 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
: F4 `( ]5 j1 j( W$ G- O2 _1 P7 d楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
5 j# P) b7 e, g% L$ |9 F k; }corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 2 q% P2 t# |, T( A5 r' X
8 G+ g! F9 ~/ r& \" v+ O
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。( i7 Z3 p `0 z% l
- o1 l$ P- d W& }1 V2 X: z安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.1 X S5 f1 [. U: `0 U3 x/ g
- F E- e' L0 A* Q# P
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
" h& g# L4 p$ m" q( d& b* t8 I% K
- |. ~6 K& d* K! U6 a( d另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
. d3 U9 @2 H- n7 ?2 B3 u% L: A+ D) I
, J( f5 W, x, `$ a! U关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
6 X+ ?. c- m/ Y# g, L$ OYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers. z3 @6 D. X* G
4 K' A6 q$ S5 f' k# J
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".' G7 m4 H% u2 X* p5 s0 _# x x
5 w1 A( s, n. F8 j( l
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
8 f; b& |1 N! U& R* `+ O1 z- U" W% n$ B6 H! B
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|