警察上不上法庭实际上没有什么关系,因为市政府/警察局常年聘用律师在交通庭坐镇,一场不落。当事警察到场不过就是多一个证人而已。如果你有把握推翻此案,则没有当事警察你就占了大便宜。其他几位的主意不错,错可以认,态度要好,但是可以哭穷,以得到减免待遇。 8 _% n. K1 D1 v9 d4 i. [3 P8 ~, F- p Y, L2 ?
开车可是千万要小心呐!现在罚款比前几年高多了。
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005- ]# @, R: [ U4 q! h
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 1 J' b6 J: n% ]$ |3 h0 G 3 @3 O( C/ F+ T0 q1 W: w1 O- E, t"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."" C" v. R, ~( ?& c3 b
: e* T! d6 [3 S, v, jYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。- S, x( v$ j" B
, v& `( j% d$ |6 n. @: d: d% B z8 n3 u! k2 v1 g L q
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: k3 e% C8 V- ^- m9 Y, zHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20054 k8 b0 y9 Y. a$ F
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb") G0 [- P' B6 L# D/ ~2 J
7 }; ~& \; F% c1 g2 N& F z
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend:0 _( I( e9 ^, Y" \
# D) g8 o5 J) F+ @ B2 N) U; V
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.