埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1877|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters:
3 s" x+ S+ W0 F( P0 Y: o3 q) Q* K+ N: {' z
Despite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat , U1 [5 D# i; [& J2 F9 p
    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US& F/ E# q3 p# d4 h; c; G- D
commercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern
% t' u' r  i2 eas the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging
+ p4 \( @& ^& MTrends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
- w' X0 O! f& M5 x7 P/ aand the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more
" |. Z- S/ n# T( L3 v; pupbeat.1 I, x. O; W6 ]; C* ~1 |
    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded
" `( p: W3 x) A2 e' P" |) y: A/ m# Bannual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects' D- e# A6 i* u% ?
interviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real
  g+ j7 Y  g/ g+ |1 n- hestate experts, including investors, developers, property company: N# ^8 `/ n$ J6 o9 J! o$ A
representatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.3 b3 X6 h, M5 W2 F; t  B) w+ V
Other versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world
& U& V1 b) Y& @2 b7 L! [+ `including Asia Pacific and Europe.2 `  r; b2 r4 K' h& |9 n9 b
    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian8 [" U( \: k) E, R# O, G
Real Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment
( v( D4 g# @9 U! {environment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to
3 s4 |2 J. w3 h8 |  xbe avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record
5 U: r  q6 d6 ?# y$ ^highs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."' i9 L1 N4 b+ d9 O. |/ C' r+ ?
    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the
+ T5 ?& }: r- ?7 O9 Iborder will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game2 ]8 X  L8 {& I/ ~3 n" _: B% C
speculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey5 @0 l: s; N* |
remain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US8 W7 T5 }) j/ J' w0 m1 K  x$ V
correction. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be
4 X9 O5 E: y' T7 r2 l3 rvery good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.' E" a$ x: V# ?  [* b( G
    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian
4 }9 H9 E* u+ J& arespondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by
+ v. U+ ^/ Z- C2 wcommercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land# l3 O1 f0 C, t0 Y, \2 X2 d
development. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country: @' g# q  O  f# v# c2 l+ {
especially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating6 y, k4 ^% z# t/ s5 b2 I0 z3 X
development prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The9 Y- t3 Y; S3 y8 h- a: ]
residential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to
) k6 Z; m  n; X4 M9 M& D5 `take a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and) S$ k" ^/ x) @8 ?" h
single-family housing looks overpriced.
; H1 J7 T# m0 x- O# c- z    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with- \$ c6 l$ z1 v* D: [
tenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian# g# ^2 b) H7 k! T
metropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push
- ~& u& |- g, I. ihigher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting
$ U3 Y% }3 T+ m8 l9 `$ tnew development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,
2 K, c/ x) `  yand most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental
5 \4 K- n/ I( xapartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary$ ~1 K3 k! \" \  c6 ?8 s
western cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing1 P3 @3 q0 H" j
shortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into
# r% [" c2 M9 n6 Uthe energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development
9 I% n$ t- ^9 f- d: h6 r% Z5 Nin other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.
( ^' s- s) G* I; X) n
! Q8 t1 ]3 X; w, ?) g& g    Canadian Markets to Watch
) l" ^7 X4 g$ b
( P+ }5 ~! w! ?+ z! K- M1 f    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central
, s3 E8 B5 w4 E. ~3 ocities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour
& ^  k5 P% ?& h) r3 a* }" s' W* {neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back
' r  w) r3 _! K5 Z$ N9 ?into the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in
7 J! @# m, o6 g; V/ d9 K' u/ fdowntown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical. p6 P- V( T5 X3 _, }0 K
projects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out, k0 ?# r6 `% Y$ r" r. ?5 Z) W
west - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment& Z- @! g2 i" j
prospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain' `, U6 r( `2 X5 }9 N8 c
whether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.
0 v. K/ T, V2 [. h+ R3 J0 N. JToronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high5 D7 j; ?, R# e
ratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.- j+ p) x; f6 G8 E7 T8 H
) W# J1 w4 h- h" J
    Calgary/Edmonton
, D( S7 `+ V% p9 A& W. ^, e/ g! O- C* L7 d1 {3 P! q9 [
    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one2 Z; X& G0 [; ~; L2 ?/ `
boomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a
0 M, E1 f/ S. B$ h0 S8 t/ {& pbuy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,, U7 a/ {0 R, J" b
48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.' i9 Q8 I$ t2 U" o
Furthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale
* N* }0 I9 F# UHomebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the: e0 N7 f6 _+ e" ^
Calgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays) N, b5 H% D: Q* P+ u
strong, this market will continue to do well.
5 \* l) {$ M5 p/ @! y; n- N: ?, Y' z/ f/ `' {
    Vancouver
+ F# @5 w5 v4 E( z" k3 S- b: Y2 C) J0 `% A7 F- C
    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is5 y- X+ v1 e" e- V0 M
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous
; z$ b/ n4 X# c) H5 w: Nreal estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the
& \  t' D' R. S# d4 N* K' }" y6 ]market is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a, j7 X' S- M( x) F
growth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy
8 i9 [& n/ [; f4 c( A8 I. trecommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%
1 E& l2 X3 u( m! e4 \for Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%
/ _1 N, b! m! V0 Rfor Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very
/ C- A7 y+ b/ _) q; d4 R; d/ I% Kgood mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.% e2 p+ N: c# K$ ?3 t( D( S
" T" ?, A) c  b1 I! i
    Toronto6 z1 ]7 R' [' y) R7 M! Y+ f6 K6 E

