 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 , a/ d5 R+ o4 n3 ~: E/ r
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!& ?9 z# V. c2 g8 o" @# u
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 C, T7 S/ ?- j0 u& E- g* @4 ?2 {9 a& O
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
! Z5 ]+ g2 Z: K4 h
# g1 X: ]8 ^# p- ^安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
) r& e. p) V" }/ ?5 b4 H) @; p2 x, c# C% F
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?8 H5 s# h: L9 c; ]$ `
, ^1 E$ p( T# U* |2 H另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。, R8 y% V# t' l; ~
% t/ Z8 d. X1 y) F$ V j! [* |关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
7 j$ s! ~, R+ \; J7 j# P! UYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
( l4 p' Z0 f, W* W8 t4 @
6 S& M9 C) J1 T( a) r& i* POr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
- j3 D* J3 G) {; c* W2 w6 @4 H2 _! o6 v. s) i
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.2 a; W! o' G4 `# F' R0 L
5 j" Q. G* ^+ [2 Y5 ?
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|