 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
8 t: m( J# b. F& ^/ l8 ^ F J楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!# P% l% a8 m6 N+ E
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 4 P0 s1 Y; I- K9 s; ?* S$ q
) Z" \1 `4 m3 C7 P' {您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
, G ~" w3 M4 U: Q, ]1 H: @; X: K! G+ @
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
% ^8 D5 j1 k1 V3 m$ i
, {, T* F( J8 r" K" S不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
z; V/ i) n5 |+ p# i8 o* O$ ?$ V! s1 J1 H" p+ t
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
v0 c. E) c- j) ~
5 x9 w7 ?9 @4 \关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):* T1 E5 Z9 d0 i* n% }' c* |
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.+ a; m8 i( [, X' L! V! _+ U
5 s. L) T$ }: R ~" n, F
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".; C# T4 }0 ]/ Q8 r
% _ y& o) d. Z0 C3 m) _But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.) O; o" n& Q* c: S6 k1 b/ t; K4 Q1 ]% b
) q% \& k* A% _+ c[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|