8 }6 N  S) P/ l4 s4 E) U" r* i    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and6 z) _7 q( L, r! C6 s5 f, _$ C% o
manufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is' b9 h8 G6 W% E" d7 h* c
relatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing# }( v8 b) N: h, u: r( R+ m3 D
industries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.; W; T" v: E- e: z
Three new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square1 u5 C# E8 J, F" _
feet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and. Y1 W) N  I, g3 C9 o# L
Apartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.
. K3 w; `2 ^- x5 D( O- E' x) l3 ~; v+ L: u  b
    Montreal4 q/ A( C+ h' L

4 _5 H' h! d, D    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall# X' M' i# o5 I
growth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up
. O; d+ t& z& V7 d$ S# v# Cshop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in: A% I" U2 k) m8 r& |
Canada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate
" Y3 j0 |; |4 j3 @; B$ ysectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors8 ?# g. ~1 V& M  F4 v
higher as a "hold" recommendation.
6 n  Q9 s, \; E5 |% d! U- O! H/ o: q& r/ v! l1 l
    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years
# C) V: V6 \0 O* Linclude a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy
8 Y9 ^/ z9 L2 z# e( Gmarkets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos. }0 g$ |: j0 t
near subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest
) A$ m- B* r( ?  t1 ^: ooverseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current0 L$ b8 e0 R* I9 }
prices."
: _2 J+ g% q- H+ X/ I/ V' O' w1 Q" u    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at4 F/ b- P2 J6 x6 q! j
www.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre.  J- A. p& z, J4 _. |% W

' n" y9 l- w0 W( u9 W! Q    About PricewaterhouseCoopers* d9 a/ k$ L; M0 o, g

- e  j& u/ U* a/ d( ]    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,
1 j/ U' v, `9 N; I7 Otax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its. S4 t# a9 K: ~* M
clients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries
3 a. d3 y+ |" b* u" Jacross our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop" I' L, O& n7 t: j& e
fresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of
" M8 J  |3 Y( M9 c4 N. P: Texcellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its
* e2 x4 J- t% P0 ?& B- G/ vrelated entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the
- M2 g  i; P8 r+ C' ecountry.
! C9 i& W9 C6 y% u; m    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario. C" w2 ^# Z5 S) v  T* x( P1 H1 Q
limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
$ Q$ f: \+ }/ _9 G; f& ?PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
- _% I9 E3 A3 Y$ M, N, b! |1 p0 D% Heach of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
1 H! G; r& A9 H8 J, [' S+ N) G" z$ c2 Y/ {  P1 o
    About the Urban Land Institute% s9 m( ~/ J: H/ @6 ]

; R( {* z4 I$ S5 w; u" A: W. _    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and
' @7 O8 ~1 D! ~1 S/ Jresearch institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide0 w8 V; F1 e* x5 d1 a7 M
leadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating
* j# Q2 j+ ?& X; Ethriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more
' ?% P7 x+ l) Z( v, C& e& Wthan 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development
' M4 c8 a" z4 }' ?+ S) v8 Cdisciplines.
# a* H. h8 |& O' f# \& X6 Q    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.$ N: w2 w/ E0 F3 N6 n
With nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District' z! O: {$ J: \/ E* O
Council was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is
! S. G1 V2 H% \% wnow being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
8 m/ T# j( q& B  S, |% p) ~hosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,9 d( X" e' Z/ ^- R, l# q" _+ D# Y
2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake6 W. o# \/ ~+ l. _5 S+ `
Hutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,$ Q! b( u2 y9 |
President of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please% y- t1 b3 Y$ ~6 s  i
call the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on
! P! B- E% {+ k" Q4 C  Lthe web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.
, G2 {" |8 k7 Z( l- g6 ^4 x
1 T5 S0 G6 f8 H3 G6 g- c9 @7 m* \
" I" Z  D3 U1 v- K/ y' g5 |' L% A* R. M6 U, h6 F& _
For further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
& z6 @/ p& f# O(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com$ W# ]# s' |% `. N7 Q8 X
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html
2 D0 J8 O" s9 G- J! C& ]1 C- b0 `" S! R4 z1 c( U& C
[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说: ' d  l+ f( ]' R. [

