 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
0 w6 {% Q* c m, `# v" D楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!9 J' ]: I( J* ~. I0 p; u$ K
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
5 b# @: N% M) I2 r/ ?3 T$ n, M! P2 ^$ Z& o$ [. [2 s$ U9 _1 d
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
; o# ]4 b# ~6 A8 ~+ |1 P" p) x/ s) Q {0 \ @6 B! t7 O+ |# B, @2 o" t
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
* P( k! C7 ]0 ]! ] ^
) ~1 W( ~4 p: T, r- H不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
/ X7 {0 b+ h( l1 M
7 g% r- Q+ Q k# s- y' J; [0 ^: |另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
8 z) x4 [! ~" m3 {& p$ I- M: u3 c1 v$ h- k) d$ _1 m
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):' o& z% q; A' B; b
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
& m ^( K/ I( L+ m+ |, y# u& i- u9 W& W! w5 ?: q g
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car". Z5 T7 ?/ x5 h/ Z1 A
9 k n+ L, ^2 s" o7 a2 eBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
6 U6 l6 t8 F8 F+ s1 l: l; M2 D* y
* L5 k8 }6 f1 _7 n- }[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|