 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
" F! s3 ]! }' S3 z8 X3 M3 @; m3 F7 n9 G7 ~* g
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
: F& K" \( s- _: T1 M阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。6 `. j+ D5 d% ~% M/ [/ G# R
6 U; a: J- F. X9 j/ d5 Lhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse! ?1 G0 P2 P/ F+ F# K0 x
0 O$ E5 l6 r4 J: j, r+ R- I n
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse6 P3 v3 V3 F" [+ q
3 }) I7 S' J3 X6 t; YOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
6 I+ M+ a% Y2 y8 `3 o& F9 l2 `& P! K7 N! \6 `: `7 `; C
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
# b$ H1 `1 x" a6 R+ k7 O5 r/ l/ c0 U) G# }, u2 B
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.9 {" f- P, J" F% U1 t8 \. b0 q
7 H, h& M$ N* D' ~! p+ o7 DAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
2 B5 ?" k, p; U, u
% Q/ G3 u9 T/ EActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
9 i' I7 \, D6 f9 C( H( h
& f! D0 @: |5 o- |6 c1 d) mBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
/ n6 W W' \9 a [
& `( Z2 u! Z% b) s“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”: o! E- n* u. F
& h& p/ k2 J) i3 sPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
0 l$ C0 q/ b' _2 z
/ a2 I! k" S w! |! ?+ B 2 v/ r3 Q( G& ^
$ H5 Y2 P( E! y5 u/ H
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.; k, ~; i4 u9 x1 Q
6 P) R4 U3 B1 t8 S" K5 h( \* {3 P( R
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.% g& w9 ~, X* P. v! B
7 X8 E& D$ I& e9 J+ KNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.- M% U2 z* e% x3 o
1 y) h9 M/ g' H/ L8 |Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
7 s7 ~3 }& S3 x, B
8 [1 `- s* _4 I( D% `But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
7 j, e1 Y o( `% U! z, G) q9 x* v
9 v. o7 s- }- H, w3 z! i" pTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.4 Q6 q# J) L# J, C# |7 a
; W& M% m Q. g( Z+ _Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.9 b/ K+ J$ e. ]& v; w& f
f; a2 J& C9 v! m( c/ I“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
" X) o! p c3 C7 N: F7 L% R: z$ x! b/ ~
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting., A" \% H8 b( ?2 F* o2 o3 e* S4 D
$ x' f3 Z& W, h0 M1 u L5 }“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”& {8 X3 {0 u6 H' T
0 R0 W1 D' d3 V0 c |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 ! v/ [; L1 w: J+ W