% @3 \2 D5 w" `  `& R) Z尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观! z; S; O: i. `; k: G
    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国5 W7 `5 P- |+ d
商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。 1 b3 ]# a+ r. m
由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴; n4 I5 `5 |0 U7 n7 L% Q# d
趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会)
9 w! w. X% f7 O3 W( K6 d+ p& v和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多0 \4 d; X  ]6 Z- q/ \) p6 o
乐观。 1 ]8 b6 `& v3 [, j* r% |, }
    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的! ]: p. a" K: V& D2 T3 F
年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了
' F- ?7 V+ N: K" Z; o访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时6 A8 `. R' r- J5 `
地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司7 C3 {( X- I, g9 W1 Z
代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。
; e- p% E2 }. r: r+ [) w9 ~其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷
  e4 G0 P+ u  i包括亚太地区和欧洲。
% c% {+ [' d8 L* P9 W4 z    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大* j6 k& q4 L( Z5 c; I& \
房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资( I  V, q: S5 g% k3 k) p3 Q( _. ]" R0 L
环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎
9 f( @/ L9 e  i5 J0 e/ V4 F可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录
4 n* U9 _* w0 y3 Q. X; |5 g: X, U高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。 $ |/ d/ b8 Z# l# `1 `. X: K0 b, C
    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的' ?* R( h) q5 g# ^8 Y# X
边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏5 C+ y* _6 `% [6 f) H
炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者5 }& o1 e8 B  E3 A8 Z
继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国% d* r1 J& d- Z0 x0 V) d
更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将% h% o3 W5 i. D4 f9 T* V
非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。
5 |  W3 t& M0 M# s+ k    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大. I. B* [# ~1 {% k* i
受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是* S3 h  M8 y) P
商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地* v4 [' p% p: }5 ^( p' M# e2 g
的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行
+ ?0 L% M5 E1 E+ c  X6 u3 }* p  g尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明& G$ r9 V2 A# l* _! c8 l' M3 A
的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该0 D2 D6 C; h" A0 R2 ~
住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要$ {! |/ F. ]/ T3 ^9 |2 T# ~. B
以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和
5 i# o9 X1 P/ `" k1 J单个家庭的房屋期待过高。
* v' I: j8 x- V* x2 P: P$ q  p    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了
' j, f2 W2 V6 _) ?% ~/ n1 G租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大5 W0 U6 S7 V+ |5 H% c
大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动  B; q1 G: ?. r, f0 z7 s
更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制
! e4 F1 r0 l. z2 M. ]) c/ z+ T新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚, - `+ j6 S7 M( |: V
和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租
! u' q5 I+ ^. v) y* T* {公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学/ [# r- J2 ?+ e9 Z
西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋
. |* Z* C9 C7 B3 m  W6 a4 l短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入
7 E' E* m+ L& X; F! `" r1 Z* S能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展
. I+ p4 A; X5 Q1 f5 S7 w0 Y: ~在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。
1 Q/ {  B8 b/ K3 R
; Y- ?1 r: y& K    加拿大市场上观看
6 M! o& u  q# Y" [+ X" z* T1 L# `. d: `4 p" z3 p
    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央
4 H& c& J( C; D5 X: |9 K/ M城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时
7 m" l+ g/ j1 }' w, j: k( ^居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回' p5 f$ q  D# G' o% C2 T
进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在
) @7 l1 y) T+ {( l# m& u8 t市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直0 D; k' O' Y7 Y+ f2 O) h0 R
项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市
; G& }" O' V: u) V6 X6 Z西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资
4 N5 x( P7 Y& n0 Y前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定4 k. F$ r. l" K5 [* b$ _) E0 e/ f
是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 3 u( |2 u2 Z) x' y
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
9 {4 Z6 t* y% _评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。 3 t. F/ Y. j6 Q! Q- D  h
" P1 B2 ?' i- R
    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿
7 q& u9 _! i" l$ |
7 Z- c: \; @7 M& f    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号0 r! |3 E/ t! b* j. D
新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作; j: U5 _3 Q0 I4 g4 ^
购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送, % a/ k! S2 a1 W! f# o, K' m4 K+ Z
48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。 + l2 B% D  X2 p$ |
此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后$ v8 C1 h" r, u- q
住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了
0 K1 k$ t7 @4 k7 d/ T5 p( P卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留
# L- @) z, F( C" s) d, o5 r, K# B强大的,这个市场将继续向好。
2 i. V* t# W5 M2 k: K6 l0 }
- |# p0 ?$ ~! p; z2 N+ l4 B1 G- b    温哥华  [2 l2 j; n7 x1 C
8 \: {+ N+ c$ v) v* S1 {1 }! Y
    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业
) X5 c1 t% w9 g红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理& {4 V$ v% [; ?. x6 H
房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和7 ^: R5 c, F: h0 x. F( c. Y
市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个
0 S. c6 @! ]8 D9 u主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进4 _9 I; G! w7 C7 G# N
建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 %   p5 K% o& Y: a3 v$ M) @2 X
工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 %
8 a9 ^, z7 {) N: _为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很+ H& O; o: B0 \$ E, N/ T; @
良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。
0 G9 B- ^( `1 w/ }  w: L3 }! Z* [( Q! e% l+ }# t: M6 R
    多伦多0 O) u# I' b2 B/ @* r
$ s: F" n4 g8 }
    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市, ; Z- `! ~5 f' H, b* j* ]
制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正
( I. Y8 u- i  d2 T价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造
' k+ x8 M4 P' n$ `( k/ Y# ?6 V工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。 0 N7 S  B$ n& z& n# w2 m9 G
三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场! Z/ o4 v# z- u
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和! Q4 Q+ J. s& i5 d- X6 g
公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。
: I$ X% s0 K& `7 b, L
( T5 G2 n2 W& f) d* Y    蒙特利尔9 b4 L* L! K: a# M6 z: T9 K7 g
* M% k# I$ q7 i0 d
    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体
! }! [. T! h4 a4 I$ j经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立, O+ I6 _2 A+ m1 x( j! r" @
店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市; i! B% @* c  t( }7 \" }" o5 c
加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产, J; D( c8 q( _. C# |
部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业# ^/ h7 {# r+ N
高为"持有"建议。 : U# q+ r5 ~% D/ u+ ?

