 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 , b0 O4 V0 H# J
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
/ j. I. P+ U8 P( N9 @corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... - }, N2 u( b; d3 l. p
c# j0 Z; w! w您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
$ r+ h/ R8 i! n- n4 T! o+ m
4 P( `0 f6 {" ?' ~; Y安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.& S) x8 G/ w1 x, B7 X! A, U
; W' w7 z7 m6 ?( j8 k3 D3 m
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?8 R. m" \* |; O2 G
* f7 r2 U9 U+ C2 h8 y1 L4 s另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。9 z/ v6 J+ z% M7 c# X% c
/ V& W8 U7 ^7 ~- w1 t- ~ F% _关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
% d! U' L0 ^+ O: T6 TYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.; f* H9 p1 G3 A" H
3 _7 z; V& m0 y: v0 I2 x$ ?! KOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".# ]3 V* A/ @/ w/ [! f% u
$ j! j2 `9 T9 A; Z# j9 h7 i1 JBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.) T/ a+ t* Z; g* s+ X. W Q0 v: E; i; |
' c/ e1 e: u0 C+ |
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|