 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
; U J1 K5 U: _! T楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
1 i! j* i# G6 j% F& vcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... ; y/ t+ n. I9 b
W) o3 |6 v% o/ Y' T2 S您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。" q" \7 {) L* V+ [) m# u' `, s
3 C# b) A! h8 T2 T$ t6 `& z
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
( u" n- l- [5 u* g" O
% [" A4 [: D8 m- l1 N* a, B3 E不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?# l2 e& u. R& W: L- X
6 o4 |! z* k) L7 ~: H
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。. O0 r5 e5 `' d+ ^. S
: d( h) [& [# P# ]% i% o- r
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
% U" |4 H, S5 [Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
, T" k2 j+ s" G) \ k# N
, f& _6 f) m! L7 Z" ?* v5 kOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".3 X- G2 I) ` ^8 j9 I
* Y ?1 f6 V: m# ]But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.. d* I3 ?) u3 i8 z9 h
- R1 w- ^$ _6 t. g w# a
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|