/ {7 |; Q  S7 S% N; c! @    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年- H  v3 k" `5 e  M  C5 {" P7 O5 M
包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源8 I3 z' V/ \2 q+ M
市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓: e: T) X+ A2 q: e4 p
附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资) L: A- h  P# p& y; O* ~
海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的  k/ `0 ]3 d. u3 ~6 D4 `% \6 W5 u
价格" 。 & y  e: x; p) F9 A" l
    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于5 \3 O- a; \; Q3 K% L: `4 Q
www.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。 + Q8 k1 H- `& n" L5 h6 ~1 K
5 H' v7 x2 G# |# q, K# h. ?. H
    约罗兵咸永道  r( h3 {$ \, s+ h, C

! e6 r7 z  o! q1 `0 U1 t9 @4 R    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证, : B+ D6 X, Z& M& d0 w; o9 p1 D
税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值! I0 E5 m* s2 X7 l
客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家+ q6 O+ ^7 j9 g/ L% u
跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发& v3 s2 I1 a/ E- U2 ?
新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的& ~. L) u' S9 N( q0 `. s/ X6 I
卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其
: Y" R  n, d' W0 m% j) e相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
+ |& K: A+ Y) H国。
7 _4 D: G3 i! y9 P6 D/ |     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略
' k8 y; V% o8 P- R有限责任合伙,或视情况需要,
7 x; @! r, O, h普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络, ) |& ?  W  C, J: p
每年这是一个独立的法律实体。
& E/ S6 ]7 r# e  b4 Q1 E
# n: u& z7 n3 K1 x$ D    关于城市土地研究所所长
# ^, t6 m5 X1 j1 O) G; ^' l! ]' R, Z. O4 G- X4 e- g
    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和# ?( {* F2 D; ]2 q  G. L
研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供; p4 |" R9 O9 ]* ?, N# W) t
领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造
. t7 H6 t& M& ~0 J/ g蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更
4 G7 t4 S3 I8 ?; B: T超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展! ]1 w, Q3 h4 X7 u; n/ w: Z* ^% H
学科。 * `* G* W/ _" k6 A& V( Z
    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。
! l7 I4 `6 M6 h4 r0 S: F与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区7 z" c2 B. N! T) M- p1 v
理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会
8 ]8 \: r, q  [8 G8 _. p2 V现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会
% @' G" K* u9 {1 g, i6 v4 Z主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日, - I) I2 Y. _$ S* |6 P
2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力* X; U( ~5 z' i
资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras , # _; r3 u$ }" F1 R, n
总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请/ [" p; L) u, r: h. F/ d* Q" i/ n' ]
致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈/ ]. {, f: ]$ Q8 c* E/ u
网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066. n% I7 @" h" b) D( ]

' t; z" S* M% \( ~1 `# Y5 v6 j% ^

& \! J1 s) y3 B2 B& r1 N更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园,
4 P$ t2 A9 u: n! k3 \7 s( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层
4 @- [( f9 r) O1 @7 h$ L

: p& Z# H/ [" O8 d/ b; m& K4 ~
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层
( \5 `9 O3 L1 v& i2 |
u
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-3 04:13 , Processed in 0.198329 second(s), 25 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表