" w3 p( ~He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.' q! v# J4 Z+ `+ y0 x( Y
) R. H! }" ]* m7 N+ k& h5 _; wAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”6 p& E& Y: f6 t
0 m2 z4 v6 r) c) X5 H- E
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
+ [) g& P" B; \/ y. Q6 i
, L5 p( x; u6 N$ s+ P# e% TBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.3 \* L2 X S$ f+ O* J$ K- u
' S6 f6 }! b1 N7 @
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”5 W* S) c& j" @( `9 c) d
5 U- [& y& J$ x: o, ]8 Z
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
, {( |: k- I% a7 B( b* B# \# i4 |( F7 q% P5 K" S2 G1 x: N+ t0 p. I
 ( T4 H0 r% P( l
5 b: O' A8 @3 x) F AThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
I0 i! T. B7 e
6 T) Y$ X; k' X6 r" c2 ]9 PIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
- [+ G! v; S, U/ Q" H0 a1 b% l% x3 u- c. t5 i9 D8 v9 u4 o
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.. V4 m+ N+ l$ o( o5 l( w- [
: C! {8 Y% t$ v8 s' rGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.) P* d/ t/ B- q
/ t, V% y& C" g- ]8 wBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
1 N+ p) M5 S+ i; r2 T' ~$ R* G* n/ Q, N r% M, N, }: A9 u% M! q1 w, }
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.% @! v3 @ n6 _' I6 G
& [ B+ a# [0 ~( G8 pActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
$ m& x& X. t: c1 s" ]
; H! b) j- h' |“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
8 j7 m6 n7 W+ |, R ]+ U6 t' i3 \! I: l( Z
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
; l0 v& [6 S. d
/ w8 B6 q# m2 q; }( p“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
7 L" |7 E# _/ h0 d( ~$ v
0 F6 X! ?1 d. F* A9 J7 _ |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
